New Pic From The Hobbit

FAN: Discuss various fictional worlds that don't qualify for SF.

Moderators: Mayabird, Steve

User avatar
Elfdart
The Anti-Shep
Posts: 9812
Joined: 2004-04-28 11:32pm
Location: What's the bonus for shooting bad guys from behind?

New Pic From The Hobbit

Postby Elfdart » 2011-07-08 12:32am

I always preferred The Hobbit to Snored through Lord of the Rings, and I was worried this was going to be like the movie version of LOTR -in other words, more of the same. But this photo of Dori, Ori and Nori from Grognardia has me thinking differently:

Image

I like the way each one has a different look and a different demeanor. I also like the fact that Jackson didn't hire a bunch of middle-aged fat guys to play the dwarves. Am I alone in thinking this way?
Image

User avatar
Imperial Overlord
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11631
Joined: 2004-08-19 04:30am
Location: The Tower at Charm
Contact:

Re: New Pic From The Hobbit

Postby Imperial Overlord » 2011-07-08 12:57am

They do look good. And The Hobbit was pretty fast paced and crammed to the gills with action and adventure, which makes it a much funner read.
The Excellent Prismatic Spray. For when you absolutely, positively must kill a motherfucker. Accept no substitutions. Contact a magician of the later Aeons for details. Some conditions may apply.

Librium Arcana

User avatar
U-95
Youngling
Posts: 69
Joined: 2011-06-21 08:43am
Location: Always on the move (or nearly so)

Re: New Pic From The Hobbit

Postby U-95 » 2011-07-08 08:02am

Agreed. They look good, and can't wait to see how looks Smaug.

I also like the fact that Jackson didn't hire a bunch of middle-aged fat guys to play the dwarves


Worse was in Eragon. Much worse...

User avatar
Vympel
Spetsnaz
Spetsnaz
Posts: 28539
Joined: 2002-07-19 01:08am
Location: Sydney Australia

Re: New Pic From The Hobbit

Postby Vympel » 2011-07-08 08:53am

LotR's flaws (which found their ultimate expression in the third film) weren't its art direction / casting so much as Peter Jackson's self-indulgent, turgid directing and questionable story-telling. It looks good though.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/

User avatar
JME2
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12258
Joined: 2003-02-02 04:04pm

Re: New Pic From The Hobbit

Postby JME2 » 2011-07-08 01:26pm

Looking good.

User avatar
Guardsman Bass
Cowardly Codfish
Posts: 9053
Joined: 2002-07-07 12:01am
Location: Beneath the Deepest Sea

Re: New Pic From The Hobbit

Postby Guardsman Bass » 2011-07-08 01:42pm

There are also pictures out of the Dwarves together, Gandalf, and Bilbo here.

I'll admit that I was slightly worried about Bilbo looking too young (Ian Holm was a great Bilbo in the LOTR movies), but he looks great in that picture.
“It is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life.”
-Jean-Luc Picard


"Men are afraid that women will laugh at them. Women are afraid that men will kill them."
-Margaret Atwood

User avatar
Bright
Padawan Learner
Posts: 378
Joined: 2010-06-15 04:33am
Location: Estonia.

Re: New Pic From The Hobbit

Postby Bright » 2011-07-08 02:28pm

Image

Oin and Gloin: Distant cousins of Thorin Oakenshield, these two doughty Northern Dwarves join the Company out of a sense of loyalty to their kin, and also because they have a substantial sum of money invested in the venture. Along with Bombur, Gloin is the only other married Dwarf in the Company (there being a shortage of female dwarves in general). His wife is an acclaimed beauty with a particularly fine beard. Gloin is the proud father of a young son, Gimli, who will go on to become part of the famous Fellowship of the Ring.

They look great. I love the different beard styles. It looks like they're going to release a picture a day for now.

User avatar
JME2
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12258
Joined: 2003-02-02 04:04pm

Re: New Pic From The Hobbit

Postby JME2 » 2011-07-08 02:33pm

Guardsman Bass wrote:There are also pictures out of the Dwarves together, Gandalf, and Bilbo here.

I'll admit that I was slightly worried about Bilbo looking too young (Ian Holm was a great Bilbo in the LOTR movies), but he looks great in that picture.


Freeman's challenge is going to be to have his Bilbo match up with Holms' portrayal. I think he can do it, though.

Sinewmire
Padawan Learner
Posts: 463
Joined: 2009-12-15 12:17pm

Re: New Pic From The Hobbit

Postby Sinewmire » 2011-07-08 03:32pm

Agreed on Peter Jackson - the films, in my opinion, got worse as they went on rather than better, as Peter Jackson got free rein. The guy cannot bear to allow surprise or sudden change, everything is foreshadowed dozens of times.

I'm deeply worried about Martin Freeman as young(er) Bilbo. I grew up on the Hobbit, so the poor guy has a lot to live up to. He's already failed dismally in The Hitch Hiker's Guide.

THe pictures are pretty good. Not how I imagined themm, but still good! They beat Games Workshop's tolkien dwarves into a bloody heap! I like how Gloin's costume is reminiscent of Gimli's.
"Our terror has to be indiscriminate, otherwise innocent people will cease to fear"
-Josef Stalin

User avatar
Bright
Padawan Learner
Posts: 378
Joined: 2010-06-15 04:33am
Location: Estonia.

Re: New Pic From The Hobbit

Postby Bright » 2011-07-08 03:34pm

Sinewmire wrote:Agreed on Peter Jackson - the films, in my opinion, got worse as they went on rather than better, as Peter Jackson got free rein.


What does that even mean? What circumstances were different with the later films? All three were scripted and filmed together.

Sinewmire
Padawan Learner
Posts: 463
Joined: 2009-12-15 12:17pm

Re: New Pic From The Hobbit

Postby Sinewmire » 2011-07-08 03:52pm

What does that even mean? What circumstances were different with the later films? All three were scripted and filmed together.


I'm sorry, didn't realise I'd been unclear. Basically, I felt as the films progressed they moved further from the source material. The Fellowship was extremely true to the original book with a few small differences, The Two Towers had a number of changes (Elves at Helm's Deep for example) whilst the Return of the King had more changes (Gollum vs Sam, "Arwen is dying" etc.) and more tonal differences (skull landslides, Army of the Dead, Komedy moments like Gandalf laying out Denethor).

Whilst I have NO problems with changes - for example, I liked Merry not being fooled by Arwen's disguise in Return of the King as he was in the book, or the warg attack in TTT - I feel that most of the changes do not improve the finished product. Furthermore, a lot of the invented scenes would have been better spent on stuff from the books. For example; I could quite happily have done without Gollum conniving to separate Sam and Frodo utterly pointlessly, or the aforementioned Arwen dying of terminal lack of screen time in exchange for say The Scouring of the Shire, or Denethor's Palantír.

tldr; TTT and especially ROTK had lots of added stuff by the production writers that was of significantly lower quality than the rest of the movie. Whilst I don't mind changes, the stuff they did change generally sucked. In my opinion. And it was more noticable in each film.
"Our terror has to be indiscriminate, otherwise innocent people will cease to fear"
-Josef Stalin

User avatar
Crossroads Inc.
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 8659
Joined: 2005-03-20 06:26pm
Location: Defending Sparkeling Bishonen
Contact:

Re: New Pic From The Hobbit

Postby Crossroads Inc. » 2011-07-08 04:14pm

I think the main thing people began to dislike was that the movies would just Drag On and ON. Especially in the extended cuts, the 'ending' for instance is a good 30min long of wrap up. Over all there where a great deal of small bits added that really did not need to be there. Some bits helped, like adding in exlanations of the gifts given in fellowships, but other changes do not add much.

For instance in the book, the Ents of TTT made up their mind to goto war In the movie they decied not to and its another 10min of exposition by Merry and Pippen before they are convinced to attack.

It felt like at times that Jackson didn't have anyone left to say 'Do we really need this?"
I mean the man did FANTASTIC Work, but there comes a point where enough is enough.

That said I am very much looking forward to The Hobbit, but I worry how long it may be. There is enough for 3hours I think, but it is supposed to be two movies. If each is 90min thats ok, but two 2 hour movies? Or 2.5? Does anyone think there is 5hours of material in The Hobbit?
Image
Praying is another way of doing nothing helpful
"Congratulations, you get a cookie. You almost got a fundamental English word correct." Pick
"Outlaw star has spaceships that punch eachother" Joviwan
Read "Tales From The Crossroads"!
Read "One Wrong Turn"!

User avatar
JME2
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12258
Joined: 2003-02-02 04:04pm

Re: New Pic From The Hobbit

Postby JME2 » 2011-07-08 04:35pm

Crossroads Inc. wrote:That said I am very much looking forward to The Hobbit, but I worry how long it may be. There is enough for 3hours I think, but it is supposed to be two movies. If each is 90min thats ok, but two 2 hour movies? Or 2.5? Does anyone think there is 5hours of material in The Hobbit?


I'll put it this way:

We know that Christopher Lee and Cate Blanchett are reprising their roles as Saruman and Galadriel. That means we'll see the White Council.

Even money says Jackson and company will be using "The Quest of Erebor" from Unfinished Tales as part of the adaption. That should give them plenty of extra material.

User avatar
Crossroads Inc.
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 8659
Joined: 2005-03-20 06:26pm
Location: Defending Sparkeling Bishonen
Contact:

Re: New Pic From The Hobbit

Postby Crossroads Inc. » 2011-07-08 05:56pm

Ah that makes sense.

Since the Hobbit was intially a stand along piece, and done as a childerns bed time story early on, it is indeed quite short and almost fully from Bilbo's viewpoint. I remember hearing more then once that, after finishing the whole LOTR series, Tolkien had mentioned he wanted to go back and redo the Hobbit to better fit into the overall series and be less a childerns story.

If jackson is taking all this into account it may end up being a far different story then some of us are expecting, yet far more in keeping the serious tone of LOTR.
Image
Praying is another way of doing nothing helpful
"Congratulations, you get a cookie. You almost got a fundamental English word correct." Pick
"Outlaw star has spaceships that punch eachother" Joviwan
Read "Tales From The Crossroads"!
Read "One Wrong Turn"!

User avatar
JME2
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12258
Joined: 2003-02-02 04:04pm

Re: New Pic From The Hobbit

Postby JME2 » 2011-07-08 06:12pm

And it'll help it segue better into the film trilogy.

User avatar
Ahriman238
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4854
Joined: 2011-04-22 11:04pm
Location: Ocularis Terribus.

Re: New Pic From The Hobbit

Postby Ahriman238 » 2011-07-09 12:19am

I'm happy that things are going well, but the Hobbit is still a long way into the future. Also, how much does it matter if the dwarves are distinctive from each other? Their role in the story (besides providing a reason to go the Lonely Mountain in the first place) is to stumble into trouble that Gandalf and later Bilbo will have to get them out of. Aside from Thorin being stubborn and prideful beyond all reason and Bombur being a lazy whiner, how much of their personalities are demonstrated?

There are thirteen dwarves and only so much screentime, as there was only so much space for individuality in the book. Thorin matters. The other dwarves are window dressing.

That said, I was very impressed by the costumes and props in the Lord of the Rings, which stood up to several repeat viewings. I am glad to see they are maintaining quality here.
"Any plan which requires the direct intervention of any deity to work can be assumed to be a very poor one."- Newbiespud

User avatar
Bright
Padawan Learner
Posts: 378
Joined: 2010-06-15 04:33am
Location: Estonia.

Re: New Pic From The Hobbit

Postby Bright » 2011-07-09 02:15am

Crossroads Inc. wrote:I think the main thing people began to dislike was that the movies would just Drag On and ON. Especially in the extended cuts, the 'ending' for instance is a good 30min long of wrap up.


The way I hear it, Jackson specifically didn't add anything to the ending in the Extended version because it was already as long as it was.

User avatar
JME2
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12258
Joined: 2003-02-02 04:04pm

Re: New Pic From The Hobbit

Postby JME2 » 2011-07-09 10:39am

Bright wrote:
Crossroads Inc. wrote:I think the main thing people began to dislike was that the movies would just Drag On and ON. Especially in the extended cuts, the 'ending' for instance is a good 30min long of wrap up.


The way I hear it, Jackson specifically didn't add anything to the ending in the Extended version because it was already as long as it was.


Yeah, according to the commentary, there were vintages focusing on Gimli and Legolas that Jackson didn't add for that very reason.

User avatar
FaxModem1
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5175
Joined: 2002-10-30 06:40pm
Location: In a dark reflection of a better world

Re: New Pic From The Hobbit

Postby FaxModem1 » 2011-07-09 02:06pm

Out of curiosity, how were the dwarves in Eragon so much worse? Keep in mind I only saw the movie once and was so bored and disgusted I've blocked most of it out of my mind and will never read the book. Heck, I don't even remember there being dwarves in Eragon.
"I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed,or numbered. I am a free man. My life is my own" Number 6
The Prisoner

User avatar
Bright
Padawan Learner
Posts: 378
Joined: 2010-06-15 04:33am
Location: Estonia.

Re: New Pic From The Hobbit

Postby Bright » 2011-07-09 02:13pm

Well, there technically weren't dwarves in the Eragon movie. The dwarf characters were never identified as such, and only appeared so briefly that it didn't really matter anyway. Nothing of value was lost.

User avatar
Elfdart
The Anti-Shep
Posts: 9812
Joined: 2004-04-28 11:32pm
Location: What's the bonus for shooting bad guys from behind?

Re: New Pic From The Hobbit

Postby Elfdart » 2011-07-14 04:21pm

Here's a new one, with Thorin's nephews Kili and Fili:

Image

Apparently, the one on the right is played by an actor who plays a vampire on a TV show. I know this this because my SO's reaction to this photo was:

An adult woman who saw this and turned into a giggly teenager wrote:Oh... my god!

It's Aiden Turner! When does this come out? Next Christmas? :shock:


And here are three more: Bifur, Bofur and Bombur.

Image
Image

User avatar
JME2
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12258
Joined: 2003-02-02 04:04pm

Re: New Pic From The Hobbit

Postby JME2 » 2011-07-14 05:32pm

Glad they got Bombur's appearance right. Hope Stephen Hunter does a good job.

User avatar
CaptainChewbacca
Browncoat Wookiee
Posts: 15745
Joined: 2003-05-06 02:36am
Location: Deep beneath Boatmurdered.
Contact:

Re: New Pic From The Hobbit

Postby CaptainChewbacca » 2011-07-14 05:46pm

Anyone else think its funny that the 2 married dwarves are Gloin and BOMBUR? Like... those are the two 'hearthrob' dwarves.
Stuart: The only problem is, I'm losing track of which universe I'm in.
You kinda look like Jesus. With a lightsaber.- Peregrin Toker
ImageImage

User avatar
LadyTevar
White Mage
White Mage
Posts: 18051
Joined: 2003-02-12 10:59pm
Location: Tahalshia Manor

Re: New Pic From The Hobbit

Postby LadyTevar » 2011-07-14 07:45pm

CaptainChewbacca wrote:Anyone else think its funny that the 2 married dwarves are Gloin and BOMBUR? Like... those are the two 'hearthrob' dwarves.
It has to be the beard
Image

Librium Arcana, Where Gamers Play!
Nitram, slightly high on cough syrup: Do you know you're beautiful?
Me: Nope, that's why I have you around to tell me.
Nitram: You -are- beautiful. Anyone tries to tell you otherwise kill them.
"A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. LLAP" -- Leonard Nimoy, last Tweet

User avatar
JME2
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12258
Joined: 2003-02-02 04:04pm

Re: New Pic From The Hobbit

Postby JME2 » 2011-07-14 10:28pm

Heh.


Return to “Fantasy”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest