I'm not sure I agree with that. Her rationale was "The Cylons think this is important; ergo, we should do the opposite of that" which matters how? For all she could know, this was some elaborate curiosity on the Cylon's part, rather than a major development of their plan. In other words, she assumed the baby was integral to the Cylon's plans. This makes her actions one based out of fear - the fear the Cylons will discover baby Athena was alive, and that this will somehow advance their plans - rather than rationality.Vympel wrote:Her reaons for doing it were rational if not "humane". Like she said, the Cylons went to a lot of trouble for this baby to be conceived. Making them think it no longer existed by taking her out of Athena's hands and making everyone believe she was dead (there still being Cylons in the fleet) was adviseable at that point in time- Athena had not proven she could be trusted.Stofsk wrote:That's true. Roslin AKA President Airlock, is a goddamn religious nutbar and who has all the predictable moral qualities of one. She's also a baby snatcher, and her reasons for doing that don't even appear rational or humane.
Furthermore, in real life if society doesn't think a group of parents are capable of raising a child they take the child away - legally, with (one presumes) evidence to back it up. This was a recourse Roslin never even considered - she babysnatched the child away, faked it's death, and then participated in an elaborate coverup. This hurt not only Athena but also Helo. She can dismiss Athena as another toaster and blast her out an airlock if she could get the chance, but Helo is a flesh and blood human being - the fact she could this to him is also obscene (though I would argue that Athena cannot be reduced to a mere machine and thus be treated with so incredible an amount of contempt that Roslin showed her).