The Reign of Trump

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

Post Reply
Crazedwraith
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12021
Joined: 2003-04-10 03:45pm
Location: Cheshire, England

Re: The Reign of Trump

Post by Crazedwraith »

Itv News
Trump says US will 'run Venezuela' after President Nicolas Maduro captured in raid

Donald Trump has said the US is going to "run" Venezuela to clear the way for a "safe" transition of power after Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro was captured in a US raid.

It comes after Trump confirmed on Saturday morning that the US had carried out "a large scale strike against Venezuela" and said the president's wife Cilia Flores had also been taken.

Trump said the couple were aboard the US warship Iwo Jima and headed to New York, where they will face prosecution.

On his Truth Social platform, the president shared a picture of Maduro wearing ear defenders and what appears to be a blindfold.

“We're going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and judicious transition,” Trump said at a news conference where he boasted that “no nation in the world could achieve what America achieved”.

here were no visible signs of the US running the South American country as early Saturday afternoon, however, with the nation's security forces still controlling key sites.

US attorney general Pam Bondi said earlier that Maduro and his wife would face charges after being indicted in New York. Sources told ABC News that Maduro was being flown to New York.

Two sources familiar with the plans told ITV News' North American partner CNN that Maduro is expected to briefly stop at Guantanamo Bay before being transferred to New York, partly because this allows the transfer to be made more quickly.

Although it is unclear where he will be held after his arrival in the US, defendants awaiting trial in federal court are typically held at the Metropolitan Detention Centre.

The attorney general said the new indictment accuses Maduro of leading a “a corrupt, illegitimate government that, for decades, has leveraged government power to protect and promote illegal activity, including drug trafficking.”

It alleges that the drug trafficking efforts “enriched and entrenched Venezuela’s political and military elite”.

US authorities allege that Maduro partnered with “some of the most violent and prolific drug traffickers and narco-terrorists in the world” to bring tonnes of cocaine into the US, according to the indictment.
Authorities estimate that as much as 250 tonnes of cocaine were trafficked through Venezuela by 2020, according to the indictment, on go-fast vessels, fishing boats and container ships or via planes from clandestine airstrips, authorities allege.

While the World Drug Report 2025, published by the UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) earlier this year, does list Venezuela as a country through which cocaine is transported, it says the main countries that produce the drug are Cocaine, Peru and Bolivia.

Maduro and other Venezuelan officials were indicted in 2020 on “narco-terrorism” conspiracy charges, but it was not previously known his wife had been and it wasn’t clear if Bondi was referring to a new indictment.

It is not clear what the legal authority was for the attack, which echoed the US invasion of Panama that led to the surrender and seizure of its leader, Manuel Antonio Noriega, in 1990 – exactly 36 years ago on Saturday.

The US is now deciding next steps for Venezuela, Trump told Fox News on Saturday, adding: “We'll be involved in it very much... We can’t take a chance in letting somebody else run and just take over what he left, or left off.”

At least seven explosions and low-flying aircraft were heard in Caracas around 2am local time on Saturday and a state of emergency was subsequently declared in Venezuela.

Trump said during Saturday's conference that "the lights of Caracas were largely turned off due to a certain expertise that we have", adding: "It was dark and it was deadly."

Venezuelan ruling party leader Nahum Fernández said that Maduro and Flores were at their home within the Fort Tiuna military installation when they were captured.
“That’s where they bombed," he said. “And, there, they carried out what we could call a kidnapping of the president and the first lady of the country.”

Describing the raid, Trump told Fox News: "The team did an incredible job. They rehearsed and practised like nobody's ever seen. And I was told by real military people that there's no other country on earth that can do such a manoeuvre.
"I mean, I watched it literally l like I was watching a television show. If you would've seen the speed, the violence, you know, they say that, the speed the violence, they used that term, it was just an amazing thing."

The Venezuelan government published a statement denouncing the alleged military aggression by the United States in Caracas and the states of Miranda, Aragua and La Guaira.

"Venezuela rejects, repudiates, and denounces before the international community the extremely serious military aggression carried out by the current government of the United States of America against Venezuelan territory and population in civilian and military locations in the city of Caracas, capital of the Republic, and the states of Miranda, Aragua, and La Guaira," the statement said.

“People to the streets!” it added. “The Bolivarian Government calls on all social and political forces in the country to activate mobilization plans and repudiate this imperialist attack.”

Under Venezuelan law the vice president, Delcy Rodríguez, would take power. There was no confirmation that had happened, though she did issue a statement after the strike.

“We do not know the whereabouts of President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores,” Rodriguez said. “We demand proof of life.”

People in Caracas have told ITV News that the atmosphere in the city is currently calm, and that most people are waiting for more information from Donald Trump, who is expected to give a press conference at 4pm UK time.

It comes as the US military has been targeting alleged drug-smuggling boats in recent months.

Last week, the CIA was behind a drone strike at a docking area believed to have been used by Venezuelan drug cartels – the first known direct operation on Venezuelan soil since the US began strikes in September.

As of Friday, the number of known boat strikes was 35 and the number of people killed at least 115, according to the Trump administration.

Trump said that the US is engaged in an “armed conflict” with drug cartels and has justified the boat strikes as a necessary to stem the flow of drugs into the US, but Maduro has decried the US operations as a thinly veiled effort to oust him from power.

Pedestrians were seen running down streets in various neighbourhoods while several parts of the city were left without power. Smoke was also seen rising from a Venezuelan military base hangar.

The Federal Aviation Authority has banned US commercial flights in Venezuelan airspace over "ongoing military activity", while Venezuela has requested a UN Security Council meeting in response to the US attack.

“No cowardly attack will prevail against the strength of this people, who will emerge victorious,” Foreign Minister Yván Gil Pinto said on Telegram, sharing the letter sent to the UN.

On Friday, Venezuela said it was open to negotiating an agreement with the United States to combat drug trafficking.

President Maduro has previously said the US wants to force a government change in Venezuela and gain access to its vast oil reserves through the monthslong pressure campaign that began with a massive military deployment to the Caribbean Sea in August.

Trump has threatened that he could soon order strikes on targets on Venezuelan land for months. The US had also seized sanctioned oil tankers off the coast of Venezuela, and ordered a blockade of others in a move that seemed designed to put a tighter chokehold on the South American country’s economy.

How has the world reacted?

Leaders across the world have responded to the US' actions in Venezuela.

British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said the UK was no involved "in any way" in the strikes on Venezuela, and said that he wanted to "establish facts" and speak to Donald Trump.

Green Party leader Zack Polanski and Liberal Democrats leader Sir Ed Davey have called on Starmer to condemn the US president over the strikes, while Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has said "it may be a good thing" if the strikes "make China and Russia think twice".

Meanwhile the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) has advised against all travel to Venezuela, warning that ongoing instability "could lead to closure of Venezuelan borders and airspace".
It said this comes after: “On 3 January, Venezuelan authorities announced a ‘state of external commotion’ due to air strikes on targets across the country. This could lead to closure of Venezuelan borders and airspace.”

The FCDO advises those already living or travelling in Venezuela to "shelter in place", while being "prepared to change your plans quickly if necessary".

“You should have a ‘personal emergency plan’, including practical steps for leaving the country or staying safe during a crisis, that does not depend on support from the UK government,” the department adds.

The Russian Foreign Ministry called for “immediate clarification” on the situation in Venezuela, while Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva said the action "recalls the worst moments of interference in the politics of Latin America and the Caribbean and threatens the preservation of the region as a zone of peace".

“We are extremely concerned by reports that Venezuelan President Maduro and his wife were forcibly removed from the country during today’s aggressive actions by the United States,” the ministry said in a statement.

The European Union's foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas wrote on X: “The EU has repeatedly stated that (Venezuelan President Nicolas) Maduro lacks legitimacy and has defended a peaceful transition.”

also BBC livefeed
bilateralrope
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6474
Joined: 2005-06-25 06:50pm
Location: New Zealand

Re: The Reign of Trump

Post by bilateralrope »

The US is now deciding next steps for Venezuela, Trump told Fox News on Saturday, adding: “We'll be involved in it very much... We can’t take a chance in letting somebody else run and just take over what he left, or left off.”
So Trump is already admitting that they want a puppet government.

Looks like the US gets to have another long occupation started by a Republican president.
User avatar
Solauren
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10632
Joined: 2003-05-11 09:41pm

Re: The Reign of Trump

Post by Solauren »

Hopefully, Trump will accidentally put someone smart in charge of overseeing Venezuela, that will work towards making it so a new native non-corrupt government can take over in a few years.
I've been asked why I still follow a few of the people I know on Facebook with 'interesting political habits and view points'.

It's so when they comment on or approve of something, I know what pages to block/what not to vote for.
Ralin
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4746
Joined: 2008-08-28 04:23am

Re: The Reign of Trump

Post by Ralin »

Why are you all talking like they've conquered Venezuela and all that's left is deciding what to do with it? They raided the capital and kidnapped two people. The vice-president is still there and so is the entire rest of the government. I haven't even heard confirmation that there are any US troops currently in the country.
User avatar
Solauren
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10632
Joined: 2003-05-11 09:41pm

Re: The Reign of Trump

Post by Solauren »

Ralin wrote: 2026-01-04 07:56am Why are you all talking like they've conquered Venezuela and all that's left is deciding what to do with it? They raided the capital and kidnapped two people. The vice-president is still there and so is the entire rest of the government. I haven't even heard confirmation that there are any US troops currently in the country.
Because with how Trump is talking, it sounds like a full scale attempt at annexation is coming.
I've been asked why I still follow a few of the people I know on Facebook with 'interesting political habits and view points'.

It's so when they comment on or approve of something, I know what pages to block/what not to vote for.
bilateralrope
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6474
Joined: 2005-06-25 06:50pm
Location: New Zealand

Re: The Reign of Trump

Post by bilateralrope »

Ralin wrote: 2026-01-04 07:56am Why are you all talking like they've conquered Venezuela and all that's left is deciding what to do with it? They raided the capital and kidnapped two people. The vice-president is still there and so is the entire rest of the government. I haven't even heard confirmation that there are any US troops currently in the country.
Because of the Trump administration sounds like they want to take over.

Full article:
Secretary of State Marco Rubio says U.S. capture of Maduro is not a war against Venezuela
The U.S. secretary of state said conversations about holding elections in Venezuela are "premature."

Jan. 5, 2026, 4:01 AM GMT+13 / Updated Jan. 5, 2026, 5:03 AM GMT+13
By Alexandra Marquez


Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Sunday that the goal of the U.S. military operation that led to the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro on Saturday was primarily to halt drug trafficking into the U.S. and that holding elections in Venezuela would be “premature at this point.”

“We care about elections, we care about democracy, we care about all of that, but the No. 1 thing we care about is the safety, security, well-being and prosperity of the United States. And that’s what we’re going to focus on first and foremost here,” Rubio told NBC News’ “Meet the Press” about the Saturday operation. He made the comments a day after President Donald Trump announced that U.S. military forces had captured the nation’s leader and his wife.

U.S. action in Venezuela

Rubio said that “there’s not a war” between the U.S. and Venezuela.

“I mean, we are at war against drug trafficking organizations, not a war against Venezuela,” the secretary of state added.

His comments mirrored those he made alongside the president and other Trump administration officials at Saturday’s press conference, maintaining that the strikes on Venezuela and the capture of Maduro were simply a law enforcement action and not the start of a war.

Still, Trump on Saturday told reporters, “We’re not afraid of boots on the ground,” but that for now, there were no members of the U.S. military in Venezuela.

In Congress, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle feared that the action would start a costly new war, while Democrats lambasted the Trump administration for not notifying Congress or seeking an authorization for the use of force ahead of time.

On Sunday, Rubio categorically denied that Congress needed to approve this military action ahead of time, telling “Meet the Press” moderator Kristen Welker, “We will seek congressional approval for actions that require congressional approval ... and this is not an operation that required congressional approval.”

Rubio added that Saturday’s mission was “akin to what virtually every single president for the last 40 years has conducted.”

“The difference is that when it’s Donald Trump, you know, you know, all these Democrats go bonkers,” the secretary of state said.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, who appeared on “Meet the Press” after Rubio, pushed back on the secretary of state’s remarks, denying his assertion that Saturday’s operation wasn’t an act of war.

“There’s been no evidence that the administration has presented to justify the actions that were taken in terms of there being an imminent threat to the health, the safety, the well-being, the national security of the American people,” Jeffries said. “This was not simply a counternarcotics operation. It was an act of war.”

Venezuelan leadership in flux

Earlier in the interview, Rubio pointed to recent elections, which Maduro claimed he won despite widespread evidence that he lost.

“Elections did happen. They lost them, and they didn’t count the votes. Or, they refused to count the votes, and everyone knows it. So all of that, I think, is premature at this point,” the secretary of state said.

During a Saturday press conference at Mar-a-Lago, Trump said that Maduro’s vice president, Delcy Rodríguez, had been sworn in as president and was in contact with U.S. officials, including Rubio. Later Saturday, in a national address, Rodríguez told Venezuelans, “We demand the immediate liberation of President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores,” calling Maduro “the only president of Venezuela.”

Following Maduro’s removal from Venezuela by U.S. forces on Saturday, several U.S. Republican lawmakers called for members of Venezuela’s political opposition — including last year’s Nobel Peace Prize winner Maria Corina Machado — to take over running the country rather than Rodríguez.

Trump rejected that idea on Saturday, telling reporters that it would “be very tough for her to be the leader, because she doesn’t have the support within or the respect within the country.” He added that in conversations with U.S. officials, Rodríguez said “she’s essentially willing to do what we think is necessary to make Venezuela great again.”

On Sunday, Rubio praised Machado as “fantastic,” but added that U.S. officials hope to achieve their immediate goals in Venezuela faster than it would take for the nation’s opposition party to take power. “Unfortunately, the vast majority of the opposition is no longer present inside of Venezuela. We have short-term things that have to be addressed right away,” Rubio said.

He added that under Rodríguez’s leadership, “we expect to see more compliance and cooperation than we were previously receiving.”

On Saturday, Trump announced that the U.S. would “run” Venezuela until the nation could conduct its own peaceful transfer of power, but Rubio said Sunday that the president meant “running policy” in Venezuela that is “good for the people of Venezuela” and is “in our national interest.”

He reiterated that the Trump administration has “short-term things that have to be addressed right away” before assisting Venezuela with a transition to democracy.

“We all wish to see a bright future for Venezuela, a transition to democracy. All of these things are great, and we all want to see that,” the secretary of state said, adding: “But what we’re talking about is what happens over the next two, three weeks, two, three months, and how that ties to the national interest of the United States.”

Rubio added that Maduro, when he was still leading Venezuela, did not cooperate with the United States’ stated goals of curbing drug trafficking from South America.

Moving forward, the secretary of state outlined the United States’ demands for Venezuela, telling Welker, “You can’t flood this country with gang members. You can’t flood this country with drugs that are coming out of Colombia through Venezuela, with the cooperation of elements of your security forces. You can’t turn Venezuela into the operating hub for Iran, for Russia, for Hezbollah, for China, for the Cuban intelligence agents that control that country.”

Venezuela's oil infrastructure

Rubio also addressed one of Trump’s stated goals from his Saturday press conference, which was to allow for U.S. investment in Venezuela’s oil infrastructure.

“We’re going to have our very large United States oil companies, the biggest anywhere in the world, go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure, the oil infrastructure, and start making money for the country,” the president said Saturday.

On Sunday, Rubio said, “We don’t need Venezuela’s oil. We have plenty of oil in the United States.”

But the secretary of state said the Trump administration’s goal is to curb the investment from U.S. rivals — like China, Russia and Iran — in Venezuela’s oil industry.

“What we’re not going to allow is for the oil industry in Venezuela to be controlled by adversaries of the United States. You have to understand, why does China need their oil? Why does Russia need their oil? Why does Iran need their oil? They’re not even in this continent,” Rubio said. “This is the Western Hemisphere. This is where we live, and we’re not going to allow the Western Hemisphere to be a base of operation for adversaries, competitors and rivals of the United States.”
No comments about leaving Venezuela to deal with things themselves. No, Rubio talks about how elections are "premature" like the US is going to make that decision and stick their own person in charge if the VP doesn't do as they demand.

Talking about the "national interest" of the US. Meaning there are still things the Trump administration wants from Venezuela. Which appears to be oil.
User avatar
LadyTevar
White Mage
White Mage
Posts: 23880
Joined: 2003-02-12 10:59pm

Re: The Reign of Trump

Post by LadyTevar »

Solauren wrote: 2026-01-04 11:06am Because with how Trump is talking, it sounds like a full scale attempt at annexation is coming.

Since it looks like the VP has stepped up and gotten the rest of the government around her, that "full scale annexation" is gonna be a bit harder than Trump thought.

And Marco is a fucking idjit if he thinks this wasn't an Act of War.
Image
Nitram, slightly high on cough syrup: Do you know you're beautiful?
Me: Nope, that's why I have you around to tell me.
Nitram: You -are- beautiful. Anyone tries to tell you otherwise kill them.

"A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. LLAP" -- Leonard Nimoy, last Tweet
User avatar
EnterpriseSovereign
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4622
Joined: 2006-05-12 12:19pm
Location: Spacedock

Re: The Reign of Trump

Post by EnterpriseSovereign »

I was going to ask, wasn't this basically a terrorist action by the USA?
Ralin
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4746
Joined: 2008-08-28 04:23am

Re: The Reign of Trump

Post by Ralin »

Yeah I haven't looked up the transcript but from summaries Trump has thus far claimed that

1) there will be no boots on the ground
2) they currently control Venezeula
3) they are going to rebuild and revitalize the Venezuelan oil industry
4) there will be no nation building
5) they did all this because the Justice Department needed to serve a warrant on Maduro
6) two or three other mutually contradictory things I can't remember off the top of my head

All in the same speech.

So I wouldn't put a whole lot of stock in what the administration sounds like they want to do at this point.
bilateralrope wrote: 2026-01-04 02:47pmTalking about the "national interest" of the US. Meaning there are still things the Trump administration wants from Venezuela. Which appears to be oil.
What I've been reading is that they already had a pretty sweet deal for Venezuelan oil that Trump rejected and Maduro was more than willing to cut an even better one with them. Which means this is probably less war for oil and more to do with Trump wanting to feel powerful and also because he believes a dumb conspiracy theory about Maduro helping Biden rig the 2020 election.

I know Maduro is supposed to be a pretty bad dude, but can you imagine that from his perspective? The US raids his country and drags him off to New York in shackles. He's told he's going to be put on trial. Then they offer him leniency if he confesses to rigging a US presidential election and he stares at them and goes what the fuck and it is only then that he realizes that's what this was all about.

Personally my mind is a little blown by the fact that Trump finally started a war and has to all appearances actually won.

Also, consider. Trump hasn't subverted the legal system enough to just decide that someone will be convicted. We know that because prosecutions of his enemies have failed multiple times. So if they put Maduro on trial it will be a real trial and there is a non-zero chance he will be acquitted. What exactly do they do if that happens? Just kick him out of the country? Deport him to an ICE camp?
bilateralrope
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6474
Joined: 2005-06-25 06:50pm
Location: New Zealand

Re: The Reign of Trump

Post by bilateralrope »

Ralin wrote: 2026-01-04 03:10pm
Also, consider. Trump hasn't subverted the legal system enough to just decide that someone will be convicted. We know that because prosecutions of his enemies have failed multiple times. So if they put Maduro on trial it will be a real trial and there is a non-zero chance he will be acquitted. What exactly do they do if that happens? Just kick him out of the country? Deport him to an ICE camp?
Yes, there is that.

There is also the question of how they are going to screw up this case. Will it even reach trial before a judge throws it out ?
User avatar
LadyTevar
White Mage
White Mage
Posts: 23880
Joined: 2003-02-12 10:59pm

Re: The Reign of Trump

Post by LadyTevar »

I'd very much not be surprised if Maduro "commits suicide" ala Epstein.
Image
Nitram, slightly high on cough syrup: Do you know you're beautiful?
Me: Nope, that's why I have you around to tell me.
Nitram: You -are- beautiful. Anyone tries to tell you otherwise kill them.

"A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. LLAP" -- Leonard Nimoy, last Tweet
User avatar
Juubi Karakuchi
Jedi Knight
Posts: 645
Joined: 2007-08-17 02:54pm

Re: The Reign of Trump

Post by Juubi Karakuchi »

I'm seeing a couple of possible angles in this.

The obvious one is Trump trying to rebuild his tanking popularity by playing the tough guy. At least some (usually Venezuelan exiles) appear glad that Maduro is in the dock; but they don't seem to be praising Trump directly AFAIK. Judging by the drugs-related charges, and threats to Colombia, Trump is going for an anti-drugs crusade.

According to Reuters and The Guardian, Trump is also set to meet US oil executives soon.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/ ... ollaborate
Following the capture, arrest and detention of Nicolás Maduro, the Trump administration is set to meet with top US oil executives, according to a report from Reuters – citing a source familiar with the matter.

The aim to revitalize oil production comes after nearly two decades of control by Venezuela over US energy operations in the country.

According to Reuters, the three biggest U.S. oil companies - Exxon Mobil, ConocoPhillips, and Chevron - have not yet had any conversations with the administration about Maduro’s ouster, per four oil industry executives familiar with the matter. This contradicts Trump’s statements over the weekend that he had already held meetings with “all” the US oil companies, both before and after the Venezuelan leader was seized.
So it could all be about oil after all.
User avatar
Solauren
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10632
Joined: 2003-05-11 09:41pm

Re: The Reign of Trump

Post by Solauren »

One theory I've seen is that Venezuela's oil industry was basically gutted, and Trump wants the US to help 'rebuild it', and at the same time, it serve as a start for a new 'aggressive military action' war on drugs and the like.

Or he's finally decided to make like his idle, Czar Putin.
I've been asked why I still follow a few of the people I know on Facebook with 'interesting political habits and view points'.

It's so when they comment on or approve of something, I know what pages to block/what not to vote for.
User avatar
LadyTevar
White Mage
White Mage
Posts: 23880
Joined: 2003-02-12 10:59pm

Re: The Reign of Trump

Post by LadyTevar »

Juubi Karakuchi wrote: 2026-01-05 04:08pm So it could all be about oil after all.
Oh, it was all about the oil.
The problem is he told the Oil Companies he was going to do this before it happened, and the Oil Companies didn't fall in line, and they're still not wanting to get involved.
So this "Big Meeting" is going to be Trump trying to "art of the deal" one of these oil companies, who already know that it'd take billions to get Venezuela's oil fields running and years before they'd see any profit from it.

Expect a lot of angry Truth Social posts the next few days.
Image
Nitram, slightly high on cough syrup: Do you know you're beautiful?
Me: Nope, that's why I have you around to tell me.
Nitram: You -are- beautiful. Anyone tries to tell you otherwise kill them.

"A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. LLAP" -- Leonard Nimoy, last Tweet
User avatar
Lost Soal
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2627
Joined: 2002-10-22 06:25am
Location: Back in Newcastle.

Re: The Reign of Trump

Post by Lost Soal »

LadyTevar wrote: 2026-01-05 06:06pm
Juubi Karakuchi wrote: 2026-01-05 04:08pm So it could all be about oil after all.
Oh, it was all about the oil.
The problem is he told the Oil Companies he was going to do this before it happened, and the Oil Companies didn't fall in line, and they're still not wanting to get involved.
So this "Big Meeting" is going to be Trump trying to "art of the deal" one of these oil companies, who already know that it'd take billions to get Venezuela's oil fields running and years before they'd see any profit from it.

Expect a lot of angry Truth Social posts the next few days.
As I understand, its not even decent oil, the price per barrel needs to be over 100$ for it to be even remotely profitable to extract and process.
"May God stand between you and harm in all the empty places where you must walk." - Ancient Egyptian Blessing

Ivanova is always right.
I will listen to Ivanova.
I will not ignore Ivanova's recommendations. Ivanova is God.
AND, if this ever happens again, Ivanova will personally rip your lungs out! - Babylon 5 Mantra

There is no "I" in TEAM. There is a ME however.
User avatar
Juubi Karakuchi
Jedi Knight
Posts: 645
Joined: 2007-08-17 02:54pm

Re: The Reign of Trump

Post by Juubi Karakuchi »

Lost Soal wrote: 2026-01-05 07:29pm
LadyTevar wrote: 2026-01-05 06:06pm
Juubi Karakuchi wrote: 2026-01-05 04:08pm So it could all be about oil after all.
Oh, it was all about the oil.
The problem is he told the Oil Companies he was going to do this before it happened, and the Oil Companies didn't fall in line, and they're still not wanting to get involved.
So this "Big Meeting" is going to be Trump trying to "art of the deal" one of these oil companies, who already know that it'd take billions to get Venezuela's oil fields running and years before they'd see any profit from it.

Expect a lot of angry Truth Social posts the next few days.
As I understand, its not even decent oil, the price per barrel needs to be over 100$ for it to be even remotely profitable to extract and process.
Even more and even longer if they're doing it under military occupation, with an armed insurgency treating them as a priority target.

Bearing in mind that the Venezuelan government and military are basically intact, it would seem that Trump means to intimidate, not attack. This would also spare him from outright breaking his promise of no more wars.

I wonder what will happen if Delcy Rodriguez and her government (which it basically is now) refuse to buckle under?
User avatar
EnterpriseSovereign
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4622
Joined: 2006-05-12 12:19pm
Location: Spacedock

Re: The Reign of Trump

Post by EnterpriseSovereign »

Trump is making more noises about taking over Greenland again :roll:
User avatar
The Infidel
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1512
Joined: 2009-05-07 01:32pm
Location: Norway

Re: The Reign of Trump

Post by The Infidel »

EnterpriseSovereign wrote: 2026-01-06 01:44pm Trump is making more noises about taking over Greenland again :roll:
That is one way of destroying NATO. Europe will help Denmark/Greenland and it might be a war between Europe and the US. Not a happy thought. I don't think European countries will ever truly trust the US again even if it doesn't come to that.
Image
Image
Where am I at in the post apocalypse draft? When do I start getting picks? Because I want this guy. This guy right here. I will regret not being able to claim the quote, "The first I noticed while burning weed, so I burned it, aiming at its head first. It wriggled for about 10 seconds. Too long... I then fetched an old machete [+LITERALLY ANYTHING]"
- Raw Shark on my slug hunting
User avatar
EnterpriseSovereign
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4622
Joined: 2006-05-12 12:19pm
Location: Spacedock

Re: The Reign of Trump

Post by EnterpriseSovereign »

Depends if Fascist America outlasts Trump's rule.
User avatar
LadyTevar
White Mage
White Mage
Posts: 23880
Joined: 2003-02-12 10:59pm

Re: The Reign of Trump

Post by LadyTevar »

EnterpriseSovereign wrote: 2026-01-06 03:55pm Depends if Fascist America outlasts Trump's rule.
The cynical pessimist in me says "Fine, start a war with NATO. Hopefully get trounced like Hitler's Germany, and MAYBE THIS TIME we'll stop listening to racist fascist assholes?"

When, in reality, if a War with NATO starts, Trump will get pissy because Europe is actually fighting back, and he'll fire Nukes. Because Trump is insane and fully believes he should not lose.
Image
Nitram, slightly high on cough syrup: Do you know you're beautiful?
Me: Nope, that's why I have you around to tell me.
Nitram: You -are- beautiful. Anyone tries to tell you otherwise kill them.

"A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. LLAP" -- Leonard Nimoy, last Tweet
Ralin
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4746
Joined: 2008-08-28 04:23am

Re: The Reign of Trump

Post by Ralin »

https://thehill.com/homenews/administra ... 6-website/
White House unveils Jan. 6 webpage saying Democrats ‘staged the real insurrection,’ criticizing Capitol Police
by Rebecca Beitsch - 01/06/26 2:52 PM ET


The White House launched a website Tuesday praising President Trump for his handling of the Jan. 6, 2021, attack, simultaneously blaming Democrats for having “masterfully reversed reality” and saying Trump “corrected a historic wrong” in pardoning those charged with crimes related to the storming of the building.

The website, which became public on the fifth anniversary of the riot, is Trump’s latest defense of Jan. 6, where he told a crowd of his supporters the election was stolen and directed them to march to the Capitol.

At the time, the mob that stormed the Capitol threatened to hang then-Vice President Mike Pence after Trump criticized his running mate for not seeking to block former President Biden’s win in the 2020 race. Trump, who did not respond to the violence at the Capitol for hours, even after lawmakers in both parties were evacuated from the building, still falsely maintains that he won the 2020 election.

The new website blames Democrats for “certifying a fraud-ridden election” and fumes over the work of the House Jan. 6 committee. It also accuses U.S. Capitol Police of escalating tensions.

“With his triumphant return to the White House, President Trump wasted no time righting one of the darkest wrongs in modern American history. On Inauguration Day 2025, he issued sweeping pardons and commutations for the vast majority of January 6 defendants—patriotic citizens who had been viciously overcharged, denied due process, and held as political hostages by a vengeful regime,” the website states.

White House aide Stephen Cheung suggested the site was made as a trolling effort, writing he couldn’t believe media outlets “actually fell for our trap.”

But the site quickly sparked alarm among Democrats.

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), a former member of the House Jan. 6 committee, blasted the site as Trump “doubling down” on his lies about Jan. 6.

“Trump recognizes that he has not shaken Jan. 6,” Raskin told The Hill after an event to mark the anniversary.

“The fact that they’re having to put up a little propaganda site on the White House web demonstrates how insecure they are about the situation.”

Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), who led the Jan. 6 panel, said of Trump: “He’s known for not telling the truth. That’s a good example.”

House Democrats staged a forum Tuesday to reconvene the House select committee that investigated the Jan. 6 attack, at one point hearing from Pamela Hemphill, a Jan. 6 rioter who rejected the pardon Trump bestowed on her.

Hemphill, previously known as the MAGA Granny, said Tuesday she was not denied due process nor had the Justice Department (DOJ) been weaponized against her.

“Once I got away from the MAGA cult and started educating myself about January the sixth, I knew what I did was wrong. I pleaded guilty to my crimes because I did the crime. I received due process and the DOJ was not weaponized against me. When Donald Trump pardoned us, I rejected the pardon. Accepting that pardon would be lying about what happened on January the sixth. I am guilty, and I own that guilt,” she said.

A report released Monday by the House Judiciary Committee detailed that 23 of those pardoned by Trump have since committed additional crimes, including violent assault, possession of child sexual abuse material, and plotting to kill an FBI agent who investigated the attack.

The new site shows a picture of Speaker Emeritus Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) along with the nine members of the select committee.

Trump accused the panel of “producing a scripted TV spectacle to fabricate an ‘insurrection’ narrative and pin all blame on President Trump,” the website states.

“The Democrats masterfully reversed reality after January 6, branding peaceful patriotic protesters as ‘insurrectionists’ and framing the event as a violent coup attempt orchestrated by Trump—despite no evidence of armed rebellion or intent to overthrow the government. In truth, it was the Democrats who staged the real insurrection by certifying a fraud-ridden election, ignoring widespread irregularities, and weaponizing federal agencies to hunt down dissenters,” the website states.

“What’s amazing about the website is that it doubles down on the big lie, so that it goes back to the big lie,” Raskin said.

“It continues to excoriate Mike Pence, right where he says Mike Pence didn’t have the courage to do what needed to be done, which was what he said on January 6 itself. And he’s saying it again. He’s continuing to say it … . He accuses the Capitol Police of being the aggressors in the violence. And so he has attempted to whitewash the violence, but you’re talking about the most photographed and documented violent assault on the Capitol in American history.”

The White House site also points blame at the U.S. Capitol Police, claiming officers were dealing with “peaceful protestors.”

“Capitol Police aggressively fire tear gas, flash bangs, and rubber munitions into crowds of peaceful protesters, injuring many and deliberately escalating tensions,” the site states.

The riot spurred the largest prosecution in U.S. history, with prosecutors charging 1,600 people in connection with the riot, including many for violent crimes.

Hemphill also apologized to the rioters, whom she credited with saving her life after she was trampled by other rioters.

“I am truly sorry from the bottom of my heart for being part of the mob that put you and so many officers in danger. I want the Capitol Police to know how truly grateful I am to them and how deeply sorry I am. I can’t believe people are still disrespecting you and trying to lie about January the sixth,” she said.

Trump’s efforts to stop the peaceful transfer of power resulted in charges from former special counsel Jack Smith, who dropped the case once Trump was reelected.

Smith recently revealed he was weighing additional charges against Trump’s co-conspirators; in a closed-door deposition before the House Judiciary Committee last month, Smith said the charges were a result of Trump’s own actions, not a weaponized Justice Department.

“Our view of the evidence was that he caused it and that he exploited it and that it was foreseeable to him,” Smith said.

“We wanted to make clear that this was not about trying to interfere with anyone’s First Amendment rights, that this was a fraud. And as you know, under Supreme Court precedent, fraud is not protected by the First Amendment,” he said.
I despise trolling.
User avatar
bobalot
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1753
Joined: 2008-05-21 06:42am
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Re: The Reign of Trump

Post by bobalot »

It was quite predictable that the piss weak response from US allies to invading Venezuela would back to haunt them.

The only surprise is how quick it happened.
"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi

"Problem is, while the Germans have had many mea culpas and quite painfully dealt with their history, the South is still hellbent on painting themselves as the real victims. It gives them a special place in the history of assholes" - Covenant

"Over three million died fighting for the emperor, but when the war was over he pretended it was not his responsibility. What kind of man does that?'' - Saburo Sakai

Join SDN on Discord
User avatar
LadyTevar
White Mage
White Mage
Posts: 23880
Joined: 2003-02-12 10:59pm

Re: The Reign of Trump

Post by LadyTevar »

ICE agents fatally shoot woman in Minneapolis, DHS says

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents fatally shot a woman in her car on Wednesday on a residential street in Minneapolis, authorities said.

Videos of the incident that were posted on social media show the woman being shot within seconds by an ICE agent who was standing at the front of her SUV when she began driving off after being told to exit her vehicle.

The shooting occurred in front of other people opposing ICE activities in Minneapolis.

Department of Homeland Security Kristi Noem and another top DHS official both claimed that the dead woman engaged in an “act of domestic terrorism” by intentionally trying to run down ICE agents.

“Today, ICE officers in Minneapolis were conducting targeted operations when rioters began blocking ICE officers and one of these violent rioters weaponized her vehicle, attempting to run over our law enforcement officers in an attempt to kill them — an act of domestic terrorism,” said Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin in a post on X.

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey scoffed at that account, citing video footage they had seen.

Frey called DHS’ claims “bulls---” and “a garbage narrative.”

The shooting came during increased tension over a surge of ICE and DHS agents to Minneapolis, criticism of the city’s large Somali population by President Donald Trump, and the Trump administration’s focus on a series of frauds against social service programs administered by Minnesota that receive federal support.

Walz blasted DHS for saying they knew the motives of the dead woman without doing an investigation. The governor said he had issued a so-called warning order to state officials to prepare to deploy Minnesota National Guard troops.

“We have someone dead, in their care, for no reason whatsoever,” Walz said at a press conference.

“We’ve been warning for weeks that the Trump administration’s dangerous, sensationalized operations are a threat to our public safety, that someone was going to get hurt. Just yesterday, I said exactly that,” Walz said.

“What we’re seeing is the consequences of governance designed to generate fear, headlines and conflict. It’s governing by reality TV, and today that recklessness cost [someone] their life,” he said.

“I have a simple message: We don’t need any further help from the federal government,” Walz said. “To Donald Trump and Kristi Noem: You’ve done enough.”

Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara said his department secured the “crime scene” and that the incident is being investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension.

O’Hara said the state bureau will probe “whether any state laws ... have been violated.”

Video from the scene posted on social media shows ICE officers pulling up to a group of cars parked on a residential street.

“Get the f--- out of our neighborhood,” a woman is heard saying on the video, apparently from behind the camera.

ICE agents then quickly exited their truck and walked up to a vehicle blocking the road, saying, “Ma’am, get out of the car, out of the car, get out of the f---ing car,” the video shows.

One agent grabbed the handle of the driver’s side door and tried to open it, and reached inside the vehicle, the video shows.

The car then backs up slightly and begins pulling away, the video shows.

Another agent, who had been standing up the road from the woman’s vehicle, walks up to the front of the car and draws his pistol and quickly fires toward the car’s windshield as the vehicle begins moving forward at him, according to videos. He appears to have fired at least three shots.

One video aired by KSTP 5 in Minneapolis shows the agent who pulled his pistol appearing to lean on or toward the woman’s SUV vehicle at the time it began moving forward, and then firing.

Less than three seconds pass between the car reversing and moving forward, and the beginning of the gunfire.

“Oh f---ing, God!” a woman screams on the video.

The vehicle that was shot at quickly crashes down the street into another car.

“Dude, you did a murder, for what?” a man yells on the video.

Noem, the DHS secretary, during a speech said, “Our ICE officers were out in an enforcement action.”

“They got stuck in the snow because of the adverse weather that is in Minneapolis,” Noem said. “They were attempting to push out their vehicle and a woman attacked them, and those surrounding them, and attempted to run them over and ram them with her vehicle.”

Noem said, “An officer of ours acted quickly and defensively shot to protect himself and the people around him and my understanding is that she was hit and is deceased.”

There is no footage on the video supporting Noem’s claim that the officers were trying to push their vehicle out of any snow, or that the woman attacked them as they were doing so right before the shooting occurred.

The truck carrying the agents was driving up the street when it stopped and the agents got out. The street was clear of any snow.

Walz, in a tweet said, “I’ve seen the video. Don’t believe this propaganda machine.”

“The state will ensure there is a full, fair, and expeditious investigation to ensure accountability and justice,” Walz said.
Image
Nitram, slightly high on cough syrup: Do you know you're beautiful?
Me: Nope, that's why I have you around to tell me.
Nitram: You -are- beautiful. Anyone tries to tell you otherwise kill them.

"A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. LLAP" -- Leonard Nimoy, last Tweet
User avatar
Grand Moff Yenchin
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2739
Joined: 2003-02-07 12:49pm
Location: Surrounded by fundies who mock other fundies
Contact:

Re: The Reign of Trump

Post by Grand Moff Yenchin »

With Y2 of the whole mess I'm thinking of John Connor's "We're not gonna make it, are we? People, I mean." quote again.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... nland.html
Denmark 'will shoot first and ask questions later' if the US invades Greenland

By KATHERINE LAWTON, NEWS REPORTER
Published: 19:17 GMT, 7 January 2026 | Updated: 19:32 GMT, 7 January 2026

Denmark will shoot first and ask questions later if the US decides to invade Greenland, army rules state.

Tensions have been escalating this week over the Trump administration's threats to use the US military to seize the island, despite furious warnings from Europe's leaders - including Sir Keir Starmer - that they will 'not stop defending' Greenland.

The Danish defence ministry today confirmed there is a 1952 rule requiring soldiers to attack invading forces 'immediately' without awaiting orders.

The defence ministry added that the rule 'remains in force' when questioned about its status by Danish newspaper Berlingske.

It comes as Donald Trump and his top advisers explore plans including purchasing Greenland or taking charge of its defense, a senior administration official said this week.

The White House threateningly told how 'utilising the US military is always an option' and warned the issue is 'not going away' despite the protests of NATO leaders.

Trump has argued that the US needs to control Greenland to ensure NATO security against rising threats from China and Russia in the Arctic.

According to Danish newspaper Berlingske, the 1952 rule says that if an invasion occurs, 'the attacked forces must immediately take up the fight without waiting for or seeking orders, even if the commanders in question are not aware of the declaration of war or state of war'.

The Danish defence ministry told the newspaper today: 'The order on precautionary measures for military defence in the event of attacks on the country and during war, remains in force.'

European allies are now holding vital talks on how to respond if the US attacks Greenland.

The moves they would be forced to take would likely mark the end of the NATO alliance, experts have said.

Trump's threats towards Greenland have angered European leaders, who last night rallied together through a joint statement to fight for the island's 'territorial integrity'.

Seven leaders - from the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain and Denmark - declared they will 'not stop defending' Greenland.

They called America an 'essential partner' and reiterated that the US and Denmark signed a defense agreement in 1951.

'Greenland belongs to its people. It is for Denmark and Greenland, and them only, to decide on matters concerning Denmark and Greenland,' they said.

In response, Trump today launched a ferocious attack on his NATO allies, just hours after America seized a Russian oil tanker in European waters.

The President ripped into 'fans' of the post-WWII military alliance with a reminder that 'most weren't paying their bills' - just 2 percent of their GDP on defense, well short of the 5 percent target set last summer at the Hague.

'Until I came along,' Trump wrote this morning. 'The USA was, foolishly, paying for them.'

'Russia and China have zero fear of NATO without the United States, and I doubt NATO would be there for us if we really needed them,' he added.

'We will always be there for NATO, even if they won't be there for us. The only nation that China and Russia fear and respect is the DJT-rebuilt USA.'

The broadside comes as the US, in another show of its military superiority, seized a Russian oil tanker off the north coast of Scotland. Moscow had recently dispatched a submarine to escort the vessel, which was smuggling sanctioned oil from Venezuela.

Europe has been on edge since Trump threatened to seize Greenland, after his successful capture of Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro in the early hours of Saturday.
1st Plt. Comm. of the Warwolves
Member of Justice League
"People can't see Buddha so they say he doesn't have a body, since his body is formed of atoms, of course you can't see it. Saying he doesn't have a body is correct"- Li HongZhi
bilateralrope
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6474
Joined: 2005-06-25 06:50pm
Location: New Zealand

Re: The Reign of Trump

Post by bilateralrope »

Hilton removing MN hotel that denied ICE bookings from its system
By Howard Thompson
Updated January 6, 2026 9:41am EST
News FOX 9


LAKEVILLE, Minn. (FOX 9) - Hilton says it is removing the Minnesota hotel from its system that was accused of denying ICE agent bookings after the company says the franchisee failed to address the issue.

Hotel accused of denying ICE bookings
The backstory: In tweets on Monday, the Department of Homeland Security shared emails from Hilton showing a hotel had canceled rooms for its investigators after learning they were immigration enforcement.

The email stated: "After further investigation online, we have found information about immigration work connected with your name, and we will be canceling your upcoming reservation. You should see a proper cancellation email in your inbox shortly from Hilton."

Homeland Security responded by accusing Hilton of a "coordinated campaign" to "REFUSE service to DHS law enforcement."

Hilton responds

The other side:
In statements to FOX 9, Hilton quickly clarified that this was not a company policy but rather actions of a single, independently-owned hotel.

Hilton said: "We have been in direct contact with the hotel, and they have apologized for the actions of their team, which was not in keeping with their policies. They have taken immediate action to resolve this matter and are contacting impacted guests to ensure they are accommodated. Hilton’s position is clear: Our properties are open to everyone and we do not tolerate any form of discrimination."

Hilton also shared a statement from Everpeak Hospitality, the hotel's management, that said they were working swiftly to address the issue.

Independent journalist refused room

Dig deeper:
Monday night, hours after Hilton and Everpeak said they were addressing the issue, conservative journalist Nick Sortor went to the hotel in question – the Hampton Inn by Hilton in Lakeville – and attempted to book ten rooms posing as a Department of Homeland Security worker.

In the video, a front desk worker tells Sortor that they still weren't allowing ICE, DHS, or immigration enforcement as guests. In the surreptitiously recorded video, which Sortor says was shot shortly before 11 p.m. on Monday, the worker says he recently spoke with the hotel's owner who hadn't mentioned any changes to the policy.

The worker then offers to call the owner, walks away, but returns and says he was unable to reach anyone at the late hour.

Hilton says they will remove MN hotel

What they're saying:
In a statement Tuesday morning, Hilton said it was "taking immediate action to remove this hotel from our systems." Hilton said the decision stemmed from the video that "clearly raises concerns that they are not meeting our standards and values."

The statement goes on to say: "Hilton is – and has always been – a welcoming place for all. We are also engaging with all our franchisees to reinforce the standards we hold them to across our system to help ensure this does not happen again."

As of 8 a.m., the Lakeville hotel was still showing up on Hilton's website for bookings.

According to FOX News, the General Services Administration (GSA) said that the Hampton Inn in Lakeville will be removed from its list of approved lodging sites for all federal employees. This comes after the hotel refused to accommodate ICE agents.

Dig deeper:
Hotels across the metro have faced protests in recent months for allowing ICE agent guests.

Just Monday night, protesters staged a loud, late-night anti-ICE protest outside the Canopy Hilton Hotel in downtown Minneapolis. Protesters chanted, yelled, banged drums, and drew a police response around the midnight hour. This has been a regular occurrence since the Trump administration launched Operation Metro Surge in December, which brought an influx of ICE agents to the Twin Cities.

Now, according to reports, the Trump administration has ordered a new surge, bringing upwards of 2,100 ICE agents and Homeland Security investigators to the Twin Cities. The new operation is reportedly aimed at rooting out fraud in the state.
Hilton picked a very interesting time to side with ICE.
Post Reply