StarDestroyer.Net BBS

Posted: **2005-07-25 06:05pm**

Jeez, what a bunch of crybabies and assholes.

Posted: **2005-07-25 06:08pm**

[quote]Maybe the best way for us to fight back here is to improve our article? More on the history of SD.net and the characters here would certainly make it a more worthwhile article as opposed to the current very basic one.
[quote]

That's exactly what I had in mind. I didn't know that there was a better article before. Damn them.

Posted: **2005-07-25 09:47pm**

Hey Castaldo, how about you register here and then we can debate the merits of whether the SDnet entry should be deleted. Stop sniping at us from afar like a coward.

Posted: **2005-07-25 10:12pm**

How is it that Spacebattles gets an entry, TrekBBS gets an entry, but somehow SDN doesn't deserve one?

I registered and made a statement as such.

Posted: **2005-07-25 10:20pm**

Here's a comment to add to the people wanting to delete it:

VGCats and 8-bit Theater have their own articles. JibJab and Neurotically Yours each has an article. Homestar Runner has multiple articles, as does Weebl. These obviously advertise the sites in question. So VGCats and 8-bit Theater can have their information condensed into the already existing Webcomic article and then deleted. JibJab, Neurotically Yours, Homestar, and Weebl can all be condensed into a single Macromedia Flash Cartoon article and deleted.

Posted: **2005-07-27 04:44pm**

?? How do I vote? I don't get the criticism either.

Posted: **2005-07-27 04:48pm**

General Brock wrote:?? How do I vote? I don't get the criticism either.

You register, then add your vote to the VfD page like so:

Code: Select all

 * Castaldo, you're a fucktard.  '''Keep.'''  ~~~~

Posted: **2005-07-27 05:15pm**

Someone mention that the forums of Something Awful have a massive article devoted solely to them and their forum culture.

Posted: **2005-07-27 11:52pm**

Already done, HG.

LOL! Even someone we banned voted 'strong keep' for us!

Surlethe, that would be nice, but we need to keep in mind that a lot of these dumbasses think that cursing somehow invalidates arguments.

Posted: **2005-07-28 12:22am**

Erm, aren't you guys providing ammunition for accusations of vote garnering?

Posted: **2005-07-28 05:01pm**

Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:Surlethe, that would be nice, but we need to keep in mind that a lot of these dumbasses think that cursing somehow invalidates arguments.

Eh, I know. I was being slightly facetious; plus, I was aware he was monitoring this thread, so I thought I'd put in a little message for him.

Posted: **2005-07-29 03:23am**

Surlethe wrote:
General Brock wrote:?? How do I vote? I don't get the criticism either.
You register, then add your vote to the VfD page like so:
Code: Select all
 * Castaldo, you're a fucktard.  '''Keep.'''  ~~~~

Thanks!

Posted: **2005-07-29 08:26am**

Pu-239 wrote:Erm, aren't you guys providing ammunition for accusations of vote garnering?

I'll bet the same thing would happen if someone tryed putting a VFD on Something Awful...

Posted: **2005-07-29 02:40pm**

Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:
Pu-239 wrote:Erm, aren't you guys providing ammunition for accusations of vote garnering?
I'll bet the same thing would happen if someone tryed putting a VFD on Something Awful...

That would be hilarious: Castaldo would get ripped apart. He had fucking better VFD SA.

Posted: **2005-08-01 05:20pm**

Surlethe wrote:
Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:
Pu-239 wrote:Erm, aren't you guys providing ammunition for accusations of vote garnering?
I'll bet the same thing would happen if someone tryed putting a VFD on Something Awful...
That would be hilarious: Castaldo would get ripped apart. He had fucking better VFD SA.

He won't. He's too busy getting assraped by Alyeska...

Other than that, it appears the VFD discussion has stagnated. I still want ComCat banned.

Posted: **2005-08-01 05:27pm**

Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:
Surlethe wrote:
Einhander Sn0m4n wrote: I'll bet the same thing would happen if someone tryed putting a VFD on Something Awful...
That would be hilarious: Castaldo would get ripped apart. He had fucking better VFD SA.
He won't. He's too busy getting assraped by Alyeska...

Other than that, it appears the VFD discussion has stagnated. I still want ComCat banned.

What did ComCat do? All I see is "NN, D" -ComCat.

Otherwise, yes, Alyeska is doing well where I left off last night

.

Posted: **2005-08-01 06:11pm**

Surlethe wrote:
Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:
Surlethe wrote: That would be hilarious: Castaldo would get ripped apart. He had fucking better VFD SA.
He won't. He's too busy getting assraped by Alyeska...

Other than that, it appears the VFD discussion has stagnated. I still want ComCat banned.
What did ComCat do? All I see is "NN, D" -ComCat.

Otherwise, yes, Alyeska is doing well where I left off last night .

Put us up on VDF in the first place is what ComCat did.

Posted: **2005-08-01 06:28pm**

Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:
Surlethe wrote:
Einhander Sn0m4n wrote: He won't. He's too busy getting assraped by Alyeska...

Other than that, it appears the VFD discussion has stagnated. I still want ComCat banned.
What did ComCat do? All I see is "NN, D" -ComCat.

Otherwise, yes, Alyeska is doing well where I left off last night .
Put us up on VDF in the first place is what ComCat did.

Ahhhh. I see now.

Posted: **2005-08-01 06:29pm**

Mike (not our Mike) just won't give up.

Posted: **2005-08-01 06:30pm**

Alyeska wrote:Mike (not our Mike) just won't give up.

*makes strangled sound* I know! And he claims to have a fucking science degree! Does he not get the whole fucking point of the scientific method?

Posted: **2005-08-01 06:34pm**

Idiot Mike: You can't compare ST and SW like Wong does, they are two different universes.

Me: Yes you can, using science. Without a common base of reference, debate and comparison is impossible. Science allows this.

Idiot Mike: You cant use science!

Me: Your attacking the fundamentals of the debate now and declaring yourself a superior authority.

Idiot Mike: No I'm not, and I'm still right!

Posted: **2005-08-01 06:41pm**

Idiot Mike: There's nothing good about the site. They insult me!

Me (bringing up new information): Yes; there's unique educational content, entertainment content, and reams of information pertinent to the vs. debate. By the way, cut out with the perceived ad hominems and style over substance fallacies.

Idiot Mike: You haven't raised anything not pointed out above. By the way, look at me; I don't throw around fancy latin terms (though I could, if I were superior enough)

Me: Why don't you address the points?

Idiot Mike: You haven't raised anything not pointed out above. Blah blah blah...oh, look, I made a point without accusing someone of logical fallacies (thus apparently demonstrating myself superior...)!

Posted: **2005-08-01 06:46pm**

If he links to this again (Since you do read this I am adressing this to you Mike) and complains how we are slandering him over here, I am going to openly mock him for his stupidity in the VFD thread.

Posted: **2005-08-01 06:58pm**

And in case anyone has a stupidity tolerance lower than Alyeska's, here's the VfD thread in question; the stupidity gets worse as one gets closer to the bottom, with Mike_Castaldo engaging in broken-record behavior, black/white fallacies, ad hominems, red herrings, and style-over-substance fallacies.

It truly pains the mind.

Posted: **2005-08-01 07:04pm**

Surlethe wrote:And in case anyone has a stupidity tolerance lower than Alyeska's, here's the VfD thread in question; the stupidity gets worse as one gets closer to the bottom, with Mike_Castaldo engaging in broken-record behavior, black/white fallacies, ad hominems, red herrings, and style-over-substance fallacies.

It truly pains the mind.

Behavior that would get him VIed here, in other words. No wonder he wants the entry gone.

StarDestroyer.Net BBS

They want to delete us again