Transporter: Physical limitation, or Federation stupidity?
Moderator: Vympel
- Straha
- Lord of the Spam
- Posts: 8198
- Joined: 2002-07-21 11:59pm
- Location: NYC
Transporter: Physical limitation, or Federation stupidity?
Are the problems with the transporters that we see a result of actual transporter transmitting limitations, or are they a result of federation bungling the project as they did with the Galaxy Class, or the Phase Cloak?
'After 9/11, it was "You're with us or your with the terrorists." Now its "You're with Straha or you support racism."' ' - The Romulan Republic
'You're a bully putting on an air of civility while saying that everything western and/or capitalistic must be bad, and a lot of other posters (loomer, Stas Bush, Gandalf) are also going along with it for their own personal reasons (Stas in particular is looking through rose colored glasses)' - Darth Yan
'You're a bully putting on an air of civility while saying that everything western and/or capitalistic must be bad, and a lot of other posters (loomer, Stas Bush, Gandalf) are also going along with it for their own personal reasons (Stas in particular is looking through rose colored glasses)' - Darth Yan
- Darth Wong
- Sith Lord

- Posts: 70028
- Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Transporter: Physical limitation, or Federation stupidit
It doesn't appear that other peoples' transporters are any more difficult to disrupt, unless they're considerably more advanced in general.Straha wrote:Are the problems with the transporters that we see a result of actual transporter transmitting limitations, or are they a result of federation bungling the project as they did with the Galaxy Class, or the Phase Cloak?
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
- Winston Blake
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 2529
- Joined: 2004-03-26 01:58am
- Location: Australia
Since other species seem to have the same problems, i'd say it's fundamental to transporters.
Of course, the real reason is that the transporter is such a piece of God-tech that the writers have had to introduce limitations to make a decent story.
Of course, the real reason is that the transporter is such a piece of God-tech that the writers have had to introduce limitations to make a decent story.
Robert Gilruth to Max Faget on the Apollo program: “Max, we’re going to go back there one day, and when we do, they’re going to find out how tough it is.”
- Metrion Cascade
- Village Idiot
- Posts: 2030
- Joined: 2003-06-14 05:54pm
- Location: Detonating in the upper atmosphere
- Ghost Rider
- Spirit of Vengeance
- Posts: 27779
- Joined: 2002-09-24 01:48pm
- Location: DC...looking up from the gutters to the stars
I say physical limitation.
Because if the Feds were as incompentent to have a technology that others have easily available and problems others don't then we're talking about people who shouldn't out there in any capacity other then minor.
Because if the Feds were as incompentent to have a technology that others have easily available and problems others don't then we're talking about people who shouldn't out there in any capacity other then minor.
MM /CF/WG/BOTM/JL/Original Warsie/ACPATHNTDWATGODW FOREVER!!
Sometimes we can choose the path we follow. Sometimes our choices are made for us. And sometimes we have no choice at all
Saying and doing are chocolate and concrete
Sometimes we can choose the path we follow. Sometimes our choices are made for us. And sometimes we have no choice at all
Saying and doing are chocolate and concrete
- Drooling Iguana
- Sith Marauder
- Posts: 4975
- Joined: 2003-05-13 01:07am
- Location: Sector ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha
Re: Transporter: Physical limitation, or Federation stupidit
Yes, but have other peoples' transporters ever caused someone to split into a good and evil half, ot to travel to a paralell dimension where everyone has goatees, or perform any of the other myriad screw-ups that Federation transporters are guilty of? The worst I can remember is when some Cardassian transporters caused the crew to be stuck in a James Bond rip-off holodeck game.Darth Wong wrote:It doesn't appear that other peoples' transporters are any more difficult to disrupt, unless they're considerably more advanced in general.Straha wrote:Are the problems with the transporters that we see a result of actual transporter transmitting limitations, or are they a result of federation bungling the project as they did with the Galaxy Class, or the Phase Cloak?

"Stop! No one can survive these deadly rays!"
"These deadly rays will be your death!"
- Thor and Akton, Starcrash
"Before man reaches the moon your mail will be delivered within hours from New York to California, to England, to India or to Australia by guided missiles.... We stand on the threshold of rocket mail."
- Arthur Summerfield, US Postmaster General 1953 - 1961
"These deadly rays will be your death!"
- Thor and Akton, Starcrash
"Before man reaches the moon your mail will be delivered within hours from New York to California, to England, to India or to Australia by guided missiles.... We stand on the threshold of rocket mail."
- Arthur Summerfield, US Postmaster General 1953 - 1961
- Uraniun235
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 13772
- Joined: 2002-09-12 12:47am
- Location: OREGON
- Contact:
Re: Transporter: Physical limitation, or Federation stupidit
Yeah, but the show doesn't revolve around other species. The number of examples of other races' transporters in use is far, far less than the number of examples of Federation transporter use.Drooling Iguana wrote:Yes, but have other peoples' transporters ever caused someone to split into a good and evil half, ot to travel to a paralell dimension where everyone has goatees, or perform any of the other myriad screw-ups that Federation transporters are guilty of? The worst I can remember is when some Cardassian transporters caused the crew to be stuck in a James Bond rip-off holodeck game.
- Sarevok
- The Fearless One
- Posts: 10681
- Joined: 2002-12-24 07:29am
- Location: The Covenants last and final line of defense
Given fact that simple rocks called Kelvanite could disrupt transporters I say their limitations are rather severe.Metrion Cascade wrote:How common were transporter problems? I wouldn't call the E-D's experiences typical. It's design was particularly shitty, and it ran into a shitload of anomalies nobody had seen before.
I have to tell you something everything I wrote above is a lie.
-
Murazor
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 2425
- Joined: 2003-12-10 05:29am
Re: Transporter: Physical limitation, or Federation stupidit
Both probably. I don't like calling the Feds stupids... let's just say happily incompetents. It seems that there are lots of strange or not so strange materials with subspace distorting properties that make the technology hazardous or outright useless. I think that some other species (the Voth or something like that?) had vastly increased range but I don't know if they had a better record or they have as many screw-ups as the Federation.Straha wrote:Are the problems with the transporters that we see a result of actual transporter transmitting limitations, or are they a result of federation bungling the project as they did with the Galaxy Class, or the Phase Cloak?
- Jon
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 1501
- Joined: 2004-03-02 10:11am
- Location: Manchester UK
Is that the one where they can walk through walls and pass through machinery, but somehow floors and seating still remains solid for them? Great innovationAdmiral_K wrote:It seemed to me the PHase cloak worked fairly well given that it was a prototype.
Hmm. They could see other, which means light was reflecting off them, which means they must in turn be visible to anyone... if it is simply a 'cloak' which also takes them out of phase with, it seems, the horizontal plane- they shouldn't be able to see each other.
But still, Transporters, indeed- the problems seem to be trekverse wide. Though it is fantastic how all those species match the colour of the ffect to their style, Green for the rommies, Red for the klingons, blue for the fed, yellow for the cardies...
- Kamakazie Sith
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 7555
- Joined: 2002-07-03 05:00pm
- Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
No, that is not the episode.Jon wrote:Is that the one where they can walk through walls and pass through machinery, but somehow floors and seating still remains solid for them? Great innovationAdmiral_K wrote:It seemed to me the PHase cloak worked fairly well given that it was a prototype.![]()
Hmm. They could see other, which means light was reflecting off them, which means they must in turn be visible to anyone... if it is simply a 'cloak' which also takes them out of phase with, it seems, the horizontal plane- they shouldn't be able to see each other.
But still, Transporters, indeed- the problems seem to be trekverse wide. Though it is fantastic how all those species match the colour of the ffect to their style, Green for the rommies, Red for the klingons, blue for the fed, yellow for the cardies...
That was a Romulan cloaking device and further more it was an accident with unexpected results.
The Federation phase cloaking device allowed the E-D to pass through a couple km of solid rock.
Milites Astrum Exterminans
- Jon
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 1501
- Joined: 2004-03-02 10:11am
- Location: Manchester UK
- Kamakazie Sith
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 7555
- Joined: 2002-07-03 05:00pm
- Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Of course the interior is solid because the Enterprise and its crew are both phased. Why wouldn't it be solid for them?Jon wrote:Ah yes, the 'Pegasus' incident, right. But still, I was making a point about the tech. Same thing, they go into 'Phase Cloak' and can pass through the asteroid, but the interior is still solid... I haven't seen this episode for years, hopefully some technobabble explains this?
As for the Romulan incident, I mean it was an accident. They were phased and stayed in phase without the use of a cloaking, or in this case a phase-cloaking device. No, other cloaking device has demonstrated this ability.
Milites Astrum Exterminans
- Jon
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 1501
- Joined: 2004-03-02 10:11am
- Location: Manchester UK
Maybe this doesn not apply to the Pegasus incident, if the whole vessel was 'phased' into a different quantum level of reality (which I assume is the only way it could be done, I must watch the episodes again and see how they said they do it- I am aware of many ways in physics where as particles would be able to pass freely through other particles, but in those cases, all the matter on a scale bigger than an atom would collaspe) which allowed them to pass through physical objects.Kamakazie Sith wrote:Of course the interior is solid because the Enterprise and its crew are both phased. Why wouldn't it be solid for them?Jon wrote:Ah yes, the 'Pegasus' incident, right. But still, I was making a point about the tech. Same thing, they go into 'Phase Cloak' and can pass through the asteroid, but the interior is still solid... I haven't seen this episode for years, hopefully some technobabble explains this?
As for the Romulan incident, I mean it was an accident. They were phased and stayed in phase without the use of a cloaking, or in this case a phase-cloaking device. No, other cloaking device has demonstrated this ability.
But, in the Romulan 'Accident'- this is most definitely nonsense, they can't be out of phase and pass through walls and computer stations and people, yet stand on firm floors and sit on chairs (which they do)- nor would light shine on them, so they wouldn't be able to see one and other- and the fact they can, means that light from 'our' phase of the universe is shining upon them, which in turn should make them visible to all.
- Solauren
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 10658
- Joined: 2003-05-11 09:41pm
- Enola Straight
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 793
- Joined: 2002-12-04 11:01pm
- Location: Somers Point, NJ
Two objects with the same frequency or wavelength of phase would still be visible to each other's viewpoints...although how the rest of the ship would ve visible to them I can't explain away.
Floors have gravity plating...which is transphasic...so it is solid regardless.
Air can still be breathed by phase-cloaked people cuz...uh...
Floors have gravity plating...which is transphasic...so it is solid regardless.
Air can still be breathed by phase-cloaked people cuz...uh...
Masochist to Sadist: "Hurt me."
Sadist to Masochist: "No."
Sadist to Masochist: "No."
- Sarevok
- The Fearless One
- Posts: 10681
- Joined: 2002-12-24 07:29am
- Location: The Covenants last and final line of defense
I think the colour of a species transporter is same as the colour of the shields on their starships. For example the Romulans have green transporters and green shields.But still, Transporters, indeed- the problems seem to be trekverse wide. Though it is fantastic how all those species match the colour of the ffect to their style, Green for the rommies, Red for the klingons, blue for the fed, yellow for the cardies...
I have to tell you something everything I wrote above is a lie.
- Darth Wong
- Sith Lord

- Posts: 70028
- Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
That asteroid would produce insignificant gravity. "The Next Phase" showed that gravity still affects phase-cloaked objects, among many other forms of interaction.Kamakazie Sith wrote:The Federation phase cloaking device allowed the E-D to pass through a couple km of solid rock.
"Pegasus" also indicated that the phase-cloak is an analogue rather than binary (on/off) proposition, ie- it's a question of the "phasing rate" being sufficiently high to pass through a particular barrier, rather than "phasing" and then being able to pass through anything. In short, there's no reason to assume they could pass through, say, a uranium wall ("The Next Phase" showed that denser objects have greater interaction with phased objects/people) or a forcefield (again, see "The Next Phase"), nor is there any reason to assume that they would be immune to the usual forms of interference which seem to fuck up all of their technology.
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
- Kamakazie Sith
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 7555
- Joined: 2002-07-03 05:00pm
- Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Was it "The Next Phase" or "Peagus" where Geordi commented that it would allow them to hide a ship within a planet? The artificial gravity explanation is certainly the best one I've heard but that just means the phase cloak would only be effected by a gravity weapon of some type and I guess a chemical weapon if they found a way to track themDarth Wong wrote:That asteroid would produce insignificant gravity. "The Next Phase" showed that gravity still affects phase-cloaked objects, among many other forms of interaction.Kamakazie Sith wrote:The Federation phase cloaking device allowed the E-D to pass through a couple km of solid rock.
"Pegasus" also indicated that the phase-cloak is an analogue rather than binary (on/off) proposition, ie- it's a question of the "phasing rate" being sufficiently high to pass through a particular barrier, rather than "phasing" and then being able to pass through anything. In short, there's no reason to assume they could pass through, say, a uranium wall ("The Next Phase" showed that denser objects have greater interaction with phased objects/people) or a forcefield (again, see "The Next Phase"), nor is there any reason to assume that they would be immune to the usual forms of interference which seem to fuck up all of their technology.
Milites Astrum Exterminans
- Jon
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 1501
- Joined: 2004-03-02 10:11am
- Location: Manchester UK
Then what light source would illuminate them to one and other?Enola Straight wrote:Two objects with the same frequency or wavelength of phase would still be visible to each other's viewpoints...although how the rest of the ship would ve visible to them I can't explain away.![]()
And chairs are transphasic? I think not- surely they should fall straight through them also and onto the gravity plated flooring (and presumeably, they would also make direct contact with the plating and not the carpet and other materials in between?)Floors have gravity plating...which is transphasic...so it is solid regardless.
Air can still be breathed by phase-cloaked people cuz...uh...
- Xon
- Sith Acolyte
- Posts: 6206
- Joined: 2002-07-16 06:12am
- Location: Western Australia
The Feds are notorious for lack of proper safty systems, so it wouldnt be suprising if there were physical limitation which the federation transporters didnt compensate for.
As far as I remember, the number of transporter fuckups in DS9 was vastly less per time than either TNG or Voyager. Mainly because the DS9 transporters werent Federation design.
After all, its a physical limitation of the computer communications that data delivery via IP packets isnt reliably. But TCP/IP is reliable.
In the case of the Feds, its not having the required software/technology to help work around the issue.
As far as I remember, the number of transporter fuckups in DS9 was vastly less per time than either TNG or Voyager. Mainly because the DS9 transporters werent Federation design.
After all, its a physical limitation of the computer communications that data delivery via IP packets isnt reliably. But TCP/IP is reliable.
In the case of the Feds, its not having the required software/technology to help work around the issue.
"Okay, I'll have the truth with a side order of clarity." ~ Dr. Daniel Jackson.
"Reality has a well-known liberal bias." ~ Stephen Colbert
"One Drive, One Partition, the One True Path" ~ ars technica forums - warrens - on hhd partitioning schemes.
"Reality has a well-known liberal bias." ~ Stephen Colbert
"One Drive, One Partition, the One True Path" ~ ars technica forums - warrens - on hhd partitioning schemes.
- Kamakazie Sith
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 7555
- Joined: 2002-07-03 05:00pm
- Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
- Sarevok
- The Fearless One
- Posts: 10681
- Joined: 2002-12-24 07:29am
- Location: The Covenants last and final line of defense
I believe it was Pegasus. IIRC Geordi referred to hiding a ship within an asteriod and not a planet.Kamakazie Sith wrote:Was it "The Next Phase" or "Peagus" where Geordi commented that it would allow them to hide a ship within a planet? The artificial gravity explanation is certainly the best one I've heard but that just means the phase cloak would only be effected by a gravity weapon of some type and I guess a chemical weapon if they found a way to track themDarth Wong wrote:That asteroid would produce insignificant gravity. "The Next Phase" showed that gravity still affects phase-cloaked objects, among many other forms of interaction.Kamakazie Sith wrote:The Federation phase cloaking device allowed the E-D to pass through a couple km of solid rock.
"Pegasus" also indicated that the phase-cloak is an analogue rather than binary (on/off) proposition, ie- it's a question of the "phasing rate" being sufficiently high to pass through a particular barrier, rather than "phasing" and then being able to pass through anything. In short, there's no reason to assume they could pass through, say, a uranium wall ("The Next Phase" showed that denser objects have greater interaction with phased objects/people) or a forcefield (again, see "The Next Phase"), nor is there any reason to assume that they would be immune to the usual forms of interference which seem to fuck up all of their technology.
I have to tell you something everything I wrote above is a lie.