![Image](http://unifiedtheory.org.uk/images/Diagram%289-3%29.gif)
Or if it does not load please go direct to unifiedtheory.org.uk/
Caps Lock is not for the win, dumbass ~GR
Moderator: Moderators
Nothing more than meaningless jibberish. I particularly like the way he thinks that if an object floats through space indefinitely as per Newtonian physics, that is an example of "perpetual motion", even though "perpetual motion" refers to efficiency above 100% (something he claims to understand earlier when he complains about the Carnot cycle).Alan Creswell wrote:ISAAC NEWTON ...... universally credited with a theoretical solution for 'The Laws of Gravity'. He made three observations entitled 'Laws of Motion'.No mention of gravity here but he does suggest that PERPETUAL MOTION exists. It also effectively states that PERPETUAL MOTION can be increased or suffocated if the 'object' is subjected to another (plus or minus) external force.1) Every object in a state of uniform motion remains in that state of motion unless an external force is applied to it.Everything starts to go wrong here, because these later external force visitations are by his definition impulse forces and are of an mv nature [Aristotle and Quantum]. The situation can be rescued by making a = w^2 k, a radial rate of change of velocity [centrifugal/centripetal acceleration values]. This move can only be justified if a mass possesses a radius of gyration k and it is made internally dynamic by a wave event of frequency fo such that (2pfo)^2 k = a. This would unify every force within science and make them multiples of the cause and effect of gravity.II) The relationship between an object's mass m, its acceleration a, and the applied force F is F = ma
Physicists accept that all mass is extremely active internally by wave actions. They are clueless as to WHY? It is because all atoms are perpetual motion machines with an input-output of fusion-fission of light. Try to suffocate any mass internal action with an external force ... its frequency and light output will increase. It will go all the way to Oppenheimer's Mc^2.Very true from outside the apple looking in. Not true from inside the apple looking out. Inside the 'free lunch' runs the business. For Heisenberg and Schrodinger Uncertainty and the Cat-in-a-Box. For Newton all matter was God made from 'indestructible but movable material. Solid, massy, hard and impenetrable. Never to wear or break in pieces. All made by God for the purpose of his creation'.III) For every action there is an equal and opposite re-action ......... (Sir Isaac Newton)
A perfect neutrino aether Meccano set by Newton for God. And all God had to do was say "LET THERE BE EVOLUTION BY CONDENSATION". It is all so beautiful that no one can take offense.
Christ, an eight gold star, 44,000 posting Sith Lord. What is a freako Star Wars site doing with a logic thread. You are banned from my life as of right now.Darth Wong wrote:Who wants to bet this is one of those asstards who posts a link to some bullshit website espousing his beliefs and never actually tries to debate them?
Somebody remind me in a week if he never produces a proper explanation and defense of this website's claims. I'll ban the little shit so he can't come back and do it again in a month (which he will, if he follows the typical modus operandi of these little shits).
Don't let the door hit you on the way out.janus20 wrote:Christ, an eight gold star, 44,000 posting Sith Lord. What is a freako Star Wars site doing with a logic thread. You are banned from my life as of right now.Darth Wong wrote:Who wants to bet this is one of those asstards who posts a link to some bullshit website espousing his beliefs and never actually tries to debate them?
Somebody remind me in a week if he never produces a proper explanation and defense of this website's claims. I'll ban the little shit so he can't come back and do it again in a month (which he will, if he follows the typical modus operandi of these little shits).
...janus20 wrote:Christ, an eight gold star, 44,000 posting Sith Lord. What is a freako Star Wars site doing with a logic thread. You are banned from my life as of right now.Darth Wong wrote:Who wants to bet this is one of those asstards who posts a link to some bullshit website espousing his beliefs and never actually tries to debate them?
Somebody remind me in a week if he never produces a proper explanation and defense of this website's claims. I'll ban the little shit so he can't come back and do it again in a month (which he will, if he follows the typical modus operandi of these little shits).