Page 1 of 1

DNA test proves it -- baby shark has no father

Posted: 2008-10-10 10:49am
by Azazal
Behold Jesus Shark!!
RICHMOND, Virginia (AP) -- Scientists have confirmed the second case of a "virgin birth" in a shark.
In a study reported Friday in the Journal of Fish Biology, scientists said DNA testing proved that a pup carried by a female blacktip shark in a Virginia aquarium contained no genetic material from a male.

The first documented case of asexual reproduction, or parthenogenesis, among sharks involved a pup born to a hammerhead at an Omaha, Nebraska, zoo.

"This first case was no fluke," Demian Chapman, a shark scientist and lead author of the second study, said in a statement. "It is quite possible that this is something female sharks of many species can do on occasion."

The scientists cautioned that the rare asexual births should not be viewed as a possible solution to declining global shark populations. The aquarium sharks that reproduced without mates each carried only one pup, while some species can produce litters of a dozen or more.

"It is very unlikely that a small number of female survivors could build their numbers up very quickly by undergoing virgin birth," Chapman said.

The medical mystery began 16 months ago after the death of Tidbit, a blacktip shark that had lived for eight years at the Virginia Aquarium & Marine Science Center in Virginia Beach. No male blacktip sharks were present during her eight years.

In May 2007, the 5-foot, 94-pound shark died after it was given a sedative before undergoing a yearly checkup. The 10-inch shark pup was found during a necropsy, surprising aquarium officials. They initially thought the embryonic pup was either the product of a virgin birth or a cross between the blacktip and a male of another shark species -- which has never been documented, Chapman said.

Tidbit's pup was nearly full term, and likely would have been quickly eaten by "really big sand tiger sharks" that were in the tank, Chapman said in a telephone interview from Florida.

That is what happened to the tiny hammerhead pup in the Omaha case.
"By the time they could realize what they were looking at, something munched the baby," he said of aquarium workers. The remains of the pup were used for the DNA testing.

Virgin birth has been proven in some bony fish, amphibians, reptiles and birds, and has been suspected among sharks in the wild.

The scientists who studied the Virginia and Nebraska sharks said the newly formed pups acquired one set of chromosomes when the mother's chromosomes split during egg development, then united anew.

Absent the chromosomes present in the male sperm, the offspring of an asexual conception have reduced genetic diversity and, the scientists said, may be at a disadvantage for surviving in the wild. A pup, for instance, can be more susceptible to congenital disorders and diseases.

The scientists said their findings offer "intriguing questions" about how frequently automictic parthenogenesis occurs in the wild.

"It is possible that parthenogenesis could become more common in these sharks if population densities become so low that females have trouble finding mates," said Mahmood Shivji, one of the scientists and director of the Guy Harvey Research Institute at Nova Southeastern University in Florida.

The DNA fingerprinting techniques used by the scientists are identical to those used in human paternity testing.

Chapman, who is with the Institute for Ocean Conservation Science at Stony Brook, was assisted in the study by Beth Firchau of the Virginia Aquarium.

Chapman and Shivji were on the team that made the first discovery of virgin birth involving the Nebraska shark.
Pretty cool to see really, but I did not know the magic sky pixie had a thing for shark tail

Re: DNA test proves it -- baby shark has no father

Posted: 2008-10-10 11:12am
by CaptainChewbacca
Now that Shark Jesus and the Shark Antichrist have been born, we can now prepare for SHARKMAGEDDON!

Re: DNA test proves it -- baby shark has no father

Posted: 2008-10-10 11:15am
by Solauren
Interesting.

This is, essentially, natural cloning of a complex organism.

If they could find a way to duplicate the process, this could lead to more accessable cloning.

My only question is, does this process negate the problems with cloning an adult, such as the 'it's 5 years old, but has the health problems assoicated with a creature it's parents age'.

Re: DNA test proves it -- baby shark has no father

Posted: 2008-10-10 11:29am
by General Zod
Solauren wrote: My only question is, does this process negate the problems with cloning an adult, such as the 'it's 5 years old, but has the health problems assoicated with a creature it's parents age'.
As per the article, it reduces genetic diversity and increases the risk for congenital diseases. So it's not exactly problem free.

Re: DNA test proves it -- baby shark has no father

Posted: 2008-10-11 12:09am
by Mayabird
Azazal wrote: Pretty cool to see really, but I did not know the magic sky pixie had a thing for shark tail
Not just sharks, but komodo dragons too.
[line 2]

Re: DNA test proves it -- baby shark has no father

Posted: 2008-10-11 01:35am
by Cal Wright
The chosen one the shark may be...

Re: DNA test proves it -- baby shark has no father

Posted: 2008-10-11 05:06am
by Darth Fanboy
I'm almost certain that the sharks at Omaha weren't Hammerheads, but the similarly shaped yet much smaller Bonnethead sharks. The Aquarium @ Henry Doorly Zoo has one large tank but it isn't near the size that an adult hammerhead would require. (People calling bonnethead sharks either hammerheads or baby hammerheads is a huge pet peeve of mine.) Sharks like the Bonnethead and Blacktip Reef Sharks mentioned in this article are fairly commonplace in aquariums but i'll hold out hope that we might eventually see this in one of the larger species as well. While it will never be practical for saving populations, I think it would be wonderful for captive breeding efforts.