Another female teacher has sex with her student

Rye · Post by **Rye** » 2005-08-14 09:04am

Yet again, the internet reminds me how unfair life is.

Fucking hell.

jegs2 · Post by **jegs2** » 2005-08-14 10:38am

Glocksman wrote:Though one of them almost certainly was playing the tease with her penchant for heels, hose, short skirts and tight blouses.

Lil Johnny wrote:Teacher, teacher, my pants got all tight and uncomfortable! What's happenin' to me?

Mrs Kendall · Post by **Mrs Kendall** » 2005-08-14 11:50am

Quadlok wrote:This makes me wonder. Do ugly teachers also have sex with their students, and we just don't hear about it? Or is the reason that it only seems like its the hot ones who do it is because they are insecure, and knowing that a thirteen year old views them sexually, and not as just another damned authority figure, really gives a confidence boost.

I think you've hit the reason right there. Of course it could just be that more and more women are becomming pedophiles. Either way it's sick and should not be happening. These insecure women should be going to find pimps if they can't get it anywhere else not poor young boys who are so impressionable. Makes me sick. *Excuse me while I go hurl*

Mrs Kendall · Post by **Mrs Kendall** » 2005-08-14 11:57am

Guys..

The New York Post wrote: the teen's best friend told the New York Post.

That is how they found out. Read your articles people

The best friend was probably jealous as all hell and decided that he wasn't going to let him get away with having so much fun.

Dakarne · Post by **Dakarne** » 2005-08-14 12:21pm

Damn she's hot.

How can someone get done for Statutory Rape charges... when it's consensual? And most likely brought up by the boy in the first place.

Aaron · Post by **Aaron** » 2005-08-14 12:29pm

Dakarne wrote:Damn she's hot.

How can someone get done for Statutory Rape charges... when it's consensual? And most likely brought up by the boy in the first place.

Because a 13 year old isn't old enough to make decisons of that nature on thier own, thats why we consider them minors. Hence the statutory rape charge.

Superman · Post by **Superman** » 2005-08-14 12:40pm

Where were these teachers when I was in school?

Knife · Post by **Knife** » 2005-08-14 12:59pm

Ok, the chick is hot. Hotter than the last sicko pedo chick.

That said, this is bullshit. 9 months in jail on an 8 year sentence? Sorry, that's an outrage! I don't care if the 13 year old boy liked it or not, he's 13 and she, as a mininum, has to be ~22. It's wrong. Period.

If the kid was 17-18, I could join in with you guys on the fun, but this is just sick and quiet hypocritical. I've never seen anyone here joke about a ~22 old man fucking a 13 year old girl.

Sick.

Mrs Kendall · Post by **Mrs Kendall** » 2005-08-14 01:00pm

Frankly, I'm with you on that one Knife.

Knife · Post by **Knife** » 2005-08-14 01:04pm

Mrs Kendall wrote:Frankly, I'm with you on that one Knife.

Look, I had a hot teacher in highschool. I had fantasys about it, but damn, 13? I can't believe the direction this thread went.

But a religeous wacho doinks a 13 year old? Whew, suit up for the flames. Wrong is wrong.

ArmorPierce · Post by **ArmorPierce** » 2005-08-14 01:08pm

Agreed, but of course there is going to be the responses of how girls and boys views sex differently, hence it's okay for a adult woman to have sex with a 13 year old boy but not vice versa. I wonder what would have been the response if it was a adult male teacher with a 13 year old boy.

Post by **Ghost Rider** » 2005-08-14 01:09pm

She's also 28, Knife

.

For me, while yes she's hot...this is some really fucked up and twisted shit. I mean seriously, she's a married woman and she goes behind her husband's back and fucks a 13 year old kid?!

Fucking A, I really don't care how hot she is, this is the same as some priest fucking a choirboy, just not having her superiors cover it up is the only difference here.

Galvatron · Post by **Galvatron** » 2005-08-14 01:15pm

Knife wrote:Look, I had a hot teacher in highschool. I had fantasys about it, but damn, 13? I can't believe the direction this thread went.

Judging by the articles, the kid is a basketball player so he's probably tall and well-built for his age.

Yes, it's still inexcusable, but the lascivious caveman in me has a very hard time imagining this kid as a "victim" for being seduced into the oh so horrific act of penetrating a beautiful woman.

Mrs Kendall · Post by **Mrs Kendall** » 2005-08-14 01:28pm

Knife wrote:
Mrs Kendall wrote:Frankly, I'm with you on that one Knife.
Look, I had a hot teacher in highschool. I had fantasys about it, but damn, 13? I can't believe the direction this thread went.

But a religeous wacho doinks a 13 year old? Whew, suit up for the flames. Wrong is wrong.

No, No I think you read me wrong, I was agreeing with you, I too was surprised at how many people are joking about her being hot without one word as to how she should be punished. I'm in full agreement with you. It's ok to think she's hot because well she is, but she fucked a 13 year old! That is soooooo wrong. And I do think it will do damage to the boy.

Mrs Kendall · Post by **Mrs Kendall** » 2005-08-14 01:31pm

She's 28 and married? WTF!

That makes it even worse!

Aaron · Post by **Aaron** » 2005-08-14 01:31pm

Mrs Kendall wrote:
No, No I think you read me wrong, I was agreeing with you, I too was surprised at how many people are joking about her being hot without one word as to how she should be punished. I'm in full agreement with you. It's ok to think she's hot because well she is, but she fucked a 13 year old! That is soooooo wrong. And I do think it will do damage to the boy.

The kids going to have an ego the size of King Kong after this. As for being damaged it's probably going to give him an unrealistic view of woman in general.

ArmorPierce · Post by **ArmorPierce** » 2005-08-14 01:32pm

While I'm against it, I doubt there will be any psychological damage to him. If anything it helped him.

Mrs Kendall · Post by **Mrs Kendall** » 2005-08-14 01:32pm

Yes, I agree.

Mrs Kendall · Post by **Mrs Kendall** » 2005-08-14 01:33pm

Damn! I was agreeing with my husband not ArmorPierce. Just to clarify.

Knife · Post by **Knife** » 2005-08-14 01:37pm

ArmorPierce wrote:Agreed, but of course there is going to be the responses of how girls and boys views sex differently, hence it's okay for a adult woman to have sex with a 13 year old boy but not vice versa. I wonder what would have been the response if it was a adult male teacher with a 13 year old boy.

Don't care. 13 is 13, no matter how you view sex. A predatory adult, preying on them is wrong. Doesn't matter if the kid is male or female or the teacher is male, female, gay or straight.

I believe the line gets blurry when both participents are below the age of consent, but when one is clearly above it and above it by more than a decade, it is a fucking tragedy that she gets only 9 months in prison.

Ghost Rider wrote:She's also 28, Knife .

My bad, I didn't pick up on that in the article so was assuming she had to be atleast 22 to have gotten her teaching certificate. Being 28 just makes it worse and more a travesty of justice.

For me, while yes she's hot...this is some really fucked up and twisted shit. I mean seriously, she's a married woman and she goes behind her husband's back and fucks a 13 year old kid?!

Fucking A, I really don't care how hot she is, this is the same as some priest fucking a choirboy, just not having her superiors cover it up is the only difference here.

I argee. I realized that some people here are young teens and the thought of their beautiful teacher bouncing up and down on their cock is appealing, but it's still wrong and some of those posting that 'he's not a victim' are not young teens.

Galvatron wrote:Judging by the articles, the kid is a basketball player so he's probably tall and well-built for his age.

Which means jack shit about his maturity and emotional growth and ability to make decisions. Which, in most states, is usually set above the age of 13. I don't care if the kid was growing a beard, he doesn't possess the ability to understand the ramifications of his decision even if he's capable of actually making that decision instead of her just making it for him.

Yes, it's still inexcusable, but the lascivious caveman in me has a very hard time imagining this kid as a "victim" for being seduced into the oh so horrific act of penetrating a beautiful woman.

I wouldn't feel sorry for you if she seduced you, no. But she is preying on a 13 year old kid. One that she teached. She abused her position, her power over the kid to fuck him.

She preyed on the weak and for that she gets 9 months in jail. The outrage I'm betting you would hear if a good looking male teacher slammed some 13 year old girl and got the same sentence, would be a lot different than what this thread got in the opening posts.

Knife · Post by **Knife** » 2005-08-14 01:38pm

Mrs Kendall wrote:
No, No I think you read me wrong, I was agreeing with you, I too was surprised at how many people are joking about her being hot without one word as to how she should be punished. I'm in full agreement with you. It's ok to think she's hot because well she is, but she fucked a 13 year old! That is soooooo wrong. And I do think it will do damage to the boy.

Actually, I'm sorry. I knew you were agreeing with me. I'm just still caught up in my rant.

Pcm979 · Post by **Pcm979** » 2005-08-14 01:42pm

Mrs Kendall wrote: She's 28 and married? WTF! That makes it even worse!

Who was that saying something about reading the article?

Knife wrote:I argee. I realized that some people here are young teens and the thought of their beautiful teacher bouncing up and down on their cock is appealing,

*Slithers away*

Mrs Kendall · Post by **Mrs Kendall** » 2005-08-14 01:45pm

Knife wrote:
Mrs Kendall wrote:
No, No I think you read me wrong, I was agreeing with you, I too was surprised at how many people are joking about her being hot without one word as to how she should be punished. I'm in full agreement with you. It's ok to think she's hot because well she is, but she fucked a 13 year old! That is soooooo wrong. And I do think it will do damage to the boy.
Actually, I'm sorry. I knew you were agreeing with me. I'm just still caught up in my rant.

Oh, I thought it was either misundertsanding or you just getting ready to fight whoever quoted you

All is good then

Mrs Kendall · Post by **Mrs Kendall** » 2005-08-14 01:46pm

Pcm979 wrote:
Mrs Kendall wrote: She's 28 and married? WTF! That makes it even worse!
Who was that saying something about reading the article?

Oh now, you shush

Mrs Kendall · Post by **Mrs Kendall** » 2005-08-14 01:49pm

Youch, it was right there too

hehe, ok fine, I guess I skipped over that info but I did read the whole article just to let you know