Uraniun235 wrote:
Except that the people doing the sabotage, in earlier trial runs, couldn't tell the difference from the untampered and the tampered switches themselves when they ran an electronic check.
This is exactly the reason for which I said "forget the guidance,go for the
engines".Obviously all the electronics would be under direct control of the computer.But some pipes not too well connected here or there would be hard or impossible to detect by a camera when the missile undergoes the periodic heavy maintenance.And that would be all that is necessary.
Uraniun235 wrote:
I imagine Colossus would have cameras installed at all maintenance positions, and would very carefully oversee all maintenance.
The missile is totally disassembled an the various components examined.
Just doing a not too good work at reassembling would probably be fatal.
The Challanger was lost to a slighty defective gasket.Missiles go kaboom despite the best efferts to prevent that.
Uraniun235 wrote:
They'd have to get the blank warhead there somehow, and I imagine Colossus kept strict checks on inventory and on what went into the facilities serving his arsenal.
Nuclear warheads need period refurbishments.Tritium has to be replaced every few years,and so on.That could be an occasion to disable them,by filling the pit that leads into the core of the fission primary device,for example.
If you manage to convince the computer that the warheads need to be replaced with newer ones the game is done.There is no way to keep under the control of a TV camera all the passages necessary to manufacture a nuclear weapon.
It would be rather difficult placing a TV camera into a nuclear reactor,a plutonium forge and similar places.Replace the plutonium/uranium with
an other material and the game is done.
Uraniun235 wrote:
You couldn't coordinate that scale of operation without Colossus learning somehow. And let's assume that somehow you manage to drive a truck over every missile silo between the US and the USSR.
For this reason I suggested building a separate telephonic line.Vehicles are not an uncommon sight near to missile silos.And remember that you do not have to use a single method.
Uraniun235 wrote:
That STILL leaves the submarine nukes. Considering that the two computers had between them 900% of the firepower needed to obliterate almost all life on Earth, you'd either need a hell of a lot of trucks, or you'd be screwed because there's probably at least 100% in the subs alone. (hell, the sub fleet is a MAJOR portion of our modern arsenal)
If you can build enough silos,you have to have at least a comparable number of trucks to service them.Unmanned SSBNs in the 60's? And what then? Orbital battlestations?
You would not even have to worry about sabotaging them,they would probably break apart after a week of patrol.
The 900% figure is probably a propaganda value.During the cold war expression like "enough firepower to destroy the world ten times" were common but that was far from real.They have to be interpreted in the sense
"enough firepower to send ten bombs on each target".Eliminating all the life on earth would require nearly BDZ level of firepower.
Intensify the forward batteries. I don't want anything to get through