Hollywood rejects Liberace biopic for being 'too gay'

OT: anything goes!

Moderator: Edi

Post Reply
User avatar
Zaune
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7445
Joined: 2010-06-21 11:05am
Location: In Transit
Contact:

Hollywood rejects Liberace biopic for being 'too gay'

Post by Zaune »

The Guardian

Hollywood studios refused to finance Steven Soderbergh's forthcoming HBO biopic of the flamboyant entertainer Liberace because it was "too gay", the Oscar-winning film-maker has revealed.

Despite the presence of two fellow Academy Award-winners, Michael Douglas and Matt Damon, in the leading roles, executives repeatedly passed on putting up the movie's relatively meagre $5m budget. Titled Behind the Candelabra, Soderbergh's film centres on the relationship between Liberace and his younger long-term lover Scott Thorson, who met when the latter was just 17. The film will screen on the pay-TV channel HBO in the US following Hollywood's lack of interest.

"Nobody would make it. We went to everybody in town," Soderbergh told the Wrap. "We needed $5m. Nobody would do it. They said it was too gay. Everybody. This was after Brokeback Mountain, by the way. Which is not as funny as this movie. I was stunned. It made no sense to any of us."

The Ocean's Eleven director denied being disappointed by the lack of a theatrical release for his film, which is based on Thorson's book Behind the Candelabra: My Life With Liberace. "[HBO are] great and they're really good at what they do, and ultimately I think more people will see it, and that's all you care about," Soderbergh said. "Studios were going: 'We don't know how to sell it.' They were scared." The film-maker said reaction from executives to Behind the Candelabra differed markedly to that received by his low-budget, sex-themed drama The Girlfriend Experience, which successfully achieved a theatrical release despite the presence of porn star Sasha Grey in the lead.

Soderbergh's film, which will screen in the spring, is intended to be his final movie before entering self-imposed retirement. It stars Douglas as Liberace, who spent more than 50 years performing and lived a highly colourful life prior to his death in 1987 from an Aids-related illness. Damon plays Thorson, who famously sued his former lover for $113m in palimony in 1982, claiming he had been the pianist and singer's companion for five years.

Soderbergh also has the thriller Side Effects – starring Channing Tatum, Rooney Mara and Jude Law – due for release in US cinemas in February (March in the UK).
What the hell did they expect when Soderbergh's people phoned up to arrange a time and date to make their pitch? Even if we're charitable and assume that the suits had a problem with the film being full of appalling gay stereotypes, it's a bloody Liberace biopic! Who do you think created the flaming-queen archetype in the first place?
There are hardly any excesses of the most crazed psychopath that cannot easily be duplicated by a normal kindly family man who just comes in to work every day and has a job to do.
-- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods)


Replace "ginger" with "n*gger," and suddenly it become a lot less funny, doesn't it?
-- fgalkin


Like my writing? Tip me on Patreon

I Have A Blog
User avatar
madd0ct0r
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6259
Joined: 2008-03-14 07:47am

Re: Hollywood rejects Liberace biopic for being 'too gay'

Post by madd0ct0r »

only $5million?

they could do that on a crowdfunding campaign.
"Aid, trade, green technology and peace." - Hans Rosling.
"Welcome to SDN, where we can't see the forest because walking into trees repeatedly feels good, bro." - Mr Coffee
User avatar
Themightytom
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2818
Joined: 2007-12-22 11:11am
Location: United States

Re: Hollywood rejects Liberace biopic for being 'too gay'

Post by Themightytom »

Wait but THOSE two??? With THAT director?? Is it possible Hollywood just didn't want to see Liberace's relationship portrayed as overtly as Ace and Gary?

I don't think Michael Douglas and Matt Damon can pull off a convincing homosexual relationship, I don't even think either is particularly good with straight partners, I feel like it would be a shit show for the gay community. This sounds like sour grapes to me, I mean really? We went to everyone and they all said it was too gay? Sure, name names, give quotes or it's all posturing. Hollywood has been fumbling with portrayal lately, when I saw Jay Edgar, it lacked emotional depth, Spoiler
and do we have to mention that face palm in Skyfall?
i think Hollywood should rightfully be concerned with quality control.

"Since when is "the west" a nation?"-Styphon
"ACORN= Cobra obviously." AMT
This topic is... oh Village Idiot. Carry on then.--Havok
Scrib
Jedi Knight
Posts: 966
Joined: 2011-11-19 11:59pm

Re: Hollywood rejects Liberace biopic for being 'too gay'

Post by Scrib »

Themightytom wrote:Wait but THOSE two??? With THAT director?? Is it possible Hollywood just didn't want to see Liberace's relationship portrayed as overtly as Ace and Gary?

I don't think Michael Douglas and Matt Damon can pull off a convincing homosexual relationship, I don't even think either is particularly good with straight partners, I feel like it would be a shit show for the gay community. This sounds like sour grapes to me, I mean really? We went to everyone and they all said it was too gay? Sure, name names, give quotes or it's all posturing. Hollywood has been fumbling with portrayal lately, when I saw Jay Edgar, it lacked emotional depth, Spoiler
and do we have to mention that face palm in Skyfall?
i think Hollywood should rightfully be concerned with quality control.
So..let me get this straight...It'd be a worse show for the gay community to see a badly portrayed (according to you) relationship than to hear that studios don't want to put up a movie with a prominent homosexual relationship? I don't even understand the "shit show" part tbh.

As for the comments, I can totally believe this. I can also believe that they didn't name names because they want to have a career after this.
JLTucker
BANNED
Posts: 3043
Joined: 2006-02-26 01:58am

Re: Hollywood rejects Liberace biopic for being 'too gay'

Post by JLTucker »

Themightytom wrote:Wait but THOSE two??? With THAT director?? Is it possible Hollywood just didn't want to see Liberace's relationship portrayed as overtly as Ace and Gary?

[...]

Hollywood has been fumbling with portrayal lately, when I saw Jay Edgar, it lacked emotional depth, Spoiler
and do we have to mention that face palm in Skyfall?
i think Hollywood should rightfully be concerned with quality control.
You aren't watching the right biopics. Soderbergh could do Liberace justice, just as he did with Che, a biopic about the man's iconic status.
User avatar
Themightytom
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2818
Joined: 2007-12-22 11:11am
Location: United States

Re: Hollywood rejects Liberace biopic for being 'too gay'

Post by Themightytom »

Scrib wrote:
So..let me get this straight...It'd be a worse show for the gay community to see a badly portrayed (according to you) relationship than to hear that studios don't want to put up a movie with a prominent homosexual relationship? I don't even understand the "shit show" part tbh.

As for the comments, I can totally believe this. I can also believe that they didn't name names because they want to have a career after this.
Oh hey Scrib I think you dropped this false dilemma here. Just because the director decided to accuse Hollywood of bigotry doesn't mean it was a direct consequence of their decision not to fund the theatrical release of his movie. Believe whatever you want, but there's nothing to prove this is more than sour grapes.
JLTucker wrote: You aren't watching the right biopics. Soderbergh could do Liberace justice, just as he did with Che, a biopic about the man's iconic status.
Fair enough, I'll give Che a try, but I'm still pretty skeptical about the actors.

"Since when is "the west" a nation?"-Styphon
"ACORN= Cobra obviously." AMT
This topic is... oh Village Idiot. Carry on then.--Havok
Post Reply