[Discussion] House of Commons

A failed experiment whereby board users were invited to advise the Senate, and instead attempted to replace the Senate.
User avatar
Hotfoot
Avatar of Confusion
Posts: 5835
Joined: 2002-10-12 04:38pm
Location: Peace River: Badlands, Terra Nova Winter 1936
Contact:

[Discussion] House of Commons

Post by Hotfoot »

Frankly, I'd like to see this as a subforum of the Senate where all users can post on matters of significance related to the board itself. It would be like a more informal version of the senate which would be used by users who are interested in having a say.

We have enough PM's, Testing and OT threads dedicated towards the public voice of Senatorial matters, let's just make it easier for people to speak up and have it all be in one easy to access place.

I personally don't think a single thread is sufficient. Single threads are for long-running topics that have singularly similar responses, NOT something as varied in topic as the numerous issues that can come to the Senate. In the past several days, there have been close to a half dozen threads that talk about current events in the Senate by non-Senators. They deserve a place where they can go. The traffic is just perfect for a sub-forum, and frankly would seem to me to be a better use of database space than some other forums, private or sub, that currently exist.
Do not meddle in the affairs of insomniacs, for they are cranky and can do things to you while you sleep.
Image
The Realm of Confusion
"Every time you talk about Teal'c, I keep imagining Thor's ass. Thank you very much for that, you fucking fucker." -Marcao
SG-14: Because in some cases, "Recon" means "Blow up a fucking planet or die trying."
SilCore Wiki! Come take a look!
User avatar
CmdrWilkens
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 9093
Joined: 2002-07-06 01:24am
Location: Land of the Crabcake
Contact:

Re: [Discussion] House of Commons

Post by CmdrWilkens »

By the same measure, however, the Senate has been unusually active. is the interest in the proceedings of the Senate a function of base level interest or is the level of non-Senator participation tied in direct relationship to the amount of activity in the Senate? That's the $10,000 question because if it is tied to the activity level in the Senate then its highly likely we could see long stretches of inactivity in the sub-forum.

I don't know mostly because I essentially never venture into HoS or testing but I rarely before have seen much in OT so I can't speak to whether past interest in Senate matters is cyclical with the Senate's activity level.
Image
SDNet World Nation: Wilkonia
Armourer of the WARWOLVES
ASVS Vet's Association (Class of 2000)
Former C.S. Strowbridge Gold Ego Award Winner
MEMBER of the Anti-PETA Anti-Facist LEAGUE

"I put no stock in religion. By the word religion I have seen the lunacy of fanatics of every denomination be called the will of god. I have seen too much religion in the eyes of too many murderers. Holiness is in right action, and courage on behalf of those who cannot defend themselves, and goodness. "
-Kingdom of Heaven
User avatar
Hotfoot
Avatar of Confusion
Posts: 5835
Joined: 2002-10-12 04:38pm
Location: Peace River: Badlands, Terra Nova Winter 1936
Contact:

Re: [Discussion] House of Commons

Post by Hotfoot »

So what if it is? Subforums don't have to be super active. Some are just showcases of past threads of note. This just makes it easier for the population to have a voice that we can easily track. I'm sick and tired of dealing with PMs, IM proddings, and other such nonsense. Testing is largely ignored, OT isn't the place, a single thread isn't enough and can easily be ignored, and making a full forum is wasteful.
Do not meddle in the affairs of insomniacs, for they are cranky and can do things to you while you sleep.
Image
The Realm of Confusion
"Every time you talk about Teal'c, I keep imagining Thor's ass. Thank you very much for that, you fucking fucker." -Marcao
SG-14: Because in some cases, "Recon" means "Blow up a fucking planet or die trying."
SilCore Wiki! Come take a look!
User avatar
Hotfoot
Avatar of Confusion
Posts: 5835
Joined: 2002-10-12 04:38pm
Location: Peace River: Badlands, Terra Nova Winter 1936
Contact:

Re: [Discussion] House of Commons

Post by Hotfoot »

Well? I know I had some support for this when I first brought it up, I'd rather not see this fall to the wayside so quickly.

If need be, I'll collect a list of people who support the idea and post their handles here.
Do not meddle in the affairs of insomniacs, for they are cranky and can do things to you while you sleep.
Image
The Realm of Confusion
"Every time you talk about Teal'c, I keep imagining Thor's ass. Thank you very much for that, you fucking fucker." -Marcao
SG-14: Because in some cases, "Recon" means "Blow up a fucking planet or die trying."
SilCore Wiki! Come take a look!
User avatar
Imperial Overlord
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11978
Joined: 2004-08-19 04:30am
Location: The Tower at Charm

Re: [Discussion] House of Commons

Post by Imperial Overlord »

I think it's a good idea.
The Excellent Prismatic Spray. For when you absolutely, positively must kill a motherfucker. Accept no substitutions. Contact a magician of the later Aeons for details. Some conditions may apply.
User avatar
LadyTevar
White Mage
White Mage
Posts: 23148
Joined: 2003-02-12 10:59pm

Re: [Discussion] House of Commons

Post by LadyTevar »

It may work.

It may even get some of the mass deluge of Senate threads to dry up.
Image
Nitram, slightly high on cough syrup: Do you know you're beautiful?
Me: Nope, that's why I have you around to tell me.
Nitram: You -are- beautiful. Anyone tries to tell you otherwise kill them.

"A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. LLAP" -- Leonard Nimoy, last Tweet
User avatar
K. A. Pital
Glamorous Commie
Posts: 20813
Joined: 2003-02-26 11:39am
Location: Elysium

Re: [Discussion] House of Commons

Post by K. A. Pital »

I will also throw my hat here. It's a good idea. And it will stop "Senate commentary" threads from spawning in either OT or Testing, which would be good - they are really out of place there.
Lì ci sono chiese, macerie, moschee e questure, lì frontiere, prezzi inaccessibile e freddure
Lì paludi, minacce, cecchini coi fucili, documenti, file notturne e clandestini
Qui incontri, lotte, passi sincronizzati, colori, capannelli non autorizzati,
Uccelli migratori, reti, informazioni, piazze di Tutti i like pazze di passioni...

...La tranquillità è importante ma la libertà è tutto!
Assalti Frontali
User avatar
Surlethe
HATES GRADING
Posts: 12267
Joined: 2004-12-29 03:41pm

Re: [Discussion] House of Commons

Post by Surlethe »

Not only are "Senate Commentary Threads" out of place in OT or Testing, they also grow old and fall down the page; a "House of Commons" subforum would permit us to preserve those threads and commentary in a less-active, more-relevant setting. It's not a big deal if the subforum's not very active, either; if it gets a flurry of helpful suggestions every two years when things blow up like this, it'll have served its purpose.
A Government founded upon justice, and recognizing the equal rights of all men; claiming higher authority for existence, or sanction for its laws, that nature, reason, and the regularly ascertained will of the people; steadily refusing to put its sword and purse in the service of any religious creed or family is a standing offense to most of the Governments of the world, and to some narrow and bigoted people among ourselves.
F. Douglass
User avatar
Patrick Degan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 14847
Joined: 2002-07-15 08:06am
Location: Orleanian in exile

Re: [Discussion] House of Commons

Post by Patrick Degan »

I can see no harm in this proposal and would be willing to support it in a senate vote should it come to the floor.
When ballots have fairly and constitutionally decided, there can be no successful appeal back to bullets.
—Abraham Lincoln

People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House

Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)
User avatar
Coyote
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 12464
Joined: 2002-08-23 01:20am
Location: The glorious Sun-Barge! Isis, Isis, Ra,Ra,Ra!
Contact:

Re: [Discussion] House of Commons

Post by Coyote »

I am very much in favor of this idea.
Something about Libertarianism always bothered me. Then one day, I realized what it was:
Libertarian philosophy can be boiled down to the phrase, "Work Will Make You Free."


In Libertarianism, there is no Government, so the Bosses are free to exploit the Workers.
In Communism, there is no Government, so the Workers are free to exploit the Bosses.
So in Libertarianism, man exploits man, but in Communism, its the other way around!

If all you want to do is have some harmless, mindless fun, go H3RE INST3ADZ0RZ!!
Grrr! Fight my Brute, you pansy!
User avatar
Hotfoot
Avatar of Confusion
Posts: 5835
Joined: 2002-10-12 04:38pm
Location: Peace River: Badlands, Terra Nova Winter 1936
Contact:

Re: [Discussion] House of Commons

Post by Hotfoot »

Excellent. I was getting a little worried when the topic was up for a while with no responses, but it would seem my concerns were unfounded. I move that we put this motion to vote:

Shall we create a House of Commons subforum for the Senate, moving all relevant threads to said subforum and allowing general access to the board population to create new topics and post replies?
Do not meddle in the affairs of insomniacs, for they are cranky and can do things to you while you sleep.
Image
The Realm of Confusion
"Every time you talk about Teal'c, I keep imagining Thor's ass. Thank you very much for that, you fucking fucker." -Marcao
SG-14: Because in some cases, "Recon" means "Blow up a fucking planet or die trying."
SilCore Wiki! Come take a look!
User avatar
RedImperator
Roosevelt Republican
Posts: 16465
Joined: 2002-07-11 07:59pm
Location: Delaware
Contact:

Re: [Discussion] House of Commons

Post by RedImperator »

Technical question: can we allow members who can't access the Senate to access a subforum of the Senate?
Image
Any city gets what it admires, will pay for, and, ultimately, deserves…We want and deserve tin-can architecture in a tinhorn culture. And we will probably be judged not by the monuments we build but by those we have destroyed.--Ada Louise Huxtable, "Farewell to Penn Station", New York Times editorial, 30 October 1963
X-Ray Blues
User avatar
Hotfoot
Avatar of Confusion
Posts: 5835
Joined: 2002-10-12 04:38pm
Location: Peace River: Badlands, Terra Nova Winter 1936
Contact:

Re: [Discussion] House of Commons

Post by Hotfoot »

RedImperator wrote:Technical question: can we allow members who can't access the Senate to access a subforum of the Senate?
Shouldn't be a problem, I would think. phpBB has traditionally been very flexible in terms of who it allows to access any given forum, though I haven't seen the new control panel yet. I suppose we'll have to find out from Mike if the vote passes and he decides to set it up.
Do not meddle in the affairs of insomniacs, for they are cranky and can do things to you while you sleep.
Image
The Realm of Confusion
"Every time you talk about Teal'c, I keep imagining Thor's ass. Thank you very much for that, you fucking fucker." -Marcao
SG-14: Because in some cases, "Recon" means "Blow up a fucking planet or die trying."
SilCore Wiki! Come take a look!
User avatar
RedImperator
Roosevelt Republican
Posts: 16465
Joined: 2002-07-11 07:59pm
Location: Delaware
Contact:

Re: [Discussion] House of Commons

Post by RedImperator »

From AcePace:
AS far as I know, the senate is just a forum with permissions set up in a specific manner. A sub forum has it's own permission set.
If a subforum has its own permissions set, then there shouldn't be any problem.
Image
Any city gets what it admires, will pay for, and, ultimately, deserves…We want and deserve tin-can architecture in a tinhorn culture. And we will probably be judged not by the monuments we build but by those we have destroyed.--Ada Louise Huxtable, "Farewell to Penn Station", New York Times editorial, 30 October 1963
X-Ray Blues
User avatar
Surlethe
HATES GRADING
Posts: 12267
Joined: 2004-12-29 03:41pm

Re: [Discussion] House of Commons

Post by Surlethe »

Hotfoot wrote:Shall we create a House of Commons subforum for the Senate, moving all relevant threads to said subforum and allowing general access to the board population to create new topics and post replies?
Motion seconded.
A Government founded upon justice, and recognizing the equal rights of all men; claiming higher authority for existence, or sanction for its laws, that nature, reason, and the regularly ascertained will of the people; steadily refusing to put its sword and purse in the service of any religious creed or family is a standing offense to most of the Governments of the world, and to some narrow and bigoted people among ourselves.
F. Douglass
User avatar
Spyder
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4465
Joined: 2002-09-03 03:23am
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Contact:

Re: [Discussion] House of Commons

Post by Spyder »

I favor this, save me having to purge my inbox every six weeks.
:D
User avatar
Coyote
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 12464
Joined: 2002-08-23 01:20am
Location: The glorious Sun-Barge! Isis, Isis, Ra,Ra,Ra!
Contact:

Re: [Discussion] House of Commons

Post by Coyote »

A lot of votes 'against', I see... apparantly, a lot of Senators don't get PM'd by constituents very much!! :?
Something about Libertarianism always bothered me. Then one day, I realized what it was:
Libertarian philosophy can be boiled down to the phrase, "Work Will Make You Free."


In Libertarianism, there is no Government, so the Bosses are free to exploit the Workers.
In Communism, there is no Government, so the Workers are free to exploit the Bosses.
So in Libertarianism, man exploits man, but in Communism, its the other way around!

If all you want to do is have some harmless, mindless fun, go H3RE INST3ADZ0RZ!!
Grrr! Fight my Brute, you pansy!
User avatar
The Yosemite Bear
Mostly Harmless Nutcase (Requiescat in Pace)
Posts: 35211
Joined: 2002-07-21 02:38am
Location: Dave's Not Here Man

Re: [Discussion] House of Commons

Post by The Yosemite Bear »

Coyote wrote:A lot of votes 'against', I see... apparantly, a lot of Senators don't get PM'd by constituents very much!! :?
nope many of us don't
Image

The scariest folk song lyrics are "My Boy Grew up to be just like me" from cats in the cradle by Harry Chapin
User avatar
RedImperator
Roosevelt Republican
Posts: 16465
Joined: 2002-07-11 07:59pm
Location: Delaware
Contact:

Re: [Discussion] House of Commons

Post by RedImperator »

I do think this is a good idea. Plainly, there was a lot of built up frustration that got vented last week. I think the House of Commons could serve as a useful safety valve. I mean, it's either that, or unending mockery from Testing (well, we're probably stuck with the mockery, but it would be helpful to hear more detailed opinions). As for PM inboxes, I went from 75% full to 98% full in a week, so some of us are getting swamped.
Image
Any city gets what it admires, will pay for, and, ultimately, deserves…We want and deserve tin-can architecture in a tinhorn culture. And we will probably be judged not by the monuments we build but by those we have destroyed.--Ada Louise Huxtable, "Farewell to Penn Station", New York Times editorial, 30 October 1963
X-Ray Blues
User avatar
Coyote
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 12464
Joined: 2002-08-23 01:20am
Location: The glorious Sun-Barge! Isis, Isis, Ra,Ra,Ra!
Contact:

Re: [Discussion] House of Commons

Post by Coyote »

But it looks like we aren't going to get the 2/3rd majority needed.

I think it's a good way to hear the voices of dissent without resorting to shadowy, anonymous PMs (especially since some folks openly admit they're intimidated), or having to wade through Testing sarcasm & mockery to see what real concerns are at the root.

Plus, I think shooting down a House of Commons might add impetus to the claims that the Senate marginalizes those who are affected by our policy decision. My two pfennigs, at least.
Something about Libertarianism always bothered me. Then one day, I realized what it was:
Libertarian philosophy can be boiled down to the phrase, "Work Will Make You Free."


In Libertarianism, there is no Government, so the Bosses are free to exploit the Workers.
In Communism, there is no Government, so the Workers are free to exploit the Bosses.
So in Libertarianism, man exploits man, but in Communism, its the other way around!

If all you want to do is have some harmless, mindless fun, go H3RE INST3ADZ0RZ!!
Grrr! Fight my Brute, you pansy!
User avatar
The Wookiee
Lex Wookos
Posts: 1650
Joined: 2003-05-29 04:17am
Location: Tearing your arms off

Re: [Discussion] House of Commons

Post by The Wookiee »

Good points, Coyote...but I'm still on the fence about it. My fear is that it will become quite busy very fast, and what sort of mechanism would we use to select viable topics for Senate discussion?
Image
"I suggest a new strategy, Artoo: Let The Wookiee win."
SDnet BBS Administrator: Service With A Roar (And A Hydrospanner)
Knight of the Order of the Galactic Empire


Do not taunt The Wookiee.
User avatar
RedImperator
Roosevelt Republican
Posts: 16465
Joined: 2002-07-11 07:59pm
Location: Delaware
Contact:

Re: [Discussion] House of Commons

Post by RedImperator »

The Wookiee wrote:Good points, Coyote...but I'm still on the fence about it. My fear is that it will become quite busy very fast, and what sort of mechanism would we use to select viable topics for Senate discussion?
I'd just trust Senators' judgment on this one. If there is a House of Commons, I plan on participating in it. If a discussion is active and full of good points, then I'll take it up to the Senate (or the mods, if it's outside the Senate's reach). I'd hope other Senators would do the same.
Image
Any city gets what it admires, will pay for, and, ultimately, deserves…We want and deserve tin-can architecture in a tinhorn culture. And we will probably be judged not by the monuments we build but by those we have destroyed.--Ada Louise Huxtable, "Farewell to Penn Station", New York Times editorial, 30 October 1963
X-Ray Blues
User avatar
Coyote
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 12464
Joined: 2002-08-23 01:20am
Location: The glorious Sun-Barge! Isis, Isis, Ra,Ra,Ra!
Contact:

Re: [Discussion] House of Commons

Post by Coyote »

Irishmick has sent me a PM:
I think in response to The Wookie's questioning during this thread, it might be a good idea to appoint someone as a sort of 'House Clerk'. If you could establish a thread in the Senate, like a Senate Docket thread, the Clerk could nominate threads in the Commons to fill the docket. Senators could then pull whichever threads in the docket onto the Senate floor for discussion.
An excellent idea. Just as the Senate has the Chancellor, so too shall the HoC have a Clerk.
Something about Libertarianism always bothered me. Then one day, I realized what it was:
Libertarian philosophy can be boiled down to the phrase, "Work Will Make You Free."


In Libertarianism, there is no Government, so the Bosses are free to exploit the Workers.
In Communism, there is no Government, so the Workers are free to exploit the Bosses.
So in Libertarianism, man exploits man, but in Communism, its the other way around!

If all you want to do is have some harmless, mindless fun, go H3RE INST3ADZ0RZ!!
Grrr! Fight my Brute, you pansy!
User avatar
Hotfoot
Avatar of Confusion
Posts: 5835
Joined: 2002-10-12 04:38pm
Location: Peace River: Badlands, Terra Nova Winter 1936
Contact:

Re: [Discussion] House of Commons

Post by Hotfoot »

As it stands, we are on the cusp of pulling through with a majority, and I would urge my fellow senators yet to vote to give this idea a chance. It's hardly anything to set up a new forum, and only a little more to take it down. This would allow for a better pressure valve than what we have had previously, while encouraging regular board members to take part in the discussions that ultimately will affect them. We have since the inception of the Senate allowed the voices of members to be heard with some moderation, and frankly we do end up hearing it anyway from Testing, be it serious or mocking.

We already have from this latest situation a half-dozen threads that are immediately relevant, and more are sure to come. None of the Commons discussions hold any power unless we Senators see fit to let them, so if you ignored PMs before, you can continue to do so now. I'm with Red in that I plan on being very active in the House of Commons, and while I can't dedicate a large amount of time each day towards it, I would not object to taking on the responsibility of managing it, since I suggested this boondoggle.
Do not meddle in the affairs of insomniacs, for they are cranky and can do things to you while you sleep.
Image
The Realm of Confusion
"Every time you talk about Teal'c, I keep imagining Thor's ass. Thank you very much for that, you fucking fucker." -Marcao
SG-14: Because in some cases, "Recon" means "Blow up a fucking planet or die trying."
SilCore Wiki! Come take a look!
User avatar
The Duchess of Zeon
Gözde
Posts: 14566
Joined: 2002-09-18 01:06am
Location: Exiled in the Pale of Settlement.

Re: [Discussion] House of Commons

Post by The Duchess of Zeon »

Uh, the vote is currently 26/12, so it's going to handily get the necessary majority.

Remember that the percentiles in the vote thread are irrelevant per Senate rules--abstentions only count toward the threshold for the minimum number of votes required to make the poll valid. When calculating the actual result, only the other options are considered.
The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. -- Wikipedia's No Original Research policy page.

In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
Locked