They want to delete us again

Admiral Bravo · Post by **Admiral Bravo** » 2005-07-25 06:05pm

Jeez, what a bunch of crybabies and assholes.

Jay · Post by **Jay** » 2005-07-25 06:08pm

[quote]Maybe the best way for us to fight back here is to improve our article? More on the history of SD.net and the characters here would certainly make it a more worthwhile article as opposed to the current very basic one.
[quote]

That's exactly what I had in mind. I didn't know that there was a better article before. Damn them.

Einhander Sn0m4n · Post by **Einhander Sn0m4n** » 2005-07-25 09:47pm

Hey Castaldo, how about you register here and then we can debate the merits of whether the SDnet entry should be deleted. Stop sniping at us from afar like a coward.

CaptainChewbacca · Post by **CaptainChewbacca** » 2005-07-25 10:12pm

How is it that Spacebattles gets an entry, TrekBBS gets an entry, but somehow SDN doesn't deserve one?

I registered and made a statement as such.

Civil War Man · Post by **Civil War Man** » 2005-07-25 10:20pm

Here's a comment to add to the people wanting to delete it:

VGCats and 8-bit Theater have their own articles. JibJab and Neurotically Yours each has an article. Homestar Runner has multiple articles, as does Weebl. These obviously advertise the sites in question. So VGCats and 8-bit Theater can have their information condensed into the already existing Webcomic article and then deleted. JibJab, Neurotically Yours, Homestar, and Weebl can all be condensed into a single Macromedia Flash Cartoon article and deleted.

General Brock · Post by **General Brock** » 2005-07-27 04:44pm

?? How do I vote? I don't get the criticism either.

Post by **Surlethe** » 2005-07-27 04:48pm

General Brock wrote:?? How do I vote? I don't get the criticism either.

You register, then add your vote to the VfD page like so:

Code: Select all

 * Castaldo, you're a fucktard.  '''Keep.'''  ~~~~

HemlockGrey · Post by **HemlockGrey** » 2005-07-27 05:15pm

Someone mention that the forums of Something Awful have a massive article devoted solely to them and their forum culture.

Einhander Sn0m4n · Post by **Einhander Sn0m4n** » 2005-07-27 11:52pm

Already done, HG.

LOL! Even someone we banned voted 'strong keep' for us!

Surlethe, that would be nice, but we need to keep in mind that a lot of these dumbasses think that cursing somehow invalidates arguments.

Pu-239 · Post by **Pu-239** » 2005-07-28 12:22am

Erm, aren't you guys providing ammunition for accusations of vote garnering?

Post by **Surlethe** » 2005-07-28 05:01pm

Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:Surlethe, that would be nice, but we need to keep in mind that a lot of these dumbasses think that cursing somehow invalidates arguments.

Eh, I know. I was being slightly facetious; plus, I was aware he was monitoring this thread, so I thought I'd put in a little message for him.

General Brock · Post by **General Brock** » 2005-07-29 03:23am

Surlethe wrote:
General Brock wrote:?? How do I vote? I don't get the criticism either.
You register, then add your vote to the VfD page like so:
Code: Select all
 * Castaldo, you're a fucktard.  '''Keep.'''  ~~~~

Thanks!

Einhander Sn0m4n · Post by **Einhander Sn0m4n** » 2005-07-29 08:26am

Pu-239 wrote:Erm, aren't you guys providing ammunition for accusations of vote garnering?

I'll bet the same thing would happen if someone tryed putting a VFD on Something Awful...

Post by **Surlethe** » 2005-07-29 02:40pm

Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:
Pu-239 wrote:Erm, aren't you guys providing ammunition for accusations of vote garnering?
I'll bet the same thing would happen if someone tryed putting a VFD on Something Awful...

That would be hilarious: Castaldo would get ripped apart. He had fucking better VFD SA.

Einhander Sn0m4n · Post by **Einhander Sn0m4n** » 2005-08-01 05:20pm

Surlethe wrote:
Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:
Pu-239 wrote:Erm, aren't you guys providing ammunition for accusations of vote garnering?
I'll bet the same thing would happen if someone tryed putting a VFD on Something Awful...
That would be hilarious: Castaldo would get ripped apart. He had fucking better VFD SA.

He won't. He's too busy getting assraped by Alyeska...

Other than that, it appears the VFD discussion has stagnated. I still want ComCat banned.

Post by **Surlethe** » 2005-08-01 05:27pm

Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:
Surlethe wrote:
Einhander Sn0m4n wrote: I'll bet the same thing would happen if someone tryed putting a VFD on Something Awful...
That would be hilarious: Castaldo would get ripped apart. He had fucking better VFD SA.
He won't. He's too busy getting assraped by Alyeska...

Other than that, it appears the VFD discussion has stagnated. I still want ComCat banned.

What did ComCat do? All I see is "NN, D" -ComCat.

Otherwise, yes, Alyeska is doing well where I left off last night

.

Einhander Sn0m4n · Post by **Einhander Sn0m4n** » 2005-08-01 06:11pm

Surlethe wrote:
Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:
Surlethe wrote: That would be hilarious: Castaldo would get ripped apart. He had fucking better VFD SA.
He won't. He's too busy getting assraped by Alyeska...

Other than that, it appears the VFD discussion has stagnated. I still want ComCat banned.
What did ComCat do? All I see is "NN, D" -ComCat.

Otherwise, yes, Alyeska is doing well where I left off last night .

Put us up on VDF in the first place is what ComCat did.

Post by **Surlethe** » 2005-08-01 06:28pm

Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:
Surlethe wrote:
Einhander Sn0m4n wrote: He won't. He's too busy getting assraped by Alyeska...

Other than that, it appears the VFD discussion has stagnated. I still want ComCat banned.
What did ComCat do? All I see is "NN, D" -ComCat.

Otherwise, yes, Alyeska is doing well where I left off last night .
Put us up on VDF in the first place is what ComCat did.

Ahhhh. I see now.

Alyeska · Post by **Alyeska** » 2005-08-01 06:29pm

Mike (not our Mike) just won't give up.

Post by **Surlethe** » 2005-08-01 06:30pm

Alyeska wrote:Mike (not our Mike) just won't give up.

*makes strangled sound* I know! And he claims to have a fucking science degree! Does he not get the whole fucking point of the scientific method?

Alyeska · Post by **Alyeska** » 2005-08-01 06:34pm

Idiot Mike: You can't compare ST and SW like Wong does, they are two different universes.

Me: Yes you can, using science. Without a common base of reference, debate and comparison is impossible. Science allows this.

Idiot Mike: You cant use science!

Me: Your attacking the fundamentals of the debate now and declaring yourself a superior authority.

Idiot Mike: No I'm not, and I'm still right!

Post by **Surlethe** » 2005-08-01 06:41pm

Idiot Mike: There's nothing good about the site. They insult me!

Me (bringing up new information): Yes; there's unique educational content, entertainment content, and reams of information pertinent to the vs. debate. By the way, cut out with the perceived ad hominems and style over substance fallacies.

Idiot Mike: You haven't raised anything not pointed out above. By the way, look at me; I don't throw around fancy latin terms (though I could, if I were superior enough)

Me: Why don't you address the points?

Idiot Mike: You haven't raised anything not pointed out above. Blah blah blah...oh, look, I made a point without accusing someone of logical fallacies (thus apparently demonstrating myself superior...)!

Alyeska · Post by **Alyeska** » 2005-08-01 06:46pm

If he links to this again (Since you do read this I am adressing this to you Mike) and complains how we are slandering him over here, I am going to openly mock him for his stupidity in the VFD thread.

Post by **Surlethe** » 2005-08-01 06:58pm

And in case anyone has a stupidity tolerance lower than Alyeska's, here's the VfD thread in question; the stupidity gets worse as one gets closer to the bottom, with Mike_Castaldo engaging in broken-record behavior, black/white fallacies, ad hominems, red herrings, and style-over-substance fallacies.

It truly pains the mind.

Rogue 9 · Post by **Rogue 9** » 2005-08-01 07:04pm

Surlethe wrote:And in case anyone has a stupidity tolerance lower than Alyeska's, here's the VfD thread in question; the stupidity gets worse as one gets closer to the bottom, with Mike_Castaldo engaging in broken-record behavior, black/white fallacies, ad hominems, red herrings, and style-over-substance fallacies.

It truly pains the mind.

Behavior that would get him VIed here, in other words. No wonder he wants the entry gone.