Ba'al's Thunderbolt wrote:Jim Raynor wrote:
1,000,000 member worlds is the Galactic Empire's size by ANH. We know the Republic is smaller than the Empire, given all the examples of Imperial conquests in the EU, and the fact that Tatooine was considered outside the Republic's borders (outside of even where Republic credits were worth anything) in TPM. Who knows, maybe the Republic was only something like 800,000 member worlds.
Even if it was, it's still MASSIVELY and almost certainly DECISIVELY larger than the CIS.
Let me just throw out some feasible numbers here:
Assume those "thousands" of planets that started the Separatist movement is 5,000. Add the 10,000 Dooku mentioned. Throw in several more thousand planets (let's make it 5,000 again) joining during the war. Assume the massive Trade Federation, which has Senate representation and is said to "effectively control" galactic shipping, has 20,000 of its own. Give the comparably powerful Techno Union 15,000, and 5,000 a piece to the Banking Clan, Commerce Guild, and Corporate Alliance. That's 85,000 planets, or more than 10% of the galaxy. Of course the actual numbers could be smaller, or bigger. But we know for a FACT that the planets the Separatists possess have a disproportionately high war fighting capability, and that most of their military is made up of ridiculously mass-produced droids rather than living citizens. Going by calculations, in ten years ONE outdated factory on Geonosis can produce as many troops as could be reasonably drafted from a planet with billions of inhabitants.
After which resistance to the Separatists hardened, not abated.
And support for the Separatists would flare up as well, when they finally stood up to the Republic in an all-out war.
I thought the holdings of the Commerce Guild, Trade Federation and Banking Clan were supposed to be comparable to what we see in the Corporate Sector. Wealthy, yes, resource rich, yes - but not on the scale of the Core Worlds.
The Trade Federation
controls galactic shipping. That's the claim using a canon quote on the official site. Likewise, the Techno Union controls "many" of the galaxy's most industrialized worlds. These are not relatively wealthy sectors, but major players on the galactic stage.
So they're the equivalent of sectors, so what? There were thousands upon thousands of sectors.
And not all sectors are equal. We know this from canon quotes about sectors with thousands of worlds, as well as Padme's sector being practically worthless (36 inhabited member worlds, one of them being Naboo which has no apparent warfighting capability).
The size of sectors vary, but we know from the EU that they can easily have thousands and thousands of worlds in them.
Sectors in the Republic were defined as having a maximum of
fifty inhabited systems, the larger sectors of later EU sources reflects the move toward centralization and the concentration of power under the New Order.
50 systems max per sector is bullshit and fits with the rest of canon as well as 3 million clones. With 1,024 senators each representing a sector (TPM Visual Dictionary), using that number you would only have 51,200 member worlds in the Republic. Which hurts
you even more, because suddenly 10,000 Separatist planets is a much bigger proportion of the Republic. The Visual Dictionary also said that Chancellor Valorum's sector had over a thousand systems.
If the Trade Federation can control shipping on a galaxy-wide scale, I would assume that it must either have a rather large sector if not more territory.
Whatever the number of worlds they own, we KNOW that these businesses controlled a disproportionate amount of the galaxy's manufacturing, logistical, and military capability.
They could control disproportionate resources and still be hopelessly outclassed on the level of potential production if the size gap between the CIS and the Republic was great enough.[/quote]
Not if they own many of the best planets. That's like saying one side has less production if it "only" has America, while the other side gets Africa.
And I guess Corellia and Kuat were whittling starships by hand out of pieces of wheat, right?
And those two planets are balanced by the shitload of big manufacturers on the Separatist side. Nice rhetorical attempt.
So you're suggesting that there must be some core of truth to the idea that, say, Jews stabbed Germany in the back in November of 1918? I mean, that was a highly effective bit of propaganda, so it couldn't possibly be that far from the truth.
I also mentioned the scale of the lie. Hitler can make up conspiracy theories about the Jews screwing Germany behind the scenes. Palpatine can't make a pathetic ass alliance of planets out to be an OPENLY huge military threat to the galaxy.
And we know in fact that the CIS wasn't pathetic and could slug it out with the Republic from CANON quotes, so stop trying to debate this.
Remember the Maine, baby! Hell, how many millions of copies did Unlimited Access sell?
A lie about ONE ship destroyed from sabotage, when nobody had any way of knowing otherwise.
There were millions of Americans that implicitly believed that Hillary Clinton decorated the White House Christmas tree with used condoms and hypodermic needles. Propaganda doesn't have to even remotely resemble truth to be effective.
Again, a lie about one person in one place. You don't understand that scale matters, do you? Bush sure as fuck didn't pass Iraq off as having millions of battle-ready troops, a fleet of aircraft carriers, and stealth fighters.
Lot's of Americans fear Osama - but that doesn't mean he's a credible threat to the continued existence of America.
Oh Jesus fucking Christ your analogies blow. Osama isn't conquering "state after state" in the northeastern US, is he? If he did then he WOULD be a credible threat to America.
Which isn't to say that al Qaeda is capable of militarily defeating the United States and forcing us to pray to Mecca...which doesn't stop lots of
retards from acting as if they can.
Yeah, bring up the retards on the absolute fringe. Mainstream America doesn't believe Al Qaeda can beat America militarily, not even the Republican fearmongers (rather the opposite, they're all positive that America is God's nation and unbeatable).
What argues most strongly against the idea that the CIS represented a force powerful enough to actually conquer the Galactic Republic once it went to a full war footing is the fact that the whole thing was being orchestrated by Sidious. What part of the character of Palpatine/Sidious as we know him leads you to believe that he would place the means to defeat his government in the hands of his ambitious apprentice, knowing that 'treachery is the way of the Sith', much less that he would place that power in the hands of tool as fundamentally unreliable as Grievous?
Except he didn't place it all in the hands of Dooku. We see Grievous and the other Separatist leaders taking orders from Darth Sidious himself in ROTS.