Congratulations, Game of Thrones. You've done it! You've officially crossed into porn land!This video has been removed as a violation of YouTube's policy on nudity or sexual content.
Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin
Moderator: Steve
Congratulations, Game of Thrones. You've done it! You've officially crossed into porn land!This video has been removed as a violation of YouTube's policy on nudity or sexual content.
Having to literally stand on the back of a fool to the peals of laughter of the entire wedding party is hardly "light ribbing", but the reason I find it a good change is because its quite simply petty and pointless, and Sansa knew it was too in the book and felt ashamed. Because we don't get her inner monologue and it'd be very hard to act in such a way so that is clear to the audience, it is much better to cut the scene in half to get the best of both worlds.Scrib wrote: Tyrion was going to have to consummate his marriage. Regardless of how he bad he feels the entire event was created to give him a chance to use his penis on Sansa. Sure, he looks like he feels bad but not bad enough to call off the marriage (which he at least offered to do in the books, no matter what you think of his motives). He's already bent to pressure once and this is a culture that pretty much walks the bride and groom right into the bed.But oh, Sansa should really realise that this its not about her! Her concern should be with the Lannister lord that is helping his family weasel their way into her ancestral home. He had no choice!
Not to mention that to a child the cries of a grown-up about how he really has no choice but to tie himself to the heir to Winterfell and deny her possible escape are going to ring hollow.
It's perhaps a good change because we can't see Sansa's inner monologue but I think that her thoughts here made perfect sense. None of them give that much of a shit about her so why should she spare them mockery? They want to take everything from her, even the "nice" Tyrion is participating.No matter what he says he's taking part. So if the only way she can strike back when her life is being chipped away is to make Tyrion feel a bit uncomfortable then okay. The tiny rebellion is all she has left. A bit impolitic but totally understandable.
I have to wonder if the backlash you see on the Westeros forums is because she did it at all or that she did it to the fan favorite Tyrion who had his own self-pitying POV where he whined about how the girl being married to people trying to murder her family and use her as a broodmare couldn't spare him a little light ribbing. He was such a Nice Guy(TM) right?
When one is faced with the knowledge that their wishes and dreams and hopes are utterly irrelevant all that's left to them is the petty and pointless actions. Sure,as a good person Sansa feels bad, but really it's difficult to feel bad for the Lannisters as a whole here.Vympel wrote:Having to literally stand on the back of a fool to the peals of laughter of the entire wedding party is hardly "light ribbing", but the reason I find it a good change is because its quite simply petty and pointless, and Sansa knew it was too in the book and felt ashamed.Scrib wrote: Tyrion was going to have to consummate his marriage. Regardless of how he bad he feels the entire event was created to give him a chance to use his penis on Sansa. Sure, he looks like he feels bad but not bad enough to call off the marriage (which he at least offered to do in the books, no matter what you think of his motives). He's already bent to pressure once and this is a culture that pretty much walks the bride and groom right into the bed.But oh, Sansa should really realise that this its not about her! Her concern should be with the Lannister lord that is helping his family weasel their way into her ancestral home. He had no choice!
Not to mention that to a child the cries of a grown-up about how he really has no choice but to tie himself to the heir to Winterfell and deny her possible escape are going to ring hollow.
It's perhaps a good change because we can't see Sansa's inner monologue but I think that her thoughts here made perfect sense. None of them give that much of a shit about her so why should she spare them mockery? They want to take everything from her, even the "nice" Tyrion is participating.No matter what he says he's taking part. So if the only way she can strike back when her life is being chipped away is to make Tyrion feel a bit uncomfortable then okay. The tiny rebellion is all she has left. A bit impolitic but totally understandable.
I have to wonder if the backlash you see on the Westeros forums is because she did it at all or that she did it to the fan favorite Tyrion who had his own self-pitying POV where he whined about how the girl being married to people trying to murder her family and use her as a broodmare couldn't spare him a little light ribbing. He was such a Nice Guy(TM) right?
Yeah, they shift the blame unto Joff, who is basically a sponge that soaks up the shitty deeds the writers don't have the courage to let their characters do.Because we don't get her inner monologue and it'd be very hard to act in such a way so that is clear to the audience, it is much better to cut the scene in half to get the best of both worlds.
This is an issue on the Westeros forums, with the camps being split between those who think that Sansa is a bitch and shouldn't have done it and those that think her actions were understandable or that considering her a bitch for it is going a bit too far. It's nowhere near contentious as the argument about whether Cat is a bitch for not treating Jon as her child but it was there-or it was when I frequented the forum.I'm not sure what backlash you're referring to - the only whining I've seen (not on westeros, elsewhere) is that it wasn't exactly like the book..
Ahriman238 wrote:I'd thought the first bedding ceremony with the witnesses was purely a royal tradition, so if the wife was barren there were witnesses that the problem was with her and not because His Grace couldn't get it up?
Why would this line of reasoning not apply to the other lords? They're in the exact same position.Ahriman238 wrote: I'd thought the first bedding ceremony with the witnesses was purely a royal tradition, so if the wife was barren there were witnesses that the problem was with her and not because His Grace couldn't get it up?
No particular reason, I've just only ever heard of the practice in relation to royals.Scrib wrote:Why would this line of reasoning not apply to the other lords? They're in the exact same position.Ahriman238 wrote: I'd thought the first bedding ceremony with the witnesses was purely a royal tradition, so if the wife was barren there were witnesses that the problem was with her and not because His Grace couldn't get it up?
Sure? It's been a while, but I seem to remember-Thanas wrote:Spoiler
Your memory is a little offAhriman238 wrote: Spoiler
.... but they did gain one Spoilerfgalkin wrote:....And the main cast has just gotten a lot smaller.
Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin
The same thing that started the whole thing? The Rains? But then,it was playing for most of the last ten minutes. SpoilerCaptHawkeye wrote:No music playing for the episode credits. What would fit after all?
When you're that old, "carpe diem" takes on an entirely new meaning.Flagg wrote:"I'll get another one."
The Rains were a signal to the men outside to start the massacre. It necessarily takes them a while to get in position.Vaporous wrote: might have been too much of a gap between "Rains" kicking in and the crossbow bolts firing. .
That's a good justification in universe. Didn't think of that.fgalkin wrote:The Rains were a signal to the men outside to start the massacre. It necessarily takes them a while to get in position.Vaporous wrote: might have been too much of a gap between "Rains" kicking in and the crossbow bolts firing. .
It's supposed to be "Jamie Lannister sends his regards". It's a joke on his part since the last thing Jamie says to Bolton before leaving is "Give Robb Stark my regards".Vaporous wrote:
Also, Bolton's "The Lannisters send their regards" felt rushed.