Page 1 of 1
Atheist/Skeptic/Deist Etcetera Site Recommendations
Posted: 2005-05-22 05:47pm
by Haruko
The following are some sites that I've visited and read much, if not all, the material of:
http://www.creationtheory.org/
http://www.geocities.com/paulntobin/
http://www.infidels.org/index.html (obviously not one I've read all the material of)
I'd like some recommendation for more sites like these.
Posted: 2005-05-22 05:48pm
by Dalton
Posted: 2005-05-22 05:50pm
by Lord Zentei
Posted: 2005-05-22 05:51pm
by salm
Posted: 2005-05-22 05:53pm
by Lord Zentei
Skeptic Magazine:
http://www.skeptic.com/
PS: Might it be an idea to sticky this?
Edit: Damn Salm beat me to skepdic and randi
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
(removed them)
Posted: 2005-05-22 05:53pm
by Wicked Pilot
The Skeptic's Dictionary
James Randi Educational Foundation
EDIT: I see Salm beat me to it. I guess great minds think alike afterall.
Posted: 2005-05-22 06:31pm
by AnimeJet
Posted: 2005-05-22 06:51pm
by Aaron
Posted: 2005-05-22 07:52pm
by Alyeska
Posted: 2005-05-22 07:57pm
by Grand Moff Yenchin
Posted: 2005-05-22 08:00pm
by Mitth`raw`nuruodo
"The Rejection of Pascal's Wager: A Skeptic's Guide To Christianity"
Some guy's personal page, with lots of stuff about Christianity along with other random things.
Posted: 2005-05-22 08:04pm
by Shroom Man 777
Posted: 2005-05-22 08:48pm
by Mayabird
Posted: 2005-05-22 08:49pm
by Haruko
I already provided that one (second one down). Have you already read all of his material, including those linked at the bottom, e.g. [God], [Christianity], etcetera? Good stuff.
Posted: 2005-05-22 09:10pm
by SirNitram
I will simply note these guys are alot more militant and rabid than most Deists. Their arguments against Atheism are poorly constructed; they fall heavily onto Ad Hominems and generalizations, and make very little effort to do much besides claim Atheism is irreasonable for rejecting what there is no evidence against, instead of remembering we Deists place something where no evidence shows.
Posted: 2005-05-23 01:57am
by Enforcer Talen
Posted: 2005-05-23 10:00am
by Lord Zentei
SirNitram wrote:
I will simply note these guys are alot more militant and rabid than most Deists. Their arguments against Atheism are poorly constructed; they fall heavily onto Ad Hominems and generalizations, and make very little effort to do much besides claim Atheism is irreasonable for rejecting what there is no evidence against, instead of remembering we Deists place something where no evidence shows.
Ah. Well, to be quite truthful I had mainly concentrated on other areas of their site rather than delving into their Deism vs Atheism page. This bears looking into more closely.
Posted: 2005-05-23 01:30pm
by SirNitram
Lord Zentei wrote:SirNitram wrote:
I will simply note these guys are alot more militant and rabid than most Deists. Their arguments against Atheism are poorly constructed; they fall heavily onto Ad Hominems and generalizations, and make very little effort to do much besides claim Atheism is irreasonable for rejecting what there is no evidence against, instead of remembering we Deists place something where no evidence shows.
Ah. Well, to be quite truthful I had mainly concentrated on other areas of their site rather than delving into their Deism vs Atheism page. This bears looking into more closely.
They're also selling it.. Hard. This just makes me quite uncomfortable for reasons I can't quite enunciate well. Deism is supposed to be different; what's the point of encouraging people to work it out for themselves if you're shoving your version of the answers at 'em?