Weapons and cloaking devices

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12242
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Weapons and cloaking devices

Post by Lord Revan »

I just watched ST6 and there was some intresting data on cloaking devices and weapon fire. General Changs BOP decloaks partly when it fires. So why doesn't E-A or Excelsior fire on BOP when fires on other one? The Scimitar. also decloaks when it fires.
User avatar
Lancer
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3957
Joined: 2003-12-17 06:06pm
Location: Maryland

Re: Weapons and cloaking devices

Post by Lancer »

Lord Revan wrote:I just watched ST6 and there was some intresting data on cloaking devices and weapon fire. General Changs BOP decloaks partly when it fires. So why doesn't E-A or Excelsior fire on BOP when fires on other one? The Scimitar. also decloaks when it fires.
see Trials & Tribble-ations for the explanation.
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12242
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Re: Weapons and cloaking devices

Post by Lord Revan »

Matt Huang wrote:see Trials & Tribble-ations for the explanation.
I can't. So could you just say it.
User avatar
HappyTarget
Padawan Learner
Posts: 439
Joined: 2003-01-29 08:24pm
Location: Michigan USA
Contact:

Re: Weapons and cloaking devices

Post by HappyTarget »

Lord Revan wrote:I just watched ST6 and there was some intresting data on cloaking devices and weapon fire. General Changs BOP decloaks partly when it fires. So why doesn't E-A or Excelsior fire on BOP when fires on other one? The Scimitar. also decloaks when it fires.
E-E vs Scimitar was much easier to hit the Reman vessle due to it's massive profile. Also, the EE has quite a few more weapons systems than the E-A does, and is also more maneuverable, so it can cover all angles of attack better.

The E-A and Excelsior vs the BOP is differenet. The BOP is a VERY small vessel (crew's only 15 IIRC), and she's considerably more maneuverable than the Scimitar. Taking this into account, and added to the fact that although visually she partially decloaks when launching the torps there is no evidence that she becomes a better SENSOR target when she does so, it's fairly easy to see why Kirk and Sulu didn't waste shots on something that was only visible for ~3 seconds visually and would be long gone by the time return fire came.
Cult of Weber Missionary
User avatar
Sarevok
The Fearless One
Posts: 10681
Joined: 2002-12-24 07:29am
Location: The Covenants last and final line of defense

Re: Weapons and cloaking devices

Post by Sarevok »

Lord Revan wrote:I just watched ST6 and there was some intresting data on cloaking devices and weapon fire. General Changs BOP decloaks partly when it fires. So why doesn't E-A or Excelsior fire on BOP when fires on other one? The Scimitar. also decloaks when it fires.
Changs BOP becomes visible for only for a very short time. It is not possible to aim a phaser or torpedo launcher in such a short time.
I have to tell you something everything I wrote above is a lie.
User avatar
Uraniun235
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13772
Joined: 2002-09-12 12:47am
Location: OREGON
Contact:

Post by Uraniun235 »

Might a good analogy be trying to shoot, in a completely dark room, at a muzzle flash you saw out of the corner of your eye and hit it, all within the span of a couple of seconds?
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12242
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Post by Lord Revan »

Uraniun235 wrote:Might a good analogy be trying to shoot, in a completely dark room, at a muzzle flash you saw out of the corner of your eye and hit it, all within the span of a couple of seconds?
You do have time to fire at full auto at general direction of flash, not very very ammo friendly but it might work.
User avatar
Chris OFarrell
Durandal's Bitch
Posts: 5724
Joined: 2002-08-02 07:57pm
Contact:

Post by Chris OFarrell »

Lord Revan wrote:
Uraniun235 wrote:Might a good analogy be trying to shoot, in a completely dark room, at a muzzle flash you saw out of the corner of your eye and hit it, all within the span of a couple of seconds?
You do have time to fire at full auto at general direction of flash, not very very ammo friendly but it might work.
Now say its a zero G room 1000m * 1000m * 1000m and the flash was at the said extreme range, do you think you'll hit the bad guy? :)

Especialy when the E-A didn't have anything like an automatic weapon. The BOP was visable for less then 1 second total during the torpedo firing. To detect the launch, train a weapon and fire will take far too long, the BOP will be long gone before you get a solid hit.

And from what I remember, Kirk was more playing for time for Excelessor and her far more sensitive scanners to arrive.
Image
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12242
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Post by Lord Revan »

Chris OFarrell wrote:
Lord Revan wrote:
Uraniun235 wrote:Might a good analogy be trying to shoot, in a completely dark room, at a muzzle flash you saw out of the corner of your eye and hit it, all within the span of a couple of seconds?
You do have time to fire at full auto at general direction of flash, not very very ammo friendly but it might work.
Now say its a zero G room 1000m * 1000m * 1000m and the flash was at the said extreme range, do you think you'll hit the bad guy? :)

Especialy when the E-A didn't have anything like an automatic weapon. The BOP was visable for less then 1 second total during the torpedo firing. To detect the launch, train a weapon and fire will take far too long, the BOP will be long gone before you get a solid hit.

And from what I remember, Kirk was more playing for time for Excelessor and her far more sensitive scanners to arrive.
The E-nil could have its weapons under computer control TOS (in "balance of terror" I think, I'm not sure.) So why couldn't E-A do this also.
User avatar
Lancer
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3957
Joined: 2003-12-17 06:06pm
Location: Maryland

Post by Lancer »

Lord Revan wrote:
Chris OFarrell wrote:
Lord Revan wrote: You do have time to fire at full auto at general direction of flash, not very very ammo friendly but it might work.
Now say its a zero G room 1000m * 1000m * 1000m and the flash was at the said extreme range, do you think you'll hit the bad guy? :)

Especialy when the E-A didn't have anything like an automatic weapon. The BOP was visable for less then 1 second total during the torpedo firing. To detect the launch, train a weapon and fire will take far too long, the BOP will be long gone before you get a solid hit.

And from what I remember, Kirk was more playing for time for Excelessor and her far more sensitive scanners to arrive.
The E-nil could have its weapons under computer control TOS (in "balance of terror" I think, I'm not sure.) So why couldn't E-A do this also.
because the cloaked BOP isn't decloaked long enough to be detected via older sensors.

Here's how it works:
TOS era sensors worked on a pulse system, somewhat similar to radar or sonar. The sensors would throw out a pulse and get the return signals. However, if you can decloak & recloak in between these sensor pulses, your still for all intents and purposes invisible to the cloak. Computer control wouldn't help because it would dismiss a single anomalous reading as a sensors ghost.
User avatar
teleguy
Youngling
Posts: 100
Joined: 2004-03-19 04:50pm

Post by teleguy »

Didn't that BOP also emit abnormal radiation before it fired?
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

I do believe that by the time of Nemesis Starfleet sensors were good enough that they were hitting the Scimitar quite often once they found it. The firing through the cloak allowed the Scimitar to get some first strikes in, but most of the time once she fired it let her enemies imediately track her and fire in return. Bassed on the shield impacts they were even able to predict her future movements to a degree.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12242
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Post by Lord Revan »

Matt Huang wrote:because the cloaked BOP isn't decloaked long enough to be detected via older sensors.

Here's how it works:
TOS era sensors worked on a pulse system, somewhat similar to radar or sonar. The sensors would throw out a pulse and get the return signals. However, if you can decloak & recloak in between these sensor pulses, your still for all intents and purposes invisible to the cloak. Computer control wouldn't help because it would dismiss a single anomalous reading as a sensors ghost.
Unless you tell the computer to target sensor ghosts and other anomalous readings (like neutron spike from the BOP).
User avatar
Enola Straight
Jedi Knight
Posts: 793
Joined: 2002-12-04 11:01pm
Location: Somers Point, NJ

Post by Enola Straight »

My WAG is that cloaking devices are partially subspace technology...as the photorp is launched, the sustainer engines briefly illuminated the hull.
Masochist to Sadist: "Hurt me."
Sadist to Masochist: "No."
Post Reply