That's a good solution ; People may try to cross to the mainland in canoes, rowboats and pontoons, but they're more likely to get themselves killed that way (30 miles is nothing for someone who knows what he's doing, an amateur would almost certainly get lost) - the only threat would come from people who manage to get their hands on a motorboat or even a sailboat, if they know how to handle one.Coyote wrote: Hmm, maybe posting a guard shift on the docks would be wise, too.
I wasn't aware of that, but I'd guess it was because she was an Indian woman in the company of two white men. I'd guess that the reason she was so disarming was because she was the guide for two healthy men. She carried a baby on her back, and yet Lewis & Clark needed her to navigate the country.Coyote wrote: That's a good cover story, really. My comment about females was reflected from the writings of Lewis & Clark, who credited Sacajawea's prescence as disarming among various tribes. But while that may be the case for Midwest & Rocky Mountain societies, it may not hold true for Seaboard communities. And Lewis & Clark may have misread the reasons behind her ability to get along.
Put yourself in the shoes of people who spend their life fighting, hunting and travelling dozens of miles on foot with ease, after they see such a sight

It had to be pretty funny for them.
We have a lot of coast to cover, though. Of course, the fact we're an island kid of limits the options of anybody coming to steal horses: I think the bigger threat lies in somebody stealing horses from our allies, and then these allies coming to us asking we send some warriors to take vengeance.Coyote wrote: The thing about safeguarding horses holds true, yes... a coastal watch eventually will have to be posted once we have made contact with the natives and they are aware ofour presence.
We'll have to build a good understanding of local politics and customs before we get involved, though. The locals may not see our way of waging war as acceptable: most of the time, for indian tribes, war meant taking a band of fighters with you and doing something brave, stealing things like horses or kidnapping women. Killing enemies was secondary, it brought more fame to touch an enemy and escape alive.Coyote wrote: As for getting involved in local wars, well, that will have to be considered based on the situation at the time. It may actually benefit us, in some way, to make a display of "don't fuck with us".
On the other hand, if we go to war, there's gonna be death, and lots of it. And we'll almost certainly make an enemy forever, since if an Indian tribe went to total war with the objective of defeating an entire enemy tribe, they'd kill everyone.
It was, actually. Kidnapping a wife from another tribe was quite common. Of course, we don't really have to: there's plenty of reasons our allies would want their daughters to marry into our tribe.Coyote wrote: Like it or not, it can also be an accepted way (for the time) to obtain females.