COngrats you have graduated from insane to stupid.I don't consider myself an animal at all. Instincts should not influence anyone's behavour.
SO tell me, your instinctual food drive doesnt motivate you at all?
Moderator: Alyrium Denryle
COngrats you have graduated from insane to stupid.I don't consider myself an animal at all. Instincts should not influence anyone's behavour.
So what are you? Vegatable, fungi, or mineral?Sokartawi wrote: I don't consider myself an animal at all. Instincts should not influence anyone's behavour.
Can choose not to eat.Alyrium Denryle wrote:COngrats you have graduated from insane to stupid.I don't consider myself an animal at all. Instincts should not influence anyone's behavour.
SO tell me, your instinctual food drive doesnt motivate you at all?
I choose not to eat three meals a day sometimes. But I cannot "choose not to eat" forever. I must eat, or I will die. Eventually one gets so hungry that they are compelled to eat. You cannot override this.Sokartawi wrote:Can choose not to eat.Alyrium Denryle wrote:COngrats you have graduated from insane to stupid.I don't consider myself an animal at all. Instincts should not influence anyone's behavour.
SO tell me, your instinctual food drive doesnt motivate you at all?
Thus I eat because I make that choice, not because I start an uncontrollable rampage towards the fridge the moment I feel hungry...frigidmagi wrote:In which case you will starve to death, way to beat those evvviiilll instincts.Can choose not to eat.
I don't know to what extent things are predetermined by karma. You're right that if it takes too large a role, then it's possible to become trapped in 'evil' ways, a murderer getting killed and getting paranoid and violent in the next life because he's trying to prevent getting killed again, which results in more deaths of others and so on. This could happen on a global scale (and it actually pretty much looks like it at the moment). The only way to stop this is when a large group of souls that have already overcome the particular 'evil' reincarnate on the particular world.Kuroneko wrote:Could and will are two different things. Unless, of course, karma predetermines things to a very large degree, in which case this sutation becomes very peculiar: if karma is truly that deterministic, pretty soon the would-be murderer would have no chance of salvaging himself, all the while being reincarnated to continue his evil acts, so that no one can stop his evil ways! Taken to this extreme of determinism, this 'karma' quite directly perpetuates evil while ignoring the good, as you've implied that good acts do not mend karma previously.Sokartawi wrote:Disagreed, that person could still develop murderous traits again due to what happened to him last time.Kuroneko wrote:Since personality is to a very large degree shaped by the environment one grows up in, a new life is the best hope for salvation this would-be murderer could have.
In a way, yes. It doesn't matter much if one or ten or more people get murdered, the murderer overcomes this particular karma when he changes his behavour and decides not to kill anymore. However, he's still indebted in a way to every individual he killed, but this is something that can be corrected with positive actions or when his victims choose to forgive him.Kuroneko wrote:The idea is simple: working in your karma-based morality, if intending to kill one person is bad, intending to kill a lot of people should be proportionally worse. Obviously, then, if the would-be murderer of a small number of people killed before he forms the intent to kill a large amount of people, he would suffer a comparatively lesser penalty to his karma. The fact that you are unwilling to sacrifice a some (a comparative smaller amount!) of your own karma for the (relative) well-being of his means you are acting selfishly.Sokartawi wrote:Uhh that does not make any sense to me.Kuroneko wrote:Moreover, even if the intent to kill is what is actually important, killing him before he forms that intent for many more people would obviously be better for his karma, so this effectively changes nothing.
Hitler in particular is irrelevant; he was merely used as an example of 'evilness'. To clarify, in order to escape the charge of selfishness, one must erase the distinction between someone willing to kill in self-defense (as you prohibit this), but is in all other respects unviolent and of good character, with a someone intending to kill a large amount of people (but to be fair, let's say that this hypothetical person is in all other respects equal, in the sense that he, unlike the real Hitler, has no interest in subverting others to his evil ways, inciting hate, etc.). My question to you is: do you deny this distinction (in the morally relevant sense) or not?Sokartawi wrote:Already explained this all before. Even had Hitler in the example.Kuroneko wrote:Unless, of course, there no difference between a soldier who is willing to kill under certain circumstances, but does not, and a Hitler-esque character that planned and was responsible for the deaths of many millions. That position I find ludicrous, but it may be just what you intend. Is it?
Funny that you chose to pick those ailments. On all of those I'd like much more research on what's causing them and how we can prevent them, instead on how to cure them.Perinquus wrote:Actually, this statement is so incredibly moronic I had to come back to it. If something doesn't work 100% of the time, it's useless, and should be abandoned.Sokartawi wrote:Like I said, I still see war, so it hasn't been a solution for the last 10k years or so. Time for something new.Perinquus wrote:I see you are ignoring this point. Could it be because it's historically verifiable, and you have no effective answer?
By this same logic, I could assert that since I still see people dying of cancer, heart disease, stokes, etc. modern medicine is obviously not effective. Time for something new.
Ah. In entering this thread, I had a strong feeling that this debate would not have a point. My conviction now is a bit stronger, since it is now apparent you fully accept the conclusion of that reductio ad absurdum, and likely would for any other I could possibly make. Since you do not make a positive argument either, this discussion not only doesn't but cannot have a point. Therefore, I will simply discontinue it.Sokartawi wrote:In a way, yes. It doesn't matter much if one or ten or more people get murdered, ... .
My thanks for your contribution, I honestly appreciated your participation.Kuroneko wrote:Ah. In entering this thread, I had a strong feeling that this debate would not have a point. My conviction now is a bit stronger, since it is now apparent you fully accept the conclusion of that reductio ad absurdum, and likely would for any other I could possibly make. Since you do not make a positive argument either, this discussion not only doesn't but cannot have a point. Therefore, I will simply discontinue it.Sokartawi wrote:In a way, yes. It doesn't matter much if one or ten or more people get murdered, ... .
Research is being done on how to prevent those. However, you still need to cure those that are already ill. His analogy is still valid.Sokartawi wrote: Funny that you chose to pick those ailments. On all of those I'd like much more research on what's causing them and how we can prevent them, instead on how to cure them.
My dear friend I don't have the ability to IM at will having a job that takes me away during the week (and like hell am I going to do it over thanksgiving). Anyway more to the point I responded to several statements you made as a counter to each of those points. This was LAST weekend and in that time despite a rash of posts between yourself and others no answering statement has been made. Claiming you don't have time to respond to a post which you've had a week to look over when almost a page worth of posts just since then can be acredited to you is ludicrous in the extreme. Moreover the whole point of this paticualr style of back and forth is that it gives each side time to make reasoned arguments (note the time lapse between most of my posts). If you'd rather conceed the points I made and just focus on your other detractors on this thread then its fine with me otherwise please engage.Sokartawi wrote:I'm currently very busy with other things, and the time I do have for myself I rather spend on things I like instead of debating like this, which I hate.CmdrWilkens wrote:Please realize that i'm going to start having to PM and pester you by e-mail if you persist in not answering things because I'd like a response or a concession, either one would do.CmdrWilkens wrote:So I'm guessing I can expect no response to thie above?
However we might be able to use IM and post the log, that might resolve the whole thing a lot quicker.
Earlier I called her a plant, but now I'm going to have to say she's some sort of fungus.DPDarkPrimus wrote:So what are you? Vegatable, fungi, or mineral?Sokartawi wrote: I don't consider myself an animal at all. Instincts should not influence anyone's behavour.
I'm not the person to ever concede anything.CmdrWilkens wrote:My dear friend I don't have the ability to IM at will having a job that takes me away during the week (and like hell am I going to do it over thanksgiving). Anyway more to the point I responded to several statements you made as a counter to each of those points. This was LAST weekend and in that time despite a rash of posts between yourself and others no answering statement has been made. Claiming you don't have time to respond to a post which you've had a week to look over when almost a page worth of posts just since then can be acredited to you is ludicrous in the extreme. Moreover the whole point of this paticualr style of back and forth is that it gives each side time to make reasoned arguments (note the time lapse between most of my posts). If you'd rather conceed the points I made and just focus on your other detractors on this thread then its fine with me otherwise please engage.Sokartawi wrote:I'm currently very busy with other things, and the time I do have for myself I rather spend on things I like instead of debating like this, which I hate.CmdrWilkens wrote: Please realize that i'm going to start having to PM and pester you by e-mail if you persist in not answering things because I'd like a response or a concession, either one would do.
However we might be able to use IM and post the log, that might resolve the whole thing a lot quicker.
Which just makes you a fool. It's not like Mike won't concede if he's wrong; it's just that he's intelligent enough not to make comments like yours that are entirely undefensible.Sokartawi wrote:I'm not the person to ever concede anything.![]()
No I'm not saying that, I just don't like the fact the world is overpopulated, in the way that all land is taken and I can't pack my stuff and start a new nation somewhere else with people I like.CmdrWilkens wrote:Wait so you're sayign you should have the right to displace people already living somewhere simply because you want to live there? Wow that's about the most egotistical reason for calling life a waste I've ever heard.Sokartawi wrote: I continue to live because I am hoping for a miracle that changes things.
Why it's a waste:
1) Lack of freedom. Can't live where I want (at least not legally) because everything is owned by someone, and if I want to buy someone out they ask outrageous prices.
Because most of the time those people do NOT get happiness from it. They seek to be happy, and they turn to others to tell them what should make them happy, and wonder why it won't work on them. Of course the shops and commercials prey on these people. A friend of mine had parents like this, while she herself was a lot better then that fortunately. When I went there, the parents always had to 'impress' me with the new stuff they bought, and in a way you would find it hard to believe... They actually told that it had been on TV, and asked if I had seen it on TV as well, or that well-known person X also likes to have a green kitchen, so they changed the kitchen... Of course when they have more money again and they see someone else say that red kitchens are trendy, they will completely pull the green kitchen out and change the thing. In the three years I went there, they have had 2 new kitchens, 3 new floorings, and they changed their garden, bedrooms and seats multiple times as well. Oh and they repainted the house once, but that could have had other reasons though I doubt it. The mother had some variant of depression, and the 'father' (not the biological one because the parents got divorced) was heavy alcoholist and smoker, and the mother told me he occasionally used marijuana (no idea why she would tell me that), not to mention he could get very violent.CmdrWilkens wrote:People are idiots/sheep and you wonder why people might have a dim view of your philosophy? People are complex creatures of emotions, needs, wants, and desires which mix and melt in interactions with each other. That some people seek to simplify this complexity by conforming to trends is a matter of seeking happiness through reduction in decision making. I'd hardly call that being an idiot even if I'd rather experience all of life. I certianly won't criticize people who want to conform to ease their lives because if it makes them happy why have distaste or are you honestly angry that some people can find happiness in a way that you can't?Sokartawi wrote:2) People are idiots/sheep. Neighbour has a new kitchen? So what? Why do YOU want a new one too all of the sudden? Not happy with what you got? Then why did you buy it in the first place, idiot...
It's because society forces this kind of uniform on people. Yes, some people like it, but there are also a lot of people that hate them, 3 out of 5 collegues specifically told me they hated it, but they have to wear the crap when at work. Why such a strict society? Why not some diversity? If someone wants to wear robes for example, then why stare at him? The only time we can wear what we want without people staring is at festivals or sci-fi/fantasy events...CmdrWilkens wrote:Life is a waste because of suits and ties? You honeslty have to be shitting me if one of your top reasons for objecting to the modern world is the freaking clothes a guy wears? Dear lord you need a psych evaluation if you think our society is worthless because of that...and fo the record I look damn good in a suit and its comfortable too.Sokartawi wrote:3) Fashion. Yeah really. What is so cool about black suits and ties? They look fucking ugly, and I can't imagine they are very comfortable either. Sure you can wear what you want, but if you REALLY had a choice I wouldn't think so many people would wear that crap.
I sorta like my computer, that's why I spend at least 60 hours a week sitting behind a screen if I get the chance. Those do not include the hours at work, which are another 40 or so. I want to make games, but I'm a crap programmer and I don't think my kind of games would sell, you'd all think I'm the second Derek Smart or somethingCmdrWilkens wrote:So life is worthless because you have no purpose? I again repeat to you that that is a sad sad outlook on life and I'd suggest that you find something that you enjoy doing and just do it because otherwise you're gonna end up lying in a gutter somewhere. Seriously you needs some help or a big bear hug because that's a very sad outlook on life.Sokartawi wrote:4) Lack of purpose. Money doesn't really interest me much because besides computer stuff (I don't buy the most expansive fastest stuff by the way) and the occasional warhammer models there isn't much that I want to buy. Except a house in the middle of nowhere perhaps, but that cost a lot more. Status doesn't interest me either, I don't feel the need to compare myself with anyone else. So in short, capitalism like this is not a very nice place for me since it offers me very little.
Had multiple counselors and they said I was fine, just very different.CmdrWilkens wrote:Feel free to tell me but if the first three reasons are all your objections that's pretty weak and a repitition of the fact that you find your life directionless just reinforces the validity of my suggestion that you get yourself a big bear hug and a trip to a counselor.Sokartawi wrote:Also some other reasons but can always spew more later.
Well that's more than a bit selfish. You are saying life is a waste, in toher words it isn't worth living, because you can't just pack up and start a new country with people you like? I'll bet you right now there is plenty of real estate in the middle of the sahara and the arabian deserts no one wants, same with the mojave and a couple other palces. You seem to be just preaching down that it is so horrible that other people, who don't agree with your worldview, happen to live in places you would want to. Honestly this should be in the dictionary definition of selfish.Sokartawi wrote:No I'm not saying that, I just don't like the fact the world is overpopulated, in the way that all land is taken and I can't pack my stuff and start a new nation somewhere else with people I like.CmdrWilkens wrote:Wait so you're sayign you should have the right to displace people already living somewhere simply because you want to live there? Wow that's about the most egotistical reason for calling life a waste I've ever heard.Sokartawi wrote: I continue to live because I am hoping for a miracle that changes things.
Why it's a waste:
1) Lack of freedom. Can't live where I want (at least not legally) because everything is owned by someone, and if I want to buy someone out they ask outrageous prices.
Well lets see here.Sokartawi wrote:Because most of the time those people do NOT get happiness from it. They seek to be happy, and they turn to others to tell them what should make them happy, and wonder why it won't work on them. Of course the shops and commercials prey on these people. A friend of mine had parents like this, while she herself was a lot better then that fortunately. When I went there, the parents always had to 'impress' me with the new stuff they bought, and in a way you would find it hard to believe... They actually told that it had been on TV, and asked if I had seen it on TV as well, or that well-known person X also likes to have a green kitchen, so they changed the kitchen... Of course when they have more money again and they see someone else say that red kitchens are trendy, they will completely pull the green kitchen out and change the thing. In the three years I went there, they have had 2 new kitchens, 3 new floorings, and they changed their garden, bedrooms and seats multiple times as well. Oh and they repainted the house once, but that could have had other reasons though I doubt it. The mother had some variant of depression, and the 'father' (not the biological one because the parents got divorced) was heavy alcoholist and smoker, and the mother told me he occasionally used marijuana (no idea why she would tell me that), not to mention he could get very violent.CmdrWilkens wrote:People are idiots/sheep and you wonder why people might have a dim view of your philosophy? People are complex creatures of emotions, needs, wants, and desires which mix and melt in interactions with each other. That some people seek to simplify this complexity by conforming to trends is a matter of seeking happiness through reduction in decision making. I'd hardly call that being an idiot even if I'd rather experience all of life. I certianly won't criticize people who want to conform to ease their lives because if it makes them happy why have distaste or are you honestly angry that some people can find happiness in a way that you can't?Sokartawi wrote:2) People are idiots/sheep. Neighbour has a new kitchen? So what? Why do YOU want a new one too all of the sudden? Not happy with what you got? Then why did you buy it in the first place, idiot...
Lets get this straight, an enforced uniform for WORK makes life a waste?Sokartawi wrote:It's because society forces this kind of uniform on people. Yes, some people like it, but there are also a lot of people that hate them, 3 out of 5 collegues specifically told me they hated it, but they have to wear the crap when at work. Why such a strict society? Why not some diversity? If someone wants to wear robes for example, then why stare at him? The only time we can wear what we want without people staring is at festivals or sci-fi/fantasy events...CmdrWilkens wrote:Life is a waste because of suits and ties? You honeslty have to be shitting me if one of your top reasons for objecting to the modern world is the freaking clothes a guy wears? Dear lord you need a psych evaluation if you think our society is worthless because of that...and fo the record I look damn good in a suit and its comfortable too.Sokartawi wrote:3) Fashion. Yeah really. What is so cool about black suits and ties? They look fucking ugly, and I can't imagine they are very comfortable either. Sure you can wear what you want, but if you REALLY had a choice I wouldn't think so many people would wear that crap.
So do data processing, or become a SysAdmin, or do something related to computers. I again repeat that you have to put effort into the things you like and if you can find purpose and enjoyment with computers then by God (singualr and non-denominational) go hit that field because the outlook you gave of no purpose is really a sad story which, all hostility aside, would make me think you need a bear hug for comfort.Sokartawi wrote:I sorta like my computer, that's why I spend at least 60 hours a week sitting behind a screen if I get the chance. Those do not include the hours at work, which are another 40 or so. I want to make games, but I'm a crap programmer and I don't think my kind of games would sell, you'd all think I'm the second Derek Smart or somethingCmdrWilkens wrote:So life is worthless because you have no purpose? I again repeat to you that that is a sad sad outlook on life and I'd suggest that you find something that you enjoy doing and just do it because otherwise you're gonna end up lying in a gutter somewhere. Seriously you needs some help or a big bear hug because that's a very sad outlook on life.Sokartawi wrote:4) Lack of purpose. Money doesn't really interest me much because besides computer stuff (I don't buy the most expansive fastest stuff by the way) and the occasional warhammer models there isn't much that I want to buy. Except a house in the middle of nowhere perhaps, but that cost a lot more. Status doesn't interest me either, I don't feel the need to compare myself with anyone else. So in short, capitalism like this is not a very nice place for me since it offers me very little.(not got much experience with his games though, battlecruiser kept crashing on my machine so returned it)
Well keep talking to them and ask them for a nice hug every now and then because of my disbelief in your position that life is worhtless you need it.Sokartawi wrote:Had multiple counselors and they said I was fine, just very different.CmdrWilkens wrote:Feel free to tell me but if the first three reasons are all your objections that's pretty weak and a repitition of the fact that you find your life directionless just reinforces the validity of my suggestion that you get yourself a big bear hug and a trip to a counselor.Sokartawi wrote:Also some other reasons but can always spew more later.