The
real scenario of a supposed Baerne attack on Costa:
MiG-31s versus F-106H, Embraers and Su-30MKIs - MiG-31 losses: up to, no higher than 10 machines. F-106H: probably 20-30 machines or more. Su-30MKI - quite possibly no losses or low losses, 3-5 craft. No dogfights between combatants likely. The fight...
15 squads of 4 MiG-31s go in fast, the 15 AEW-coordinator MiG-31s go at ~20 km pushing out all up to max speed, the guided 3x15 groups go below them, spread out, keeping the speed - maybe going just slightly slower than the wing leaders.
The R-99 Embraer can detect them at oh-400 km. In ~10 minutes from intruder detection the R-99 is waste and toast, even if these are baseline MiG-31s which are flying with baseline R-77s, no fancy stuff. It can't even run away, and it would only buy itself a minute at most. If any additional AEW&C attempt to rise up, they would be downed.
The MiG-31s would be carrying a mix of R-77 and Kh-31P missiles. The defenders would have a total of 96 F-106H and 16 Su-30MKI planes. Even if they sortie at a rate of 1 per minute per airfield, and they have like 4 airfields alltogether, it would be roughly 25 minutes before everything is in the air. By that time, the MiG-31s would already close on their targets, or be closing. A sizeable number of planes would be in the air, but without nuclear missiles, ground radars and a guiding center the F-106H is going to be nigh-useless. The Su-30MKIs would put up a good fight, but as I said, the casualty count wouldn't be anywhere as lopsided.
Maybe no casualties would be inflicted on the Su-30MKI just because the MiGs won't bother getting bogged down which would make them vulnerable for the kills.
The MiG-31s ability to simply outrun any pursuer would play a great role here.
Maybe several MiG-31s would be lost to enemy action, and a few to pilot errors. I'd say losing 10 out of 60 is a pretty decent estimate. As for the enemy losses, I would believe the MiG-31s would hardly be able to inflict large losses in evasive air-to-air combat, but everything that is flying below them, rising to fight them, or staying on the ground (radar masts, planes on the rise, watch towers on airfields) will be dusted by Kh-31 salvos.
The MiG-31s would leave Costa airspace in a matter of minutes if they want to. "Binding" the MiG-31s in Costa is impossible for their airforce; they don't have heavy SAMs to bind them, lock them in their operative depth. The MiGs will leave as soon as they feel they are taking too much flak or simply get objectives accomplished. The pursuers would not be able to pursue them effectively - the disparity in speed would penalize Costa.
Note on fighter losses: I project high frame fatigue losses for old planes. Both F-106s and MiG-31s are old frames. It's likely that out of 9-10 MiGs lost, 2 would be lost to frame fatigue. The F-106s force could have as high as 10 machines dying to frame fatigue. The Su-30MKIs wouldn't have fatigue problems. Pilot experience is likely to doom some Baerne MiGs (I projected 1 out of 10), and likewise for Costa especially on strained machines, 3-5 would die simply due to pilot errors.
Bomber losses: 18 out of 20, or (X- small number) out of X depending on how many you sent
The B-1Bs... why send strategic bombers into tiny Costa? That's stupid in my view. But if Baerne did that, I'm afraid he'll be losing some of them indeed. The Su-30MKIs are not as good as dedicated interceptors, but still they'd manage. The F-106Hs here would be a tad better despite the obsolecency, still they'd be much faster than the B-1. If not all Embraers would be taken out by the MiG-31s first run, then they could be adequately guided to the B-1B.
So I'm afraid Beowulf is correct on the casualty count with the bombers. No matter if you send them high or low, their ceiling is too low to be competitive vis modern fighters and interceptors, and their speed is quite low likewise. RCS-reducing measures on the B-1 are slightly inferior to those of the Tu-160, and it's basically the least competitive amongst modern supersonic bombers of SDN World...
Naval warfare: result: no Kirovs lost, the carrier's fate is up for grabs. The submarine - most likely killed.
Baerne would quite probably concentrate on counter-mine warfare before sailing out: minesweepers and large number of frigates would be dedicated to cleaning the area. I see Baerne has no, or did not list, small-tonnage ASUW patrol craft. That is regrettable, because it indicates that indeed the submarines may be undetected for a while.
The 5th escadra, alert, would probably disperse and maintain range between escorts and the carrier - P-3 and Hawkeye craft would be constantly patrolling the area. Sonobuoys would be most likely deployed in vinicity of the harbor, meaning the attack should be occuring further out - and further out the ships won't be as concentrated.
The Kirovs would most likely defeat a submarine attack against them, they have purposeful salvo systems which yield a 0.9 kill probability against a simple heavy torpedo going at them and have a very little reaction time and distance, meaning even if we sub were close, it wouldn't succeed unless deploying 3-4 torpedoes to sink the cruiser (incidentaly that's the number used to sink it at the trials I recall, so...). Even with a two-torpedo attack, the Kirovs would evade the other torp. After which, all sorts of shit would be shot towards the submarine.
The carrier is unlikely to evade a torpedo hit, unless one of the Kirovs helps it with a hedgehog barrage - which is distinctly possible. However, it may be that the carrier would be damaged.
The submarine may be toast or not, but with the concentration of ships in the area, most likely toast. Towed arrays would be deployed by all ships at small sail to determine the location of the attacker.
Thanks for playing 