Battle of Cajamarca - Questioning Casualties
Posted: 2009-03-08 07:00pm
This is the epic battle between the Inca and the Spanish.
According to Wiki, there was 6,000 to 7,000 Casualties with no Spanish Casualties except for an injury.
That is something like 30 kills for every single soldier. Even if unarmed, that seems kind of ludicrous. Cannons don't seem to even explain it very well.
In a National Geographic episode, there is the siege of Peru (Youtube of it) discussed. The Pizarro Chronicles talk about tens of thousands of attackers and completely downplay the other tribes as allies. As well, supposedly there was a great cavalry charge which turned the battles. Other sources indicate that there were only thousands of attackers and allies did the bulk of the fighting. This is also supported by the archaeology. Finally, there was really no effective cavalry charge with teh only attempt resulting in broken legs.
In another discussion (Yes, I am discussing it on a few different boards and not getting shot down over it), there is the idea that "So many Thousand" was apparently shorthand for "any large number" or "a lot." Also that very few people at the time had any conception of what a thousand was or were able to count that high.
Anyone else read anything which puts these numbers in question?
According to Wiki, there was 6,000 to 7,000 Casualties with no Spanish Casualties except for an injury.
That is something like 30 kills for every single soldier. Even if unarmed, that seems kind of ludicrous. Cannons don't seem to even explain it very well.
In a National Geographic episode, there is the siege of Peru (Youtube of it) discussed. The Pizarro Chronicles talk about tens of thousands of attackers and completely downplay the other tribes as allies. As well, supposedly there was a great cavalry charge which turned the battles. Other sources indicate that there were only thousands of attackers and allies did the bulk of the fighting. This is also supported by the archaeology. Finally, there was really no effective cavalry charge with teh only attempt resulting in broken legs.
In another discussion (Yes, I am discussing it on a few different boards and not getting shot down over it), there is the idea that "So many Thousand" was apparently shorthand for "any large number" or "a lot." Also that very few people at the time had any conception of what a thousand was or were able to count that high.
Anyone else read anything which puts these numbers in question?