Big News Week for Sci Fi -- St vs. Star Wars ends

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

Locked
Tommy J
Jedi Master
Posts: 1284
Joined: 2004-08-20 09:02am
Contact:

Big News Week for Sci Fi -- St vs. Star Wars ends

Post by Tommy J »

Well folks the irony of it all especially for StarDestoryer.net.

StarTrek ends its 18 year run next Friday and Star Wars the final chapter comes to the big screen. They both made the news today, and have this week as noted below.

I'm posting it here, well because it is news.

I'm sad, glad, and excited. I've planned all along to watch the final few episodes of Star Trek, and was pleasantly suprised by the Mirror Darkly two parter. And I plan to watch tonights episode, even though last week's zenophobic plot was kind of lame.

I have my tickets purchased electronically to see Star Wars at an Imax theatre next Saturday and will watch next Friday night the end of the long ST journey.

Like Star Trek or hate it, Like Star Wars or hate it; it's a big coming week for Sci-fi.

What are you plans? What of all the news about these two series?

For me, the reviews have been outstanding for the Wars film-I cannot wait. I'm just hoping that it won't be anti-climatic. As for Star Trek, I'm glad it's ending. Time to move on. I was a junior in highschool when Next Gen started and it was the best sci-fi at the time. And when they brought in the Borg it was must see TV.

But, I'm no longer in high school. ST never grew up while I did. Forunately, Star Wars did. From all accounts this is the most 'mature' of all the films. No Jar-Jar, better acting, and a darker more adult theme. About time.

Goodbye Star Trek and after I see it Star Wars, It's been a lot of fun!!



Image

Image



MSNBC.com

‘Trek’ has drifted since ‘Next Generation’
Departing ‘Enterprise’ didn’t capture magic
COMMENTARY
By Andy Dehnart
MSNBC contributor
Updated: 4:03 p.m. ET May 12, 2005

Every day after middle school, I'd make popcorn and sprawl out on the living-room carpet. Impatiently, I'd wait for the screen to darken and the following words to escape Patrick Stewart's lips: "Space. The final frontier. These are the voyages of the starship Enterprise. Its continuing mission: to explore strange new worlds, to seek out new life and new civilizations, to boldly go where no one has gone before."

After he spoke, the Enterprise banked and shot into warp drive, and a new world unfolded on-screen for the next hour, minus commercial interruptions. Those words began an hour of escape.

"Star Trek: The Next Generation" was appointment TV for me, and I was deeply fascinated by the show: A poster of the ship hung on my wall for many years. I browsed through a book outlining the ship's schematics. I used primitive graphic design software on the public library's computer to try to copy the graphic design of the displays on the ship's bridge. I had a plastic phaser and a communicator pin and two Star Trek Christmas tree ornaments. The very first CD I bought had the "Next Generation" theme on it.

Why, in my early teens, I was drawn into a utopian universe full of possibility and promises of a better, kinder tomorrow isn't a big mystery. Still, in retrospect, these things sound weird and obsessive, and obsessively weird. And when I attended a Star Trek convention with a friend a few years ago, I felt strangely out of place, and not just because there were Klingons everywhere. My interest in the show came and went, and has never returned with as much force as it had when "Star Trek: The Next Generation" was being broadcast.

Thus, when the franchise comes to an end Friday — as the final two episodes of "Enterprise" air on UPN — I probably won't even watch. I just don't care, and haven't, really, since "Next Generation" ended.

‘Trek’ has moved away from original themes
Although there's certainly plenty of consternation about the series' conclusion, the end (for now) of Star Trek is long overdue. Television's most prolific science fiction franchise has, over the last 18 years, moved away from the original two series' basic themes: exploration, escapism, and the promise of a better tomorrow. And thus the three most recent series just haven't held up to the standards set by the first two.

On some level, all "Star Trek" series were about exploration. But none of the series that followed "The Next Generation" captured the magic that it managed to produce week after week. Each series — "Star Trek: Deep Space Nine," "Star Trek: Voyager," and "Star Trek: Enterprise" — told its stories with varying degrees of success.

However, those three versions grounded themselves in a more gritty, realistic version of the future. While the writers and production designers deserve credit for offering worlds that were perhaps slightly more believable, they lost the fantastic, wondrous approach to space travel that "The Next Generation" borrowed from the original "Star Trek" and then perfected.

"Voyager" was too obsessed with the idea of returning home, and of course the immobile "Deep Space Nine" never really went anywhere. Both of them felt far too much like our world, not a utopian, even unrealistic future. On "Next Generation," viewers really felt like they were exploring uncharted space alongside the crew.

"Enterprise"'s concept seemed to reconnect with the idea of exploration, but aesthetically, it didn't fit into the Star Trek universe. The ship is too modern, even despite its beams and hard edges. Ironically, because "Enterprise" doesn't look anything like its rapidly aging grandparent, it feels false, an impostor pretending to precede a series it clearly comes long after. A Commodore 128 plugged into a TV set feels more futuristic than the flashing lights of the original NCC-1701, and thus "Enterprise" found itself in an impossible position: appeal to audiences in the 21st century while looking like a 1960s vision of the 22nd century.

"Star Trek: The Next Generation" found this balance with a sleek ship and slightly more idealized human inhabitants. Still, the series was far from flawless, almost shifting into full-on camp mode at times. The early episodes now appear almost comical. They have the feel of high school actors navigating sets constructed in 15 minutes with spray-painted refrigerator boxes; Data's caked-on makeup resembled a robotic Tammy Faye Baker.

Yet the cast managed to move beyond the constraints of late 1980s production design, and there's no doubt that much of that is attributable to Patrick Stewart's presence. As Captain Jean-Luc Picard, he brought the full force of his stage acting experience, and helped make many of the stories feel like Shakespearean dramas set in space.

The other actors also added weight to the show, although many took time to find and feel comfortable as their characters.

Troi's stilted dialogue gradually improved, and Worf eventually learned how to be more than a 24th century Ryan Atwood, doing more than brooding and fighting. Even teenage Wesley Crusher and android Data grew up over time.

"Star Trek: The Next Generation" became the realization of the Trek universe's ideals, an imperfect but post-apocalyptic world where adventure and exploration were the primary goals. The episodes posed serious questions, starting with the pilot, in which Q forced Captain Picard to defend humanity against its sins. These themes weren't always introduced subtly or gracefully, but they fit into the universe that had been created.

While later Trek series picked up on similar themes, none had the distinct combination of elements that made "The Next Generation" so watchable.

Although no Trek series are currently in development, ideas floated for future series include a focus on Starfleet Academy.

That might be a good idea for a typical drama, but it's not the right way to bring back Trek. The only real way to resuscitate Star Trek is to focus on exploring space in a future after the U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701-D's time. Otherwise, it's better to end the series now, at least until there's a way to recapture what "Star Trek: The Next Generation" used to bring into our living rooms.

Andy Dehnart is a writer and teacher who publishes reality blurred, a daily summary of reality TV.
© 2005 MSNBC Interactive

© 2005 MSNBC.com

URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7819103/
The sixth film in George Lucas' epic sci-fi series, Star Wars: Episode III is the final entry in the prequel trilogy that began with 1999's Star Wars: Episode I -- The Phantom Menace. Set three years after the events of Star Wars: Episode II -- Attack of the Clones, this film chronicles the downfall of the Republic as the Clone Wars rage on and Anakin Skywalker (Hayden Christensen) makes the transition to the dark side of the force, becoming Sith Lord Darth Vader (voiced by James Earl Jones). The events of this film are those that preceded the original Star Wars film, later retitled Star Wars: Episode IV -- A New Hope, and some characters from that film make appearances here in younger forms, including Chewbacca (Peter Mayhew) and infants Leia and Luke Skywalker. ~ Matthew Tobey, All Movie Guide

READERS' REVIEWS Report a Problem Post | Posting Policy | FAQ
Average Reader Rating (4.1 stars, 51 votes)
Number of Reviews: 5

Write Review Rate This
MOST HELPFUL READER REVIEW
Lucas Redeemed!, May 8, 2005

Reviewer: biscuit2k
When I asked the reviewer sitting next to me to sum up Revenge of the Sith, he simply said "great!" That seemed to basically be the consensus of virtually everyone in attendance at an advance press screening of the final chapter in the Star Wars saga. There are no real spoilers in ROTS. Everyone basically knows what happens in Episode 4: A New Hope. We all know Anakin becomes Vader. We know Obi Wan lives and we know Luke and Leia are born. What we don't know is how Lucas weaves those story lines into the large, six-part opus and better yet, why? No, it's not a perfect movie. There are those moments that make us cringe. Bad dialog and High School drama class acting make for a few awkward moments where you can hear audible moans and giggles in the audience, but we have come to expect this from modern Star Wars films. The upside is that these moments are rare in Episode III. Fortunately, we have one savior to rely on for stellar acting. Mr. Ian McDiarmid as Supreme Chancellor Palpatine. McDiarmid brings the elegance of an Alec Guiness back to the franchise in a knockout performance that leaves the audience riveted and exhausted. From an acting standpoint, he is the lifeblood of the film. Here's to Mr. Lucas for giving us all something spectacular to remember for our entire lives that embodies the whole point of going to the movies in the first place, to escape and lose ourselves in another world.
User avatar
GrandMasterTerwynn
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6787
Joined: 2002-07-29 06:14pm
Location: Somewhere on Earth.

Post by GrandMasterTerwynn »

Can we say "duh"? It's only been a topic of discussion here since . . . ohh, the last three months. There are a multitude of threads discussing these very two topics in the Pure Star Wars and Pure Star Trek forums.
Tommy J
Jedi Master
Posts: 1284
Joined: 2004-08-20 09:02am
Contact:

Post by Tommy J »

GrandMasterTerwynn wrote:Can we say "duh"? It's only been a topic of discussion here since . . . ohh, the last three months. There are a multitude of threads discussing these very two topics in the Pure Star Wars and Pure Star Trek forums.
A mod can kill it if they want. It's just been all over the news, and hit me today because both shows made the newspaper's living section today.
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

Since this is like posting "News just in: evolution real!" on a board full of Nature subscribers, the thread will die.

But, just so you know, there are the two series planned for SW in the future. Though yes, it is the end of the main saga, so it is quite humbling to see two of the biggest sci-fi franchises finally end (ST on a very low note however).

Et fin.

Image
Locked