Star Trek Is Not Dead, Producers Declare

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
Darth Lucifer
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1685
Joined: 2004-10-14 04:18am
Location: In pursuit of the Colonial Fleet

Post by Darth Lucifer »

Switching gears to something I would love to see...

Star Trek: Excelsior

Come on people...George Takei is not getting any younger.
User avatar
Stofsk
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12925
Joined: 2003-11-10 12:36am

Post by Stofsk »

Mario1470 wrote:Come on people...George Takei is not getting any younger.
As much as I would love to see a series like that, I think the possibility is so remote that it's not funny. And I don't wan B&B to come anywhere near such a project.

[EDIT] The premise for Enterprise was actually a good one. They had new characters, a 'go back to grass roots' theme, and a revamped new setting. The problem came from the idiotic writing and crappy portrayal of characters by both script treatment and actor's performance. ENT could have been damn good, but the B&B Midas touch didn't help the series any.
Image
User avatar
JME2
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12258
Joined: 2003-02-02 04:04pm

Post by JME2 »

Stofsk wrote:
Mario1470 wrote:Come on people...George Takei is not getting any younger.
As much as I would love to see a series like that, I think the possibility is so remote that it's not funny. And I don't wan B&B to come anywhere near such a project.
The best we'll get at this point are books featuring the adventures of the Excelsior crew. Michael A. Martin and Andy Mangels, writers of the first Lost Era novel, The Sundered (2298), have a new novel, Excelsior: Forged in Fire due out sometime in 2005.
User avatar
The Silence and I
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1658
Joined: 2002-11-09 09:04pm
Location: Bleh!

Post by The Silence and I »

Stofsk wrote:
Mario1470 wrote:Come on people...George Takei is not getting any younger.
As much as I would love to see a series like that, I think the possibility is so remote that it's not funny. And I don't wan B&B to come anywhere near such a project.

[EDIT] The premise for Enterprise was actually a good one. They had new characters, a 'go back to grass roots' theme, and a revamped new setting. The problem came from the idiotic writing and crappy portrayal of characters by both script treatment and actor's performance. ENT could have been damn good, but the B&B Midas touch didn't help the series any.
It is hard to describe how much I wanted ENT to be good when I saw the premise. It was new, fresh, it had potential to do things Startrek had never done before--but it didn't. It is slowly turning around, but it will never live up to the original premise. :cry:
"Do not worry, I have prepared something for just such an emergency."

"You're prepared for a giant monster made entirely of nulls stomping around Mainframe?!"

"That is correct!"

"How do you plan for that?"

"Uh... lucky guess?"
User avatar
Superman
Pink Foamin' at the Mouth
Posts: 9690
Joined: 2002-12-16 12:29am
Location: Metropolis

Post by Superman »

Indeed. Here in th UK a season of Smallville (I think it costs about as much to produce as Star Trek) costs half as much as one of Star Trek. Add that to the fact that TOS was released decades ago and you have a serious rip-off.
Yeah, plus everyone know that Superman would kick Star Trek's ass. Why the fuck are those damned boxed sets so expensive. If they were cheaper, I might consider buying them, but at their current prices? Fuck no. I spent 60 bucks on the "Friday the 13th" boxed set and it was worth every penny, but fuck B & B. I'm not giving them a dime.
Image
User avatar
JME2
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12258
Joined: 2003-02-02 04:04pm

Post by JME2 »

Superman wrote:
Indeed. Here in th UK a season of Smallville (I think it costs about as much to produce as Star Trek) costs half as much as one of Star Trek. Add that to the fact that TOS was released decades ago and you have a serious rip-off.
Yeah, plus everyone know that Superman would kick Star Trek's ass. Why the fuck are those damned boxed sets so expensive. If they were cheaper, I might consider buying them, but at their current prices? Fuck no. I spent 60 bucks on the "Friday the 13th" boxed set and it was worth every penny, but fuck B & B. I'm not giving them a dime.
Because Paramount has a general idea of how far down the toilet Trek's gone, but they refuse to admit it and continue to milk the cash cow as long as they can.
User avatar
Sam Or I
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1894
Joined: 2002-07-12 12:57am
Contact:

Post by Sam Or I »

Why do I just want to make bad Monte Python jokes............
User avatar
Stravo
Official SD.Net Teller of Tales
Posts: 12806
Joined: 2002-07-08 12:06pm
Location: NYC

Post by Stravo »

JME2 wrote:
Superman wrote:
Indeed. Here in th UK a season of Smallville (I think it costs about as much to produce as Star Trek) costs half as much as one of Star Trek. Add that to the fact that TOS was released decades ago and you have a serious rip-off.
Yeah, plus everyone know that Superman would kick Star Trek's ass. Why the fuck are those damned boxed sets so expensive. If they were cheaper, I might consider buying them, but at their current prices? Fuck no. I spent 60 bucks on the "Friday the 13th" boxed set and it was worth every penny, but fuck B & B. I'm not giving them a dime.
Because Paramount has a general idea of how far down the toilet Trek's gone, but they refuse to admit it and continue to milk the cash cow as long as they can.
The truth is that if ths stupid fanboys would not buy them then they would not be priced that way. The price is what they know the market will pay. I'm interested in the TOS sales figures because I saw many fans look at the box and put it right back on the shelf. Seriuosly $106 at Best Buy?! With scant extras?? Fuck you Paramount
Wherever you go, there you are.

Ripped Shirt Monkey - BOTMWriter's Guild Cybertron's Finest Justice League
This updated sig brought to you by JME2
Image
Nieztchean Uber-Amoeba
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3317
Joined: 2004-10-15 08:57pm
Location: Regina Nihilists' Guild Party Headquarters

Post by Nieztchean Uber-Amoeba »

If you go to either "Human Ships: NX Class"'s appendix, or "Articles: Enterprize Ramblings, even Graham Kennedy hates Enterprize. I wonder if there's anyone who actually watches it? :lol:

But if I could design the series, I'd place it not on a Federation vessel, but on a Romulan Warbird. You'd get to see the other side of the coin, that not all aliens are of one personality. You'd get to see a ship not burdened by any wussy 'Prime Directive' to hold them back. You'd get to see ship design which made sense from a military point of view.

And of course, in the last season, the Romulans would make war on Earth, and since the main characters always win... :twisted:
Crazedwraith
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12039
Joined: 2003-04-10 03:45pm
Location: Cheshire, England

Post by Crazedwraith »

Mario1470 wrote:Switching gears to something I would love to see...

Star Trek: Excelsior

Come on people...George Takei is not getting any younger.
You could do a televised version of the Star Trek: Shattered Empires game, Sulu mysterious transferred to the ISS Excelsior has to fight his way past the TE into tholian space to get back home...

Off course it wouldn't quite jingle with establised DS9 continuity but I'm sure there's some wiggle room for that...
User avatar
Sharp-kun
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2993
Joined: 2003-09-10 05:12am
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Post by Sharp-kun »

Nieztchean Uber-Amoeba wrote:You'd get to see ship design which made sense from a military point of view.
A large green bird?
Nieztchean Uber-Amoeba
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3317
Joined: 2004-10-15 08:57pm
Location: Regina Nihilists' Guild Party Headquarters

Post by Nieztchean Uber-Amoeba »

Sharp-kun wrote:
Nieztchean Uber-Amoeba wrote:You'd get to see ship design which made sense from a military point of view.
A large green bird?
No, I mean things like small bunks and lockers instead of hotel suites, perhaps the Science/Exploration part of it welded onto the bottom of ship at the last minute as an afterthought, engineering safety principles, etc.
Post Reply