Posted: 2003-02-12 12:00pm
Gah, I still have no idea what you're talking about. ![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
https://bbs.stardestroyer.net/
Computer guided guns in 1946? Weren't computers big enough to fill an entire house back then? I doubt it would fit in the B-36.phongn wrote:Much of this revolved around whether the Germans could intercept the B-36 around 1946 or so. Sheppard was adamant that the Germans could; I was more or less adamant that the B-36 would be able to penetrate with minimal (though not zero) losses.Setzer wrote:P.S. I did a thread like this a while back, but Google was on the Fritz, so I didn't see any responses. Could someone link to the thread on another NG?
My belief stemmed from it's speed (fast for it's time), defensive armament (radar and computer guided 20mm) and operational altitude (above most, though not all, Nazi fighters). The altitude is more critical; while a fighter might be able to get up that high it will have expended so much fuel in doing so that interception is very difficult.
Depends what you want them to do. These computers did one thing, make the guns match with the radar contact and shoot. Computers had been providing control for naval guns for decades by WW2. What the B-36 did was take radar and computers and combined them, previous systems needed a man in the loop to give the radar data to the computer. The B-29 also had computer control guns, but rather then radar humans in remote stations told them where to shoot. The computers then calculated the off set needed because of the differing locations.Setzer wrote:Computer guided guns in 1946? Weren't computers big enough to fill an entire house back then? I doubt it would fit in the B-36.phongn wrote:Much of this revolved around whether the Germans could intercept the B-36 around 1946 or so. Sheppard was adamant that the Germans could; I was more or less adamant that the B-36 would be able to penetrate with minimal (though not zero) losses.Setzer wrote:P.S. I did a thread like this a while back, but Google was on the Fritz, so I didn't see any responses. Could someone link to the thread on another NG?
My belief stemmed from it's speed (fast for it's time), defensive armament (radar and computer guided 20mm) and operational altitude (above most, though not all, Nazi fighters). The altitude is more critical; while a fighter might be able to get up that high it will have expended so much fuel in doing so that interception is very difficult.
If the entire economy is mobilized for war, the only big things being made are tanks, ships, guns, and aircraft. Ergo, if there are factories cranking out pianos, the entire economy is not mobilized for war.Gah, I still have no idea what you're talking about.
Okay, if the US was totally mobilized for war, in that all of our workers and factories were dedicated to the war effort, would we be producing pianos?Spanky The Dolphin wrote:Gah, I still have no idea what you're talking about.
Out of curiosity, how long would the US be able to sustain such an effort?phongn wrote:Okay, if the US was totally mobilized for war, in that all of our workers and factories were dedicated to the war effort, would we be producing pianos?Spanky The Dolphin wrote:Gah, I still have no idea what you're talking about.
I'm not sure; they would have needed to keep the draconian price controls (the corrective hyperinflation after the war would be even nastier than OTL)Uraniun235 wrote:Out of curiosity, how long would the US be able to sustain such an effort?phongn wrote:Okay, if the US was totally mobilized for war, in that all of our workers and factories were dedicated to the war effort, would we be producing pianos?Spanky The Dolphin wrote:Gah, I still have no idea what you're talking about.
We could have kept it up longer than the Nazis, that's for damn sure.phongn wrote:I'm not sure; they would have needed to keep the draconian price controls (the corrective hyperinflation after the war would be even nastier than OTL)Uraniun235 wrote:Out of curiosity, how long would the US be able to sustain such an effort?phongn wrote: Okay, if the US was totally mobilized for war, in that all of our workers and factories were dedicated to the war effort, would we be producing pianos?