Old Peculier wrote:
Oh MithrasThis thread inspired me to look up a bit on Mithras, so my girlfriend and I were amused by the
wikiclaiming: 'From the structure of the mithraea it is possible to surmise that worshippers would have gathered for a common meal along the
reclining couches lining the walls.'
Reclining couches and food in a cave or uncomfortable pews? If I was going to celebrate a 'traditional' winter holiday I know which I'd prefer.
Your girlfriend wouldn't be welcome, the Cult of Mithras was men only, it was a fraternal society. You could say that it was a mixture between a Fraternity and the Free Masons (though the Free Masons of old were often little more than a wild drinking society).
Since everybody celebrated something around that time the Christian Church decided that they had to do so as well. However Christmas is
not Yule, that's a common misunderstanding but Yule was in fact earlier on in December. Historically the first Christian kings changed the date of the solstice celebration so it'd match with the Christian celebration.
Now then about the video... they got the name Mithras right, they got the birth date right but... Damn it! I'm fed up with people getting ancient religions wrong so here goes:
He was a saviour, mithras, sent to Earth so sinners could be reborn into eternal life
Not quite, Mithras slew the Great Heavenly bull, and shed its life giving blood, so that the universe could be born and we might live. Nor did the cult have the concept of sin as such, but rather it thought that the problem was ignorance of the Mysteries of Mithras.
He died for our sins
He never died.
but came back to life the following sunday
And since he never died he never came back to life.
He was born of a virgin in a cave or a manger
He was born of a giant rock (or a pine-cone in some rare variations) in a cave, which is why all the Mithraeums were caves or made to look like caves. No virgin was involved, well, I'm sure the rock was technically a virgin but that's not
quite what they have in mind.
Attended by shepheards
Nope, Pates and Cautopates were torchbearers, not shepheards, symbolic of life and death, beginnings and ends, night and day, and things like that. One held his torch up, the other had it pointing down.
He was known as the light of the world
Possibly, such titles were common, and he was a frigging
sun god.
He had twelve disciples
There's no evidence whatsoever of this, however I think I know where the confusion comes from... in some engravings Mithras is surrounded by ritual representations of the Zodiac.
With whom he shared a last meal before dying
Since he never died there was no last meal, though ritual meals
were important to mithraism.
His followers symbolically shared the flesh and blood of him
No.
There was a ritual sharing of flesh and blood, where the priests would spread a bull hide over the dining area and consecrate bread and wine. However when you look at the portrayal of the bull that Mithras slew you'll see that often it's shown as spouting grain from its tail...
In short the meal was ritually imbibing the life giving bull that Mithras slew, not the god himself.
Most Christians at the time did see a similarity between their rituals and that of mithraism, and thought the devil had put the Mithraists up to it. Chritianity is actually, from extant evidence, slightly older than Mithraism (in the Mystery Cult sense) and we know the ritual meal was with Christianity from day one. Yet we don't see people arguing that the Mithraists stole from Christianity...
Because Mithras was a Sun God he was worshipped on Sunday
Yes, quite true, I'm surprised they got something right.
Often portrayed with a halo around his head
Occasionally portrayed with what could be a halo, but usually he wasn't. Mithras was generally recognised by wearing a phrygian cap, not by having a halo around his head.
Leader of the cult was called Papa
Pater or Pater Patrum (who was first among equals).
HQ was on Vatican Hill in Rome
There was no HQ for mithraism, just as there's no HQ for Free Masonry, the cult spread all across Europe and each congregation was pretty much independent. Christianity on the other hand had a strict Chain of Command.