Salm, i'll admit...i have no freaking clue about lighting whatsoever beyond 'things should be visible. Which probably explains it.
Though I've identified some weak points in the look of it materials wise that i'll be redoing...i think i got lazy towards the end of the project. And uh, no clue how to make the rendering work better.
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------ My LPs
I tweaked it a little for this pic, reduced city size, redid the outer arm materials and added ambient lighting. It's meant to be a really large warship. It's the second re-invention of one i've posted before in fact.
I meant Ambient Occlusion, I cant get satisfying results from multiple lights as of yet, but i think i may have been too conservative with the ambient.
This is it ramped up to about 1/2.
the Crossroads Central Control Tower, also wonderfully made by our lady DarkEvil
Praying is another way of doing nothing helpful
"Congratulations, you get a cookie. You almost got a fundamental English word correct." Pick
"Outlaw star has spaceships that punch eachother" Joviwan Read "Tales From The Crossroads"! Read "One Wrong Turn"!
I use the opensource crazyness that is known as Blender.
I mainly do this as a form of recreation so i'll consider any requests people have and do them if they'd be fun to do.
Darkevilme wrote:I use the opensource crazyness that is known as Blender.
I mainly do this as a form of recreation so i'll consider any requests people have and do them if they'd be fun to do.
Hmmn I may have something for you to do if thats OK but I will PM you on it.
On topic, well, I agree on the starfield, it looks meh and drags the pic down. Some minor texture work can also touch the pic up in my mind.
Better, but the starfield is still suxorz. Also, you might have to turn up your monitors brightness to see it but the moon has a dark gray box around it. NASA has good backgrounds for stuff like that. Or google for Hubble.
Looks much better than the previous starfield. Part of me wants to be a party pooper and complain about that many bright stars close by but I wont. You are getting there though.