Reprehensible Movies

OT: anything goes!

Moderator: Edi

User avatar
Edi
Dragonlord
Dragonlord
Posts: 12461
Joined: 2002-07-11 12:27am
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by Edi »

Warwolf Urban Combat Specialist

Why is it so goddamned hard to get little assholes like you to admit it when you fuck up? Is it pride? What gives you the right to have any pride?
–Darth Wong to vivftp

GOP message? Why don't they just come out of the closet: FASCISTS R' US –Patrick Degan

The GOP has a problem with anyone coming out of the closet. –18-till-I-die
User avatar
FSTargetDrone
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7878
Joined: 2004-04-10 06:10pm
Location: Drone HQ, Pennsylvania, USA

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by FSTargetDrone »

Zixinus wrote:One movie I could mention is a Christmas movie: while most such movies center around jaded men having their heart grow three sizes, the rediscovery of the value of family and friends, this one particular movie centered around one thing: you have to believe.

I can't recall the title, but I specifically recall that it was an 3D animated film and it heavily involved trains: with kids going on a train ride (I think there was a scene where there were other kids and hot cocoa). There were a lot of whacy train rides with some rather weirdly laid out tracks and one awesome freefall scene where the train was moving so fast that there were a few moments of freefall.
Sounds like The Polar Express.
Image
User avatar
Zixinus
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6663
Joined: 2007-06-19 12:48pm
Location: In Seth the Blitzspear
Contact:

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by Zixinus »

FSTargetDrone wrote:
Sounds like The Polar Express.
Yes, that should be it.

Bare in mind that I saw the film a long time ago.
Credo!
Chat with me on Skype if you want to talk about writing, ideas or if you want a test-reader! PM for address.
User avatar
RRoan
Padawan Learner
Posts: 222
Joined: 2005-04-16 09:44pm

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by RRoan »

The book it was based on was an awesome children's book that I have very fond memories of, so I'm going to have to disagree with you on the story itself being reprehensible. That being said, I haven't seen the movie, so I don't know how it was presented.
User avatar
Big Orange
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7105
Joined: 2006-04-22 05:15pm
Location: Britain

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by Big Orange »

The Polar Express (from what I've seen of it) is not reprehensible the way other movies are (by expressing racist views or promoting criminal activities, or revising history for negative propagandist reasons) but it used CGI animation to depict the characters, with unintentionally eerie results (CGI or puppet characters who are very human but not human enough are disconcerting; this is called the "Uncanny Valley" effect).
'Alright guard, begin the unnecessarily slow moving dipping mechanism...' - Dr. Evil

'Secondly, I don't see why "income inequality" is a bad thing. Poverty is not an injustice. There is no such thing as causes for poverty, only causes for wealth. Poverty is not a wrong, but taking money from those who have it to equalize incomes is basically theft, which is wrong.' - Typical Randroid

'I think it's gone a little bit wrong.' - The Doctor
Kanastrous
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6464
Joined: 2007-09-14 11:46pm
Location: SoCal

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by Kanastrous »

I was struck by a weird (and doubtless totally unintentional) parallel between The Polar Express and Larry Niven's Convergent Series. In the latter there's a character who more-or-less mistakenly summons a demon, and when he tries to find a church to seek aid he finds only empty lots where the buildings should be - having summoned a demon, for him houses of God no longer exist. I was reminded of that during the scene near the end where the kid is in the huge crowd swirling around Santa, and at first, try as he might, the kid can't see Santa...because since he doesn't believe, for him Santa doesn't exist...

My sister, who alas is some flavor of undiagnosed detached-from-reality not-right-in-the-head, *really* seized upon Polar Express as the metaphor for, well, everything and anything about all and sundry, and was actually walking around for a while presenting people with little brass jingle bells and solemnly telling them that 'they had to believe'. I know that the film itself is mostly innocuous but it was distressing to see the effect it could have, on an unbalanced mind.
I find myself endlessly fascinated by your career - Stark, in a fit of Nerd-Validation, November 3, 2011
User avatar
Bob the Gunslinger
Has not forgotten the face of his father
Posts: 4760
Joined: 2004-01-08 06:21pm
Location: Somewhere out west

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by Bob the Gunslinger »

RRoan wrote:The book it was based on was an awesome children's book that I have very fond memories of, so I'm going to have to disagree with you on the story itself being reprehensible. That being said, I haven't seen the movie, so I don't know how it was presented.
No, the book is reprehensible, too. I've had to read it recently, and I find the message to be offensive and even counter-productive considering this reading was for school children. "Remember kids, it doesn't matter what's real or what you can prove to exist. Just believe! Believe in what we tell you to believe!"
"Gunslinger indeed. Quick draw, Bob. Quick draw." --Count Chocula

"Unquestionably, Dr. Who is MUCH lighter in tone than WH40K. But then, I could argue the entirety of WWII was much lighter in tone than WH40K." --Broomstick

"This is ridiculous. I look like the Games Workshop version of a Jedi Knight." --Harry Dresden, Changes

"Like...are we canonical?" --Aaron Dembski-Bowden to Dan Abnett
User avatar
DudeGuyMan
Jedi Knight
Posts: 587
Joined: 2010-03-25 03:25am

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by DudeGuyMan »

Jim Raynor wrote:Asian guys get to date in Hollywood movies? If an Asian character is portrayed as sexy, chances are the character is an "exotic" female for the white hero. Asian males are either pussy nerds or loser clowns. If he's not a pussy, he's a sexless Martial Artist who can kick ass but won't get to kiss the girl, even if he's supposed to kiss the girl (e.g. Romeo Must Die).
There was... uh... um...

Quick Kick from the old eighties GI Joe cartoon? They showed him dating a white woman. Which is pretty unusual considering that the show was otherwise basically built on silly stereotypes.

But yeah, interracial relationships are pretty scarce. Hancock with Will Smith maybe, even though he and what's her name didn't get to be together in the end. Which sort of negates it, I guess.
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by Darth Wong »

Onscreen interracial relationships are a lot more common now than they were just 20 years ago. Remember the Cosby show? We've come a long way. Of course, some areas have come farther than others. The more liberal cities are full of interracial couples, while there are parts of the Deep South that are still informally segregated.

If you see a movie where relationships are strictly segregated, check the date. It's probably more than 10 years old.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Stravo
Official SD.Net Teller of Tales
Posts: 12806
Joined: 2002-07-08 12:06pm
Location: NYC

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by Stravo »

Reprehensible is a great word to describe those movies that as you watch them you just get deeply offended. Not "Boy that sucked" but more like "Jesus Christ, I am personally offended by this movie. It had a message or scene in it that just disgusted me to the core"

For me the ones that stand out are:

"Signs" Yes, this ode to blind faith just made me ill after watching it. So, let me get this straight. God killed Mel Gibson's wife to send him some really obscure and arcane message that he interprets at the last minute so he can save his family from space aliens that are themselves an abomination against all science and reason? Riiggghht. And Mel instead of being angry at this shitty god regains his faith. How awful.

"Soul Plane" I'm not black and this offended the hell out of me. It is essentially an ode to all things racial and stereotypical. Anyone who starred, wrote or participated in this film are forever banned from being offended by anything racially insensitive directed at African Americans.

"John Carpenter's Vampires" this one I remember because the treatment of the sole female character was so over the top offensive that I was shocked and usually that's the one group I usually pass over on these kind of things because it's hard to be offended by the naked female form. But when your sole female character is literally a whore, spends half the movie tied up and naked and slapped around by every man in the cast you have to take note.

I know this is not a movie but I was recently exposed to a show "The Jersey Shore" and I now understand what all the hubub was about among Italian Americans. If you had a show that brought together every walking hispanic stereotype and put them all in a house to make asses of themselves I would be just as outraged. Really? These are the only young italian kids (or wannabe Italian in the case of the mess known as Snookie) you could find on the Jersey shore??

I know there are more but these were the ones I could come up with off the top of my head.
Wherever you go, there you are.

Ripped Shirt Monkey - BOTMWriter's Guild Cybertron's Finest Justice League
This updated sig brought to you by JME2
Image
User avatar
Isolder74
Official SD.Net Ace of Cakes
Posts: 6762
Joined: 2002-07-10 01:16am
Location: Weber State of Construction University
Contact:

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by Isolder74 »

For me being a big Titanic History buff it was Titanic. For someone who's taken the time to study the stories that happened on the real ship the movie was just a constant tease. We'd get to several points where they lead up to the point of maybe showing us something cool about the real history of the ship then tapdance away from it.

Another for myself is Pearl Harbor. As a lover of the movie Tora, Tora, Tora; the movie just made me mad. what's worse I've ready the stories about the two pilots that the movie's main characters replace and that just made me even madder. Not only don't we get the real story of Pearl Harbor we get a stupid '90's love triangle to boot! Then they stomp all over 30 Seconds Over Tokyo while they are at it at the end! You might say that they couldn't use the two real pilots for narrative reason that;'s fine but they could at least be true to the real story? The Great Escape makes liberal use of renaming and combining the real people and didn't stomp on their real life awesome why couldn't the writers of Pearl Harbor?
Hapan Battle Dragons Rule!
When you want peace prepare for war! --Confusious
That was disapointing ..Should we show this Federation how to build a ship so we may have worthy foes? Typhonis 1
The Prince of The Writer's Guild|HAB Spacewolf Tank General| God Bless America!
User avatar
Flagg
CUNTS FOR EYES!
Posts: 12797
Joined: 2005-06-09 09:56pm
Location: Hell. In The Room Right Next to Reagan. He's Fucking Bonzo. No, wait... Bonzo's fucking HIM.

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by Flagg »

Isolder74 wrote:For me being a big Titanic History buff it was Titanic. For someone who's taken the time to study the stories that happened on the real ship the movie was just a constant tease. We'd get to several points where they lead up to the point of maybe showing us something cool about the real history of the ship then tapdance away from it.

The real atrocity of Titanic is that James Cameron got such a fucking hardon for it that he spent 12 fucking years deep diving to masturbate on it's steel corpse rather than making awesome action movies.
We pissing our pants yet?
-Negan

You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to
Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan

He who can,
does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
User avatar
Shroom Man 777
FUCKING DICK-STABBER!
Posts: 21222
Joined: 2003-05-11 08:39am
Location: Bleeding breasts and stabbing dicks since 2003
Contact:

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by Shroom Man 777 »

Flagg wrote:The real atrocity of Titanic is that James Cameron got such a fucking hardon for it that he spent 12 fucking years deep diving to masturbate on it's steel corpse rather than making awesome action movies.
Amen, brother. As awesome as Avatar was, Cameron's preoccupation with Titanic directly led to the inadvertent shitttening of the Terminator and Aliens franchises due to all sorts of hacks chewing into those awesome serieses while Cameron was busy looking at stupid dead underwater boats. Think of all the wonderful things he could've done with Arnold Schwarzenegger after True Lies! :(
Image "DO YOU WORSHIP HOMOSEXUALS?" - Curtis Saxton (source)
shroom is a lovely boy and i wont hear a bad word against him - LUSY-CHAN!
Shit! Man, I didn't think of that! It took Shroom to properly interpret the screams of dying people :D - PeZook
Shroom, I read out the stuff you write about us. You are an endless supply of morale down here. :p - an OWS street medic
Pink Sugar Heart Attack!
User avatar
Isolder74
Official SD.Net Ace of Cakes
Posts: 6762
Joined: 2002-07-10 01:16am
Location: Weber State of Construction University
Contact:

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by Isolder74 »

Perhaps he was hoping to find his impossible perfectly undamaged drawing of a naked woman.....
Hapan Battle Dragons Rule!
When you want peace prepare for war! --Confusious
That was disapointing ..Should we show this Federation how to build a ship so we may have worthy foes? Typhonis 1
The Prince of The Writer's Guild|HAB Spacewolf Tank General| God Bless America!
User avatar
Setzer
Requiescat in Pace
Posts: 3138
Joined: 2002-08-30 11:45am

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by Setzer »

DudeGuyMan wrote:
Jim Raynor wrote:Asian guys get to date in Hollywood movies? If an Asian character is portrayed as sexy, chances are the character is an "exotic" female for the white hero. Asian males are either pussy nerds or loser clowns. If he's not a pussy, he's a sexless Martial Artist who can kick ass but won't get to kiss the girl, even if he's supposed to kiss the girl (e.g. Romeo Must Die).
There was... uh... um...

Quick Kick from the old eighties GI Joe cartoon? They showed him dating a white woman. Which is pretty unusual considering that the show was otherwise basically built on silly stereotypes.

But yeah, interracial relationships are pretty scarce. Hancock with Will Smith maybe, even though he and what's her name didn't get to be together in the end. Which sort of negates it, I guess.
I remember seeing Firefly for the first time, and being surprised that Wash and Zoe were married. I think it was the first interracial marriage in entertainment that i can remember seeing.
Image
User avatar
Isil`Zha
Jedi Knight
Posts: 768
Joined: 2002-07-07 02:50pm
Location: Orbital Frame Naked Jehuty

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by Isil`Zha »

Law Abiding Citizen.

I'm not sure who could even consider a protagonist in this movie. As a movie I thought it was okay - up until the end.
Spoiler
I can't remember any names, but the guy that lost his family went way over the top on the two criminals.

For the rest of the movie it seemed that his lawyer, whom he was angry with, had become the protaganist. That is, until the end. So at the end he just waltzes into the prison with a BOMB, and allows it to go off, killing Butler's character!?

The worst part is, the movie implies that he had absolutely zero consequences for blowing up part of a prison and murdering an inmate. :banghead:
Though we are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are,--
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
User avatar
Darth Yan
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2488
Joined: 2008-12-29 02:09pm
Location: California

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by Darth Yan »

I think that was sort of the point. At the very start Darby successfully exploits the system to save his ass, and the system can't stop it. Even if Nick had been a moral man he would have had to make the deal because the alternative would have been allowing both monsters to walk free. In addition, they were told point blank that murdering CLyde was the only thing that could stop him was murdering him. It shows that the law system isn't perfect. to quote tvtropes on the subject
TvTropes wrote:Black And Gray Morality: Let's see. He's a Well Intentioned Extremist, willing to kill anyone to make his rather naive political statements. They're the forces of justice, who start out incompetent and unable to put away the bad guys, and wind up violating civil rights at the drop of a hat and staging vigilante executions. Who're we supposed to cheer for?
I don't think there was supposed to be a protaganist; the system is flawed, and sometimes you have to bend it to stop the bad guy.
User avatar
Big Orange
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7105
Joined: 2006-04-22 05:15pm
Location: Britain

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by Big Orange »

Titanic was perhaps genuinely reprehensible in how it besmudged the name of the second officer of the RMS Titanic (where he was depicted gunning down the Irish and Italian steerage passangers, then committed suicide aftewards).

Bad Boys II puts me off where our heroes (Will Smith and that crazy guy) were ploughing through a shanty town in one of those gross, unlamented yellow Hummers and in another segment they were tormenting a somewhat dorky but harmless youth.
'Alright guard, begin the unnecessarily slow moving dipping mechanism...' - Dr. Evil

'Secondly, I don't see why "income inequality" is a bad thing. Poverty is not an injustice. There is no such thing as causes for poverty, only causes for wealth. Poverty is not a wrong, but taking money from those who have it to equalize incomes is basically theft, which is wrong.' - Typical Randroid

'I think it's gone a little bit wrong.' - The Doctor
User avatar
Patrick Degan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 14847
Joined: 2002-07-15 08:06am
Location: Orleanian in exile

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by Patrick Degan »

Big Orange wrote:Titanic was perhaps genuinely reprehensible in how it besmudged the name of the second officer of the RMS Titanic (where he was depicted gunning down the Irish and Italian steerage passangers, then committed suicide aftewards).
Oh yes. James Cameron had to issue a public apology to the family of First Officer William Murdoch for that one.

(btw, Charles Herbert Lightoller was RMS Titanic's Second Officer)
When ballots have fairly and constitutionally decided, there can be no successful appeal back to bullets.
—Abraham Lincoln

People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House

Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)
User avatar
Isil`Zha
Jedi Knight
Posts: 768
Joined: 2002-07-07 02:50pm
Location: Orbital Frame Naked Jehuty

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by Isil`Zha »

Darth Yan wrote:I think that was sort of the point. At the very start Darby successfully exploits the system to save his ass, and the system can't stop it. Even if Nick had been a moral man he would have had to make the deal because the alternative would have been allowing both monsters to walk free. In addition, they were told point blank that murdering CLyde was the only thing that could stop him was murdering him. It shows that the law system isn't perfect. to quote tvtropes on the subject
TvTropes wrote:Black And Gray Morality: Let's see. He's a Well Intentioned Extremist, willing to kill anyone to make his rather naive political statements. They're the forces of justice, who start out incompetent and unable to put away the bad guys, and wind up violating civil rights at the drop of a hat and staging vigilante executions. Who're we supposed to cheer for?
I don't think there was supposed to be a protaganist; the system is flawed, and sometimes you have to bend it to stop the bad guy.
Bull - he could have him moved to another prison. It took Darby 10 years to setup what he did. The way to stop him, was to simply move him.

What bothers me the most is that Nick suffered absolutely zero consequences for his actions. The movie's message turned into "...the system is flawed, and sometimes you have to bend it to stop the bad guy. You will suffer no consequences if you do this because he 'deserved it.'"
Though we are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are,--
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
User avatar
The Yosemite Bear
Mostly Harmless Nutcase (Requiescat in Pace)
Posts: 35211
Joined: 2002-07-21 02:38am
Location: Dave's Not Here Man

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by The Yosemite Bear »

A boy and his dog.

the hero is a rapist, cannibal....
Image

The scariest folk song lyrics are "My Boy Grew up to be just like me" from cats in the cradle by Harry Chapin
lance
Jedi Master
Posts: 1296
Joined: 2002-11-07 11:15pm
Location: 'stee

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by lance »

The Yosemite Bear wrote:A boy and his dog.

the hero is a rapist, cannibal....
Where was he a cannibal? I remember him feeding the girl to his dog, did he eat some too?
User avatar
Gaidin
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2646
Joined: 2004-06-19 12:27am
Contact:

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by Gaidin »

Isil`Zha wrote: What bothers me the most is that Nick suffered absolutely zero consequences for his actions. The movie's message turned into "...the system is flawed, and sometimes you have to bend it to stop the bad guy. You will suffer no consequences if you do this because he 'deserved it.'"
You don't know that. The movie ended right after the cell was set on fire.
User avatar
Isil`Zha
Jedi Knight
Posts: 768
Joined: 2002-07-07 02:50pm
Location: Orbital Frame Naked Jehuty

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by Isil`Zha »

Didn't it show Nick some time later, you know, not in prison?
Though we are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are,--
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
User avatar
Marcus Aurelius
Jedi Master
Posts: 1361
Joined: 2008-09-14 02:36pm
Location: Finland

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by Marcus Aurelius »

Isolder74 wrote: Another for myself is Pearl Harbor. As a lover of the movie Tora, Tora, Tora; the movie just made me mad. what's worse I've ready the stories about the two pilots that the movie's main characters replace and that just made me even madder. Not only don't we get the real story of Pearl Harbor we get a stupid '90's love triangle to boot! Then they stomp all over 30 Seconds Over Tokyo while they are at it at the end! You might say that they couldn't use the two real pilots for narrative reason that;'s fine but they could at least be true to the real story? The Great Escape makes liberal use of renaming and combining the real people and didn't stomp on their real life awesome why couldn't the writers of Pearl Harbor?
I suppose this calls for this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pM8PrqY5Rg
I miss you more then Michael Bay missed the mark
When he made Pearl Harbor
I miss you more than that movie missed the point
And that's an awful lot girl
And now, now you've gone away
And all I'm trying to say is
Pearl Harbor sucked, and I miss you

I need u like Ben Affleck needs acting school
He was terrible in that film
I need u like Cuba Gooding needed a bigger part
He's way better than Ben Affleck
And now all I can think about is your smile
and that shitty movie too
Pearl Harbor sucked and I miss you

Why does Michael Bay get to keep on making movies?
I guess Pearl Harbor sucked
Just a little bit more than I miss you
It's impossible to say it better, so no need for any further comments :mrgreen:

As for Tora! Tora! Tora!: it's a great historical docudrama, but unfortunately not a very good movie. Yes, it's better than Pearl Harbor even as a movie, but then again almost anything done with a big budget is, except perhaps Battlefield Earth...
Post Reply