Beautiful ugly spaceships

SF: discuss futuristic sci-fi series, ideas, and crossovers.

Moderator: NecronLord

User avatar
wautd
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7580
Joined: 2004-02-11 10:11am
Location: Intensive care

Beautiful ugly spaceships

Post by wautd »

Personally there are some ships I'll never find beautiful (I'm looking at you Millennium Falcon or Firefly's Serenity), but some designs are so ugly they're beautiful in their own way.

For me, I really like the bulldoggisch look of a Klingon D7/K'Tinga battlecruiser. What are the favorites of you guys?
User avatar
Stofsk
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12925
Joined: 2003-11-10 12:36am

Re: Beautiful ugly spaceships

Post by Stofsk »

The Defiant. Not as pretty, elegant or sophisticated as a lot of other starfleet ships, but goddamn one look at her and you know she means business.
Image
Cowl
Youngling
Posts: 70
Joined: 2012-02-14 02:19pm

Re: Beautiful ugly spaceships

Post by Cowl »

In my opinion the Millenium Falcon would fall exactly into this category, but I would have to agree with you on the Firefly ship. It really does nothing for the senses, and for some reason the design conjures up the image of a beast of burden -- a 'space horse'.

Anyway, my pick would be the Cardassian Galor class. Sturdy looking, ochre-colored and cobra-headed in appearance. It looks like a ship designed for a mining operation.
User avatar
El Moose Monstero
Moose Rebellion Ambassador
Posts: 3743
Joined: 2003-04-30 12:33pm
Location: The Cradle of the Rebellion... Oop Nowrrth, Like...
Contact:

Re: Beautiful ugly spaceships

Post by El Moose Monstero »

Don't know about beautiful, but I always liked the original Red Dwarf, pre-CGI where they changed the engines from a rocket nozzle to some sort of flat panel with multiple exhausts and screwing with the lines.
Image
"...a fountain of mirth, issuing forth from the penis of a cupid..." ~ Dalton / Winner of the 'Frank Hipper Most Horrific Drag EVAR' award - 2004 / The artist formerly known as The_Lumberjack.

Evil Brit Conspiracy: Token Moose Obsessed Kebab Munching Semi Geordie
User avatar
Gunhead
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1715
Joined: 2004-11-15 08:08am

Re: Beautiful ugly spaceships

Post by Gunhead »

FPA ships from LoGh, I think they're kinda clunky looking but in a functional way. But LoGH is pure starship porn anyway. It also contains the most awesome looking ships in all of Scifi too.

-Gunhead
"In the absence of orders, go find something and kill it."
-Generalfeldmarschall Erwin Rommel

"And if you don't wanna feel like a putz
Collect the clues and connect the dots
You'll see the pattern that is bursting your bubble, and it's Bad" -The Hives
User avatar
wautd
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7580
Joined: 2004-02-11 10:11am
Location: Intensive care

Re: Beautiful ugly spaceships

Post by wautd »

Gunhead wrote:FPA ships from LoGh
Yeah, I kind of like their sober, no-nonsense designs. Just a bunch of cannons taped together, a big engine strapped on the back and living quarters somewhere inbetween et voila, a pure killing machine has been born.
User avatar
charlemagne
Jedi Knight
Posts: 924
Joined: 2008-10-13 02:28am
Location: Regensburg, Germany

Re: Beautiful ugly spaceships

Post by charlemagne »

EVE Online is king of ugly ships. Some is just a matter of personal taste, like the asymmetry of ships like the Exequror cruiser, others like the whole Caldari line-up are pure, condensed ugly, I mean just look at the Moa:

Image
Image
User avatar
wautd
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7580
Joined: 2004-02-11 10:11am
Location: Intensive care

Re: Beautiful ugly spaceships

Post by wautd »

charlemagne wrote:EVE Online is king of ugly ships. Some is just a matter of personal taste, like the asymmetry of ships like the Exequror cruiser, others like the whole Caldari line-up are pure, condensed ugly, I mean just look at the Moa:
I always found the Scorpion a sexy beast
User avatar
Ted C
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4486
Joined: 2002-07-07 11:00am
Location: Nashville, TN
Contact:

Re: Beautiful ugly spaceships

Post by Ted C »

Cowl wrote:In my opinion the Millenium Falcon would fall exactly into this category, but I would have to agree with you on the Firefly ship. It really does nothing for the senses, and for some reason the design conjures up the image of a beast of burden -- a 'space horse'.
I actually like Serenity for much the same reasons you dislike her. She's a small freighter, not a luxury yacht, and she looks pretty practical.

Imperial Star Destroyers, B5 Omega-class destroyers, and Colonial Battlestars also have designs that are meant to be functional, not pretty. Quite the opposite of Federation ships in Star Trek and Minbari ships in B5, which sometimes seem to be paying more attention to aesthetics than performance.
"This is supposed to be a happy occasion... Let's not bicker and argue about who killed who."
-- The King of Swamp Castle, Monty Python and the Holy Grail

"Nothing of consequence happened today. " -- Diary of King George III, July 4, 1776

"This is not bad; this is a conspiracy to remove happiness from existence. It seeks to wrap its hedgehog hand around the still beating heart of the personification of good and squeeze until it is stilled."
-- Chuck Sonnenburg on Voyager's "Elogium"
User avatar
Darksider
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5271
Joined: 2002-12-13 02:56pm
Location: America's decaying industrial armpit.

Re: Beautiful ugly spaceships

Post by Darksider »

Ted C wrote: *snip*
Imperial Star Destroyers, .*snip*
Bullshit. If they were designed purely for function they wouldn't have giant bridge towers sticking out begging to be shot off. Don't get me wrong. A Star Destroyer is an impressive bit of ship design, but it's pretty clearly designed to intimidate the Empire's enemies by being large and impressive rather than being purely practical.

In terms of SW designs, i'd actually say the Mon Calamari cruisers are more practical than Star Destroyer-variant ships. They're essentially one solid mass, with no obvious bits hanging off them. Which fits with in-universe descriptions of them being more durable than ISDs.
And this is why you don't watch anything produced by Ronald D. Moore after he had his brain surgically removed and replaced with a bag of elephant semen.-Gramzamber, on why Caprica sucks
User avatar
The Romulan Republic
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 21559
Joined: 2008-10-15 01:37am

Re: Beautiful ugly spaceships

Post by The Romulan Republic »

The TARDIS. Something that looks like a police phone box should not make such a beautiful space ship.
User avatar
Eternal_Freedom
Castellan
Posts: 10379
Joined: 2010-03-09 02:16pm
Location: CIC, Battlestar Temeraire

Re: Beautiful ugly spaceships

Post by Eternal_Freedom »

The Romulan Republic wrote:The TARDIS. Something that looks like a police phone box should not make such a beautiful space ship.
Most definitely this.
Baltar: "I don't want to miss a moment of the last Battlestar's destruction!"
Centurion: "Sir, I really think you should look at the other Battlestar."
Baltar: "What are you babbling about other...it's impossible!"
Centurion: "No. It is a Battlestar."

Corrax Entry 7:17: So you walk eternally through the shadow realms, standing against evil where all others falter. May your thirst for retribution never quench, may the blood on your sword never dry, and may we never need you again.
Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 30165
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: Beautiful ugly spaceships

Post by Simon_Jester »

Darksider wrote:Bullshit. If they were designed purely for function they wouldn't have giant bridge towers sticking out begging to be shot off. Don't get me wrong. A Star Destroyer is an impressive bit of ship design, but it's pretty clearly designed to intimidate the Empire's enemies by being large and impressive rather than being purely practical.
I don't think I agree.

The point about the aesthetic isn't "this is the most efficient ship design I or anyone else can imagine." It's a question of the look.

Take a Star Wars ship like the Naboo fighters and yacht. It's pretty obvious that the designer of a ship like that started by thinking "how do we want this to look," then figured out how to fit the necessary parts into the hullform he wanted.

Whereas the ISD looks like someone wanted a warship. It's got that exposed bridge tower, which is a weak point- but if we don't get all obsessive over EU details, we don't know why the bridge tower is there. The obvious design inspiration for the ISD is World War-era warships, which bristle with large and small weapon turrets... and have big exposed superstructures, because those superstructures are needed for the ship to fight effectively.

The first time someone sees an ISD, they won't think "ahha, weak exposed bridge tower, stupid flashy design." They see something big and blocky and ungraceful and heavily armed- it looks functionalist in design, even if there are some questionable choices made about how the ship is laid out.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
User avatar
gigabytelord
Padawan Learner
Posts: 473
Joined: 2011-08-23 07:49pm
Location: Chicago IL. formerly Livingston TX.

Re: Beautiful ugly spaceships

Post by gigabytelord »

wautd wrote:I always found the Scorpion a sexy beast
Good choice but I'm a big fan on the Rohk, after the last expansion all those rail guns not only look awesome but their actually useful now, not that I get to use them anymore :(

I always thought it looked like a big ass space shotgun, in fact I even named one my ships that.
Cowl
Youngling
Posts: 70
Joined: 2012-02-14 02:19pm

Re: Beautiful ugly spaceships

Post by Cowl »

Ted C wrote:I actually like Serenity for much the same reasons you dislike her. She's a small freighter, not a luxury yacht, and she looks pretty practical.
The design of the ship is not very enticing, even from a purely utilitarian standpoint. Apparently the writers wanted a ship that would spark up when launching into FTL mode, hence the class description as 'Firefly'. That's more gimmicky, in opposed to practical.
Imperial Star Destroyers, B5 Omega-class destroyers, and Colonial Battlestars also have designs that are meant to be functional, not pretty. Quite the opposite of Federation ships in Star Trek and Minbari ships in B5, which sometimes seem to be paying more attention to aesthetics than performance.
Omega-class destroyers are indeed aesthetically pleasing.
Gigabytelord wrote:Good choice but I'm a big fan on the Rohk, after the last expansion all those rail guns not only look awesome but their actually useful now, not that I get to use them anymore :(
Just watched two episodes of Legend of Galactic Heroes, and the ship design of the Rohk appears to be very similar. Of course it also looks like a train, so that isn't saying much. :wink:
User avatar
PREDATOR490
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1790
Joined: 2006-03-13 08:04am
Location: Scotland

Re: Beautiful ugly spaceships

Post by PREDATOR490 »

Throw in Stargate X304s

Not really pretty but they do seem rather effective. Since EVE Online Rokh is brought up... the X304 could easily end up fitting right in with the Caldari Navy Pre-Plasma beams.
User avatar
Metahive
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2795
Joined: 2010-09-02 09:08am
Location: Little Korea in Big Germany

Re: Beautiful ugly spaceships

Post by Metahive »

Darksider wrote:Don't get me wrong. A Star Destroyer is an impressive bit of ship design, but it's pretty clearly designed to intimidate the Empire's enemies by being large and impressive rather than being purely practical.
All of its predecessors looked the same way, including the ones used by the Republic. I think it's just that KDY utilizes the "slice of cake"-setup for brand recognition.
People at birth are naturally good. Their natures are similar, but their habits make them different from each other.
-Sanzi Jing (Three Character Classic)

Saddam’s crime was so bad we literally spent decades looking for our dropped monocles before we could harumph up the gumption to address it
-User Indigo Jump on Pharyngula

O God, please don't let me die today, tomorrow would be so much better!
-Traditional Spathi morning prayer
User avatar
Eternal_Freedom
Castellan
Posts: 10379
Joined: 2010-03-09 02:16pm
Location: CIC, Battlestar Temeraire

Re: Beautiful ugly spaceships

Post by Eternal_Freedom »

PREDATOR490 wrote:Throw in Stargate X304s

Not really pretty but they do seem rather effective. Since EVE Online Rokh is brought up... the X304 could easily end up fitting right in with the Caldari Navy Pre-Plasma beams.
OH yes. The 304's have a definite vote. They have a wonderfully military look to them. The Ha'taks look showy bu the Daedalus and her sisters look all buisiness.
Baltar: "I don't want to miss a moment of the last Battlestar's destruction!"
Centurion: "Sir, I really think you should look at the other Battlestar."
Baltar: "What are you babbling about other...it's impossible!"
Centurion: "No. It is a Battlestar."

Corrax Entry 7:17: So you walk eternally through the shadow realms, standing against evil where all others falter. May your thirst for retribution never quench, may the blood on your sword never dry, and may we never need you again.
User avatar
Ahriman238
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4854
Joined: 2011-04-22 11:04pm
Location: Ocularis Terribus.

Re: Beautiful ugly spaceships

Post by Ahriman238 »

More specifically on the Firefly example, they wanted Serenity to look vaguely like an insect. Something that could sting and annoy the mighty Alliance, but never deliver a decisive blow.

The X-wing games had a series of freighters that were basically frames for holding a number of generic and interchangeable cargo containers to an engine.
"Any plan which requires the direct intervention of any deity to work can be assumed to be a very poor one."- Newbiespud
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16350
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Seriously thinking about moving to Marvel because so much of the DCEU stinks

Re: Beautiful ugly spaceships

Post by Batman »

When did 'practical' enter the debate? Yes, the Star Destroyer exposed bridge isn't exactly the smartest design decision ever, but neither is the offset cockpit of the YT-1300 or any starship actually having bridge windows. I thought this was about looks.
I like the ISDs- 'Yeah, we're definitely the Bad Guys'-, the Battlestars (I still think nBSG stinks but visually, their Battlestars worked)-'Yeah, I'm ugly, but I'm a Valendamned vessel of war, and sometimes we're ugly'-and the B5 Omega-'Yes, I'm ugly, and the rotating section makes no rational sense, but tell me I don't look like I mean business.'
Also, Serenity. She's a working ship and she looks like it.

Heck prior to the PT there were no pretty Wars ships. With the possible exception of the A-Wing, name me one OT Wars ship that actually looks sleek.
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
User avatar
gigabytelord
Padawan Learner
Posts: 473
Joined: 2011-08-23 07:49pm
Location: Chicago IL. formerly Livingston TX.

Re: Beautiful ugly spaceships

Post by gigabytelord »

I'll throw a vote in for Galactica being a beautiful, mean looking ship that was clearly designed to hand out very large cans of pure unadulterated whoop-ass to all those who dared to stand against her, and she was designed fairly intelligently to boot :)
That being said, I simply can't say she was ugly.
User avatar
Terralthra
Requiescat in Pace
Posts: 4741
Joined: 2007-10-05 09:55pm
Location: San Francisco, California, United States

Re: Beautiful ugly spaceships

Post by Terralthra »

Batman wrote:With the possible exception of the A-Wing, name me one OT Wars ship that actually looks sleek.
The Lambda-class shuttles, the Nebulon-B escort frigate, the Slave I (modified Firespray 31-class patrol craft), hell, even the Gallofree medium transports (Hoth escape) and the Mon Cal cruisers from the Battle over Endor, especially the Liberty-type.
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16350
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Seriously thinking about moving to Marvel because so much of the DCEU stinks

Re: Beautiful ugly spaceships

Post by Batman »

You gotta be kidding me. Have you looked at the belly of the Gallowfree? The top might look sleek but the bottom-not so much. I'll give you the Mon Cals, they're pretty sleek looking designs, but both the Lambdas and the Nebulon B look just as angular as the rest of the OT ships. And Slave I managed to create a whole new subset of ugly all on its own.
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
User avatar
Darth Tedious
Jedi Master
Posts: 1082
Joined: 2011-01-16 08:48pm

Re: Beautiful ugly spaceships

Post by Darth Tedious »

I've said it before and I'll say it again:
Old-school Borg cubes.
Simple geometry. Ugly as shit.

But... the... GREEBLIES.

"Oh my God, it's full of greeblies!"

And on that note, the Monoliths. Same concept, but the opposite extreme.

Just an aside: Does everyone remember the Spaceship of the Imagination (from Sagan's Cosmos TV series)? That was a pretty ship... DANDELION IN SPAAACE!!!
"Darth Tedious just showed why women can go anywhere they want because they are, in effect, mobile kitchens." - RazorOutlaw

"That could never happen because super computers." - Stark

"Don't go there girl! Talk to the VTOL cause the glass canopy ain't listening!" - Shroomy
User avatar
Terralthra
Requiescat in Pace
Posts: 4741
Joined: 2007-10-05 09:55pm
Location: San Francisco, California, United States

Re: Beautiful ugly spaceships

Post by Terralthra »

Batman wrote:You gotta be kidding me. Have you looked at the belly of the Gallowfree? The top might look sleek but the bottom-not so much. I'll give you the Mon Cals, they're pretty sleek looking designs, but both the Lambdas and the Nebulon B look just as angular as the rest of the OT ships. And Slave I managed to create a whole new subset of ugly all on its own.
Maybe you and I mean something different by sleek. I mean definition 3b: having trim graceful lines. Something can have straight lines and angles on it while still being sleek. I'd call F-14 Tomcats, F-15 Eagles, and F-16 Fighting Falcons all "sleek" to varying degrees, despite a number of straight lines, angles, and hard edges.
Post Reply