Page 5 of 15

Posted: 2005-03-23 09:59pm
by Kazuaki Shimazaki
Gorefiend wrote:Aye, I agree they can easily have the energy and weapon power output of several smaller ships and give a good fight to several standard warships, but it’s still not likely that they can go head to head against 1000 warships at the same time.
Why not?

The point of the vignettes are generic examples of the advantage of large ships. Nitting they ain't Execs don't help. Since you don't seem to be contesting that base point, I accept your concession
Yes I always licked that fight, it shows very well why super ships like the Iron Fist have quit some trouble in battle, because of firings arcs and them just being very large targets. The Iron Fist takes beatings from several sides by vessels that are far less powerful then she is, but they are many of them and she cant concentrate all firepower at one single target, while the rebel fleet can concentrate its entire firepower against one single ships.
Despite those supposed difficulties, it still easily defeated Mon Remonda. In fact, Zsinj running was quite un-understandable. Even with half his shield strength lost and Razor's Kiss destroyed, he had more than enough power to finish.
The eu these days makes the ssd 12,8kms long (or so starwars.com says). The thing is, not only west end game has the same weapon and armament stats for the ssd, starwars.com lists them as well, as do wizards of the coast (though there is a typo on their site making the ssd 12,0 km) and most other eu sources. I am just wondering why everyone keeps going back to blaming weg they just made the best of what they were told to do, like anyone else, I would blame lucasfilms for not giving them the 12,8 (or 17,6 as some claim) right away.
The correct movie answer is about 17.6, and it is repeated in the new ITW:OT (finally). The idea is that these sodding WEG SOBs were supposed to do the research. They have access to secret papers that we could only dream about, and they watch the same movie we do! It was sloppy research that created the mess in the first place, and that's why WEG is blasted.

Understand this: You don't need secret access to be able to scale from the film correctly.

WoTC is blasted for 12.8km because it is little more than a lame attempt to appease fans while not admitting they are wrong, thus getting the worst of both worlds. The WEG-stickers wonder why they changed the 5-mile length (for them, a problem didn't exist until the change to 12.8), a sentiment shared by the adherers to canon policy, for what was the point of a correction if the correction is also wrong (thus adding more confusion).
As eu replaces itself over older sources we have to assume the ssd in x-wing were all meant to be 12,8km (as far as I recall the standing eu length for the ssd). The problem for me with making the ssd much stronger (not just larger) in hinsight would be the fact that the tactics in x-wing would not have worked, but that’s just mho.
Actually, most just try to ignore the 12.8km ship. A ship that has precisely the same armament as the 5-miler while being 3 miles longer is just too dumb for even the EU-people to contemplate. I suppose they did that to try not to break the continuity, but all it does is make the fix even dumber.
Is was being sarcastic anyway, I never said that a ship like the ven does not have the capacity to hold that much, if it is supposed to stays in continuity and they better give a good reason why it is given such a over the top fighter load compared to all later ships.
What happened to your previous position on the matter, about the EU replacing itself?
who in the star wars galaxy beside the empire had the ability to build something like it? It’s not like the rebellion had it’s own kuat drive yards. It scared the enemies of the empire pretty well as far as we know and that’s what it is build for
Who cares whether you can build a ten km monster if by building 10 1-km nibblers you can beat it?
Sure it’s cheaper to build in bulk, the problem seems to be, that you don’t get any real improvements in fighting abilities beyond a certain size
IP would have done better to mention the firepower. With the new estimates, the Executor is 20 times more expensive with about 78x (5000TLs to 64) the firepower. The Death Star's firepower is definitely worth more than 20 Sector Groups, which put together won't generate even 1E32J (the order of magnitude range required for a minimal blow-up).
Its not as absurd as you might think, their must be a reason why warships normally don’t get much longer then ~ 1,5-2 km, most likely either because it does not make tactical sense, or economic. The DS also seems to requires a huge hyperspace drive to propel it a long at a very slow speed compared to it’s size
Probably, it is resource limits. There are quite a large range of ships that are above 2km in any case. As an aside, the Executor's hyperdrive (if you believe the official stats) is a "Class 2", which is equivalent to that of the ISD-I.

The DS is ultimately a spaceship, since it moves, though a very large one. Basically, you take the DS's size and known firepower, then scale it down to the ISD.
Vengeance is called a super star destroyer variant build by kdy.
Good, so there are other types.
Allegiance should most likely be a ssd like the executor, but the guy drawing dark empire should be beaten to death anyway. The dark empire sourcebook just calls it a commando ship, so know one really knows.
Actually, the author could have drawn a triangle and be more convincing it was the Executor. In the DE itself, it was classified as a "Super Star Destroyer" (thus showing once again the uselessness of the moniker), and shown in enough detail a scaling was possible!
Admiral Giel's command ship? Same problem as with starships in comics in general, either they are not supposed to be a normal ship, or the artists are just very bad at drawing.
And where there is no reason to think they misdrew, you take it as truth. Next.
I second the complaining about dark empire, it should never have been made
For all its flaws, it is still one of the few non-minimalist pieces of EU work, and should be respected for it.

Posted: 2005-03-24 12:52am
by Jim Raynor
I just took a look at the link (+http://www.millenniumfalcon.com/phpbb/v ... php?t=3478 ) Vympel provided.

ICS SPOILERS


The page on the Tri-Fighter states that it's smarter than the common Trade Federation "Vulture" fighter. Are Vultures supposed to be the droid fighters we saw in Episode I? I wasn't aware that those things were ever given an actual name.

Also, are there any pictures and/or information on the Eta-2 Actis Interceptor? The Venator's profile mentions that it carries 192 of these ships, but the Eta-2 doesn't have a page in the ICS. I looked through TFN boards, and one person said it was supposed to be a precursor to the TIE. I'm not sure whether that can be trusted, because he didn't provide any sources, and the people in that thread were posting a lot of BS or speculation. I hate it when books mention a ship and never show it.

Posted: 2005-03-24 01:03am
by Vympel
Also, are there any pictures and/or information on the Eta-2 Actis Interceptor? The Venator's profile mentions that it carries 192 of these ships, but the Eta-2 doesn't have a page in the ICS. I looked through TFN boards, and one person said it was supposed to be a precursor to the TIE. I'm not sure whether that can be trusted, because he didn't provide any sources, and the people in that thread were posting a lot of BS or speculation. I hate it when books mention a ship and never show it.
The Eta-2 Actis is the fighter flown by Anakin and Obi-Wan in the film. It features in both the teaser and the full trailers. It is in the ICS- its actually on the cover of the German language version.
I wasn't aware that those things were ever given an actual name.
It's probably a nickname. I should check my TPM ICS as well ...

Posted: 2005-03-24 01:05am
by Spanky The Dolphin
"Vulture" isn't in the TPM ICS. Probably came from another source later.

Posted: 2005-03-24 01:40am
by Gorefiend
it's from the eu, in the clone wars comics they call them vultures, in the novels as well, plus the negtsav also calls them vultures. :wink:

Posted: 2005-03-24 02:23am
by Gorefiend
I can only take what we have seen/read “überschiffe” to be able to do, and so far they don’t stand up all to well for them being supposed to take on fleets of ships. We agree on that don’t we? They might be putting them down in fighting power they should have by numbers, but so far we just haven’t seen any of them actually fight well. Sad but true. ^^

What happened to your previous position on the matter, about the EU replacing itself?
That was for the same series of ships, not a new series, unless some official source is going to say they got the fighter stats wrong for all other ships, we should stick with the given numbers.
Who cares whether you can build a ten km monster if by building 10 1-km nibblers you can beat it?
The Rebellion had to scrap together its fighting ships, the empire can spit out supercruisers just for the fun of it as it seems, which aren’t all the militarily sound (or so the old guide to star ships and vehicles at least claims), but would have certainly demoralise their enemy.
Probably, it is resource limits. There are quite a large range of ships that are above 2km in any case. As an aside, the Executor's hyperdrive (if you believe the official stats) is a "Class 2", which is equivalent to that of the ISD-I.
I cant think of that many in fact @ 2+ km. The Black Ice, the executor, the death star and the trade federation super freighters. At least once we know stats for and limited resources should not be a problem, at least to the empire. We either have to assume that there is not much point in building them larger because smaller ships can do all their bigger brothers can (or several of them together are cheaper to employ for something then building a bigger ship for it), or that after a certain size there is no more advantage in building them larger. I personally think it has something to do with a over proportional increase in the hyper drive propulsion power needed but that is just an idea.
The DS is ultimately a spaceship, since it moves, though a very large one. Basically, you take the DS's size and known firepower, then scale it down to the ISD.
Ah k that’s what that was about, so what’s the fire power ration for isd to ds?
For all its flaws, it is still one of the few non-minimalist pieces of EU work, and should be respected for it.
Yes, the worst part is they have another überschiff and it does even worse than all its brothers. They could have for once shown for them to be good at fighting but know they just get it blown up by a mad force user and later a droid.

Posted: 2005-03-24 04:53am
by Gorefiend
hmpf just picked up the itwoswt and after spending half an hour with observing jabba’s palace I flipped over to the executor, oh well… it says the ship is almost 12 isd long ( so more then 17,6 in the direction of 19,2 km, well done saxton you just made the thing even more a mess)

it’s nice they actually for once increased the weapons load out as well (though it is still possible that they counted batteries as multiple weapons, unlike the other sources)…

but it none the less does not actually give a clear point to our fighter debate

“carries wings of starfighters” could be anywhere from 2 wings (144) up to a million and for some reason they give the ship only 2 garrison bases, I though it had three o.O

Another interesting fact is that it’s now a bit bigger then the eclipse class ;]

otherwise the book does not seem that good... or useful except for jabba's palace. ^^

Posted: 2005-03-24 05:36am
by Stark
Ships with docking cavities large enough to almost enclose an ISD have 144 fighters? HA!

While I'm hardly an EU-hugger, the Executor stats should be totally disregarded - or, more appropriately, used to describe a different ship at 8 miles long. They're a laughable hackjob: but if its the 80s and you work for WEG, you can do what you want :roll:

If Venators have exposed engines, large fighter complements, and relatively light heavy armament, what the hell are they doing mixing it up close range? Shouldn't the Republic have a class of ships with decent guns, or is there some kind of Republic/fighters, Imperial/guns commentary going on?

I'm disappointed all the ships mentioned are so small. Oh well, back to 'Strike Cruisers'.

Posted: 2005-03-24 06:20am
by Kazuaki Shimazaki
Gorefiend wrote:hmpf just picked up the itwoswt and after spending half an hour with observing jabba’s palace I flipped over to the executor, oh well… it says the ship is almost 12 isd long ( so more then 17,6 in the direction of 19,2 km, well done saxton you just made the thing even more a mess)
Not a problem. It is easy to use a AOB problem to make even a 12 mile ship measure out to be 11 miles long in the film (angle shortens the length). It will be quite impossible to even a 11 mile ship measure out to be even 11.1 miles long. Therefore, he added some flex room to accomodate uncertainty.
it’s nice they actually for once increased the weapons load out as well (though it is still possible that they counted batteries as multiple weapons, unlike the other sources)…
Actually, that's precisely what happened. Saxton uses real canon measurements instead of WEG talk. As a reference, the real ISD-II has 64 HTLs in 8 turrets.
“carries wings of starfighters” could be anywhere from 2 wings (144) up to a million and for some reason they give the ship only 2 garrison bases, I though it had three o.O
He's adding a bit of flex, but by removing the limiter, anyone with a brain stem can figure out for himself which is more likely.
Another interesting fact is that it’s now a bit bigger then the eclipse class ;]
Longer. The Eclipse is still bulkier.
I can only take what we have seen/read “überschiffe” to be able to do, and so far they don’t stand up all to well for them being supposed to take on fleets of ships. We agree on that don’t we? They might be putting them down in fighting power they should have by numbers, but so far we just haven’t seen any of them actually fight well. Sad but true. ^^
Probably because there was no one left to take down any stories where they did fight well. Besides, any such story would be even less interesting than the horrid SDR (yes, I wrote it ... the entire board would never forgive me for it).
The Rebellion had to scrap together its fighting ships, the empire can spit out supercruisers just for the fun of it as it seems, which aren’t all the militarily sound (or so the old guide to star ships and vehicles at least claims), but would have certainly demoralise their enemy.
They would hardly be demoralized if they can counter it by building smaller vessels.
I cant think of that many in fact @ 2+ km.
Actually, you just can't think of many that WEG has graced with a set of statistics and are over 2km. Here are a set.
Ah k that’s what that was about, so what’s the fire power ration for isd to ds?
Think ... estimates of Star Destroyer firepower range up to about E24W. The DS' blast on Alderaan is at least E38J range. To supply the power for that once a day means a power generation in the E33W range. E33/E24=E9. Since 20 Sector Groups don't have close to 1 billion Star Destroyers or even 1 billion other ships ...
Yes, the worst part is they have another überschiff and it does even worse than all its brothers. They could have for once shown for them to be good at fighting but know they just get it blown up by a mad force user and later a droid.
Actually, I'm relieved they made it go that way. Since they are clearly not going to give it a chance to cause countless NR casualties, such a non-combat related death is the least damaging death they could assign.

Posted: 2005-03-24 11:39am
by Gorefiend
so it's just another size change not really one of real abielities.
Probably because there was no one left to take down any stories where they did fight well. Besides, any such story would be even less interesting than the horrid SDR (yes, I wrote it ... the entire board would never forgive me for it).
the imps would talk about it ;) and pass me a link to that story please.

144 fighters is seemling the standart compliment, they could most likely fit more in if they really wanted to. oh well let's just see what the future brings...

Posted: 2005-03-24 01:14pm
by Jim Raynor
The Rebellion had to scrap together its fighting ships, the empire can spit out supercruisers just for the fun of it as it seems, which aren’t all the militarily sound (or so the old guide to star ships and vehicles at least claims), but would have certainly demoralise their enemy.
Are you talking about the EGTVV? I have that book, and it says no such thing. It called the Executor impractical, because a few smaller ships could do its job. What jobs did it have to do? Smashing puny Rebel bases. That statement could very easily mean the Executor was overkill. No where did it say that the ship isn't militarily sound. I can't believe you think higher, more realistic numbers for Old Republic ships makes the Empire look weak, while at the same time you favor an Executor that's a mere impotent facade that fails to utilize >90% of its size.

Posted: 2005-03-24 01:34pm
by Gorefiend
Are you talking about the EGTVV? I have that book, and it says no such thing. It called the Executor impractical, because a few smaller ships could do its job. What jobs did it have to do? Smashing puny Rebel bases. That statement could very easily mean the Executor was overkill. No where did it say that the ship isn't militarily sound.
It is a cruiser (a big one) and serves that function in general, and I took that quote, as that any number of smaller ships could do just as fine in the same job.
I can't believe you think higher, more realistic numbers for Old Republic ships makes the Empire look weak, while at the same time you favor an Executor that's a mere impotent facade that fails to utilize >90% of its size.
Its not like I made the stats I am just saying that the clone wars era ships (especially the venator) make the established imperial vessel fighter capacities lock really pitiful (which they do) and it is a brake with continuity which should not happen that radically, because now they have to either give a good reason why all the imperial ships have far lower amounts of fighters, or revise the given stats.

I am not even touching on realism behind any sci-fi stuff which is usually an argument that leads no where.

Posted: 2005-03-24 02:25pm
by Rob Wilson
Managed to find some High-res meshes of the Venator if anyone wants to have a look. Don't know who did them or how official they are, but they give a good look at them.

EDIT : Turns out they are fan Meshes based on early Venator images - Rob Wilson :oops:

Venator top

Venator bottom

ON another topic, if you have an Acclamator, Venator & Executor - doesn't that bode well for Imperator, and perhaps the VSD being a Victor rather than Victory? Just a musing while I was looking for the pics. :)

Posted: 2005-03-24 02:34pm
by McC
Rob, those pictures are pure sex! Thank you! :D

Posted: 2005-03-24 02:44pm
by RedWizard
Rob Wilson wrote:Managed to find some High-res meshes of the Venator if anyone wants to have a look. Don't know who did them or how official they are, but they give a good look at them.

Venator top

Venator bottom
That's not the Venator, it's a fan creation loosely based on some of the early images of the Venator.

http://www.scifi-meshes.com/forums/show ... hp?t=20177

Posted: 2005-03-24 02:46pm
by McC
RedWizard wrote:That's not the Venator, it's a fan creation loosely based on some of the early images of the Venator.
Aww... :cry: *looks at his dashed hopes scattered across the ground*

It's still pretty hot. Though I suppose I should've recognized right off that it wasn't an ILM model -- it doesn't have the ILM "feel" to it that all of ILM's work manages to get.

Posted: 2005-03-24 02:48pm
by Spanky The Dolphin
Yeah, the real Venator looks almost nothing like that. For one it actually has dual bridge towers.

Posted: 2005-03-24 02:49pm
by Firefox
This is the Venator:

http://jtrun.mine.nu/cc/fox/Jedi_Attack_Cruiser.jpg

EDIT: Switched to URL.

Posted: 2005-03-24 02:55pm
by Rob Wilson
RedWizard wrote: That's not the Venator, it's a fan creation loosely based on some of the early images of the Venator.

http://www.scifi-meshes.com/forums/show ... hp?t=20177
Ah, cheers for that, I've edited my post to clear that up.

Posted: 2005-03-24 02:56pm
by Rob Wilson
Firefox wrote:This is the Venator:

Venator model
Ah, very different, though I kind of prefer the Fan meshes - at least for the Forward Guns.

Posted: 2005-03-24 05:00pm
by Cabwi Desco
Dual Bridges? WTF?

so basically the bridge design goes

1.Triangle with elongated pod at the top
2.Imp Star Bridge with antenae sticking out the front
3.Larger Triangle with Two elongated pods at the top
4.Normal Impstar bridge.

backwards forewards backwards forewards...something seems out of whack with star destroyer chonology.

Posted: 2005-03-24 05:17pm
by Illuminatus Primus
Cabwi Desco wrote:Dual Bridges? WTF?

so basically the bridge design goes

1.Triangle with elongated pod at the top
2.Imp Star Bridge with antenae sticking out the front
3.Larger Triangle with Two elongated pods at the top
4.Normal Impstar bridge.

backwards forewards backwards forewards...something seems out of whack with star destroyer chonology.
Not really. The ISD/KDY bridge from the OT was probably adapted from Rendili designs, which featured the original version of this bridge tower, albeit modified and smaller, while the original KDY bridge of the Acclamator and then the Venator was probably abandoned OR possibly simply retained for smaller ships while larger ones got a blown-up copy version of Rendili's standard tower. The ISD tower would be pretty oversied on the Acclamator, for example.

Posted: 2005-03-24 05:31pm
by Firefox
There's also the Rand Ecliptic, which has a hybridized pod bridge design, with wing structures that give it a sort of distant resemblance to the KDY bridge tower design.

Posted: 2005-03-24 05:58pm
by Crossroads Inc.
On the subject of that Fan Created ship posted earlier? I have to say, ages ago when I first saw that I nearly creamed… Here at last was a wonder of StarWars design, it beautifully bridged the gap between the ‘Acclamator’s from AotC, and the ISD from NewHope.

It truly is a wonderful thing to look at, probably more that, unlike ‘almost’ all other StarWars ships, we can actually SEE all the Weapon implacments, and, they look so lovely!

I dreamed of the battle of Courscont, Of seeing a sky filled with these glorious ships! And then… Then the ‘Real’ pics came out, And I saw those thin, anorexic Venator-SD Thir Twin Bridges ((What the F*** is up witrh that)) I saw those, and my heart sank… It is a sad sad day when those… THINGS become the cannon Starship that will eventually become the ISD

Posted: 2005-03-24 06:00pm
by FTeik
Rob Wilson wrote:Managed to find some High-res meshes of the Venator if anyone wants to have a look. Don't know who did them or how official they are, but they give a good look at them.

EDIT : Turns out they are fan Meshes based on early Venator images - Rob Wilson :oops:

Venator top

Venator bottom

ON another topic, if you have an Acclamator, Venator & Executor - doesn't that bode well for Imperator, and perhaps the VSD being a Victor rather than Victory? Just a musing while I was looking for the pics. :)
Don't know about you, but for me that looks a lot better, than the real thing.