Multiple Habitable Worlds in A Single Star System

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

Junghalli
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5001
Joined: 2004-12-21 10:06pm
Location: Berkeley, California (USA)

Multiple Habitable Worlds in A Single Star System

Post by Junghalli »

Is it realistic to have star systems with more than one planet bearing advanced life? So far I don't see why it would be. If Mars had come out of the oven a little differently our solar system might be one of them. Do you think it would be realistic or unrealistic to have star systems with multiple habitable worlds?
User avatar
Zed Snardbody
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2449
Joined: 2002-07-11 11:41pm

Post by Zed Snardbody »

wouldn't this be better suited to SLAM?

Anyway, I belive the habitable zone is large enough as to encompas the orbits of two worlds, but they wouldn't be earth like. More along the lines of really hot and really cold, but still livable.
The Zen of Not Fucking Up.
User avatar
Zor
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5928
Joined: 2004-06-08 03:37am

Post by Zor »

If they are moons above a gas giant, yes.

Zor
HAIL ZOR! WE'LL BLOW UP THE OCEAN!
Heros of Cybertron-HAB-Keeper of the Vicious pit of Allosauruses-King Leighton-I, United Kingdom of Zoria: SD.net World/Tsar Mikhail-I of the Red Tsardom: SD.net Kingdoms
WHEN ALL HELL BREAKS LOOSE ON EARTH, ALL EARTH BREAKS LOOSE ON HELL
Terran Sphere
The Art of Zor
User avatar
xcr
Youngling
Posts: 134
Joined: 2004-11-21 04:12pm
Location: New Brunswick

Post by xcr »

One could be earth like, I think- Is Mars not within the zone in which it is possible for a world to be habbitable?
User avatar
Shroom Man 777
FUCKING DICK-STABBER!
Posts: 21222
Joined: 2003-05-11 08:39am
Location: Bleeding breasts and stabbing dicks since 2003
Contact:

Post by Shroom Man 777 »

Venus, if it turned out a bit differently a few bajillion years ago, would've been habitable. Minus the acid rain, volcanoes and other deathstuff, it's exactly just like earth exactly.
Image "DO YOU WORSHIP HOMOSEXUALS?" - Curtis Saxton (source)
shroom is a lovely boy and i wont hear a bad word against him - LUSY-CHAN!
Shit! Man, I didn't think of that! It took Shroom to properly interpret the screams of dying people :D - PeZook
Shroom, I read out the stuff you write about us. You are an endless supply of morale down here. :p - an OWS street medic
Pink Sugar Heart Attack!
User avatar
wautd
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7580
Joined: 2004-02-11 10:11am
Location: Intensive care

Post by wautd »

Shroom Man 777 wrote:Venus, if it turned out a bit differently a few bajillion years ago, would've been habitable. Minus the acid rain, volcanoes and other deathstuff, it's exactly just like earth exactly.
[conspiracy mode]Hah! That's what we want you to think comrade.[/conspiracy mode]
User avatar
RedImperator
Roosevelt Republican
Posts: 16465
Joined: 2002-07-11 07:59pm
Location: Delaware
Contact:

Post by RedImperator »

There's no reason why there couldn't be more than one habitable planet in the same system. Dozens of them, like some people say is the case for Firefly and Battlestar Galactica, no. Not without wholesale engineering of the entire system.
Image
Any city gets what it admires, will pay for, and, ultimately, deserves…We want and deserve tin-can architecture in a tinhorn culture. And we will probably be judged not by the monuments we build but by those we have destroyed.--Ada Louise Huxtable, "Farewell to Penn Station", New York Times editorial, 30 October 1963
X-Ray Blues
User avatar
Solauren
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10233
Joined: 2003-05-11 09:41pm

Post by Solauren »

Sure, it's possible.

The maximum number depends on the size of the star the planets are orbiting.


For example, our own Solar System could have had 3 around the Sun (Venus, Earth, Mars), had Venus and Mars turned out a little different

A star with the size and temperature to have a large inhabitable zone around it could have any number of planets orbiting it. The closer to the sun they got, that thinner the atmosphere would have to been, and the furhter out, the thicker (to control heat trapping and so forth)

Also, in our own solar system, if Jupiter was heavier (I don't know how much heavier), it's 4 Gaileian moons are all big enough to have developed life. (I personally think the one that's frozen over, Europa is it, probably does have life on it, or did at one time)

So, it is possible.

How LIKELY it is, is another story.
WyrdNyrd
Jedi Knight
Posts: 693
Joined: 2005-02-01 05:02am

Post by WyrdNyrd »

IIRC, you can have up to three bodies in a single, stable orbit around a fourth, e.g. three planets around a star. Or it could be just two, memory's fuzzy...

Point is, you can then double or triple the number of planets in a star's habitable zone.
User avatar
Mange
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4179
Joined: 2004-03-26 01:31pm
Location: Somewhere in the GFFA

Post by Mange »

xcr wrote:One could be earth like, I think- Is Mars not within the zone in which it is possible for a world to be habbitable?
Both Venus and Mars is in the habitable zone. However, some scientists have started to question this rather narrow view. There could be other processes that could lead to emergence of life even in relatively remote areas of a star system.
User avatar
RedImperator
Roosevelt Republican
Posts: 16465
Joined: 2002-07-11 07:59pm
Location: Delaware
Contact:

Post by RedImperator »

Mange the Swede wrote:
xcr wrote:One could be earth like, I think- Is Mars not within the zone in which it is possible for a world to be habbitable?
Both Venus and Mars is in the habitable zone. However, some scientists have started to question this rather narrow view. There could be other processes that could lead to emergence of life even in relatively remote areas of a star system.
That doesn't translate to human-habitable, though.
Image
Any city gets what it admires, will pay for, and, ultimately, deserves…We want and deserve tin-can architecture in a tinhorn culture. And we will probably be judged not by the monuments we build but by those we have destroyed.--Ada Louise Huxtable, "Farewell to Penn Station", New York Times editorial, 30 October 1963
X-Ray Blues
User avatar
GrandMasterTerwynn
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6787
Joined: 2002-07-29 06:14pm
Location: Somewhere on Earth.

Re: Multiple Habitable Worlds in A Single Star System

Post by GrandMasterTerwynn »

Junghalli wrote:Is it realistic to have star systems with more than one planet bearing advanced life? So far I don't see why it would be. If Mars had come out of the oven a little differently our solar system might be one of them. Do you think it would be realistic or unrealistic to have star systems with multiple habitable worlds?
If you go by our solar system, you can get up to three habitable planets, depending on how the mass distribution falls out. Some solar systems will give you four or five, but that's pushing it. This assumes habitable means "large terrestrial planet like Earth." If by habitable, you mean any ball of rock capable of supporting complex life, then the total doubles, since the large moons of gas giants can have water oceans under their icy crusts.

If you include stars that have evolved off the main sequence, they have habitable zones extending from the orbit of Jupiter to past the orbit of Saturn (or, later on, past the orbit of Saturn and to the orbit of Uranus.) There, any large ice and rock moon will count as a habitable world, and you can have around ten or more.
User avatar
GrandMasterTerwynn
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6787
Joined: 2002-07-29 06:14pm
Location: Somewhere on Earth.

Post by GrandMasterTerwynn »

Shroom Man 777 wrote:Venus, if it turned out a bit differently a few bajillion years ago, would've been habitable. Minus the acid rain, volcanoes and other deathstuff, it's exactly just like earth exactly.
If Mars and Venus had been interchanged, then you'd have three habitable planets today. Far Venus would've been massive enough to hang onto a thick, pleasant atmosphere, and near Mars's low mass would've meant it would've had a harder time holding onto an atmosphere capable of producing a runaway greenhouse effect. Of course, for this to happen, you would've needed Jupiter to orbit a bit further out, which would've either meant that, instead of having the four gas giants we have now, we'd have a giant with Jupiter and Saturn's mass combined and Uranus and Neptune, a Jupiter with a less-massive Saturn, and a Uranus and Neptune, a Jupiter, a giant with Saturn and Uranus' combined mass, and a Neptune, or a Jupiter and another gas giant with Saturn, Uranus' and Neptune's mass combined, orbiting at around the orbit of Uranus.

This sort of solar system is perfectly possible, given what we know of the mechanics of solar system formation.
User avatar
Broomstick
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 28796
Joined: 2004-01-02 07:04pm
Location: Industrial armpit of the US Midwest

Post by Broomstick »

If you have double planets - say, if Earth's moon had been larger and more Earth-like, with an atmosphere and so forth - you could have two planets in one habitable zone. So... if venus-earth-mars orbits are "habitable", then by putting a double-planet system in each orbit you'd have six habitable worlds.

Probably not at all likely... but possible.
User avatar
xcr
Youngling
Posts: 134
Joined: 2004-11-21 04:12pm
Location: New Brunswick

Post by xcr »

I remember a rather poor sci-fi movie in which there is another planet essentially the same as earth, in the same orbit exactly, on the other side on the sun, but I assume that is so close to impossible as to be a pointless consideration...
Hardy
Padawan Learner
Posts: 410
Joined: 2004-01-30 06:13pm
Location: Florida
Contact:

Post by Hardy »

Destructionator XIII wrote:If they wern't perfectly opposite, their gravitional interaction would also mess things up, pulling each other off stable orbits, meaning again that both planets will decay into the star.
I think that may not entirely be the case. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the leading planet would be slowed down constantly by the trailing planet's gravity, while the trailing planet will be constantly sped up. Both planets should have the eccentricity of their orbits increased, but the trailer will have its semi-major axis increased, while the lead planet should have its semi-major axis decreased. Only one planet would have its orbit "decay".

It hurts to think of what might happen in the long term, as periods and eccentricities change since the frequency and intensity of perterbations change. This is why n-body problems are not our friends.
User avatar
fgalkin
Carvin' Marvin
Posts: 14557
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:51pm
Location: Land of the Mountain Fascists
Contact:

Post by fgalkin »

xcr wrote:I remember a rather poor sci-fi movie in which there is another planet essentially the same as earth, in the same orbit exactly, on the other side on the sun, but I assume that is so close to impossible as to be a pointless consideration...
You've seen Gor? I pity you.

And NOTHING about Lange's folly makes even the slightest sense (take the fact that Gor has a lighter gravity, but its inhabittants are somehow stronger than their Earth counterparts), so I fail to see why we must be discussing it.

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin
Junghalli
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5001
Joined: 2004-12-21 10:06pm
Location: Berkeley, California (USA)

Post by Junghalli »

Destructionator XIII wrote:
xcr wrote:I remember a rather poor sci-fi movie in which there is another planet essentially the same as earth, in the same orbit exactly, on the other side on the sun, but I assume that is so close to impossible as to be a pointless consideration...
If I'm not mistaken, having a second planet in the same orbit would cause both orbits to destabilize. The gravity between the two planets would add to the star's gravity, causing both them to decay into the star. If they wern't perfectly opposite, their gravitional interaction would also mess things up, pulling each other off stable orbits, meaning again that both planets will decay into the star.
Well, There are the Trojan asteroids, which move in the same orbit as Jupiter (one group moves ahead of the planet the other behind the planet). And I think there might be some smaller Jovian or Saturnian moons that share orbits but I can't remember for sure offhand.
Hardy
Padawan Learner
Posts: 410
Joined: 2004-01-30 06:13pm
Location: Florida
Contact:

Post by Hardy »

Junghalli wrote: Well, There are the Trojan asteroids, which move in the same orbit as Jupiter (one group moves ahead of the planet the other behind the planet).
The Trojans are at Jupiter's L4 and L5 points where the gravity of Jupiter and the Sun balance out. Their own collective mass is too negligible to significantly perturb Jupiter, though.
And I think there might be some smaller Jovian or Saturnian moons that share orbits but I can't remember for sure offhand.
I know Metis and Adrastea satisfy this condition, but their masses are far too small to drastically perturb each other.

You can search NSSDC for such moons.
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/
Hmm...NSSDC has a makeover.
User avatar
Mange
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4179
Joined: 2004-03-26 01:31pm
Location: Somewhere in the GFFA

Post by Mange »

RedImperator wrote:
Mange the Swede wrote:
xcr wrote:One could be earth like, I think- Is Mars not within the zone in which it is possible for a world to be habbitable?
Both Venus and Mars is in the habitable zone. However, some scientists have started to question this rather narrow view. There could be other processes that could lead to emergence of life even in relatively remote areas of a star system.
That doesn't translate to human-habitable, though.
No, absolutely not (I'm sorry if I was a bit vague). It could for example be very tiny biospheres.
User avatar
Symmetry
Jedi Master
Posts: 1237
Joined: 2003-08-21 10:09pm
Location: Random

Post by Symmetry »

xcr wrote:I remember a rather poor sci-fi movie in which there is another planet essentially the same as earth, in the same orbit exactly, on the other side on the sun, but I assume that is so close to impossible as to be a pointless consideration...
Unsuprisingly, the Wikipedia has an article on just this topic. The situation you describe (L3) would be a solution to the three body problem, but it's an unstable one and would quickly fall apart given pertubations from the other planets.
SDN Rangers: Gunnery Officer

They may have claymores and Dragons, but we have Bolos and Ogres.
User avatar
Mange
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4179
Joined: 2004-03-26 01:31pm
Location: Somewhere in the GFFA

Post by Mange »

Space.com had an interesting article on the subject:

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/0 ... _like.html
User avatar
Kuja
The Dark Messenger
Posts: 19322
Joined: 2002-07-11 12:05am
Location: AZ

Post by Kuja »

Imagine the budget NASA would have if Venus and Mars had turned out to be inhabitable.....
Image
JADAFETWA
User avatar
Broomstick
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 28796
Joined: 2004-01-02 07:04pm
Location: Industrial armpit of the US Midwest

Post by Broomstick »

In such an instance I doubt exploration and space flight would have remained solely in government hands, or in the hands of just one agency. If there was something on either of those planets worth the trip and the risk greed would provide the impulse.
User avatar
Zaia
Inamorata
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2002-10-23 03:04am
Location: Londontowne

Post by Zaia »

To SLAM.
"On the infrequent occasions when I have been called upon in a formal place to play the bongo drums, the introducer never seems to find it necessary to mention that I also do theoretical physics." -Richard Feynman
Post Reply