What's with you and putting words in my mouth fuckwit? Never did I post, "your boss should be able to fire you for looking at him funny."Darth Wong wrote:Do you have some kind of reading comprehension problem? I said that "ironclad job protection" is a terrible idea. You somehow interpreted that as "your boss should be able to fire you for looking at him funny", and you claim that my position is impossible to understand. Perhaps you're just not very good at this whole "understanding" thing.Bob Gaussington wrote:I was unclear what exactly he was saying. I'm still not entirely clear as to his position. I gave the ways in which a judge may be removed, yet it seems Wong wants something more. Or not.Boyish-Tigerlilly wrote: I think he knows what an independent judiciary is, Gussington. I also don't recall him saying they should be fired at will. He's merely saying they shouldn't have some absolute independence because that's impractical. He's saying there must be some way to remove them if they are incompetent.
I'm just unclear if you know why judges should have extreme job security. You know, the part where I asked if you knew what an independent judiciary was. Post what you mean. In English. Or Engrish.
