Queen Elizabeth II

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

User avatar
Jub
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4396
Joined: 2012-08-06 07:58pm
Location: British Columbia, Canada

Re: Queen Elizabeth II

Post by Jub »

Ralin wrote: 2022-09-10 10:53am
His Divine Shadow wrote: 2022-09-10 10:51am Man some people just love to suck the dick of the people making everything in the world worse for everyone.
I guess Wong was wrong all those years back. There really is such a thing as being too righteous to understand.
Can you do anything that doesn't involve licking the boots of people wealthier and/or more well respected than you are?
User avatar
His Divine Shadow
Commence Primary Ignition
Posts: 12726
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
Location: Finland, west coast

Re: Queen Elizabeth II

Post by His Divine Shadow »

Just to derail completely, but not really because I bet the queen was a billionaire, the channel "second thought" is a good channel and has several videos on billionaires and their effect on society.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=316nOvHUS8A
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who did not.
User avatar
LadyTevar
White Mage
White Mage
Posts: 23145
Joined: 2003-02-12 10:59pm

Re: Queen Elizabeth II

Post by LadyTevar »

ENOUGH.
Back on Topic.
Image
Nitram, slightly high on cough syrup: Do you know you're beautiful?
Me: Nope, that's why I have you around to tell me.
Nitram: You -are- beautiful. Anyone tries to tell you otherwise kill them.

"A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. LLAP" -- Leonard Nimoy, last Tweet
User avatar
Jub
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4396
Joined: 2012-08-06 07:58pm
Location: British Columbia, Canada

Re: Queen Elizabeth II

Post by Jub »

Bets on how long it'll be before Charles is feeding the worms alongside Liz?
User avatar
Gandalf
SD.net White Wizard
Posts: 16285
Joined: 2002-09-16 11:13pm
Location: A video store in Australia

Re: Queen Elizabeth II

Post by Gandalf »

Jub wrote: 2022-09-10 11:21am Bets on how long it'll be before Charles is feeding the worms alongside Liz?
He's mid seventies and has had a life of solid privilege, so he'll probably get a good decade or so?
"Oh no, oh yeah, tell me how can it be so fair
That we dying younger hiding from the police man over there
Just for breathing in the air they wanna leave me in the chair
Electric shocking body rocking beat streeting me to death"

- A.B. Original, Report to the Mist

"I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately."
- George Carlin
bilateralrope
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5938
Joined: 2005-06-25 06:50pm
Location: New Zealand

Re: Queen Elizabeth II

Post by bilateralrope »

The palace bees have been notified of her death

Because that's a thing that happens.
User avatar
Jub
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4396
Joined: 2012-08-06 07:58pm
Location: British Columbia, Canada

Re: Queen Elizabeth II

Post by Jub »

Gandalf wrote: 2022-09-10 11:22am
Jub wrote: 2022-09-10 11:21am Bets on how long it'll be before Charles is feeding the worms alongside Liz?
He's mid seventies and has had a life of solid privilege, so he'll probably get a good decade or so?
One can hope the stress of his new role starts that clock ticking faster.
User avatar
LadyTevar
White Mage
White Mage
Posts: 23145
Joined: 2003-02-12 10:59pm

Re: Queen Elizabeth II

Post by LadyTevar »

Gandalf wrote: 2022-09-10 11:22am
Jub wrote: 2022-09-10 11:21am Bets on how long it'll be before Charles is feeding the worms alongside Liz?
He's mid seventies and has had a life of solid privilege, so he'll probably get a good decade or so?
A better question, that came from my Mother -- How long til he steps down and lets William take over?

I think we'll have King Charles for 10-15 years, until William's kids are teens/twenties, and old enough to start attending Royal Functions, take over Royal Patronages, etc.
Then again, he might reign til he dies, which will be at least 25 years depending on his health. That would make him 98, while his father died at 99.

Either way, I'm expecting a new King within my lifetime.
Image
Nitram, slightly high on cough syrup: Do you know you're beautiful?
Me: Nope, that's why I have you around to tell me.
Nitram: You -are- beautiful. Anyone tries to tell you otherwise kill them.

"A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. LLAP" -- Leonard Nimoy, last Tweet
Crazedwraith
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11863
Joined: 2003-04-10 03:45pm
Location: Cheshire, England

Re: Queen Elizabeth II

Post by Crazedwraith »

Abdication simply to retire and let the new generation take over isn't really the tradition of the British Monarchy as we an see from QEII. I expect Charles III will follow her example and do it as long as possible.
User avatar
Gandalf
SD.net White Wizard
Posts: 16285
Joined: 2002-09-16 11:13pm
Location: A video store in Australia

Re: Queen Elizabeth II

Post by Gandalf »

Also, with the possible growing strength of the republican movement, maybe Charles could be the last king.
"Oh no, oh yeah, tell me how can it be so fair
That we dying younger hiding from the police man over there
Just for breathing in the air they wanna leave me in the chair
Electric shocking body rocking beat streeting me to death"

- A.B. Original, Report to the Mist

"I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately."
- George Carlin
User avatar
LadyTevar
White Mage
White Mage
Posts: 23145
Joined: 2003-02-12 10:59pm

Re: Queen Elizabeth II

Post by LadyTevar »

bilateralrope wrote: 2022-09-10 11:23am The palace bees have been notified of her death

Because that's a thing that happens.
The Bee-boy's Song
Kipling's poem in "Puck of Pook's Hill" was the first time I'd ever heard of the custom.

So many old rituals that we don't even remember WHY they're done, but they're done because it's Ritual, and you don't want something bad to happen because you forgot to do it.

The black mourning ribbons are a nice touch.
Image
Nitram, slightly high on cough syrup: Do you know you're beautiful?
Me: Nope, that's why I have you around to tell me.
Nitram: You -are- beautiful. Anyone tries to tell you otherwise kill them.

"A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. LLAP" -- Leonard Nimoy, last Tweet
Crazedwraith
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11863
Joined: 2003-04-10 03:45pm
Location: Cheshire, England

Re: Queen Elizabeth II

Post by Crazedwraith »

Gandalf wrote: 2022-09-10 11:38am Also, with the possible growing strength of the republican movement, maybe Charles could be the last king.
Possibly? William and Kate are pretty popular.

I don't think the UK's going to cease being a monarchy any time soon. I expect there will be lot of commonwealth countries that will stop having the monarchy and go to their own head of state first though.
User avatar
LadyTevar
White Mage
White Mage
Posts: 23145
Joined: 2003-02-12 10:59pm

Re: Queen Elizabeth II

Post by LadyTevar »

Gandalf wrote: 2022-09-10 11:38am Also, with the possible growing strength of the republican movement, maybe Charles could be the last king.
I've been hearing "Charles will be the last" for DECADES. Started after he split with Diana. Got worse after her death.

I doubt it will go that far. The Commonwealth might elect their own Heads of State, but England will cling to the Royalty for some time yet
Image
Nitram, slightly high on cough syrup: Do you know you're beautiful?
Me: Nope, that's why I have you around to tell me.
Nitram: You -are- beautiful. Anyone tries to tell you otherwise kill them.

"A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. LLAP" -- Leonard Nimoy, last Tweet
User avatar
Zaune
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7430
Joined: 2010-06-21 11:05am
Location: In Transit
Contact:

Re: Queen Elizabeth II

Post by Zaune »

LadyTevar wrote: 2022-09-10 11:43amThe Commonwealth might elect their own Heads of State, but England will cling to the Royalty for some time yet.
And why not? It's not like we haven't spent at least the past twelve years electing people who are even bloody worse.
There are hardly any excesses of the most crazed psychopath that cannot easily be duplicated by a normal kindly family man who just comes in to work every day and has a job to do.
-- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods)


Replace "ginger" with "n*gger," and suddenly it become a lot less funny, doesn't it?
-- fgalkin


Like my writing? Tip me on Patreon

I Have A Blog
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27375
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Re: Queen Elizabeth II

Post by NecronLord »

Zaune wrote: 2022-09-10 03:48pm And why not? It's not like we haven't spent at least the past twelve years electing people who are even bloody worse.
There are some arguments to be said that the paralysis of having a constitutional monarch who can act openly once and only once as a head of state means you don't have a balance against the prime-ministerial executive constantly expanding its power.

People often knee-jerk to 'the US President is a terrible model and we'd get that' but I think the Irish President, who has functionally the same role as the queen or governor general, but has a veto that he or she can use without fear of triggering a constitutional crisis, and which refers a law to the courts or to a plebiscite (the supreme court has been more used historically) unless it's a budgetary or constitutional law, is far more effective at curtailing the excesses of bad leaders. And because the President of Ireland is elected, there is no issue with them using their veto, so it's been actively used.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
Zaune
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7430
Joined: 2010-06-21 11:05am
Location: In Transit
Contact:

Re: Queen Elizabeth II

Post by Zaune »

Counterpoint: There is a non-negligible possibility that we'd elect Boris Johnson to the presidency.

More seriously, I think the monarchy isn't even in the top ten most pressing problems with the current system compared to First Past The Post, the complete impotence of the Press Complaints Commission, the lack of regional parliaments within England and more other stuff than I have the patience to list. Electing someone every five years to do all the mostly-ceremonial stuff that used to be the job of the monarch while changing nothing else of substance about how the country is ruled would barely change anything, and what it did change might not be for the better.
There are hardly any excesses of the most crazed psychopath that cannot easily be duplicated by a normal kindly family man who just comes in to work every day and has a job to do.
-- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods)


Replace "ginger" with "n*gger," and suddenly it become a lot less funny, doesn't it?
-- fgalkin


Like my writing? Tip me on Patreon

I Have A Blog
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27375
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Re: Queen Elizabeth II

Post by NecronLord »

How many of those problems might be redressed by having a someone who can actually refer a bill to a constitutiona court? Certainly things like the MPs voting to exempt themselves from conduct rules in flagrant corruption would be a fine example of what's wrong in this country, and something that conceptually the monarch is supposed to counterbalance but actually cannot because their interests are wholly about preserving their family privelege, and not serving the nation, or charitably, with that as a distant second.

As for Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson, Narcissistic populists in countries with a non-executive president do not want to be president - the Irish experience has borne this out, with Presidents being much, much less narcissistic IMO than Taoiseacha. The very limited power to say no to things and otherwise open hospitals doesn't tend to appeal to such people.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
ray245
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7954
Joined: 2005-06-10 11:30pm

Re: Queen Elizabeth II

Post by ray245 »

Jub wrote: 2022-09-10 08:48am
ray245 wrote: 2022-09-10 08:16am
Jub wrote: 2022-09-10 07:08am This is why I question the large bonuses for executives who lose the company money. The worker who costs the company $100 would surely be fired and steps may even be taken to recover those funds, meanwhile, the CEO who loses them billions is paid to leave and may even get bonuses on top of that... This system is very logical and makes much sense.
It's why I think it's only in certain industries, and even then only exclusively referring to the top end of the spectrum tvat you get bosses getting their dues as for failures as compared to the employees.

I'm talking about football ( not the American kind, that's not football), especially in the top end of the competition in Premier league and etc for elite footballers.

It's one of the very few industry where you can see the employees being more valued than the manager, and any manager that fails to perform gets sacked.

This is because the competition is actually intense and failure to perform can be easily seen by the public.

Despite what most capitalist thinks about capitalism is a competitive system, in reality it is still more of a cartel. The level of competition often aren't fierce enough for the poor performance of a company to be linked to any particular CEOs and etc.

And most capitalistic system simply isn't willing to embrace a truly competitive environment in which bad decisions and bad decision makers are punished.

Our economic structures protects the bad decision makers because it is still a cartel.
This is so very true. There is very little real competition in business because the status quo suits companies and thus stagnation and rot set in.

How many companies death spiral, cutting costs to pay shareholders rather than innovating and reinvesting to try to stimulate new avenues of revenue? Why are individuals supposed to have 3-months of liquid assets on hand but not companies? If the landscape was truly competitive each recession would kill all unfit companies and yet we suffer round after round of bailouts because a company must never suffer any real risk.
And this is the exact reason why Americans especially tried to make European football more like the NFL.

Because creating a Super-League will ensure badly performing clubs won't be too badly damaged from the mistakes they themselves made.

People talks about how communism is just an ideal that won't be practical in real life, but the same is for capitalism too.

True competition of companies is just an ideal.
Humans are such funny creatures. We are selfish about selflessness, yet we can love something so much that we can hate something.
User avatar
Gandalf
SD.net White Wizard
Posts: 16285
Joined: 2002-09-16 11:13pm
Location: A video store in Australia

Re: Queen Elizabeth II

Post by Gandalf »

In good news, Australia is getting a public holiday for the whole mess. Woohoo!

Also, what now of PedoPrince?
"Oh no, oh yeah, tell me how can it be so fair
That we dying younger hiding from the police man over there
Just for breathing in the air they wanna leave me in the chair
Electric shocking body rocking beat streeting me to death"

- A.B. Original, Report to the Mist

"I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately."
- George Carlin
User avatar
Zaune
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7430
Joined: 2010-06-21 11:05am
Location: In Transit
Contact:

Re: Queen Elizabeth II

Post by Zaune »

Gandalf wrote: 2022-09-10 11:39pmAlso, what now of PedoPrince?
He's keeping his head down and his mouth shut and staying out of trouble if he knows what's good for him. If we still had any far-flung, desolate outposts of the Empire with ample opportunities to get a fatal tropical disease named after oneself then he would have been made governor of one of those, but these days they have to make do with stripping him of all his honourary titles and probably cutting him out of the will.

And I'm actually prepared to believe his protestations of ignorance, if not necessarily innocence. I dare say the red flags were there for anyone with the wits and the morals to look for them, but Epstein must have been at least a moderately convincing bullshitter to have got away with as much as he did and Prince Andrew never was known for being terribly perceptive or quick on the uptake.
There are hardly any excesses of the most crazed psychopath that cannot easily be duplicated by a normal kindly family man who just comes in to work every day and has a job to do.
-- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods)


Replace "ginger" with "n*gger," and suddenly it become a lot less funny, doesn't it?
-- fgalkin


Like my writing? Tip me on Patreon

I Have A Blog
bilateralrope
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5938
Joined: 2005-06-25 06:50pm
Location: New Zealand

Re: Queen Elizabeth II

Post by bilateralrope »

Gandalf wrote: 2022-09-10 11:38am Also, with the possible growing strength of the republican movement, maybe Charles could be the last king.
Republican is not a word with good associations right now. We can blame the US for that.

Are any countries seriously talking about leaving the commonwealth right now ?

I'm not expecting much there unless Charles does something that angers people.
User avatar
Eternal_Freedom
Castellan
Posts: 10361
Joined: 2010-03-09 02:16pm
Location: CIC, Battlestar Temeraire

Re: Queen Elizabeth II

Post by Eternal_Freedom »

bilateralrope wrote: 2022-09-11 02:08am
Gandalf wrote: 2022-09-10 11:38am Also, with the possible growing strength of the republican movement, maybe Charles could be the last king.
Republican is not a word with good associations right now. We can blame the US for that.

Are any countries seriously talking about leaving the commonwealth right now ?

I'm not expecting much there unless Charles does something that angers people.
I think the speculation is not so much that countries will leave the Commonwealth, but that the assorted other Realms Charles is also King of (IIRC places like Canada, Austrailia, New Zealand and some Caribbean islands) might get rid of him as their individual Head of State and join the other 30-odd countries that are in the Commonwealth but don't have a monarch.
Baltar: "I don't want to miss a moment of the last Battlestar's destruction!"
Centurion: "Sir, I really think you should look at the other Battlestar."
Baltar: "What are you babbling about other...it's impossible!"
Centurion: "No. It is a Battlestar."

Corrax Entry 7:17: So you walk eternally through the shadow realms, standing against evil where all others falter. May your thirst for retribution never quench, may the blood on your sword never dry, and may we never need you again.
User avatar
Solauren
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10172
Joined: 2003-05-11 09:41pm

Re: Queen Elizabeth II

Post by Solauren »

Zaune wrote: 2022-09-11 12:00am And I'm actually prepared to believe his protestations of ignorance, if not necessarily innocence. I dare say the red flags were there for anyone with the wits and the morals to look for them, but Epstein must have been at least a moderately convincing bullshitter to have got away with as much as he did and Prince Andrew never was known for being terribly perceptive or quick on the uptake.
That's a polite way of saying the truth - Prince Andrew is a fucking moron that believes anything presented to him
I've been asked why I still follow a few of the people I know on Facebook with 'interesting political habits and view points'.

It's so when they comment on or approve of something, I know what pages to block/what not to vote for.
User avatar
LadyTevar
White Mage
White Mage
Posts: 23145
Joined: 2003-02-12 10:59pm

Re: Queen Elizabeth II

Post by LadyTevar »

Eternal_Freedom wrote: 2022-09-11 08:48am I think the speculation is not so much that countries will leave the Commonwealth, but that the assorted other Realms Charles is also King of (IIRC places like Canada, Austrailia, New Zealand and some Caribbean islands) might get rid of him as their individual Head of State and join the other 30-odd countries that are in the Commonwealth but don't have a monarch.
The PM of Antigua and Barbuda declared HRM Charles III head of state, and soon after suggested a Referendum will be started to become a Republic "Within three years".

Australia has ruled out holding a Referendum "for at least four years".

Antigua and Barbuda Acknowledge Charles III
Image
Nitram, slightly high on cough syrup: Do you know you're beautiful?
Me: Nope, that's why I have you around to tell me.
Nitram: You -are- beautiful. Anyone tries to tell you otherwise kill them.

"A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. LLAP" -- Leonard Nimoy, last Tweet
User avatar
Darth Yan
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2488
Joined: 2008-12-29 02:09pm
Location: California

Re: Queen Elizabeth II

Post by Darth Yan »

Jub wrote: 2022-09-09 09:23pm
Ralin wrote: 2022-09-09 12:48pmSo, morally neutral?
How does one get to be a billionaire without exploiting people and therefore becoming evil? Even mere inheritance without divestment of those funds is still evil as hoarded funds and the concentration of wealth only serve to harm society. The only ethical way to have a billion dollars is to immediately give it away and descend to the mere mortal realm of a comfortable multi-millionaire.
As someone pointed out "No sane person can honestly tell me that every poor person is inherently virtuous and wouldn't be a scumbag if they were rich. It's also entirely possible for a rich person to try to do some good with their money, be it from guilt or genuine philanthropy. It's the structural concentration of wealth in a few hands that is the problem, not the rich themselves."

There are poor people who are good and poor people who are assholes. There are rich people who are assholes.....and there are also rich people who are good.
Post Reply