[Discussion]Pleb comments in Testing?

Moderator: CmdrWilkens

User avatar
Knife
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 15769
Joined: 2002-08-30 02:40pm
Location: Behind the Zion Curtain

[Discussion]Pleb comments in Testing?

Post by Knife »

I haven't had this many PM's in...well since before RogueIce got a girlfriend.
I've been pondering a better way for the masses to put in their input on Senate threads. I think it's important for the rest of us to be able to easily voice our thoughts, and the current improvised PM system is a pain for both the common folk and the senate folk.

How about a stickied thread in Testing for each Senate discussion thread? Link to the senate thread in the testing thread and vice versa; that way the rest of the board can easily voice an opinion that can just as easily be observed if useful or ignored by the senate if things end up getting out of hand. In testing, such stuff will disappear when it's outlived it's usefulness and it won't clutter the rest of the board.

Presumably there wouldn't be such a thing for explicit voting threads, as (in my mind) the purpose of this is for other folks to express actual ideas or give thoughtful input, not "ban +1".

If you'd post this as a discussion thread (with my name on it is fine) or bring it up with the relevant parties, I'd appreciate it.
Posted without serious comment by this Senator while I chew upon the idea.
They say, "the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots." I suppose it never occurred to them that they are the tyrants, not the patriots. Those weapons are not being used to fight some kind of tyranny; they are bringing them to an event where people are getting together to talk. -Mike Wong

But as far as board culture in general, I do think that young male overaggression is a contributing factor to the general atmosphere of hostility. It's not SOS and the Mess throwing hand grenades all over the forum- Red
User avatar
LadyTevar
White Mage
White Mage
Posts: 23329
Joined: 2003-02-12 10:59pm

Post by LadyTevar »

That's going to be a lot of stickies. We'd need someone to go in and kill each one as the discussion thread dies.
Image
Nitram, slightly high on cough syrup: Do you know you're beautiful?
Me: Nope, that's why I have you around to tell me.
Nitram: You -are- beautiful. Anyone tries to tell you otherwise kill them.

"A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. LLAP" -- Leonard Nimoy, last Tweet
User avatar
Hotfoot
Avatar of Confusion
Posts: 5835
Joined: 2002-10-12 04:38pm
Location: Peace River: Badlands, Terra Nova Winter 1936
Contact:

Post by Hotfoot »

And we'd have to read testing? Ugh.
Do not meddle in the affairs of insomniacs, for they are cranky and can do things to you while you sleep.
Image
The Realm of Confusion
"Every time you talk about Teal'c, I keep imagining Thor's ass. Thank you very much for that, you fucking fucker." -Marcao
SG-14: Because in some cases, "Recon" means "Blow up a fucking planet or die trying."
SilCore Wiki! Come take a look!
User avatar
Knife
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 15769
Joined: 2002-08-30 02:40pm
Location: Behind the Zion Curtain

Post by Knife »

LadyTevar wrote:That's going to be a lot of stickies. We'd need someone to go in and kill each one as the discussion thread dies.
Still haven't decided how I feel about the subject but in relation you your post, an easy fix might just be one pleb comment sticky that gets purged every ten pages or so.
They say, "the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots." I suppose it never occurred to them that they are the tyrants, not the patriots. Those weapons are not being used to fight some kind of tyranny; they are bringing them to an event where people are getting together to talk. -Mike Wong

But as far as board culture in general, I do think that young male overaggression is a contributing factor to the general atmosphere of hostility. It's not SOS and the Mess throwing hand grenades all over the forum- Red
User avatar
Dalton
For Those About to Rock We Salute You
For Those About to Rock We Salute You
Posts: 22637
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:16pm
Location: New York, the Fuck You State
Contact:

Post by Dalton »

I don't know. Some people like to retain anonymity when sending suggestions to the Senate.
Image
Image
To Absent Friends
Dalton | Admin Smash | Knight of the Order of SDN

"y = mx + bro" - Surlethe
"You try THAT shit again, kid, and I will mod you. I will
mod you so hard, you'll wish I were Dalton." - Lagmonster

May the way of the Hero lead to the Triforce.
User avatar
Hotfoot
Avatar of Confusion
Posts: 5835
Joined: 2002-10-12 04:38pm
Location: Peace River: Badlands, Terra Nova Winter 1936
Contact:

Post by Hotfoot »

Dalton wrote:I don't know. Some people like to retain anonymity when sending suggestions to the Senate.
Couldn't you do that with Testing? Unless something changed since I last checked, you could post without logging in, right?
Do not meddle in the affairs of insomniacs, for they are cranky and can do things to you while you sleep.
Image
The Realm of Confusion
"Every time you talk about Teal'c, I keep imagining Thor's ass. Thank you very much for that, you fucking fucker." -Marcao
SG-14: Because in some cases, "Recon" means "Blow up a fucking planet or die trying."
SilCore Wiki! Come take a look!
User avatar
Knife
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 15769
Joined: 2002-08-30 02:40pm
Location: Behind the Zion Curtain

Post by Knife »

Dalton wrote:I don't know. Some people like to retain anonymity when sending suggestions to the Senate.
Again, to play devils advocate, since it's not my idea; I guess the PM system still works for anonymity, while those who want to voice an opinion, can do so in testing without bugging a Senator.
They say, "the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots." I suppose it never occurred to them that they are the tyrants, not the patriots. Those weapons are not being used to fight some kind of tyranny; they are bringing them to an event where people are getting together to talk. -Mike Wong

But as far as board culture in general, I do think that young male overaggression is a contributing factor to the general atmosphere of hostility. It's not SOS and the Mess throwing hand grenades all over the forum- Red
User avatar
Coyote
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 12464
Joined: 2002-08-23 01:20am
Location: The glorious Sun-Barge! Isis, Isis, Ra,Ra,Ra!
Contact:

Post by Coyote »

It could be like the Rant threads, where it is stickied for a period of time... then cut loose to sink into the morass and be lost when the pertinent subject is voted on and passed.

I like this plan! I'm excited about this plan!
Something about Libertarianism always bothered me. Then one day, I realized what it was:
Libertarian philosophy can be boiled down to the phrase, "Work Will Make You Free."


In Libertarianism, there is no Government, so the Bosses are free to exploit the Workers.
In Communism, there is no Government, so the Workers are free to exploit the Bosses.
So in Libertarianism, man exploits man, but in Communism, its the other way around!

If all you want to do is have some harmless, mindless fun, go H3RE INST3ADZ0RZ!!
Grrr! Fight my Brute, you pansy!
User avatar
Surlethe
HATES GRADING
Posts: 12267
Joined: 2004-12-29 03:41pm

Post by Surlethe »

Hotfoot wrote:
Dalton wrote:I don't know. Some people like to retain anonymity when sending suggestions to the Senate.
Couldn't you do that with Testing? Unless something changed since I last checked, you could post without logging in, right?
No. It's been disabled for nigh on a year now.

My concern with a Testing sticky is that the Testing signal:noise ratio, while still better than other forums', is still very low. The sticky could become a spamfest with very little actual feedback, causing a hardworking Senator to waste his time slogging through it for no rewarding comments.
A Government founded upon justice, and recognizing the equal rights of all men; claiming higher authority for existence, or sanction for its laws, that nature, reason, and the regularly ascertained will of the people; steadily refusing to put its sword and purse in the service of any religious creed or family is a standing offense to most of the Governments of the world, and to some narrow and bigoted people among ourselves.
F. Douglass
User avatar
Knife
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 15769
Joined: 2002-08-30 02:40pm
Location: Behind the Zion Curtain

Post by Knife »

Coyote wrote:It could be like the Rant threads, where it is stickied for a period of time... then cut loose to sink into the morass and be lost when the pertinent subject is voted on and passed.

I like this plan! I'm excited about this plan!
There is a very definate, slim chance, we'd survive it.
Surlethe wrote:My concern with a Testing sticky is that the Testing signal:noise ratio, while still better than other forums', is still very low. The sticky could become a spamfest with very little actual feedback, causing a hardworking Senator to waste his time slogging through it for no rewarding comments.
I might be wrong, but the intent I got from the original poster was more a way for plebs to communicate their ire or support for senate threads, rather than direct communication from plebs to Senators via importent threads.

The PM system would still work for actual communication.[/quote]
They say, "the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots." I suppose it never occurred to them that they are the tyrants, not the patriots. Those weapons are not being used to fight some kind of tyranny; they are bringing them to an event where people are getting together to talk. -Mike Wong

But as far as board culture in general, I do think that young male overaggression is a contributing factor to the general atmosphere of hostility. It's not SOS and the Mess throwing hand grenades all over the forum- Red
User avatar
Knife
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 15769
Joined: 2002-08-30 02:40pm
Location: Behind the Zion Curtain

Post by Knife »

From a concern citizen;
Not every issue raised in the Senate warrants (or will even necessarily garner) comment and discussion by the general membership.

However, should there be multiple issues going on at the same time which generate considerable discussion, it could easily overload a unified "post all your Senate commentary here" thread into nigh-unreadability.

In my opinion, I think it would be a hell of a lot simpler to simply allow people to create threads on the topic of Senate discussions. Right now, I have the distinct feeling - and I freely admit it may be baseless - that if I were to go into Off-Topic right now and post a thread along the lines of "so what do you guys think about [insert Senate discussion here]?", it would be closed and frowned upon. Just letting people know it's okay to start a thread discussing a topic currently being pondered by the Senate seems to me the simplest way to tackle this issue.

Neither Off-Topic nor Testing are currently so busy that a few extra threads concerning Senate activities are likely to push active threads into page 2 and out of sight, so I don't think there's any real concerns at this point on the impact this will have on ease of browsing. If this should change in the future then the policy can be revised. If people go overboard it can be curbed or even stopped. It seems a harmless enough attempt to me.
They say, "the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots." I suppose it never occurred to them that they are the tyrants, not the patriots. Those weapons are not being used to fight some kind of tyranny; they are bringing them to an event where people are getting together to talk. -Mike Wong

But as far as board culture in general, I do think that young male overaggression is a contributing factor to the general atmosphere of hostility. It's not SOS and the Mess throwing hand grenades all over the forum- Red
User avatar
Zaia
Inamorata
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2002-10-23 03:04am
Location: Londontowne

Post by Zaia »

Knife wrote:From a concern citizen;
Not every issue raised in the Senate warrants (or will even necessarily garner) comment and discussion by the general membership.

However, should there be multiple issues going on at the same time which generate considerable discussion, it could easily overload a unified "post all your Senate commentary here" thread into nigh-unreadability.

In my opinion, I think it would be a hell of a lot simpler to simply allow people to create threads on the topic of Senate discussions. Right now, I have the distinct feeling - and I freely admit it may be baseless - that if I were to go into Off-Topic right now and post a thread along the lines of "so what do you guys think about [insert Senate discussion here]?", it would be closed and frowned upon. Just letting people know it's okay to start a thread discussing a topic currently being pondered by the Senate seems to me the simplest way to tackle this issue.

Neither Off-Topic nor Testing are currently so busy that a few extra threads concerning Senate activities are likely to push active threads into page 2 and out of sight, so I don't think there's any real concerns at this point on the impact this will have on ease of browsing. If this should change in the future then the policy can be revised. If people go overboard it can be curbed or even stopped. It seems a harmless enough attempt to me.
I think I mostly agree with this, but have a slight reservation about the potential for people to start threads more to whine about being mentioned than to actually contribute meaningfully to the discussions. I would still say I'd be ok with giving it a try, though.
"On the infrequent occasions when I have been called upon in a formal place to play the bongo drums, the introducer never seems to find it necessary to mention that I also do theoretical physics." -Richard Feynman
User avatar
Coyote
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 12464
Joined: 2002-08-23 01:20am
Location: The glorious Sun-Barge! Isis, Isis, Ra,Ra,Ra!
Contact:

Post by Coyote »

Using the threads (OT or Testing) for spam or attention-whoring could be met with minor wrist-slappage anyway. Say, using a "Senate Attention" thread for personal wankage could earn a four-month custom title of "Paris Hilton" or something like that.

First thing I could think of for attention-whoring, I'm no necessarily dead-set on that-- a quick grab outta the hat idea.
Something about Libertarianism always bothered me. Then one day, I realized what it was:
Libertarian philosophy can be boiled down to the phrase, "Work Will Make You Free."


In Libertarianism, there is no Government, so the Bosses are free to exploit the Workers.
In Communism, there is no Government, so the Workers are free to exploit the Bosses.
So in Libertarianism, man exploits man, but in Communism, its the other way around!

If all you want to do is have some harmless, mindless fun, go H3RE INST3ADZ0RZ!!
Grrr! Fight my Brute, you pansy!
User avatar
Dalton
For Those About to Rock We Salute You
For Those About to Rock We Salute You
Posts: 22637
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:16pm
Location: New York, the Fuck You State
Contact:

Post by Dalton »

Suggestion from Starglider...

Starglider wrote:Oh and if you'd like I could implement automatic creation and deletion of senate mirror threads in testing as suggested in this senate thread, that should be easy. I'm afraid I can't help with the problem of getting anyone in the senate to pay attention to them though. :)
Image
Image
To Absent Friends
Dalton | Admin Smash | Knight of the Order of SDN

"y = mx + bro" - Surlethe
"You try THAT shit again, kid, and I will mod you. I will
mod you so hard, you'll wish I were Dalton." - Lagmonster

May the way of the Hero lead to the Triforce.
User avatar
Surlethe
HATES GRADING
Posts: 12267
Joined: 2004-12-29 03:41pm

Post by Surlethe »

If Starglider can make it work with the auto-pruner, I'm interested into looking further into the idea of mirroring Senate threads.
A Government founded upon justice, and recognizing the equal rights of all men; claiming higher authority for existence, or sanction for its laws, that nature, reason, and the regularly ascertained will of the people; steadily refusing to put its sword and purse in the service of any religious creed or family is a standing offense to most of the Governments of the world, and to some narrow and bigoted people among ourselves.
F. Douglass
User avatar
Coyote
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 12464
Joined: 2002-08-23 01:20am
Location: The glorious Sun-Barge! Isis, Isis, Ra,Ra,Ra!
Contact:

Post by Coyote »

Starglider wrote:...I'm afraid I can't help with the problem of getting anyone in the senate to pay attention to them though. :)
I'd recommend a thread title such as "downoadable coupons for FREE BEER" or "Check out these HUGE BOOBS".

Avoid thread titles that discuss Viagra or Nigerian royalty, though.
Something about Libertarianism always bothered me. Then one day, I realized what it was:
Libertarian philosophy can be boiled down to the phrase, "Work Will Make You Free."


In Libertarianism, there is no Government, so the Bosses are free to exploit the Workers.
In Communism, there is no Government, so the Workers are free to exploit the Bosses.
So in Libertarianism, man exploits man, but in Communism, its the other way around!

If all you want to do is have some harmless, mindless fun, go H3RE INST3ADZ0RZ!!
Grrr! Fight my Brute, you pansy!
User avatar
The Duchess of Zeon
Gözde
Posts: 14566
Joined: 2002-09-18 01:06am
Location: Exiled in the Pale of Settlement.

Post by The Duchess of Zeon »

We're trying to be as useless as the real thing, but I like the basic idea of letting them comment in some fashion or another. I'm also at least somewhat annoyed with anonymous comments--if you write the Senate in the real world they do a fucking background check on you--since the whole "Senate, calm down" thread got frustrating fast with a bunch of anony's getting posted. It felt like you were debating someone who didn't exist.
The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. -- Wikipedia's No Original Research policy page.

In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
User avatar
Zaia
Inamorata
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2002-10-23 03:04am
Location: Londontowne

Post by Zaia »

The Duchess of Zeon wrote:We're trying to be as useless as the real thing, but I like the basic idea of letting them comment in some fashion or another. I'm also at least somewhat annoyed with anonymous comments--if you write the Senate in the real world they do a fucking background check on you--since the whole "Senate, calm down" thread got frustrating fast with a bunch of anony's getting posted. It felt like you were debating someone who didn't exist.
I quite like the fact that people have the option to remain anonymous if they so choose. I think letting people's words stand for themselves is sometimes the best way to consider issues, so what we think of the person who's brought forth the issue is left out of it.
"On the infrequent occasions when I have been called upon in a formal place to play the bongo drums, the introducer never seems to find it necessary to mention that I also do theoretical physics." -Richard Feynman
User avatar
Frank Hipper
Overfiend of the Superego
Posts: 12882
Joined: 2002-10-17 08:48am
Location: Hamilton, Ohio?

Post by Frank Hipper »

Some people ( :angelic: ) think that merely having a senate is too far down the path of democracy for comfort...but plebe input?

If this is being given serious thought, why not just give everyone senator status?

:x

Give everyone a voice and you end up with deafening white noise.

The Senate shall speak and the Plebes shall listen.
Period.
Image
Life is all the eternity you get, use it wisely.
User avatar
Dalton
For Those About to Rock We Salute You
For Those About to Rock We Salute You
Posts: 22637
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:16pm
Location: New York, the Fuck You State
Contact:

Post by Dalton »

I think having user input can be beneficial. Why turn away a suggestion just because it was made by a "plebe"?
Image
Image
To Absent Friends
Dalton | Admin Smash | Knight of the Order of SDN

"y = mx + bro" - Surlethe
"You try THAT shit again, kid, and I will mod you. I will
mod you so hard, you'll wish I were Dalton." - Lagmonster

May the way of the Hero lead to the Triforce.
User avatar
fgalkin
Carvin' Marvin
Posts: 14557
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:51pm
Location: Land of the Mountain Fascists
Contact:

Post by fgalkin »

Dalton wrote:I think having user input can be beneficial. Why turn away a suggestion just because it was made by a "plebe"?
If a plebe has a suggestion, he could do it the old way- PMing a Senator. That way, he will think twice before doing so, because if it's dumb, the Senator will not only decline to pass it on, he will mock the hell out of them for it. Quality control, people. Do you really want to sift through a thread filled with the half-formed brainchildren of the Testing crowd on an ego trip due to their new importance?

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin
User avatar
The Duchess of Zeon
Gözde
Posts: 14566
Joined: 2002-09-18 01:06am
Location: Exiled in the Pale of Settlement.

Post by The Duchess of Zeon »

Zaia wrote:
The Duchess of Zeon wrote:We're trying to be as useless as the real thing, but I like the basic idea of letting them comment in some fashion or another. I'm also at least somewhat annoyed with anonymous comments--if you write the Senate in the real world they do a fucking background check on you--since the whole "Senate, calm down" thread got frustrating fast with a bunch of anony's getting posted. It felt like you were debating someone who didn't exist.
I quite like the fact that people have the option to remain anonymous if they so choose. I think letting people's words stand for themselves is sometimes the best way to consider issues, so what we think of the person who's brought forth the issue is left out of it.
That would be fine if a situation hadn't developed where instead of simply a single comment, the anonymous individuals would then mail in replies to the replies to their original comment, i.e., essentially a debate, but a debate where one part of the arrangement remained anonymous.
The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. -- Wikipedia's No Original Research policy page.

In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
User avatar
The Duchess of Zeon
Gözde
Posts: 14566
Joined: 2002-09-18 01:06am
Location: Exiled in the Pale of Settlement.

Post by The Duchess of Zeon »

fgalkin wrote:
Dalton wrote:I think having user input can be beneficial. Why turn away a suggestion just because it was made by a "plebe"?
If a plebe has a suggestion, he could do it the old way- PMing a Senator. That way, he will think twice before doing so, because if it's dumb, the Senator will not only decline to pass it on, he will mock the hell out of them for it. Quality control, people. Do you really want to sift through a thread filled with the half-formed brainchildren of the Testing crowd on an ego trip due to their new importance?

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin
You know, when you put it that way, I get this ugly mental image of the posters of Testing in this Roman style mob, screaming and throwing rocks to intimidate the Senate into allowing inlining of explicit 4chan images or something like that.
The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. -- Wikipedia's No Original Research policy page.

In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
User avatar
Zaia
Inamorata
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2002-10-23 03:04am
Location: Londontowne

Post by Zaia »

The Duchess of Zeon wrote:That would be fine if a situation hadn't developed where instead of simply a single comment, the anonymous individuals would then mail in replies to the replies to their original comment, i.e., essentially a debate, but a debate where one part of the arrangement remained anonymous.
*shrugs* Maybe that person had legit points but was afraid you'd turn your nose up and sniff in disapproval at him or her because of who he or she was, instead of what he or she had to say. Because of that possibility, I think it's good that the option to be anonymous exists.
"On the infrequent occasions when I have been called upon in a formal place to play the bongo drums, the introducer never seems to find it necessary to mention that I also do theoretical physics." -Richard Feynman
User avatar
Knife
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 15769
Joined: 2002-08-30 02:40pm
Location: Behind the Zion Curtain

Post by Knife »

I don't really see it as any sort of Senator/pleb interaction in most cases, rather than letting the public at large discuss the happenings of the senate.

Since it's creation, the Senate forum has been viewable by the public at large for a sense of openess. I see nothing wrong with some one standing on their soap box in a some what structured way, and talking about the happenings of the senate.

Putting it in testing makes clean up easier, or Off topic would seem best. It's not like normal rules of the board would automatically disappear with such an understaking either. Any troll or dumbshit gets out of line and they deal with the Mods.
They say, "the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots." I suppose it never occurred to them that they are the tyrants, not the patriots. Those weapons are not being used to fight some kind of tyranny; they are bringing them to an event where people are getting together to talk. -Mike Wong

But as far as board culture in general, I do think that young male overaggression is a contributing factor to the general atmosphere of hostility. It's not SOS and the Mess throwing hand grenades all over the forum- Red
Locked