Did you just use an appeal to the unknown in your primary argument and then complain that I didn't have any observable evidence to support my claim?Skgoa wrote:funny how you are equating "this is how I want the setting to work" with "observable evidence".
Have you even read the main page? Occams Razor? How to Analyze Sci-Fi?
So, you have a problem with something I claimed? Well, I did back down from the magic motor-car being an exception, but every other factual claim is substantiated. If you want to claim otherwise, point out specifics. Of course, given that your argument hinjes on an appeal to the unknown, that is physically impossible but I'll enjoy watching you flounder anyway.
Given the way you're arguing, though, you're going to try and say "Nuh-uh! You first!"
You really want to argue that Technology doesn't have problems working around Hogwarts?
You really want to argue that Wizard Society is not largely ignorant of Muggle advancements?
You really want to argue that Wizard Society don't have prejudices against Muggles when that was the main villains motivation and one of the main thing the heroes fought against?!
You really want to argue that the role a tank suits on the battlefield does not apply to most Wizard combat situations, which are more akin to house to house skirmishes than open warfare?
The only claim I make is the EMP one, which I only list as "General consensus" and nothing more.
And for the sake of complete-ness, I'll name the two series I initially thought of: Mahou Sensei Negima and Mahou Shojo Lyrical Nanoha.
Japan has a knack for mixing sci-fi and fantasy in ways that make purists.