Re: The Salvation War: Pantheocide. Part Seventy One Up
Posted: 2010-06-12 04:11am
Not to mention, if they're at all proportionate to their height, male Angels would probably satisfy his need to see enormous dicks.
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/
In Heaven, you mean? That's... a very fascinating question. Prior to (relatively) recent history, there weren't all that many people living in cities. Didn't Imperial Rome top out at a maximum population of one million? And that was with pre-Industrial Age technology. And urban 20th century folks, well, the only examples of those in Heaven were supposed to be those Mikey smuggled in, right?Edward Yee wrote:On a less furry note, what numerical proportion are we talking in terms of "rural" Second-Lifers (and therefore more likely to have gotten a great deal that'd understandably tie them to the angels) compared to the "urban" Second-Lifers (not so much)? I didn't really get a sense of the proportion (i.e. percentage) from the story.
Angels vary in size according to rank (as do daemons). The smallest (Ishim) are at the top edge of human sized (six to eight feet) while the largest are in the 30 - 40 feet bracket. A tiny handful of the very highest (including Michael) are almost 60 feet tall. Their buildings are scaled to match. However, remember it's a very sharp neck-down in terms of numbers. The overwhelming majority of angels are in the lowest categories.Akalabeth wrote: Also, does anyone remember how tall Uriel was? I thought he was closer to 40 feet, but I can't seem to find a quote.
Dunno. The biggest difference I see is that no one back on Earth feels any impulse to let the angels go back to running things, as the plantation-owner class more or less managed to go back to running things in the postbellum South.Captain Trek wrote:Or indeed the "Great Leap Forward" in Maoist China. That too was a farce in a basket... Then again, Hitler's "radical reconstruction" of 30s Germany did work pretty well (as evil as that regime was), so massive, sweeping changes don't always go belly-up, but given Stuart's fresh batch of Word-of-God saying that post-SalWar Heaven and the post-CivWar American South will be roughly equivocal, the "farce in a basket" thing seems a certainty...
Well, dunno about blood. Blood might transfer or it might not. Organs would almost certainly not work, thoughMarko Dash wrote:[Second Lifer donations would be a good idea] except that the organs would soon die on earth.
Michael-Lan is sixty feet tall? That really screws with my mental image of him.Stuart wrote:A tiny handful of the very highest (including Michael) are almost 60 feet tall.
And this, children, is why an F18's 20 mm cannon isn't immediate and sudden death for an angel like Uriel.Guardsman Bass wrote:Michael-Lan is sixty feet tall? That really screws with my mental image of him.Stuart wrote:A tiny handful of the very highest (including Michael) are almost 60 feet tall.
Man, Yahweh must really be gigantic, then. It's starting to make sense of how he could keep a pet the size of "Wuffles".
Bass, one question: where's the quote from? At this point, the thread is so long that searching the whole thing for this passage would be a bit prohibitive.Guardsman Bass wrote:Michael-Lan is sixty feet tall? That really screws with my mental image of him.Stuart wrote:A tiny handful of the very highest (including Michael) are almost 60 feet tall.
Man, Yahweh must really be gigantic, then. It's starting to make sense of how he could keep a pet the size of "Wuffles".
Just go up a few posts on this page.Simon_Jester wrote:Bass, one question: where's the quote from? At this point, the thread is so long that searching the whole thing for this passage would be a bit prohibitive.Guardsman Bass wrote:Michael-Lan is sixty feet tall? That really screws with my mental image of him.Stuart wrote:A tiny handful of the very highest (including Michael) are almost 60 feet tall.
Man, Yahweh must really be gigantic, then. It's starting to make sense of how he could keep a pet the size of "Wuffles".
That's going to be a problem, and given the speed, and willingness to deploy everything they have, that the Human forces have right now, it's likely to be a very quick battle. Which means that Angels might not get the chance to learn just how scary humanity can be.Akalabeth wrote:I think the relatively little combat the angels have seen is also going to make the upcoming changes a lot harder to face. The baldricks aweful experiences with human weaponry (emphasis on awe) seems to have given them a strange sort of hero-worship attitude towards the humans. Maybe that's not quite the right word, but they want to emulate us pretty bad, and given how hellish demonic society was, most of the remaining demons have probably had their quality of life improve a tiny bit. Heaven seems like a relatively more comfortable place for the angels, and the vast majority haven't really had their inferiority to modern humans really shown in such an aggressive manner. Maybe if enough nuke survivors make it back and enough angels get to see the long term effects there, but I doubt that'll be enough to drive the point home. What the angels would probably need are some more nukes, or conventional bombing runs on the Eternal City, or something, to let war-weariness set in. If only they had factories making tanks or something so we'd have some reason to bomb them.
It's possible, after all, the angels do seem to have a basically human mentality, under their thick layers of a very non-human upbringing and social conditioning (much like the demons in fact), so it does seem quite plausible that a lot of lower ranked angels (which do make up the vast bulk of their population) aren't entirely happy with being locked in their current position as menial (less so then humans, but still) servants for all of eternity.Akalabeth wrote:I wonder, are there angels with similar conditions to the baldricks in the areas surrounding Dis? They seemed pretty happy to hear about Satan getting killed. It'll be interesting to hear the point of view of the lower class angels and baldricks of human occupied Heaven/Hell, but that'll probably need to wait until Lords of War.
That must make interactions with them tricky at times. Somebody on Micheal's scale is going to be close on ten times the size of some of the people he's interacting with, it's like having a six-story building come up and talk to you, that's immense. I mean everyone in Heaven will be used to stuff like that, but it does explain some of the towering architecture that you see in Heaven. There aren't comments about Michael ducking when in the apartment that Maion is given, so that implies she's walking around in a room where the ceiling is three times her height.Stuart wrote:Angels vary in size according to rank (as do daemons). The smallest (Ishim) are at the top edge of human sized (six to eight feet) while the largest are in the 30 - 40 feet bracket. A tiny handful of the very highest (including Michael) are almost 60 feet tall. Their buildings are scaled to match. However, remember it's a very sharp neck-down in terms of numbers. The overwhelming majority of angels are in the lowest categories.
Well, given I'd been assuming up till now that Maion was a typical size for a female angel, war-brides seemed unlikely. However if the majority of them are in a human compatible size (even 8 feet tall isn't out of the question, of course at 6'4" myself, I've probably got an odd idea on what 'overly tall' is.Atlan wrote:You know, with the upheaval of Angelic society, and the loss of a great number of males leaving a sizable number of females without a husband, plus the not too large size discrepancy between the lower Angels and humans, I have to wonder:
Will there be any war brides?
I mean, the average Angel might not have a very human-friendly mindset, but there's allways people willing to do whatever it takes to survive, and Angels ARE stunningly beautiful by human standards.
Oh, she probably is fairly typical for her species/culture. I didn't say she'll be setting an incorrect model for how people think about Succubi.EdBecerra wrote:Of course, you assume she's not a typical succubi. There's a reason for stereotypes. Good or bad, they're an effective form of mental shorthand - cheat sheets for an entire population, as it were.Tamahori wrote:Heh, Luga probably doesn't realize it, but with her very public lifestyle, she's going to be setting a lot of the model for how people think about Succubi, for good and ill.
Hmm, you would expect an angel to have a low pitched voice, though even very large creatures can put out high pitched sounds, so they could just have voice-boxes 'pitched high' as it were.Jeremy wrote:So how big are human apartments? If Lemuel is comparable to Maion then are Human apartments built to Angel size?
Are there any angel sopranos?
What kind of pole do they dance on at Michael's club?
And further more, a 20ft (or there abouts) dominatrix? General Dynamics Land Systems, that is terrifying.
I've read (though I can't find the citation) that extending constitutional citizenship to cover non-humans would require an ammendment. It was somewhere talking about Aliens, though I think it applies here.Tamahori wrote: Though I dread to think how people would react to somebody on Earth wanting to get legally married to an angel ... especially if it's in the US and the angel then wants a green card.Same applies with demons too ... Luga doesn't seem the marrying type, but it might make sense to another succubus. I expect it would be less of an issue if Drippy found some compatible second-life human, because they'll probably be Roman, and he's already (I assume) considered a Roman (if not yet a citizen ... we don't know if he owns land or not).
Loosely related: I'm thinking the image of 'traditional church wedding' has had to change.
-- Brett