Iraq Stops U.S. Rice Buys; Farmers Angry

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, SCRawl, Thanas, Edi, K. A. Pital

User avatar
Stark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 36169
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:56pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Contact:

Re: Iraq Stops U.S. Rice Buys; Farmers Angry

Postby Stark » 2012-02-24 02:44pm

Lord Zentei wrote:Guys? Iraq's decision not to buy rice is NOT a "free market" decision, quite the opposite. It's Iraqi government officials who decided which countries to import from. If Iraq were to decide not to buy US rice in a free market like manner, then the Iraqi government would have had to permit US imports, but no one on the street would have wanted to buy it.

That being said, the US rice farmers are full of shit, but if they're desperate, that's probably understandable.



More or less 'free market' than acquiring guaranteed markets through conquest who cannot refuse to buy your products? :v

User avatar
Korto
Jedi Knight
Posts: 941
Joined: 2007-12-19 07:31am
Location: Newcastle, Aus

Re: Iraq Stops U.S. Rice Buys; Farmers Angry

Postby Korto » 2012-02-24 03:30pm

Ultonius wrote:
Gandalf wrote:If that's really how people saw the Iraq War, they're fucking morons. How isolated from reality does one have to be to wonder why some Iraqis aren't particularly grateful for the war?


I suppose that some of the people with this attitude dismiss and underestimate the human cost to Iraq compared to the net benefit of overthrowing Saddam, either because they haven't examined it closely or because it's easier to do that than admit that their country's actions are unsupportable.

Was there a net benefit, for Iraq as a whole? Saddam's gone, but a lot of killing, lawlessness, still lots of torture, lot less women's rights as far as I've heard, destruction of infrastructure, and so on and so on. I've had the feeling Iraq would have been better off if Saddam had been left to die of old age.

Ronald Gerson wrote:You would think with all that we've done over there, there would be a way to get them to do business with us,


Can what he's asking for really be described as compensation? He wants them to buy American rice at a somewhat higher price than they would have to pay other countries, not give America money for saving them...

Required to buy AND at higher price === loser's war tribute. It's just got a thin facade for the modern age.
“I am the King of Rome, and above grammar”
Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor

User avatar
Steel
Jedi Master
Posts: 1057
Joined: 2005-12-09 03:49pm
Location: Cambridge

Re: Iraq Stops U.S. Rice Buys; Farmers Angry

Postby Steel » 2012-02-24 03:44pm

Lord Zentei wrote:Guys? Iraq's decision not to buy rice is NOT a "free market" decision, quite the opposite. It's Iraqi government officials who decided which countries to import from. If Iraq were to decide not to buy US rice in a free market like manner, then the Iraqi government would have had to permit US imports, but no one on the street would have wanted to buy it.

That being said, the US rice farmers are full of shit, but if they're desperate, that's probably understandable.


Of course its a free market decision by any reasonable definition: Iraq has chosen to buy the rice from someone selling it for less.

If the US were selling at the same price or less than the people they were dropped for then you could have a case, but they aren't. The article was about people complaining that Iraq wont continue to buy the ever increasingly expensive US produced rice.
Apparently nobody can see you without a signature.

User avatar
Lord Zentei
Space Elf Psyker
Posts: 8742
Joined: 2004-11-22 02:49am
Location: Ulthwé Craftworld, plotting the downfall of the Imperium.

Re: Iraq Stops U.S. Rice Buys; Farmers Angry

Postby Lord Zentei » 2012-02-24 04:53pm

Stark wrote:More or less 'free market' than acquiring guaranteed markets through conquest who cannot refuse to buy your products? :v
LOL, well, no-one said that America was not being hypocritical on free trade. Except for America and its apologists.

Steel wrote:
Lord Zentei wrote:Guys? Iraq's decision not to buy rice is NOT a "free market" decision, quite the opposite. It's Iraqi government officials who decided which countries to import from. If Iraq were to decide not to buy US rice in a free market like manner, then the Iraqi government would have had to permit US imports, but no one on the street would have wanted to buy it.

That being said, the US rice farmers are full of shit, but if they're desperate, that's probably understandable.
Of course its a free market decision by any reasonable definition: Iraq has chosen to buy the rice from someone selling it for less.

If the US were selling at the same price or less than the people they were dropped for then you could have a case, but they aren't. The article was about people complaining that Iraq wont continue to buy the ever increasingly expensive US produced rice.

That is not what a "free market" means. A free market is one where consumers are the ones who decide what gets bought and where owners/producers decide what gets sold, and the only regulating mechanisms are peoples tastes and the market price. As opposed to government officials making the decisions. The fact that these government officials decided to buy lower quality rice at a lower price doesn't mean that end consumers in Iraq's streets would have done the same.

Regardless, that doesn't change the fact that the rice farmers in the OP were full of shit when they claimed that Iraq owed them for the war.
CotK <mew> | HAB | JL | MM | TTC | Cybertron

TAX THE CHURCHES! - Lord Zentei TTC Supreme Grand Prophet

And the LORD said, Let there be Bosons! Yea and let there be Bosoms too!
I'd rather be the great great grandson of a demon ninja than some jackass who grew potatos. -- Covenant
Dead cows don't fart. -- CJvR
...and I like strudel! :mrgreen: -- Asuka

User avatar
Stark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 36169
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:56pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Contact:

Re: Iraq Stops U.S. Rice Buys; Farmers Angry

Postby Stark » 2012-02-24 04:59pm

Yeah, a more fair criticism would be that obviously farmers aren't interested in a free market because of the protectionism they advocate or are shielded by. Just the bald-faced honestly of saying 'my country invaded yours and thus you owe me personal financial restitution' can't be topped, really.

Ultonius
Padawan Learner
Posts: 244
Joined: 2012-01-11 08:30am

Re: Iraq Stops U.S. Rice Buys; Farmers Angry

Postby Ultonius » 2012-02-24 05:37pm

Korto wrote:Was there a net benefit, for Iraq as a whole? Saddam's gone, but a lot of killing, lawlessness, still lots of torture, lot less women's rights as far as I've heard, destruction of infrastructure, and so on and so on. I've had the feeling Iraq would have been better off if Saddam had been left to die of old age.


Sorry, I should have said 'net benefit in the eyes of the people who think the Iraqis should be grateful'.

Korto wrote:Required to buy AND at higher price === loser's war tribute. It's just got a thin facade for the modern age.


To give him the benefit of the doubt, he may not see Iraqis (or at least all Iraqis) as losers who should pay reparations, but instead may see them as people America has liberated, and who he feels should do America a good turn in return.

User avatar
Skgoa
Jedi Master
Posts: 1389
Joined: 2007-08-02 01:39pm
Location: Dresden, valley of the clueless

Re: Iraq Stops U.S. Rice Buys; Farmers Angry

Postby Skgoa » 2012-02-24 06:02pm

Korvan wrote:
Ziggy Stardust wrote:
Stas Bush wrote:Maybe he's right, we should not demonize them as evil, just admit they're fucking dumb and that's all.


This.

They are incredibly ignorant, to the point that it is deliberate. These aren't people that go onto Internet forums and news sites to find out what is going on in the world; likely they never read the newspaper or watch anything but the local news, and all of their attitudes towards world affairs are gathered from talking in the bar after work.

Not evil, really, or at least not aggressively so. Just really, really, really stupid.


I have to agree with this. My folks (who are left leaning, even for Canadians) spend a fair bit of time in Arizona. While there they picked up the belief that every single illegal Mexican immigrant was involved with the drug trade. I was able to get through to them with a fair bit of effort that the vast majority of illegals were gardeners. farm laborers, construction workers, etc but it wasn't easy. Turns out that pretty much every local media source there is harping on the illegal immigrant = drug trade.

Ignorance isn't as connected to stupidity as you think. There is plenty of "moronic" believes that very intelligent people hold.


Korto wrote:
Ultonius wrote:I suppose that some of the people with this attitude dismiss and underestimate the human cost to Iraq compared to the net benefit of overthrowing Saddam, either because they haven't examined it closely or because it's easier to do that than admit that their country's actions are unsupportable.

Was there a net benefit, for Iraq as a whole? Saddam's gone, but a lot of killing, lawlessness, still lots of torture, lot less women's rights as far as I've heard, destruction of infrastructure, and so on and so on. I've had the feeling Iraq would have been better off if Saddam had been left to die of old age.

The Kurds* are better of, as are some Shia. Overall, most Sunni and Shia in a far worse place than they were before. THough I bet Achmesomethingsomething is praising the Lord every night for american foreign politics.

* Only those in Iraq, since Turkey has cracked down on those living in Turkey as a reaction to the threat of kurdish independence.
http://www.politicalcompass.org/test
Economic Left/Right: -7.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.74

This is pre-WWII. You can sort of tell from the sketch style, from thee way it refers to Japan (Japan in the 1950s was still rebuilding from WWII), the spelling of Tokyo, lots of details. Nothing obvious... except that the upper right hand corner of the page reads "November 1931." --- Simon_Jester

Grumman
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2358
Joined: 2011-12-10 09:13am

Re: Iraq Stops U.S. Rice Buys; Farmers Angry

Postby Grumman » 2012-02-24 09:05pm

Lord Zentei wrote:That is not what a "free market" means. A free market is one where consumers are the ones who decide what gets bought and where owners/producers decide what gets sold, and the only regulating mechanisms are peoples tastes and the market price. As opposed to government officials making the decisions. The fact that these government officials decided to buy lower quality rice at a lower price doesn't mean that end consumers in Iraq's streets would have done the same.

A Trade Ministry official said Iraq has decided to import only long-grain basmati rice from India due to its wide acceptance nationwide and cheap price.

"We have no problem with the U.S. rice specifically, which was widely acceptable by Iraqis, but we are seeing a demand for the Indian rice rather than others, which is also bought in good prices," he added.

It's obviously not a perfect free market, but the government importing the rice that people are demanding is at least on the right track.

User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70027
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: Iraq Stops U.S. Rice Buys; Farmers Angry

Postby Darth Wong » 2012-02-24 11:14pm

Ultonius wrote:Can what he's asking for really be described as compensation? He wants them to buy American rice at a somewhat higher price than they would have to pay other countries, not give America money for saving them.

What the fuck is the moral difference between taking their money and forcing them to pay higher prices for your goods?
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html

User avatar
bobalot
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1577
Joined: 2008-05-21 06:42am
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Re: Iraq Stops U.S. Rice Buys; Farmers Angry

Postby bobalot » 2012-02-25 01:33am

Stark wrote:This is really a stunning example of honesty. 'You owe us' is a lot more honest than 'they hate us for our freedoms'. They invaded Iraq for money; everyone knew that. They're just finally owning up - and turning their back on the free market (and arguably globalisation) at the same time.

Farmers? Complaining? Not 'news' to me. :V

I think our farmers here in Australia could give the Americans a run for their money when it comes to their entitlement attitude, demands for government assistance and endless excuses for their failing businesses.

Farmer: "I tried to farm in the middle of the desert and it hasn't rained in years! I NEVER COULD HAVE PREDICTED THIS! GIMME A GOVERNMENT HANDOUT!"

As for these douchebags, just how long did they expect Iraqis to buy their overpriced rice?
"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi post.
"Problem is, while the Germans have had many mea culpas and quite painfully dealt with their history, the South is still hellbent on painting themselves as the real victims. It gives them a special place in the history of assholes" - Covenant
"Over three million died fighting for the emperor, but when the war was over he pretended it was not his responsibility. What kind of man does that?'' - Saburo Sakai.

User avatar
Thanas
Magister
Magister
Posts: 29453
Joined: 2004-06-26 07:49pm

Re: Iraq Stops U.S. Rice Buys; Farmers Angry

Postby Thanas » 2012-02-25 03:03am

Ultonius wrote:To give him the benefit of the doubt, he may not see Iraqis (or at least all Iraqis) as losers who should pay reparations, but instead may see them as people America has liberated, and who he feels should do America a good turn in return.


And by America, he of course means his bank account. Also, if he still thinks the Iraqis were grateful for being liberated (of their life) then there might have been some post-invasion images on TV showing it differently. Ergo, making him once more, an idiot.
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs

User avatar
mr friendly guy
The Doctor
Posts: 8875
Joined: 2004-12-12 10:55pm
Location: In a 1960s police telephone box somewhere in Australia

Re: Iraq Stops U.S. Rice Buys; Farmers Angry

Postby mr friendly guy » 2012-02-25 03:06am

Ultonius wrote:Is it really fair to blame one farmer in Texas for the Iraq War? I suspect that a lot of Americans, perhaps especially those in rural or conservative areas see the war as being similar to World War 2: overthrowing an aggressive dictator and liberating the people he oppressed, at the cost of American lives. Of course, looking closely at the lead-up to the war and the way it has been conducted shows that it is far less morally clear-cut than WW2, but people who like to see America as a straightforward hero, as most American conservatives do, look at the two conflicts and wonder why Iraqis are not as grateful as Europeans were after WW2. Additionally, as the article points out, it has been a difficult year for rice farmers. If farmers perceive that Iraq is causing their families hardship by not buying their rice, they will resent that, even if they acknowledge that Iraqis have suffered from the invasion.


I blame him, only as much as I blame the voters who didn't do enough to oppose it, ie very little.

However, he and others like him as you will note in the article are quite happy to claim credit for "helping Iraq" (like many because he is American and they claim credit for things their government has done, even if they themselves weren't in a position of power) therefore by the same logic he should be happy to take the blame as well (even if he isn't in a position of power). So yeah, fuck him.
Never apologise for being a geek, because they won't apologise to you for being an arsehole. John Barrowman - 22 June 2014 Perth Supernova.

Countries I have been to.
Australia, Canada, China, Denmark, Ecuador, Finland, Malaysia, Norway, Singapore, Sweden, USA.
Always on the lookout for more nice places to visit.

Ultonius
Padawan Learner
Posts: 244
Joined: 2012-01-11 08:30am

Re: Iraq Stops U.S. Rice Buys; Farmers Angry

Postby Ultonius » 2012-02-25 12:15pm

Darth Wong wrote:What the fuck is the moral difference between taking their money and forcing them to pay higher prices for your goods?


They get your goods in return, instead of nothing at all? I should stress that I'm not saying that forcing/encouraging people to buy from you at a higher price because you think they owe you for a favour you believe you did them is a good thing. I'm just saying that it's not quite as bad as simply demanding money from them as payment for the favour.

User avatar
SCRawl
Has a bad feeling about this.
Posts: 3858
Joined: 2002-12-24 03:11pm
Location: Burlington, Canada

Re: Iraq Stops U.S. Rice Buys; Farmers Angry

Postby SCRawl » 2012-02-25 12:30pm

Ultonius wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:What the fuck is the moral difference between taking their money and forcing them to pay higher prices for your goods?


They get your goods in return, instead of nothing at all? I should stress that I'm not saying that forcing/encouraging people to buy from you at a higher price because you think they owe you for a favour you believe you did them is a good thing. I'm just saying that it's not quite as bad as simply demanding money from them as payment for the favour.


You aren't getting it.

If we force Iraq to buy US goods, and those goods have higher prices for the same quantity/quality products -- reasonable, considering we're talking about a commodity like rice -- then the net effect is to steal money from them. Observe:

Case 1: Purchase for the best price on the market. Get 1 million units of rice for, say, $1 million.
Case 2: Purchase from the US. Get 1 million units of rice for $1.2 million.

In case 2, Iraq would have purchased one million units of rice and spent an extra $0.2 million for no obvious benefit. This has effectively been stolen from them if they are compelled to buy from the US. Some customers may choose to purchase from the US instead of the least expensive alternative for various reasons. They may prefer something about it which may not be easily quantifiable, but is of value to the customer. That's fine, it's how the market is supposed to work, but only if they have the choice.
73% of all statistics are made up, including this one.

I'm waiting as fast as I can.

Ultonius
Padawan Learner
Posts: 244
Joined: 2012-01-11 08:30am

Re: Iraq Stops U.S. Rice Buys; Farmers Angry

Postby Ultonius » 2012-02-25 04:01pm

SCRawl wrote:You aren't getting it.

If we force Iraq to buy US goods, and those goods have higher prices for the same quantity/quality products -- reasonable, considering we're talking about a commodity like rice -- then the net effect is to steal money from them. Observe:

Case 1: Purchase for the best price on the market. Get 1 million units of rice for, say, $1 million.
Case 2: Purchase from the US. Get 1 million units of rice for $1.2 million.

In case 2, Iraq would have purchased one million units of rice and spent an extra $0.2 million for no obvious benefit. This has effectively been stolen from them if they are compelled to buy from the US. Some customers may choose to purchase from the US instead of the least expensive alternative for various reasons. They may prefer something about it which may not be easily quantifiable, but is of value to the customer. That's fine, it's how the market is supposed to work, but only if they have the choice.


Okay, conceded. I suppose the most you can say is that the farmers quoted in the article advocating that Iraq should be compelled to buy American rice show less malice aforethought than someone advocating that Iraq should simply give America money as a reward for overthrowing Saddam.

User avatar
bobalot
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1577
Joined: 2008-05-21 06:42am
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Re: Iraq Stops U.S. Rice Buys; Farmers Angry

Postby bobalot » 2012-02-25 04:32pm

Ultonius wrote:
SCRawl wrote:You aren't getting it.

If we force Iraq to buy US goods, and those goods have higher prices for the same quantity/quality products -- reasonable, considering we're talking about a commodity like rice -- then the net effect is to steal money from them. Observe:

Case 1: Purchase for the best price on the market. Get 1 million units of rice for, say, $1 million.
Case 2: Purchase from the US. Get 1 million units of rice for $1.2 million.

In case 2, Iraq would have purchased one million units of rice and spent an extra $0.2 million for no obvious benefit. This has effectively been stolen from them if they are compelled to buy from the US. Some customers may choose to purchase from the US instead of the least expensive alternative for various reasons. They may prefer something about it which may not be easily quantifiable, but is of value to the customer. That's fine, it's how the market is supposed to work, but only if they have the choice.


Okay, conceded. I suppose the most you can say is that the farmers quoted in the article advocating that Iraq should be compelled to buy American rice show less malice aforethought than someone advocating that Iraq should simply give America money as a reward for overthrowing Saddam.

It just makes them self-centred douchebags.

Iraq is a country with massive infrastructure, economic and social problems. There are still millions of internally and externally displaced persons.

Farmer: Don't spend your money trying to end suffering and misery (that I'm partly responsible for!), GIMME MORE MONEY FOR MY OVERPRICED GOODS!

Yeah, totally not a hint of "malice" there. Just massive assholedom.
"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi post.
"Problem is, while the Germans have had many mea culpas and quite painfully dealt with their history, the South is still hellbent on painting themselves as the real victims. It gives them a special place in the history of assholes" - Covenant
"Over three million died fighting for the emperor, but when the war was over he pretended it was not his responsibility. What kind of man does that?'' - Saburo Sakai.

Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 26484
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: Iraq Stops U.S. Rice Buys; Farmers Angry

Postby Simon_Jester » 2012-02-25 04:50pm

How much pressure did the US exert to get the Iraqis to buy American rice in the first place?

I'm not saying there wasn't any. I'd be very surprised if there wasn't any. But I've literally never heard about this specific issue before in my life.

User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 36186
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
Contact:

Re: Iraq Stops U.S. Rice Buys; Farmers Angry

Postby Sea Skimmer » 2012-02-25 05:01pm

Iraq buying US rice goes back to the Iran Iraq war when the US was unwilling to provide credit to Saddam for much of anything else except buying US agricultural products. US grain ect... also was just really cheap back then, cheapest in the world more or less. I'm surprised the buys lasted this long myself.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956


Return to “News and Politics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Beowulf, His Divine Shadow and 4 guests