Posted: 2002-07-30 04:25am
*reads Graham Kennedy's fan-fic and feels his occular nerves severed by brain to minimalize damage*
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/
I had a crappy science teacher in HS in my junior year. It was NOT pleasant. I know how bad Kennedy can be, and you should not even be joking about him being a good teacher because you learn about scientific errors and things. My teacher once failed to have a correct answer on more than 30% of the test that she gave us (the multiple-choice section), and on two more of the forty-five questions, the answer letter that was right was marked incorrect and we had to argue with her about what the answer should have been. And that was not nearly the worst thing she did to us!Doomriser wrote:Kennedy would be a great science teacher. Students would learn about scienfific errors, logical fallacies, circular reasoning, and unethical research practices. They wouldn't learn it intentionally, though.
There IS! According to GK himself, about 95% of the feedback he gets for the story is positive!Stravo wrote:Despite all these points we've brought up, I think that it is fairly obvious that there is a rabid contigent out there that looks upon "Portal" the way we look on "Conquest" UGH.
His e-mail is posted on his site. It is: webmaster@ditl.org <webmaster@ditl.org>2000AD wrote:Does someone have an e-mail address for GK so we can all tell him how much we laughed at his brilliant piece of comedy?
Although there is no evidence of this, I wouldn't be supprised if Kennedy was a creationist also. When you are of an intellegence of his level, it is easy to get sucked in.Doomriser wrote:Kennedy would be a great science teacher. Students would learn about scienfific errors, logical fallacies, circular reasoning, and unethical research practices. They wouldn't learn it intentionally, though.
That's what I would suggest. We should do so, anyway, just to make sure that he doesn't say that we've been launching stealth attacks on his site, the way that Wong sometimes comes under attack.Stravo wrote:Can't we just email him this thread? Or post this thread somewhere for all to see....it would be GREAT if some idiot Trekkie who believed this pile of horsehit would come along and try to defend this tripe. Has ANYONE actually ever even DEFENDED this utter piece of shit??? If so please post the thread....
That reminds me of my Geometry teacher. I had a nice conversation with her, which ended with my saying:Master of Ossus wrote:My teacher once failed to have a correct answer on more than 30% of the test that she gave us (the multiple-choice section), and on two more of the forty-five questions, the answer letter that was right was marked incorrect and we had to argue with her about what the answer should have been. And that was not nearly the worst thing she did to us!
What exactly are you thinking about? Heck, GAT's deconstruction is quite fine.Cpt_Frank wrote:Now, anyone perhaps gonna write 'Portal - the truth' and send it GK?
Cpt_Frank wrote:Now, anyone perhaps gonna write 'Portal - the truth' and send it GK?
Master of Ossus wrote:I just did, Grand Admiral Thrawn. I asked him to come here and set you guys straight on who would REALLY win a fight between ST & SW, so you'd better be scared!