Irrelevant. The entire point of this topic is finding an Ancient warship in the SW galaxy. As a privateer what am I supposed to find impressive about drones that can blast 'huge asteroids', Turbolasers and standard lasers can do that just fine and we have access to bombs in ATOC that can shread entire asteroid fields.
Why would I be inclined to store drones when I can store those bombs or use simple lasers to destroy asteroids in the unlikely event I need to 'clear a path' for anything ?
Funny but no cigar, it was just an example that this things do have a byte behind them in comparison to Trek weaponry such as Photon torpedoes after all it is stated that it would take all the loadout of the Enterprise D to blast a single asteroid something a single drone can accomplish without a sweat. Meaning we are dealing with a far more substantial weapon than what you are claiming it to be...
What the fuck...
This is Star Wars and Stargate, Star Trek has nothing to do with this.
So a drone can destroy an asteroid better than Star Trek, big fucking deal when this is a comparison between Star Wars and Stargate. Unless your trying to claim Star Trek weapons 'such as photon torpedoes' are better than Star Wars weapons, all your stating is drones are better than a weapon that has been proven to be inferior compared to Star Wars.
Star Wars has seismic charges that shread multiple asteroids so are you claiming drones are a more substantial 'weapon' against asteroids (i) than this ?
(i) - This of course ignores the fact destoying asteroids is pointless.
If only Star Wars ships were asteroids and didnt have shields you could claim they would be a 'substantial weapon'.
Since Star Wars DOES have shields and those ships are not asteroids, destroying asteroids shows us nothing of the effect they will have against a shield or armor.
By that reasoning, the bomb used by Jango would be an even more 'substantial weapon' in the Stargate universe than drones.
The only effect it actually DOES show is the DESTRUCTIVE power of drones. To which you should put forth evidence of this destructive power showing they are equal or greater than Star Wars options.
So far all you have fielded is that a drone is more powerful than the entire compliment of the E-D's 'photon torpedoes'.
Oh wait - Here
Right, being more powerful than the E-D is such a strong indication they would be a 'substantial weapon' in Star Wars.
Provide evidence that a single drone is more destructive than Slave I's missiles or even in the same ballpark as Star Wars fighter weaponary.
IYour not indubitably saying they would work, you are just arguing they could work...
You have not stated how they work to begin with and have repeatedly appealed to ignorance about, so your claiming they can use this method against SW when you cannot even prove they can or do use this method. Hence, the burden is on you to state and prove which method the drones are using.
That's a LIE my position is that since we don't know the official position that it may not work and then again it may work
. What you are trying again is to implicitly imply that they cannot possibly work under any circumstances ever and that's a load of crock because there is no evidence to support that position either. The one that was proposing that they could work without any evidence behind it was An Ancient by the way and now you are doing just the opposite...
Another appeal to ignorance.
The burden of proof lies with those trying to claim the positive. Ancient provided no evidence drones 'would' penetrate Star Wars shields hence where is YOUR evidence that it 'may work' ?
Until you prove the drones either:
A) Use a method Star Wars shields are vulnerable
B) Can do more damage than SW weaponary to shields
The default position is they will not work and will not become a 'substantial' weapon. Except in the Star Trek universe against asteroids, which is so fucking helpful for a privateer in the SW universe to know when he dosent even know what Stargate is.