Just what are 'acceptable' casualties?

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37389
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Cpt_Frank wrote:Duh. Military losses are acceptable as long as the mission objective is accomplished.
Civilian casualties should be kept as low as possible.
Famous example: battle of jutland.
Though the german's High Seas Fleet sunk more warships than the british, the long-term effect was that after the battle the german fleet never left the home again during most of WWI.
Actually they were back out seeking an another fleet action within two months, and later made several other major deployments against both the British and Russians.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
Cpt_Frank
Official SD.Net Evil Warsie Asshole
Posts: 3652
Joined: 2002-07-03 03:05am
Location: the black void
Contact:

Post by Cpt_Frank »

Yeah that's why I said most time the High Seas fleet didn't do anything significant after the battle of jutland anymore until the great scuttling at scapa flow.
Always wanted to make a visit there, perhaps to the König or the Markgraf.
Image
Supermod
Post Reply