StarDestroyer.Net BBS

Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid people
Login   Register FAQ    Search

View unanswered posts | View active topics


It is currently 2013-05-19 03:50am (All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ])

Board index » Fiction » Science Fiction


Quote of the Week: "Whereas some states possess an army, the Prussian army possesses a state" - Voltaire (real name: Francois-Marie Arouet), French writer and philosopher (1694-1778)

New Firefly on the way?

Moderators: Stofsk, NecronLord

Post new topic Post a reply  Page 1 of 3
 [ 70 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message

Crazedwraith
 Post subject: New Firefly on the way?
PostPosted: 2012-07-11 03:13pm 

Emperor's Hand


Joined: 2003-04-10 03:45pm
Posts: 7575
Location: Lichfield, Staffordshire, England
Firefly is getting a shiny new TV special.

To celebrate the cult-favorite sci-fi drama’s 10th anniversary, Science Channel is shooting a new one-hour special chronicling the Firefly cast reunion at Comic-Con this week.

The special — titled Browncoats Unite — will include footage from Friday’s reunion panel, featuring several members of the original team including star Nathan Fillion and creator Joss Whedon. Plus, the cast is shooting an in-depth behind-the-scenes roundtable interview that will dive deeper into burning fan questions about the beloved series. Both the panel and the roundtable will be moderated by Entertainment Weekly‘s own Jeff Jensen.

“Firefly is a landmark work of science fiction and a favorite with our viewers,” said Debbie Myers, general manager and executive vp of Science. “Ever since it premiered on Science, fans have asked us to do something special to mark its 10-year anniversary. With this signature celebration, punctuated by Browncoats Unite, we will connect the minds behind this classic franchise with its legions of passionate fans.”

In addition to Whedon and Fillion, Friday’s 12:30 p.m. Comic-Con panel will feature Alan Tudyk, Summer Glau, Adam Baldwin, Sean Maher, showrunner Tim Minear, and writer Jose Molina. The special, produced by Pangolin Pictures, promises to unearth defining memories and first-person accounts of making the show from both sides of the camera. Browncoats Unite will air on Science, along with an all-day marathon of Firefly episodes, on Sunday, Nov. 11.


Just behind the scenes, out of universe stuff I guess, but could still be fun.
   Profile |  

Themightytom
PostPosted: 2012-07-11 03:23pm 

Sith Devotee


Joined: 2007-12-22 12:11pm
Posts: 2640
Location: United States
I feel like they're mining the crap out of it though, I wish Joss would throw together some webisodes or a spinoff series or SOME kind of new content.
   Profile |  

Lord Baal
PostPosted: 2012-07-11 04:01pm 

Padawan Learner


Joined: 2011-08-25 03:17pm
Posts: 248
Location: Segmentun Solar, Sol system, Terra, America, South America, Venezuela, Lara, Barquisimeto, my office
Sad thing... I would say that FOX is ruled by a retarded monkey. But that would give retarded people and monkeys a bad name.
   Profile |  

Darth Fanboy
PostPosted: 2012-07-11 05:17pm 

DUH! WINNING!


Joined: 2002-09-20 05:25am
Posts: 11181
Location: Mars, where I am a totally bitchin' rockstar.
Joss Whedon is still too busy right now having probably made more money on opening weekend of avengers than the entire run of firefly plus that awful movie put together.

Seriously why would any fan begging for new content at this point when pretty much everyone involved with the show worth watching has moved on completely? Naw lets do a half assed low budget web-based resurrection that pretty much fails at recapturing the feel of the old series? The movie was the last chance and it just didn't happen the way everyone thought it would.
   Profile |  

Lord Baal
PostPosted: 2012-07-11 05:28pm 

Padawan Learner


Joined: 2011-08-25 03:17pm
Posts: 248
Location: Segmentun Solar, Sol system, Terra, America, South America, Venezuela, Lara, Barquisimeto, my office
Yeah, once you see the movie you understand the thing is death, the characters they kill, the way it develops and unravels the space cannibals... damn you to hell FOX!!!

In any case, a new series, fully funded a backed up by a network with more brains than bladder, based on the same universe and being respectful of it's continuity might be worth the shot, but it would be a long shoot indeed, having to fill those huge shoes.
   Profile |  

Simon_Jester
PostPosted: 2012-07-11 10:45pm 

Emperor's Hand


Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm
Posts: 17649
The problem with any attempt to resurrect Firefly is that it wasn't the IP that made it work, it was the cast. And they're not interested anymore. Summer Glau was 21 when Firefly aired. Now she's 31. I don't think she wants to go back to being cast as a crazy psychic waif. The same goes for the rest of the cast, maybe to varying degrees, but it does. That window of opportunity probably closed some time in the Bush administration.

So to make anything out of it that the fanbase would think was "as good" as the original, someone would have to put together a new bunch of actors who would have something like the chemistry and skill that made it work the first time. It's not practical.

It might have been nice if the thing had run for two seasons or so, but it's dead, it's hardly the best thing that ever happened, and a lot of other good stuff has been created since.
   Profile |  

Themightytom
PostPosted: 2012-07-12 04:08pm 

Sith Devotee


Joined: 2007-12-22 12:11pm
Posts: 2640
Location: United States
Darth Fanboy wrote:
Joss Whedon is still too busy right now having probably made more money on opening weekend of avengers than the entire run of firefly plus that awful movie put together.

Seriously why would any fan begging for new content at this point when pretty much everyone involved with the show worth watching has moved on completely? Naw lets do a half assed low budget web-based resurrection that pretty much fails at recapturing the feel of the old series? The movie was the last chance and it just didn't happen the way everyone thought it would.


Planning to fail is failing to plan. Look at the webisodes for Sanctuary...oh wait, you don't have to, because it became a show.
   Profile |  

Sarevok
PostPosted: 2012-07-12 10:17pm 

The Fearless One


Joined: 2002-12-24 08:29am
Posts: 10681
Location: The Covenants last and final line of defense
Simon_Jester wrote:
The problem with any attempt to resurrect Firefly is that it wasn't the IP that made it work, it was the cast. And they're not interested anymore. Summer Glau was 21 when Firefly aired. Now she's 31. I don't think she wants to go back to being cast as a crazy psychic waif. The same goes for the rest of the cast, maybe to varying degrees, but it does. That window of opportunity probably closed some time in the Bush administration.

So to make anything out of it that the fanbase would think was "as good" as the original, someone would have to put together a new bunch of actors who would have something like the chemistry and skill that made it work the first time. It's not practical.

It might have been nice if the thing had run for two seasons or so, but it's dead, it's hardly the best thing that ever happened, and a lot of other good stuff has been created since.


The cast was a very important part of it yes but the universe was also interesting and good enough to explore. Also bear in mind Firefly was intentionally developed such that the cast are a literal bunch of nobodies. They are not Captain Picard of the Enterprise or Jake Sisko of Deep Space 9 or Dylan Hunt of the Andromeda. They don't decide fate of entire planets or even change the course of history barring one lucky misstep. These people are the random janitors,cargo ship crewmen and mooks whose stories don't get featured in other space opera.

If Firefly actuallly developed into a second season they would have to deal with a plotline that leads to a major conflict. Mal Reynolds aint no Sisko and the notion of him commanding massive fleet engagements may make some fanfic writers drool but it is so stupid and inconsistent with the character and the series itself. Having Mal and his plucky band of misfits decide the fate of an interplanetary war like other space opera heroes etc would totally ruin the feel of the series. If you want to do the BIG picture of the aftermath of events of Serenity you have to move away from the original main characters. Mal had his moment in the sun but thats about it.
   Profile |  

Sidewinder
PostPosted: 2012-07-12 10:29pm 

Sith Acolyte


Joined: 2005-05-18 10:23pm
Posts: 5030
Location: Feasting on those who fell in battle
Sarevok wrote:
If Firefly actuallly developed into a second season they would have to deal with a plotline that leads to a major conflict. Mal Reynolds aint no Sisko and the notion of him commanding massive fleet engagements may make some fanfic writers drool but it is so stupid and inconsistent with the character and the series itself. Having Mal and his plucky band of misfits decide the fate of an interplanetary war like other space opera heroes etc would totally ruin the feel of the series.

Do you believe this is the reason Serenity bombed- that it alienated fans and potential fans by making Mal "Savior of the Universe"?
Quote:
If you want to do the BIG picture of the aftermath of events of Serenity you have to move away from the original main characters. Mal had his moment in the sun but thats about it.

What characters do you believe this show should star? A soldier/explorer/diplomatic/ambassador, like Kirk or Picard? A hero on a quest to meet his destiny, like Luke Skywalker?
   Profile |  

Sarevok
PostPosted: 2012-07-12 10:48pm 

The Fearless One


Joined: 2002-12-24 08:29am
Posts: 10681
Location: The Covenants last and final line of defense
Quote:
Do you believe this is the reason Serenity bombed- that it alienated fans and potential fans by making Mal "Savior of the Universe"?


I don't know. Serenity was the first Firefly I watched and loved it so much I bought the whole series in DVD. In retrospect the movie is somewhat inconsistent in many regards (as many would point out) but that never bothered me. It was first decent science fiction movie set in space in many years that was not Stargate or Star Trek. And with memorable characters, dialogue, humor and all around great action scenes I loved every minute of it.

Quote:
What characters do you believe this show should star? A soldier/explorer/diplomatic/ambassador, like Kirk or Picard? A hero on a quest to meet his destiny, like Luke Skywalker?


I think a Deep Space 9 like approach would be best way to deal with the comic intrigue,political developments and eventual war that may engulf the entire planetary system. However I am not sure if Joss Whedon is upto the task of developing a wide range of memorable background characters as seen in DS9, his style is more like TNG/TOS where it is 7 highly detailed interesting main heroes. JMS might be better option if he could be tapped.
   Profile |  

Simon_Jester
PostPosted: 2012-07-13 01:23am 

Emperor's Hand


Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm
Posts: 17649
Sarevok wrote:
The cast was a very important part of it yes but the universe was also interesting and good enough to explore. Also bear in mind Firefly was intentionally developed such that the cast are a literal bunch of nobodies. They are not Captain Picard of the Enterprise or Jake Sisko of Deep Space 9 or Dylan Hunt of the Andromeda. They don't decide fate of entire planets or even change the course of history barring one lucky misstep. These people are the random janitors,cargo ship crewmen and mooks whose stories don't get featured in other space opera.
Without the original cast, any new Firefly would be a reboot, in which case you can start over with the same premise instead of being stuck with Serenity changing the tone of the story.
   Profile |  

Sarevok
PostPosted: 2012-07-13 02:10am 

The Fearless One


Joined: 2002-12-24 08:29am
Posts: 10681
Location: The Covenants last and final line of defense
^^

That is certainly true. IIRC Firefly was originally supposed to be more realistic taking place in the asteroid belt with no aritifical gravity, filming requirements and budget forced them to change the setting because 0 G is hard to do in live action even today.
   Profile |  

Guardsman Bass
PostPosted: 2012-07-13 04:06pm 

Cowardly Codfish


Joined: 2002-07-07 12:01am
Posts: 8241
Location: Beneath the Deepest Sea
Without having seen Firefly first, Serenity is only an okay SF movie with some cool stylistic elements and characters. I saw it in theaters years before I ever watched any Firefly, and I don't remember being that impressed with it when I saw it.
   Profile |  

Simon_Jester
PostPosted: 2012-07-13 09:47pm 

Emperor's Hand


Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm
Posts: 17649
Sarevok wrote:
^^

That is certainly true. IIRC Firefly was originally supposed to be more realistic taking place in the asteroid belt with no aritifical gravity, filming requirements and budget forced them to change the setting because 0 G is hard to do in live action even today.
Well, you could keep the... scenery of Firefly (many habitable planets, most of them living in subsistence or poverty, with the 'space Western' aesthetic). But you'd still need a different cast. Either you'd just have Mal/Zoe/etc. with different faces, or you'd reimagine the basic personalities of the characters and rearrange things.

And you'd have to do a very good job, either way. In some ways this is the same obstacle that we're going to see to a remake of Star Wars (eventually, after George Lucas dies and they run out of ways to milk the original movies by remastering them and 3D-ifying them and so on). A lot of actors in the original did a great job with the characterization, and who's going to sign up to out-Han Harrison Ford? Or out-Obiwan Alec Guiness? And if they did, could they actually pull it off?

Maybe, but it'd be a hard job to do, and the temptation to just randomly pull in big names who aren't suited for the roles would be tough to fight.
   Profile |  

The Yosemite Bear
PostPosted: 2012-07-16 03:35am 

Mostly Harmless Nutcase


Joined: 2002-07-21 02:38am
Posts: 35153
Location: Dave's Not Here Man
well Browncoats will always unite, I spent this weekend instead with a young lady who just turned 1, whose named after a character in firefly.
   Profile |  

Skgoa
PostPosted: 2012-07-16 08:26am 

Jedi Master


Joined: 2007-08-02 01:39pm
Posts: 1388
Location: Dresden, valley of the clueless
Vera?
   Profile |  

The Yosemite Bear
PostPosted: 2012-07-16 11:32am 

Mostly Harmless Nutcase


Joined: 2002-07-21 02:38am
Posts: 35153
Location: Dave's Not Here Man
Nope and not the psychic waif, or the "Ambassadore" think Wrench Wench
   Profile |  

Themightytom
PostPosted: 2012-07-16 12:03pm 

Sith Devotee


Joined: 2007-12-22 12:11pm
Posts: 2640
Location: United States
Sarevok wrote:
Without the original cast, any new Firefly would be a reboot, in which case you can start over with the same premise instead of being stuck with Serenity changing the tone of the story.[/quote]
Sarevok wrote:
^^

That is certainly true. IIRC Firefly was originally supposed to be more realistic taking place in the asteroid belt with no aritifical gravity, filming requirements and budget forced them to change the setting because 0 G is hard to do in live action even today.
[quote="Simon_Jester"]

No it's not true. Without the cast, a new Firefly could easily be any other set of characters set in the same universe. The entire concept was that the these were every Schmos in a crappy ship just trying to get by. Sure the characters were a huge part of making it work, but that's exactly why any other set of Schmos that are equally good characters could make it work too. Firefly was about the people who happened to be in the ship. You could just as easily put different people in the ship, and build their stories. Set it fifteen years later in the aftermath of a long and bloody second civil war and maybe have a send off from a cast member or two.

You can have an entirely fresh story with the occasional nod to the old cast, OR use a different firefly altogether, maybe the class became popular after the events of Serenity. You could ditch the "firefly" part altogether, and do stories about mercenaries, bounty hunters, rebels, colonists or any other fringe group out on the edge, or you could do one from the Alliance perspective, where the main characters have no idea about the sinister machinations of the Alliance but are determined to defend civilization, you could even DO a political story about an internal overthrow of the alliance or something. The universe created has plenty of potential, it doesn't rely solely on the characters we got to know in twelve episodes.
   Profile |  

Crown
PostPosted: 2012-07-16 04:45pm 

NARF


Joined: 2002-07-11 11:45am
Posts: 9571
Location: In Transit ...
Simon_Jester wrote:
The problem with any attempt to resurrect Firefly is that it wasn't the IP that made it work, it was the cast. And they're not interested anymore. Summer Glau was 21 when Firefly aired. Now she's 31. I don't think she wants to go back to being cast as a crazy psychic waif. The same goes for the rest of the cast, maybe to varying degrees, but it does. That window of opportunity probably closed some time in the Bush administration.

So to make anything out of it that the fanbase would think was "as good" as the original, someone would have to put together a new bunch of actors who would have something like the chemistry and skill that made it work the first time. It's not practical.

It might have been nice if the thing had run for two seasons or so, but it's dead, it's hardly the best thing that ever happened, and a lot of other good stuff has been created since.


I think everyone can state what made Firefly special for them and it would be equally valid, but I pretty much agree 100% with the above. Why didn't he just start writing novels? My imagination could have kept all the characters alive, and my internal monologue would have been in each characters/actors voices. Would have been nice.
   Profile |  

jollyreaper
PostPosted: 2012-07-16 10:58pm 

Jedi Knight


Joined: 2010-06-28 10:19pm
Posts: 963
Firefly was good but the show is dead. While I enjoyed it and the movie greatly and always will, this is the time to move on.

Part of creating a new universe is about casting off the old baggage. Acknowledge your influences, pay homage where suitable, but make something new. A reboot is the cheap-ass way of doing that.

Firefly was trying to do a more realistic space opera with the sense of "What if we saw Han Solo before A New Hope when he was still a smuggler?" with a touch of lost-cause survivor of a failed rebellion.

Thing is, the spirit, themes and characters of Firefly made far more sense than the setting. If I ever set aside how much I liked the characters, my brain starts seg-faulting on the 'verse as presented. It makes even less sense than BSG reboot which was pretty goddamn horrific to begin with.

Frankly, at this point I would care less about the in-universe story mechanics and more about the real world mechanics of producing the show. Can a show like this be produced without getting fucked by the network? Show me that and I'll feel comfy getting to know the characters and invested in the story.

Realistic space opera is hard since space opera is pretty unrealistic to begin with. Space is no more conducive to swashbuckling than Cold War sub combat is to 18th century Horatio Hornblower stories. There's no daring sub skippers seducing beautiful Russian agents and boarding actions. A good Cold War sub story is possible, they've been told, but they're pretty much incompatible with derring-do and high adventure. Much in the same way that a WWIII nuclear war in-the-bunker story could be gripping and captivating but simply won't have the same feel as a tale of Rome with barbarians at the gates.
   Profile |  

JME2
PostPosted: 2012-07-16 11:48pm 

Emperor's Hand


Joined: 2003-02-02 05:04pm
Posts: 11570
Location: San Francisco, CA
Skgoa wrote:
Vera?


:lol: :lol: :lol:

I sorry, I was laughing for a minute after reading this.
   Profile |  

Simon_Jester
PostPosted: 2012-07-17 01:54am 

Emperor's Hand


Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm
Posts: 17649
Themightytom wrote:
No it's not true. Without the cast, a new Firefly could easily be any other set of characters set in the same universe. The entire concept was that the these were every Schmos in a crappy ship just trying to get by. Sure the characters were a huge part of making it work, but that's exactly why any other set of Schmos that are equally good characters could make it work too. Firefly was about the people who happened to be in the ship. You could just as easily put different people in the ship, and build their stories. Set it fifteen years later in the aftermath of a long and bloody second civil war and maybe have a send off from a cast member or two.
You're jumping at shadows.

My point is that you'd have to work to assemble a cast good enough to make it work again. The details don't matter- it could be a near-clone of Firefly with new faces, or it could be 'other schmos in another jalopy-ship.' Or it could be something completely different, like people struggling to rebuild a single planet, or Alliance minions, or whatever.

And that was my point all along. However you do it, you're going to have to find a cast with good enough chemistry that it looks as good as the original. Otherwise, you won't keep the old fans and you won't make enough new ones to avoid the fate of the original.

Crown wrote:
I think everyone can state what made Firefly special for them and it would be equally valid, but I pretty much agree 100% with the above. Why didn't he just start writing novels? My imagination could have kept all the characters alive, and my internal monologue would have been in each characters/actors voices. Would have been nice.
What, Whedon? Because he's not that kind of artist. Whedon produces visual media; as a novelist he'd be nothing special.

jollyreaper wrote:
Realistic space opera is hard since space opera is pretty unrealistic to begin with. Space is no more conducive to swashbuckling than Cold War sub combat is to 18th century Horatio Hornblower stories. There's no daring sub skippers seducing beautiful Russian agents and boarding actions. A good Cold War sub story is possible, they've been told, but they're pretty much incompatible with derring-do and high adventure. Much in the same way that a WWIII nuclear war in-the-bunker story could be gripping and captivating but simply won't have the same feel as a tale of Rome with barbarians at the gates.
I think there's a lot to be said for the freedom to imagine in SF. Among other things, when we aren't spending all our mental energy trying to make the science fiction "hard," we have more to spare for making it applicable- we can talk about things that we already know are likely to be 21st-century issues. Science fiction has a social criticism role, along with being a source of escape fantasy.
   Profile |  

jollyreaper
PostPosted: 2012-07-17 07:03am 

Jedi Knight


Joined: 2010-06-28 10:19pm
Posts: 963
One question is why does Firefly have to be in space? It could have just as easily been Earth 100 years in the future. The US is on the losing side of a war with China. The new political leaders in this country are currying favor with Beijing and keeping their wealth and power selling out the regular folk. Mal would have been ex-military. The Serenity could Ben's tramp freighter sailing in some region that credibly includes backwaters and major cities in reasonable proximity, a place where central authority is stretched thin.

Come to think of it, the war might not have been China vs America but the Feds cracking down on ip violations by their own citizens because China was upset about piracy. Maybe the rebels were using black market replicators to run off copies of necessary goods or grew illegal seeds without paying the vig to the ag conglomerate.

Spaceships are cool but the themes seem like they could still work out in the mid-future on Earth. The biggest concern would be the expense of production. Were generic planets that all looked alike cheaper to pull off? How about the effects for the ship? Cheaper to pull off than attempting with a real boat and selective CGI?

The western stuff would be easy to explain. It's a manufactured counter-culture, the rebels deliberately aping antiquated styles as a form of rebellion. Cowboys = freedom even though the history doesn't quite track. If whatever country music evolves into goes political like rock in the 60's, if the styles in the vids make an impression on youth, you'll see a subculture spread and morph. Cowboying up is just another way of raising a finger to the Man.
   Profile |  

Darth Fanboy
PostPosted: 2012-07-17 03:41pm 

DUH! WINNING!


Joined: 2002-09-20 05:25am
Posts: 11181
Location: Mars, where I am a totally bitchin' rockstar.
Themightytom wrote:
Planning to fail is failing to plan. Look at the webisodes for Sanctuary...oh wait, you don't have to, because it became a show.


Yeah because Sanctuary was a high budget show on a broadcast network expected to perform like the various Star Treks, Buffy, etc...

oh wait no it wasn't.
   Profile |  

Darth Fanboy
PostPosted: 2012-07-17 03:44pm 

DUH! WINNING!


Joined: 2002-09-20 05:25am
Posts: 11181
Location: Mars, where I am a totally bitchin' rockstar.
Holy crap though I come back to this thread and i'm seeing some of the most rational posting about Firefly i've seen on this board yet (except for themightytom who continues the browncoat tradition of masturbatory fantasies involving the resurrection of this failed franchise).
   Profile |  

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Post a reply  Page 1 of 3
 [ 70 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

It is currently 2013-05-19 03:50am (All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ])

Board index » Fiction » Science Fiction

Who is online: Users browsing this forum: Ford Prefect and 5 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group