ONE AT-AT vs...

Acclamator · Post by **Acclamator** » 2002-08-03 12:01pm

A single AT-AT

vs

USS Iowa

USS New Jersey

USS Missouri

USS Wisconsin

HIJMS Yamato

HIJMS Musashi

KM Bismarck

KM Tirpitz

HMS Hood

HMS Warspite

HMS Iron Duke

All as they were during WWII. The fact that these ships were on opposite sides of WWII is irrelevant, in this thread they're all on the same side.

Crazy_Vasey · Post by **Crazy_Vasey** » 2002-08-03 12:05pm

Umm that's a little lop sided.

Post by **Mr Bean** » 2002-08-03 12:21pm

As in VERY lopsided?

AT-AT goes down maybe one.. No no casulatles, A full Barrage would put them it down before it got a shot off

Captain Cyran · Post by **Captain Cyran** » 2002-08-03 01:29pm

With that many battleships....I'm sorry but I have to say that AT-AT goes squish.

Howedar · Post by **Howedar** » 2002-08-03 01:30pm

Any one of those could potentially destroy the AT-AT. This is just silly.

Renewed_Valour1 · Post by **Renewed_Valour1** » 2002-08-03 03:03pm

Howedar wrote:Any one of those could potentially destroy the AT-AT. This is just silly.

Even if someone wants to be stupid enough to imply that AT-AT could handle that many broadsides we have one small problem....

It would be in the bottom of a VERY deep crater.

Darth Garden Gnome · Post by **Darth Garden Gnome** » 2002-08-03 03:14pm

Acclamator, there is a line between diffcult, and absurd. This thread has crossed the difficult thread and crossed over to the absurd thread.

Only some one with a total lack of a brain would say an AT-AT even begins to partially have a chance against 11 battleships. AT-AT goes the way of the dodo on this one.

Master of Ossus · Post by **Master of Ossus** » 2002-08-05 10:46pm

The AT-AT can fire over the horizon, but it cannot match the range of the battleships, here.

Jack Lain · Post by **Jack Lain** » 2002-08-05 10:51pm

US Navy. Its a walk. Even if the AT AT gets one ship, it cannot defeat that fleet.

-Jack.