Cesario wrote:You know your government has problems when being in the military makes you more likely to join an armed insurrection.
I think you mean being exposed to the outside world. Tatooine isn't exactly going to have top rate access to current galactic events. Hyperwave transponders aren't cheap and unlike in the core you're a long way from the nearest broadcast station.
Cesario wrote:I'll obviously take your word for it, because only what I say requires evidence.
I'm pretty sure the fact that the rebels are under supplied isn't something that I need to cite. The fact that they were using outdated fighters like Y-Wings is one example of them being under equipped. I think them being low on munitions is from the novelization, I'll have to look that up later. Them hiding in ruins on some uncivilized forest moon, and then fleeing to a shittastic ice planet should be proof that they weren't big enough to set up shop on even the worst of actually inhabited planets. The EU also makes it painfully obvious that the Empire was still a large scale threat even years after Endor.
Cesario wrote:Not like the existence of Luke Skywalker. No one knows about that shit, but solar reflectors of Coruscant everyone knows about.
Where did I ever say that Luke didn't exist? I said that it wasn't proof that everybody hates the Empire.
Cesario wrote:Yep, that's evidence that a handful of artists successfully teraformed a world alright.
Where did I say that they terraformed anything? I said that you were free to go anywhere you want given the freedom of hyperdrive, given the level of technology setting up a habitat should be trivial. If you really want to be free you can always make your own space station in the middle of some godforsaken system as long as it has some asteroids you can stay there effectively forever.
Cesario wrote:Actually, it means the opposite. It means there's no fronteer for you to escape to that isn't a day's drive away from the bright center of the universe.
We can fly over any point on the planet in a day right now, yet you can still get to a place where people won't be able to find you with ease. It's the same thing here, you pick a place and go there. Sure somebody could find you, but what are the odds of somebody going back to a system that had a probe sent to it ages ago and was never colonized because it lacks anything of exceptional value.
Cesario wrote:You mean the stubs that don't prove what you claimed you were going to prove with them?
You've never defined Utopia so for all I know those could fit the bill perfectly.
Cesario wrote:You don't understand my reasoning at all. I don't think that the Empire is going to lack utopian planets because Palpetine is a dick. I think the Empire is going to lack utopian planets because Star Wars isn't trying to present a utopian setting.
So you think that because we see a civil war from the side of the rebels that there couldn't possibly be anything as nice as the UFP tucked away in there? Out of a million systems if even 0.1% are as nice as the UFP they have more people living in luxury than we see in Trek.
Cesario wrote:You've pulled a handful of stubs form Wookiepedia and called it a case for "nice places", when you were supposed to go find utopian planets. Meanwhile, you've been given three from Trek and whinged about not having every planet doccumented to distract from your failure.
You brought up the term Utopia, now define it.
Cesario wrote:Good thing those planets weren't supposed to be utopias for humans, then wasn't it? Another big difference between the Federation and the Empire. Humans aren't the only people in the Federation that anyone gives a shit about.
So if I want a Utopia my options are Erath, Earth, or Earth... Wow, those are some great options.
Cesario wrote:Name one person who wanted to leave earth that wasn't allowed to do so. One.
Show me a personal spacecraft, or any orbital traffic at all over Earth. In fact how many civilian ships of any sort do we see in UFP space? If you want to explore it seems to be star fleet or bust and given the few star ships we see there is no way they can be meeting demand.
Cesario wrote:Demonstrably? Great. Demonstrate it.
Look at any shot of Earth, how much space or air traffic do we see around it? How many times is the Enterprise required to evacuate a colony, shouldn't they have their own ship if personal spaceships are common? I can't prove a negative though, so why don't you show me these ships.
Cesario wrote:
But you know what a utopia is. That's why you claimed you could prove that there were more utopian worlds in the Empire than in the Federation. You remember doing that, right?
You introduced the term, so it's on you to define it. Given that everybody is going to have a different view on what a perfect society is a simple dictionary definition - which you have also failed to provide - won't do.
Cesario wrote:Still not doing so great on that whole "we're talking about domestic policy, not military" angle, I see.
I'm curious, what makes you think the Federation is unusually resource-rich?
I never said it was, I simply used that as an example of something that might seem like a Utopia but isn't. The fact that shit walks through the entire federation and arrives at Earth without them being ready shows that they aren't secure enough to meet my definition of a Utopia. A Utopia must be stable and you must not be at risk from monster of the week style attacks. How many times do we see bad shit happen to UFP colonies and space stations? Does entire starship crews going missing, and colonies failing meet your definition of a Utopia?
Cesario wrote:You were the one who made a claim that you could prove the Empire has more utopian planets than the Federation. I assumed that meant you knew what utopian meant. Guess you expect to be able to prove things you don't even understand yourself. And given your approach to providing evidence, that isn't at all a surprising assumption on your part.
Our personal definition of a Utopia obviously differs, so please define the term. Unless you do so this debate is impossible.
Cesario wrote:That isn't even related to your previous rantings, so I'm just going to assume you're still in the "throw out everything and hope no one notices I failed to prove my statement about utopian worlds in the Empire" mode.
I've argued that the society in a Brave New World is a Utopia, so I think I can find a place where the majority are happy and call it good enough.
Cesario wrote:Wow, the existence of even one person loyal to the Empire means a million loyalists for every disaffected individual who hasn't yet had his family murdered by the Empire. What stellar logic.
Look at the real world, does the majority of it hate the Evil Empire (US)? Do the majority of American citizens want to see the government fall? Heck, because it could be argued that the US isn't as bad as the Empire I'll set the bar at 20%. You need to find solid proof that 20% of all Americans are disaffected enough that they would either leave or take major steps to significantly alter the way the country is run at the first signs of a better alternative. I ask this because it is what you are claiming the UFP would do to the Empire.
Cesario wrote:Yeah, it's not like Leia's world of Alderon's top of the line planetary shields indicate they were expecting trouble or anything. And that wasn't a major world or anything anyway.
I've never heard of Alderon... Do you perhaps mean Alderaan? Also a lot of major worlds have planetary shields, Coruscant has two or more systems each able to provide complete planetary coverage.
Cesario wrote:You mean the "if it's not in our archive, it doesn't exist" folks?
No, I mean examples of corporations hiding the existence of resource rich worlds. I'll provide evidence, but I didn't bookmark every interesting tidbit I came across while I was scanning the info in those 130 planets.
Cesario wrote:Yeah, worked great for Lando, didn't it?
That was a major mining operation providing a not insignificant portion of the galaxy's tibanna gas output. You could do a little bit of fact checking before posting.
Cesario wrote:Which is kind of the problem if you're trying to get away from it all.
No, as I explained above all you have to do is head to a spot people aren't likely to go looking. Just because the government could fly a chopper out to some random spot in the Canadian wilderness doesn't mean that just because you set up a small house there the government will come and bother you.