General Schatten wrote:Stofsk wrote:no other droid really needs to chat to anyone.
You forgot battle droids that need to transmit information to their biological commanders.
Conceded, although I would suggest it would be better if the frontline troops don't have that ability, and rather communicate with radio bursts or something. It might make them more canny opponents if their adversaries couldn't hear them chat amongst themselves. (like we see them do in the prequels)
DudeGuyMan wrote:Stofsk wrote:Does your computer talk? I can talk to my computer, but can it talk back to me? I listen to video and audio on it, but does that equal a capability to make ordered conversation? Of course not.
Does your computer accept complex instructions by voice thanks to it's excellent understanding of the English language, while possessing intelligence and personality on the level of a sentient being?
Whoa, missed the point much?
What you wrote:Oh c'mon now, if a droid can receive verbal input it ought to be able to generate meaningful output. Especially when it generates audio output anyway and already includes the hardware to record and play animated holographic messages complete with sound. It has the capacity to understand language, and the ability to play back speech, but somehow it doesn't talk?
Emphasis added. So my response by way of analogy, which you took far too literally, was meant to convey that you can't conclude capabilities that don't necessarily exist, or don't necessarily follow. Just because an R2 unit has the technological capability to play and record messages and display them in holographic video and stereo, doesn't mean they can talk normally. My computer has the same capability to show me videos and I have a speaker set to give me stereo - that doesn't mean it can fucking talk to me.
As for receiving verbal input, I can do the same thing with my computer - but that doesn't mean it can generate meaningful output. It turns out that the latter is a far more difficult programming feat to accomplish. For all you know, an R2 unit's programming and memory banks are full already with countless things that are related to it's primary occupational speciality - fixing things. Anything else that is added might dilute that speciality to the point where the R2 unit functions suboptimally. That's speculative, but considering R2 units can make hyperspace calculations (IIRC) as well as fix things autonomously, or with direction, there may not even be room in their brains to put in the language programs you'd need for millions of different dialects. That's why you have protocol droids after all (whose primary occupational speciality is to facilitate communications between biologicals and cybernetic or robotic agents - 'human/cyborg relations' as Threepio says).
It certainly doesn't make "bleep bloop blop" the totality of it's output and expect you to get by with that.
Why not? As Havok said, the denizens of the SW universe get by just fine for the most part. On the other hand, having a protocol droid is quite useful considering they can assist biologicals communicate with each other, to primitive tribes, non-standard or 'strange' computer systems, and with other robots.
"Sure man, I'll have this hyperdrive fixed in ten minutes. Er, I mean, beep boop."
"Okay, but it'll take me about six hours to fix the hyperdrive. It's pretty messed up. Uh, bloop beep I mean."
"The hyperdrive is fixed, but you should go easy on it and not take it above 100c until we get home and can do a full overhaul. By which I mean boop beep whistle."
"I can't repair the hyperdrive because the starboard phlebotinum coil is burned out. We'll need to call for help unless there's somewhere nearby we can limp to at sublight. Then again we might be able to cobble together a temporary replacement if we disassemble one of the... OH WAIT, BLEEP BLOOP BLEEP, WHY WOULD YOU EVER NEED TO HEAR ANYTHING I HAVE TO SAY? I'M ONLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF YOUR INTERSTELLAR SPACECRAFT!"
I love how you totally ignore my other points in order to respond to my
utterly facetious remark instead. Good form there mate.
I also wrote:What are you talking about? Robots today don't talk back, because they don't need to - they do a very specific set of actions related to what they've been programmed to do. An astromech droid is designed to be a roving repair droid that repairs things needing repairing. They don't need to talk back, or ask you to 'clarify' what their tasks are - they already know what it is, because of their programming.
...
If the robot is autonomous and capable of doing its job without supervision, then you don't need that human to be in the loop. If the supervision is constant, then you also don't need the robot to communicate, because the human can determine what's at fault and take corrective measures or issue countermanding orders. EDIT: And if the robot does a lot of repairs in vacuum, like we see a stack of them do in TPM (fuck you for making me remember this film) then what exactly is it going to say to anyone when sound doesn't travel in space? Same goes for them being in the X-wing or Y-wing slots. Those are their primary roles, and in both circumstances they're going to be either plugged in to the fighter's computer and pilot interface, or will otherwise be directed by a starship's computer (like in TPM).
I mean, the final paragraph pretty much dooms your rebuttal to complete bullshit. Astromechs are primarily used in space, where having the ability communicate verbally (or aurally might be a better adverb) would be totally worthless. Instead, in the X- or Y-wings, they're plugged in and can communicate via a computer screen.
If they need to communicate at all, which they probably don't. (Luke was the one who told R2 that the stabiliser had come loose and to see if he could lock it down) In the TPM example, those astromechs were being directed by a damage control computer, and it's good money to bet someone on the bridge would be overseeing it and could direct them to do x, y, z if needs be.
Claiming that this is bad design by pointing out how R2's need to tell their human masters the details of the repair work is disingenous, when those human masters are the
ones directing them to do those repairs. Hell, look at my first paragraph - a real world example of real world robots that aren't designed to talk back to the humans who operate them. I bet those are bad designs as well.
Havok wrote:General Schatten wrote:According to EU sources it's 'binary'.
sigh.... Does the EU have to take every little piece of throw away dialogue from the movies to make crap?
I know you don't like the EU Hav, but I don't find this part objectionable. Considering Threepio responds to R2 in a conversational manner, those beeps-bloops-bleeps must translate to some kind of grammar and syntax. Though I wish they'd call the droid language something other than 'binary', other than that I find it a reasonable invention by the EU as it supports the films.
Incidentally this would make it easier to comprehend droids than DudeGuyMan claims, especially if you grew up all your life working with droids like a certain farm boy did. Maybe not enough to understand them completely, but enough to get the gist.
Bilbo wrote:Because we all know that your personal computer is as smart as R2-D2.

blow me moron
apparently using an analogy is too hard for some