Yes, I'm optimistic that people actually read stickies.
![Crying or Very sad :cry:](./images/smilies/icon_cry.gif)
Moderator: NecronLord
Because useless Chaos players can't win a campaign to save their lives, even with a numerical and technological superiority. You want to bad mouth Abbadon, start with the Chaos players who keep losing.Stark wrote:'why is Abbadon such a hopeless loser'.
Didn't Chaos actually start well in the EoT campaign and it was only a last minute winning streak by the Forces of Order that prevented Cadia from falling? I know the attacks on Caliban and The Webway were repelled easily, but I'm sure the main battle was almost won by Chaos because from the start they were organised and knew how to use the way the tournament worked to take control of systems.Lost Soal wrote:Because useless Chaos players can't win a campaign to save their lives, even with a numerical and technological superiority. You want to bad mouth Abbadon, start with the Chaos players who keep losing.Stark wrote:'why is Abbadon such a hopeless loser'.
I would be all in support of that. As cool as I'm sure Wankhammer 40,000 is, it's not my cup o'tea, and I wouldn't mind not having to sort through a dozen threads just to read about something cool. Actually, if I could be so bold, I would propose eliminating the PST and STvSW forums, as they seem to have served their purpose, merge all threads into OSF, then create two new sf forums. One would be the aforementioned WH40K one, the other would be devoted to the Sci-Fi channel's originals; the Stargates and BSG. There's not much on the latter right now, but come July I guarantee a wildfire of activity. Of course, not all topics would be moved to their pertinent forums, that would require a large amount of effort, but current and new ones certainly could be.Elheru Aran wrote:Another option that I've floated in the chat and elsewhere is a subforum for 40K that could be included in here. The software's not difficult; our own Destructionator 13 worked it out for phpBB.