Who's the worse abusive father?
Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital
- Darth Wong
- Sith Lord
- Posts: 70028
- Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
Who's the worse abusive father?
Father #1: once every few months, he sexually abuses his daughter. He has been doing this since she was 8 years old. She has severe psychological problems as a result. He does not beat her.
Father #2: he regularly beats his daughter, and often burns her with cigarettes in order to teach her a lesson. He has been doing this since she was 8 years old. She has scars all over her body and severe psychological problems as a result. He does not sexually abuse her.
Which guy is worse? Or do they both equally deserve to be tortured to death?
Father #2: he regularly beats his daughter, and often burns her with cigarettes in order to teach her a lesson. He has been doing this since she was 8 years old. She has scars all over her body and severe psychological problems as a result. He does not sexually abuse her.
Which guy is worse? Or do they both equally deserve to be tortured to death?
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
- Einhander Sn0m4n
- Insane Railgunner
- Posts: 18630
- Joined: 2002-10-01 05:51am
- Location: Louisiana... or Dagobah. You know, where Yoda lives.
- Einhander Sn0m4n
- Insane Railgunner
- Posts: 18630
- Joined: 2002-10-01 05:51am
- Location: Louisiana... or Dagobah. You know, where Yoda lives.
- Einhander Sn0m4n
- Insane Railgunner
- Posts: 18630
- Joined: 2002-10-01 05:51am
- Location: Louisiana... or Dagobah. You know, where Yoda lives.
- General Zod
- Never Shuts Up
- Posts: 29205
- Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
- Location: The Clearance Rack
- Contact:
- El Moose Monstero
- Moose Rebellion Ambassador
- Posts: 3743
- Joined: 2003-04-30 12:33pm
- Location: The Cradle of the Rebellion... Oop Nowrrth, Like...
- Contact:
Re: Who's the worse abusive father?
Christ, this is difficult: gut instinct says the sexual abuser as you could sort of see that a father that beats and burns is someone who has no idea how to relate with kids and should never have them, but a father who sexually abuses his kids should never be allowed to roam free in society.Darth Wong wrote:Father #1: once every few months, he sexually abuses his daughter. He has been doing this since she was 8 years old. She has severe psychological problems as a result. He does not beat her.
Father #2: he regularly beats his daughter, and often burns her with cigarettes in order to teach her a lesson. He has been doing this since she was 8 years old. She has scars all over her body and severe psychological problems as a result. He does not sexually abuse her.
Which guy is worse? Or do they both equally deserve to be tortured to death?
On the other hand, the daughter of father 2 will have to carry both mental and physical scarring for her whole life whilst the daughter of father 1 'simply' has the mental problems. Both problems may eventually be resolved by psychotherapy, but one of these people will still have to endure a lifetime of people staring at scars and having a perpetual reminder of what happened even after the issues are resolved.
Obviously I'd be quite happy to watch both fathers rot in jail for a long time, but if you gave me a gun or a prison term and told me one would walk free and the other wouldn't, then I suspect I would slap the sexual abuser in jail simply because of the abhorrence of sexual abuse in society.
"...a fountain of mirth, issuing forth from the penis of a cupid..." ~ Dalton / Winner of the 'Frank Hipper Most Horrific Drag EVAR' award - 2004 / The artist formerly known as The_Lumberjack.
Evil Brit Conspiracy: Token Moose Obsessed Kebab Munching Semi Geordie
Evil Brit Conspiracy: Token Moose Obsessed Kebab Munching Semi Geordie
- Civil War Man
- NERRRRRDS!!!
- Posts: 3790
- Joined: 2005-01-28 03:54am
- fgalkin
- Carvin' Marvin
- Posts: 14557
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:51pm
- Location: Land of the Mountain Fascists
- Contact:
The first one should be hung from a tree by a rope attached to his legs. His head shouild be between his legs in his groin, with his cut-off genitalia stuffed in his mouth. To make this possible, his spine shouild be broken,
The second one should be beaten, his eyes out out with a hot stick,and the same white-hot stick then should be applied to various areas of his body, and then be driven up his anus. Then, he should be hung from that very tree by his own intestines.
Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin
The second one should be beaten, his eyes out out with a hot stick,and the same white-hot stick then should be applied to various areas of his body, and then be driven up his anus. Then, he should be hung from that very tree by his own intestines.
Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin
A father is typically expected to protect his children from harm, not harm them for his own sick, perverted pleasure. While some may advocate death by slow torture, I feel the need to not waste time on these slimebags by "punishing" them. In my mind, the purpose of the justice system should be to "correct" wrongdoers, as opposed to simply "punishing" them. In this case, "correction" should involve simply getting rid of them.
Thus:
Hang 'em both from the same tree and bury the corpses in the same grave, marked only by dog urine.
Thus:
Hang 'em both from the same tree and bury the corpses in the same grave, marked only by dog urine.
- Nova Andromeda
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 1404
- Joined: 2002-07-03 03:38am
- Location: Boston, Ma., U.S.A.
--This one is easy; the physical abuse is much worse. I come to this conclusion by knowing without any doubt I'd choose option #1 instead of option #2 if I was forced to choose one for myself. That being said, both are horrible. Father #1 can probably be made much less of a threat by castration and I would force him to work for the rest of his life and give all the money to his daughter (perhaps without his daughters knowledge, don't want to cause more trama). One should note that confinement is not the only form of punishment in the world and there are other forms compatible with an 80 hour forced work week. Father #2 is harder to deal with and should perhaps be put out of everyones misery straight away unless there is a Chinese hard labor camp for him to attend (all proceeds from any work go to the daughter of course).
-To the previous posters who say the actions are equally bad: Grow a Fucking Spine and stop playing to the audience!!! It's people like you give polititians justifications for their fucked up sentencing rules where doing drugs or stealing a car can get you as much time as killing a man.
-To the previous posters who say the actions are equally bad: Grow a Fucking Spine and stop playing to the audience!!! It's people like you give polititians justifications for their fucked up sentencing rules where doing drugs or stealing a car can get you as much time as killing a man.
Nova Andromeda
- Darth Servo
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 8805
- Joined: 2002-10-10 06:12pm
- Location: Satellite of Love
I voted "kill both" but upon greater reflection, the physical abuser does have the potential to eventually KILL his daughter if he gets angry enough and does do real physical damage to her body. I think that tips the scales against physical abuse.
"everytime a person is born the Earth weighs just a little more."--DMJ on StarTrek.com
"You see now you are using your thinking and that is not a good thing!" DMJay on StarTrek.com
"Watching Sarli argue with Vympel, Stas, Schatten and the others is as bizarre as the idea of the 40-year-old Virgin telling Hugh Hefner that Hef knows nothing about pussy, and that he is the expert."--Elfdart
"You see now you are using your thinking and that is not a good thing!" DMJay on StarTrek.com
"Watching Sarli argue with Vympel, Stas, Schatten and the others is as bizarre as the idea of the 40-year-old Virgin telling Hugh Hefner that Hef knows nothing about pussy, and that he is the expert."--Elfdart
- General Zod
- Never Shuts Up
- Posts: 29205
- Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
- Location: The Clearance Rack
- Contact:
Simply removing a sex offender's organs isn't really enough to stop them from committing sex crimes. If anything it would add to their frustration and give them new excuses to commit said crimes, except in possibly much more bizarre and unusual fashions.Nova Andromeda wrote:--This one is easy; the physical abuse is much worse. I come to this conclusion by knowing without any doubt I'd choose option #1 instead of option #2 if I was forced to choose one for myself. That being said, both are horrible. Father #1 can probably be made much less of a threat by castration and I would force him to work for the rest of his life and give all the money to his daughter (perhaps without his daughters knowledge, don't want to cause more trama). One should note that confinement is not the only form of punishment in the world and there are other forms compatible with an 80 hour forced work week. Father #2 is harder to deal with and should perhaps be put out of everyones misery straight away unless there is a Chinese hard labor camp for him to attend (all proceeds from any work go to the daughter of course).
-To the previous posters who say the actions are equally bad: Grow a Fucking Spine and stop playing to the audience!!! It's people like you give polititians justifications for their fucked up sentencing rules where doing drugs or stealing a car can get you as much time as killing a man.
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
-
- Sith Marauder
- Posts: 3690
- Joined: 2005-01-06 12:35am
- Location: Oregon, the land of trees and rain!
Kil both, but I think sexual abuse is worse. Again, can't quite explain.
"The rest of the poem plays upon that pun. On the contrary, says Catullus, although my verses are soft (molliculi ac parum pudici in line 8, reversing the play on words), they can arouse even limp old men. Should Furius and Aurelius have any remaining doubts about Catullus' virility, he offers to fuck them anally and orally to prove otherwise." - Catullus 16, Wikipedia
- Nova Andromeda
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 1404
- Joined: 2002-07-03 03:38am
- Location: Boston, Ma., U.S.A.
--Actually, it goes a long way toward stopping them from committing sex crimes by largely removing their desire for sex. That is what the doctors say when one is castrated due to prostate cancer at least (the lack of desire part). However, one need not rely upon it when punishing the offender. The point is Father #1 doesn't seem like a violent criminal in manner that Father #2 is since he never beat his daughter. This makes him much less of a general threat.General Zod wrote:Simply removing a sex offender's organs isn't really enough to stop them from committing sex crimes. If anything it would add to their frustration and give them new excuses to commit said crimes, except in possibly much more bizarre and unusual fashions.Nova Andromeda wrote:--This one is easy; the physical abuse is much worse. I come to this conclusion by knowing without any doubt I'd choose option #1 instead of option #2 if I was forced to choose one for myself. That being said, both are horrible. Father #1 can probably be made much less of a threat by castration and I would force him to work for the rest of his life and give all the money to his daughter (perhaps without his daughters knowledge, don't want to cause more trama). One should note that confinement is not the only form of punishment in the world and there are other forms compatible with an 80 hour forced work week. Father #2 is harder to deal with and should perhaps be put out of everyones misery straight away unless there is a Chinese hard labor camp for him to attend (all proceeds from any work go to the daughter of course).
-To the previous posters who say the actions are equally bad: Grow a Fucking Spine and stop playing to the audience!!! It's people like you give polititians justifications for their fucked up sentencing rules where doing drugs or stealing a car can get you as much time as killing a man.
-BTW, you might want to support your claim with some evidence next time....
Nova Andromeda
This is the toughie.Father #2: he regularly beats his daughter, and often burns her with cigarettes in order to teach her a lesson. He has been doing this since she was 8 years old. She has scars all over her body and severe psychological problems as a result. He does not sexually abuse her.
If the SOB isn't doing all of this out of some kind of sick gratification and genuinely thinks that he's 'teaching her a lesson', then he might not be beyond rehabilitation.
Perhaps a long prison sentence coupled with mandatory psych therapy may be appropriate. Or death, if the prospect of rehab is nil.
Death, preferably a slow and drawn out one.Father #1: once every few months, he sexually abuses his daughter. He has been doing this since she was 8 years old. She has severe psychological problems as a result. He does not beat her.
"You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours."- General Sir Charles Napier
Oderint dum metuant
Oderint dum metuant
- General Zod
- Never Shuts Up
- Posts: 29205
- Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
- Location: The Clearance Rack
- Contact:
The vast majority of studies such as this one performed on sex crimes indicate the primary motivation was for power or dominance over the individual, rather than sex itself. Which suggests removing someone's genitals will have zero impact on their desire to commit such a crime.Nova Andromeda wrote: --Actually, it goes a long way toward stopping them from committing sex crimes by largely removing their desire for sex. That is what the doctors say when one is castrated due to prostate cancer at least (the lack of desire part). However, one need not rely upon it when punishing the offender. The point is Father #1 doesn't seem like a violent criminal in manner that Father #2 is since he never beat his daughter. This makes him much less of a general threat.
-BTW, you might want to support your claim with some evidence next time....
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
- Darth Servo
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 8805
- Joined: 2002-10-10 06:12pm
- Location: Satellite of Love
Last I heard, sex crimes weren't about desire for sex. It was desire for power over the victim. Thats what rape is about anyway. Often the rapist doesn't even use his own penis. I've read of cases where the asshole used a BROOMSTICK of all things.Nova Andromeda wrote:--Actually, it goes a long way toward stopping them from committing sex crimes by largely removing their desire for sex.
"everytime a person is born the Earth weighs just a little more."--DMJ on StarTrek.com
"You see now you are using your thinking and that is not a good thing!" DMJay on StarTrek.com
"Watching Sarli argue with Vympel, Stas, Schatten and the others is as bizarre as the idea of the 40-year-old Virgin telling Hugh Hefner that Hef knows nothing about pussy, and that he is the expert."--Elfdart
"You see now you are using your thinking and that is not a good thing!" DMJay on StarTrek.com
"Watching Sarli argue with Vympel, Stas, Schatten and the others is as bizarre as the idea of the 40-year-old Virgin telling Hugh Hefner that Hef knows nothing about pussy, and that he is the expert."--Elfdart
- fgalkin
- Carvin' Marvin
- Posts: 14557
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:51pm
- Location: Land of the Mountain Fascists
- Contact:
So, rapists never get an erection? How can they rape people then?Darth Servo wrote:Last I heard, sex crimes weren't about desire for sex. It was desire for power over the victim. Thats what rape is about anyway. Often the rapist doesn't even use his own penis. I've read of cases where the asshole used a BROOMSTICK of all things.Nova Andromeda wrote:--Actually, it goes a long way toward stopping them from committing sex crimes by largely removing their desire for sex.
Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin
- Darth Servo
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 8805
- Joined: 2002-10-10 06:12pm
- Location: Satellite of Love
Men can get erections from things other than a nekkid hot chick (tm). Especially the sicko that would do the things this thread is about.fgalkin wrote:So, rapists never get an erection? How can they rape people then?
Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin
"everytime a person is born the Earth weighs just a little more."--DMJ on StarTrek.com
"You see now you are using your thinking and that is not a good thing!" DMJay on StarTrek.com
"Watching Sarli argue with Vympel, Stas, Schatten and the others is as bizarre as the idea of the 40-year-old Virgin telling Hugh Hefner that Hef knows nothing about pussy, and that he is the expert."--Elfdart
"You see now you are using your thinking and that is not a good thing!" DMJay on StarTrek.com
"Watching Sarli argue with Vympel, Stas, Schatten and the others is as bizarre as the idea of the 40-year-old Virgin telling Hugh Hefner that Hef knows nothing about pussy, and that he is the expert."--Elfdart
- fgalkin
- Carvin' Marvin
- Posts: 14557
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:51pm
- Location: Land of the Mountain Fascists
- Contact:
Yes, but an erection is a strictly physiological response to sexual stimuli. You can't have an erection without sexual stimuli. Now, those people may get off on different things, but they still do it because these things give them sexual gratification.Darth Servo wrote:Men can get erections from things other than a nekkid hot chick (tm). Especially the sicko that would do the things this thread is about.fgalkin wrote:So, rapists never get an erection? How can they rape people then?
Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin
Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin
- General Zod
- Never Shuts Up
- Posts: 29205
- Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
- Location: The Clearance Rack
- Contact:
Rape isn't necessarily dependent on whether or not the victim is inserting his penis in places it doesn't belong.fgalkin wrote: So, rapists never get an erection? How can they rape people then?
Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin
Main Entry: 3rape
Function: noun
1 : an act or instance of robbing or despoiling or carrying away a person by force
2 : unlawful sexual activity and usually sexual intercourse carried out forcibly or under threat of injury against the will usually of a female or with a person who is beneath a certain age or incapable of valid consent -- compare SEXUAL ASSAULT, STATUTORY RAPE
3 : an outrageous violation
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
- General Zod
- Never Shuts Up
- Posts: 29205
- Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
- Location: The Clearance Rack
- Contact:
- fgalkin
- Carvin' Marvin
- Posts: 14557
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:51pm
- Location: Land of the Mountain Fascists
- Contact:
The most common type does, and even those that do not involve the rapist sticking his dick where it doesn't belong, their body still treats it as sexual stimulii (aka gives him a boner).General Zod wrote:Rape isn't necessarily dependent on whether or not the victim is inserting his penis in places it doesn't belong.fgalkin wrote: So, rapists never get an erection? How can they rape people then?
Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin
Main Entry: 3rape
Function: noun
1 : an act or instance of robbing or despoiling or carrying away a person by force
2 : unlawful sexual activity and usually sexual intercourse carried out forcibly or under threat of injury against the will usually of a female or with a person who is beneath a certain age or incapable of valid consent -- compare SEXUAL ASSAULT, STATUTORY RAPE
3 : an outrageous violation
Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin