Pretty cool machine.
Zor
Moderator: Edi
Are they mental? People will take one look at this picture and see flying motorcycle as in "holy shit it's the future where can I buy one?"Aeroidiots wrote:But Aerofex does not plan to immediately develop and sell a manned version. Instead, the aerospace firm sees the aerial vehicle as a test platform for new unmanned drones — heavy-lift robotic workhorses that could use the same hover technology to work in agricultural fields, or swiftly deliver supplies to search-and-rescue teams in rough terrain.

Even if noise can be deal with to an extent, stream of air capable of lifting such thing could potentially deal a lot of damage in urban environment, plus, it might just not be safe to use due to lack of space between trucks and low-hanging cables. It would basically need huge overhaul of any given city infrastructure, and if handed to celebrity it might just end with said celebrity killing him/herself and huge damage to company from being sued/interest in vehicle vanishing. Might just not be practical product, though, I can see it being sold as quad-like off road vehicle...Lagmonster wrote:I don't know how great these would be in public. I'd imagine the noise from it would make a fleet of Harleys sound like a gentle whispering breeze.
then there's also the thing that regular bike accidents are rather messy as it is, now think what that be with a bike that could potentially go even faster then a regular bike and that's ignoring the safety hazard the fan blades would cause in event of a crash (and you don't need a celeberty for that there's enough morons within the "regular" people).Irbis wrote:Even if noise can be deal with to an extent, stream of air capable of lifting such thing could potentially deal a lot of damage in urban environment, plus, it might just not be safe to use due to lack of space between trucks and low-hanging cables. It would basically need huge overhaul of any given city infrastructure, and if handed to celebrity it might just end with said celebrity killing him/herself and huge damage to company from being sued/interest in vehicle vanishing. Might just not be practical product, though, I can see it being sold as quad-like off road vehicle...Lagmonster wrote:I don't know how great these would be in public. I'd imagine the noise from it would make a fleet of Harleys sound like a gentle whispering breeze.
I thought of small rocks, glass shards and pieces of trash shooting aside in every which way as it passes over them. It's a big enough problem with helicopters.Irbis wrote: Even if noise can be deal with to an extent, stream of air capable of lifting such thing could potentially deal a lot of damage in urban environment, plus, it might just not be safe to use due to lack of space between trucks and low-hanging cables. It would basically need huge overhaul of any given city infrastructure, and if handed to celebrity it might just end with said celebrity killing him/herself and huge damage to company from being sued/interest in vehicle vanishing. Might just not be practical product, though, I can see it being sold as quad-like off road vehicle...

Fuel consumption will be one of the bigges issues, now that goverments and companies want to try and phase motor transportation to either save less on petrol consumption (ie:20 people getting on a bus as opposed to 20 people driving) or make them into more electric and renewable fuel based vehicles.PeZook wrote:I thought of small rocks, glass shards and pieces of trash shooting aside in every which way as it passes over them. It's a big enough problem with helicopters.Irbis wrote: Even if noise can be deal with to an extent, stream of air capable of lifting such thing could potentially deal a lot of damage in urban environment, plus, it might just not be safe to use due to lack of space between trucks and low-hanging cables. It would basically need huge overhaul of any given city infrastructure, and if handed to celebrity it might just end with said celebrity killing him/herself and huge damage to company from being sued/interest in vehicle vanishing. Might just not be practical product, though, I can see it being sold as quad-like off road vehicle...
Also fuel consumption.
A helicopter needs to produce a lot more downwards thrust than this would, just because it's heavier. It might still be too much, but a half-ton of thrust from a hoverbike isn't going to be as disruptive as, say, ten tons of thrust from an Apache.PeZook wrote:I thought of small rocks, glass shards and pieces of trash shooting aside in every which way as it passes over them. It's a big enough problem with helicopters.
