Did you not read the "Some segments"? There are Japanese historians who oppose the use of the books, though they were met with death threats etc. and even a firebombing.AniThyng wrote:Do japanese pacifists, the kind who do not like the JDF spending money on more high tech weapons systems also deny the atrocities of world war 2?
I'm not entirely certain that japan is the only country guilty of world war 2 revisionism - China certainly has its own reasons to play it up, but Taiwan has always seemed much less antagonistic - and even Malaysian history textbooks have a slant that in the long run, the rise of japan in ww2 was good insofar as it gave the mat sallehs (malay slang for white man) a bloody nose and helped speed up our independence post war - they even talk about how japanese ingenuity and technological superiority helped crush the allies early on!
Mind, this was in a national malay-medium school - it's possible a Chinese medium school would be a lot less sympathetic.[/i]
Taiwan's view of the Japanese occupation is a lot less biased because the Japanese developed the Taiwanese economy early on, whereas the Nationalist KMT came to Taiwan and indulged in some rampaging which led to the ethnic Taiwanese not liking the mainlanders too much.
Interesting that the Malaysian textbooks portrayed the Japanese in positive light, considering the Chinese led to the beaches to be shot at. But then again, Malay supremacist leanings are probably at work as well. In Singapore, the older generation do not hold fond memories of the Japanese occupation.
The words may be the same, but don't words acquire different meanings over time? Korean for example has words for that mean the same thing, but totally different usage context.General Zod wrote:Japanese has changed relatively little in structure, many of the Japanese kanji are identical to Chinese characters they originated from, even if the pronounciations might change slightly according to region. So I'm failing to see how the word would somehow magically be changed to be indicative of some modern mindset.Fingolfin_Noldor wrote: Well, the way it is used now. I am not sure how it was used hundreds of years ago, though the way words are used change with the passage of time.