Enterprise-J *spoilers*
Moderator: Vympel
- Master of Ossus
- Darkest Knight
- Posts: 18213
- Joined: 2002-07-11 01:35am
- Location: California
Good to see that Trek ship designers are continuing in their efforts to get the maximum surface area:volume ratios possible out of every pixel.
"Sometimes I think you WANT us to fail." "Shut up, just shut up!" -Two Guys from Kabul
Latinum Star Recipient; Hacker's Cross Award Winner
"one soler flar can vapririze the planit or malt the nickl in lass than millasacit" -Bagara1000
"Happiness is just a Flaming Moe away."
Latinum Star Recipient; Hacker's Cross Award Winner
"one soler flar can vapririze the planit or malt the nickl in lass than millasacit" -Bagara1000
"Happiness is just a Flaming Moe away."
- Darth Wong
- Sith Lord

- Posts: 70028
- Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
Each new iteration of Trek ship looks less physical, and more like the CGI creation of some braindead idiot who has no concept whatsoever of structural design. They're not even hiding it any more; the latest ship looks like some cheap-ass fanboy CGI rendering where they forgot to add finishing detail.
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
- Chris OFarrell
- Durandal's Bitch
- Posts: 5724
- Joined: 2002-08-02 07:57pm
- Contact:
I'm curious. From an Engineering perspective, how would you rate the following UFP ships general design?Darth Wong wrote:Each new iteration of Trek ship looks less physical, and more like the CGI creation of some braindead idiot who has no concept whatsoever of structural design. They're not even hiding it any more; the latest ship looks like some cheap-ass fanboy CGI rendering where they forgot to add finishing detail.
Constitution.
Miranda.
Excelessor.
Galaxy.
Nebula.
Sovereign.
Defiant.
Intrepid.
NX.

- Jason von Evil
- Sol Badguy
- Posts: 8103
- Joined: 2002-11-29 02:13am
- Location: Writer of the fictions
- Contact:
- Anarchist Bunny
- Foul, Cruel, and Bad-Tempered Rodent
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: 2002-07-12 02:08am
- Contact:
Prometheus could have been like the Excelsior, a good enough design that didn't need improvement on for a long period of relative peace. Or just a relic that never got decomissioned, like the Connie that was slagged at W349.
//This Line Blank as of 7/15/07\\
Ornithology Subdirector: SD.net Dept. of Biological Sciences
Wiilite

Ornithology Subdirector: SD.net Dept. of Biological Sciences
Wiilite

- Jason von Evil
- Sol Badguy
- Posts: 8103
- Joined: 2002-11-29 02:13am
- Location: Writer of the fictions
- Contact:
359.anarchistbunny wrote:Prometheus could have been like the Excelsior, a good enough design that didn't need improvement on for a long period of relative peace. Or just a relic that never got decomissioned, like the Connie that was slagged at W349.
"It was the hooker rationing that finally drove people over the edge." - Mike on coup in Thailand.

-
Howedar
- Emperor's Thumb
- Posts: 12472
- Joined: 2002-07-03 05:06pm
- Location: St. Paul, MN
Interestingly, FC is also the only one that used a physical model of the E-E. Insurrection and Nemesis used CGI.Uraniun235 wrote: Maybe (maybe), but it's a damn shame that only First Contact came close to properly conveying the starship's size and majesty. I simply don't get that effect with either of the other two Ent-E films.
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
- Einhander Sn0m4n
- Insane Railgunner
- Posts: 18630
- Joined: 2002-10-01 05:51am
- Location: Louisiana... or Dagobah. You know, where Yoda lives.
Ent J? I'd say something, but Vympel
May I suggest an alternative?
and MikeVympel wrote:Fuck their Enterprise J and every other letter in the alphabet. I've said it before, but this is their fucking prequel. Time travel, the same old shit we've seen a million times, and an Enterprise from the future. They should just go fuck themselves, the no talent hack cunts.
Pisses me off.
completely stole my thunder.Darth Wong wrote:Each new iteration of Trek ship looks less physical, and more like the CGI creation of some braindead idiot who has no concept whatsoever of structural design. They're not even hiding it any more; the latest ship looks like some cheap-ass fanboy CGI rendering where they forgot to add finishing detail.
May I suggest an alternative?

- Spanky The Dolphin
- Mammy Two-Shoes
- Posts: 30776
- Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
- Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)
- JME2
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 12258
- Joined: 2003-02-02 04:04pm
Not quite. The majority of the shots involving the Ent-E were of the physical model. The CGI was built for the rescue of Picard aboard the Son'a station.Howedar wrote:Interestingly, FC is also the only one that used a physical model of the E-E. Insurrection and Nemesis used CGI.Uraniun235 wrote: Maybe (maybe), but it's a damn shame that only First Contact came close to properly conveying the starship's size and majesty. I simply don't get that effect with either of the other two Ent-E films.
- Einhander Sn0m4n
- Insane Railgunner
- Posts: 18630
- Joined: 2002-10-01 05:51am
- Location: Louisiana... or Dagobah. You know, where Yoda lives.
- Sarevok
- The Fearless One
- Posts: 10681
- Joined: 2002-12-24 07:29am
- Location: The Covenants last and final line of defense
Insurrection ship SFX was horrible. It looked like a computer game ship. Infact on a high end machine Bridgecommander produces better renderings of the Sovergein than ithe Insurrection Enteterprise.Howedar wrote:Interestingly, FC is also the only one that used a physical model of the E-E. Insurrection and Nemesis used CGI.Uraniun235 wrote: Maybe (maybe), but it's a damn shame that only First Contact came close to properly conveying the starship's size and majesty. I simply don't get that effect with either of the other two Ent-E films.
I have to tell you something everything I wrote above is a lie.
- Durandal
- Bile-Driven Hate Machine
- Posts: 17927
- Joined: 2002-07-03 06:26pm
- Location: Silicon Valley, CA
- Contact:
- Thag
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 794
- Joined: 2004-02-12 06:44pm
- Location: Cannot be revealed without endangering our assets.
- Daltonator
- Reclusive Wanker
- Posts: 383
- Joined: 2003-03-23 03:10pm
- Location: Zelda fanboy heaven
- Contact:
Durandal wrote:Jesus Christ, another time travel plot-line? I don't even watch the show, and I'm annoyed by it.
As for me, the Ent-J looks WAY too top-heavy, and presents a nice, big juicy target for gunners even if they DON'T have sensor tracking.
I like the Defiant-type designs better.
JMS 4:22 | 

- InnocentBystander
- The Russian Circus
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: 2004-04-10 06:05am
- Location: Just across the mighty Hudson
- Metrion Cascade
- Village Idiot
- Posts: 2030
- Joined: 2003-06-14 05:54pm
- Location: Detonating in the upper atmosphere
The E-J is fucking hideous. Any positive aesthetic points we see in future episodes will probably be little things like windows and lamps, if that.
And you're all full of shit if you treat your estimations of what classes were seen in those screencaps as anything but educated guesses. Or stretch canon to try and rectify them when those estimations lack even the authority of tech manuals. Here are a few hints, kids:
- the Federation CANNOT have the "Dauntless class" because they didn't build it and the "Dauntless" itself was assimilated by the Borg.
- Starfleet reuses hull designs. A sufficiently blurry screencap of an Akira might look like the NX. A sufficiently blurry screencap of the Prometheus might look like an Intrepid.
- There is no reason for the Federation to use the E-J's hull if they can make the Sovereign last as long as it's suggested they made the Prometheus last. Unless the E-J's flimsy shape is some technobabble hull contouring designed for the environment the sphere-builders are turning the AQ into.
And you're all full of shit if you treat your estimations of what classes were seen in those screencaps as anything but educated guesses. Or stretch canon to try and rectify them when those estimations lack even the authority of tech manuals. Here are a few hints, kids:
- the Federation CANNOT have the "Dauntless class" because they didn't build it and the "Dauntless" itself was assimilated by the Borg.
- Starfleet reuses hull designs. A sufficiently blurry screencap of an Akira might look like the NX. A sufficiently blurry screencap of the Prometheus might look like an Intrepid.
- There is no reason for the Federation to use the E-J's hull if they can make the Sovereign last as long as it's suggested they made the Prometheus last. Unless the E-J's flimsy shape is some technobabble hull contouring designed for the environment the sphere-builders are turning the AQ into.
- Metrion Cascade
- Village Idiot
- Posts: 2030
- Joined: 2003-06-14 05:54pm
- Location: Detonating in the upper atmosphere
- Metrion Cascade
- Village Idiot
- Posts: 2030
- Joined: 2003-06-14 05:54pm
- Location: Detonating in the upper atmosphere
Here's another possibility for the E-J. Remember that shuttlepod that had more internal space than its external volume? What if the Federation in the E-J's time had the same ability, and the picture doesn't accurately represent the E-J's internal structure or volume? Personally I'm kind of intrigued by the idea that, say;
- a ship could be built so the nacelles don't appear to be connected from the outside, but from the inside they are connected by the requisite conduits and work space
- a ship that only has the external surface area necessary for weapons, docking ports, exhaust, etc. but has vastly more internal volume than is visible from the outside. You could have 6' x 2' x 1' photon torpedoes pouring out of a "tube" that from the outside only appears to be about two feet by one foot in surface area and a few inches deep. And not only does it appear to be that deep, but if you shoot at where you expect the rest of the mechanism to be you'll hit empty space.
And it's not as simple as phase cloaking. The shuttle's inside and outside were physically connected to each other. The shuttle's interior space wasn't intersecting with the shuttle's hull, or the sections of the NX-01 that were below the shuttle (even if that's only the floor of the NX's bottom deck). I'm not saying the idea isn't pseudoscientific bullshit. But it is established as possible in ENT, and does present some interesting possibilities.
- a ship could be built so the nacelles don't appear to be connected from the outside, but from the inside they are connected by the requisite conduits and work space
- a ship that only has the external surface area necessary for weapons, docking ports, exhaust, etc. but has vastly more internal volume than is visible from the outside. You could have 6' x 2' x 1' photon torpedoes pouring out of a "tube" that from the outside only appears to be about two feet by one foot in surface area and a few inches deep. And not only does it appear to be that deep, but if you shoot at where you expect the rest of the mechanism to be you'll hit empty space.
And it's not as simple as phase cloaking. The shuttle's inside and outside were physically connected to each other. The shuttle's interior space wasn't intersecting with the shuttle's hull, or the sections of the NX-01 that were below the shuttle (even if that's only the floor of the NX's bottom deck). I'm not saying the idea isn't pseudoscientific bullshit. But it is established as possible in ENT, and does present some interesting possibilities.
