The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor (spoilers)

OT: anything goes!

Moderator: Edi

Post Reply
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor (spoilers)

Post by Darth Wong »

I saw this today at the behest of my son David. I actually thought it wasn't bad; it wasn't as good as the first one, but it was better than the second one, which I thought sucked donkey balls and was responsible for some of the flaws in this one. I'm aware that it's been absolutely slagged at rottentomatoes.com (10%), but the second film got 47%, and it was an utter horror-show. That's not really fair; if the second film was worth 47%, then this one should be worth at least 60%. We're not talking about a great movie here with the third film, but egads, the second one should have led to someone being tarred and feathered.

Strong points of the film:
  1. Brendan Fraser has a good persona for these kinds of absurd over-the-top movies. He knows how to strike a balance between action and levity which befits the intrinsic silliness of the material.
  2. Jet Li is suitably intense, and his character has a good mix of powers. I particularly liked the way he looked before he was fully reincarnated.
  3. The whole terra-cotta idea was begging to be done.
Weak points of the film:
  1. The son, Alex. By the sweet lords of cinema, I have never seen a flatter character in a big-budget motion picture.
  2. The actress who replaced Rachel Weisz. She was competent, but it never really works to replace an actress with another actress playing the same character. Worse yet, they made her a typical Hollywood "strong woman", which is to say that she made a very strong impression and never really seemed to get rattled. The original Evelyn from the first movie had strong opinions, but she was terrified and discombobulated once the fighting started, just as she should have been.
  3. The "warrior woman" revision to the Evelyn character. This stupid idea helped sink the second film, and it does the same to this one. Evelyn was a clumsy bookish bespectacled librarian in the first movie, and that was part of the great charm of her character. In the second film, they made her the reincarnation of some fighting warrior chick from ancient Egypt, and irrevocably ruined her character.
  4. The nerfing of the bad guy. In the first Mummy movie, Imhotep was nigh-unstoppable. He was a living god, and the film reinforced this. At every turn, he seemed more invincible. But in the second one, the villain was a lame CGI scorpion with the face of The Rock, and he didn't even really do anything at all until the end of the movie. In this one, the villain is the Emperor, who is said to control the five elements: earth, wind, fire, water, and since it's Jet Li, I'm assuming the fifth element is kung fu. That's a pretty damned impressive dossier. Earlier in the film, he demonstrates the ability to control snow and turn it into ice shards, and he can hurl fireballs. At one point, he turns into a three-headed fire-breathing flying dragon. Pretty cool, but later in the film, his army is beset by an airplane, and his only response is to turn into a giant dog and attempt to leap into the air in a futile attempt to claw at it. Why the fuck doesn't he use his cool powers? Shouldn't he be hurling fireballs at the plane, or turning into a fire-breathing dragon to bring it down? Wouldn't it inspire so much more awe and dread if he seemed truly unstoppable, rather than just being a guy with a big bag of party tricks?
  5. The nerfing of the bad guy's army. They did this in the second film as well: when the dreaded Army of Anubis was raised, there was a growing sense of dread as the mere mortals of the Magi faced off against them. They charged, the battle was joined, and ... the Army of Anubis turned out to be a bunch of pussies. They literally crumbled when hit. The movie just hit the wall at that point, and never recovered. They do the same thing in the third movie: the undead Terra Cotta army is raised, and they look appropriately menacing, but they crumble like clay pottery when struck. Couldn't they have given them the consistency of granite, to make them much more threatening? They did say that the army would become "indestructible" once they passed the Great Wall, but of course, that only telegraphs the fact that they will never make it past the Great Wall. And sure enough, they don't. They don't even seem to be able to sweep past the undead skeletons that the kindly witch raises to stop them, even though they are the poorly equipped skeletons of the very same enemies that this same army effortlessly crushed 2500 years ago.
  6. The part where Brendan Fraser challenges Jet Li to stop using his powers and fight him hand to hand, like a man. In English, even though Jet Li's character doesn't understand a word of it. And it works: Jet Li fights him without using any of his powers: a mistake which naturally leads to his death. Groooaannnn ...
I don't know why the writers felt the need to include a big contrived battle scene in the second and third films of this series. Wouldn't it be more dramatic to show the Army of Anubis or the Terra Cotta army effortlessly crushing all who stand in their way, rather than being inevitably countered by a force which can fight them to a standstill while Brendan Fraser takes out their leader? The word "formulaic" seems appropriate here.

I guess that looks like a pretty scathing review. But it is what it is: a mindless summer popcorn movie. Besides, negative points #1, #3, #4, and #5 were all flaws found in the second movie as well, which for some reason got roughly five times as many positive reviews. And I have to admit that the kids loved it.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Singular Intellect
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2392
Joined: 2006-09-19 03:12pm
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Post by Singular Intellect »

Reinforcing one of your points there, it would be nice to see an extremely powerful villian in this vein who actually uses his awe inspiring powers intelligently and consistently.

But then that would force the writers to, I dunno, really come up with some intelligent plan that actually beats him/her in a believable manner.
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

Bubble Boy wrote:Reinforcing one of your points there, it would be nice to see an extremely powerful villian in this vein who actually uses his awe inspiring powers intelligently and consistently.

But then that would force the writers to, I dunno, really come up with some intelligent plan that actually beats him/her in a believable manner.
That's when you have no choice but to accuse them of insulting the audience's intelligence. When I saw that the plane was strafing his terra cotta army and I knew that he had power over the wind, I was thinking "well obviously, he's going to bring down that plane with his wind powers". But noooo, he turns into a giant dog and tries to leap up and claw it out of the air! WTF?
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
CaptainZoidberg
Padawan Learner
Posts: 497
Joined: 2008-05-24 12:05pm
Location: Worcester Polytechnic
Contact:

Post by CaptainZoidberg »

Bubble Boy wrote:But then that would force the writers to, I dunno, really come up with some intelligent plan that actually beats him/her in a believable manner.
Why do the goods guys need to beat them? One of my favorite movies: Invasion of the Body Snatchers (70s version) ends with the protagonist being killed and replaced by an alien. In fact, the good guys losing reinforced how scary the aliens were.
Jim Raynor
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2922
Joined: 2002-07-11 04:42am

Post by Jim Raynor »

I loved the first Mummy, and think it's one of the best light-hearted action movies. I agree that the second one was terrible; turning Evey into a warrior woman pussifying Imhotep took away some of the best things from the first movie. I still don't understand how The Mummy Returns managed to get mixed reviews that only somewhat leaned to the negative.

Glad to hear from someone that the third movie isn't the complete piece of shit that RT says it is. I like most of the actors involved and thought it would have been a shame if they all went down because of this movie (which could very well still happen).

It's possible that after the shitty second movie, the Mummy franchise lost any good will with the critics, who went into this movie hating it.
"They're not triangular, but they are more or less blade-shaped"- Thrawn McEwok on the shape of Bakura destroyers

"Lovely. It's known as impugning character regarding statement of professional qualifications' in the legal world"- Karen Traviss, crying libel because I said that no soldier she interviewed would claim that he can take on billion-to-one odds

"I've already laid out rules for this thread that we're not going to make these evidential demands"- Dark Moose on supporting your claims
User avatar
Singular Intellect
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2392
Joined: 2006-09-19 03:12pm
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Post by Singular Intellect »

Darth Wong wrote:
Bubble Boy wrote:Reinforcing one of your points there, it would be nice to see an extremely powerful villian in this vein who actually uses his awe inspiring powers intelligently and consistently.

But then that would force the writers to, I dunno, really come up with some intelligent plan that actually beats him/her in a believable manner.
That's when you have no choice but to accuse them of insulting the audience's intelligence. When I saw that the plane was strafing his terra cotta army and I knew that he had power over the wind, I was thinking "well obviously, he's going to bring down that plane with his wind powers". But noooo, he turns into a giant dog and tries to leap up and claw it out of the air! WTF?
I'd argue they aren't necessarily trying to insult the audience's intelligence; rather they may be just displaying the lack of their own.
CaptainZoidberg wrote:Why do the goods guys need to beat them? One of my favorite movies: Invasion of the Body Snatchers (70s version) ends with the protagonist being killed and replaced by an alien. In fact, the good guys losing reinforced how scary the aliens were.
'The Terminator' was scary as fuck, unstoppably powerful, and yet it was defeated in a very realistic and believable way.

Not that I have a problem with the villian winning, I just think writers lately tend to be extremely lazy when it comes to making the good guys win.

In regards to this specific movie, sounds like it would've been great if Jet Li had been taunted to fight without powers by any character, and he promptly roasts them with fire (or other power application).

When you have bigger guns than your opponent, you don't dial them down to make the fight more fair. You reduce your opponent to ash and go after what you're fighting for in the first place.
Block
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2333
Joined: 2007-08-06 02:36pm

Post by Block »

Well he did challenge the Emperor's honor. Again, in English, so I'm not sure how that got through, but apparently he could ignore that. The fifth element was metal, although you're right, it would've been better if it'd been Kung Fu. I enjoyed the movie though, it was silly, lots of action, and had Yetis kicking a soldier over the goal posts.
User avatar
XaLEv
Lore Monkey
Posts: 5372
Joined: 2002-07-04 06:35am

Post by XaLEv »

Darth Wong wrote:In this one, the villain is the Emperor, who is said to control the five elements: earth, wind, fire, water, and since it's Jet Li, I'm assuming the fifth element is kung fu.
Darth Wong wrote: When I saw that the plane was strafing his terra cotta army and I knew that he had power over the wind, I was thinking "well obviously, he's going to bring down that plane with his wind powers". But noooo, he turns into a giant dog and tries to leap up and claw it out of the air! WTF?
Did they mention wind specifically? Because the five Chinese elements are fire, water, earth, wood and metal. No wind.
User avatar
hongi
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1952
Joined: 2006-10-15 02:14am
Location: Sydney

Re: The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor (spoilers)

Post by hongi »

Darth Wong wrote:
[*]The nerfing of the bad guy's army. They did this in the second film as well: when the dreaded Army of Anubis was raised, there was a growing sense of dread as the mere mortals of the Magi faced off against them. They charged, the battle was joined, and ... the Army of Anubis turned out to be a bunch of pussies. They literally crumbled when hit. The movie just hit the wall at that point, and never recovered.
I think the invincibility aspect was not so much that they were impossible to destroy, but that the army could endlessly respawn and possibly in greater numbers as well. If you consider the opening scenes where the Anubian army overran the ancient city, they pretty much are invincible for their period.
User avatar
Gandalf
SD.net White Wizard
Posts: 16307
Joined: 2002-09-16 11:13pm
Location: A video store in Australia

Post by Gandalf »

XaLEv wrote:Did they mention wind specifically? Because the five Chinese elements are fire, water, earth, wood and metal. No wind.
They mention wind in the previews I've seen.
"Oh no, oh yeah, tell me how can it be so fair
That we dying younger hiding from the police man over there
Just for breathing in the air they wanna leave me in the chair
Electric shocking body rocking beat streeting me to death"

- A.B. Original, Report to the Mist

"I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately."
- George Carlin
User avatar
Master of Ossus
Darkest Knight
Posts: 18213
Joined: 2002-07-11 01:35am
Location: California

Re: The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor (spoilers)

Post by Master of Ossus »

Darth Wong wrote:In this one, the villain is the Emperor, who is said to control the five elements: earth, wind, fire, water, and since it's Jet Li, I'm assuming the fifth element is kung fu. That's a pretty damned impressive dossier.
Well, the fifth element is, actually, "heart." At least until that video happens.

I think I'll wait for the DVD and for when I have nothing else to watch through Netflix, but thanks for the review.
"Sometimes I think you WANT us to fail." "Shut up, just shut up!" -Two Guys from Kabul

Latinum Star Recipient; Hacker's Cross Award Winner

"one soler flar can vapririze the planit or malt the nickl in lass than millasacit" -Bagara1000

"Happiness is just a Flaming Moe away."
Trogdor
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2553
Joined: 2003-08-08 02:44pm
Location: Strong Badia

Post by Trogdor »

XaLEv wrote:Did they mention wind specifically? Because the five Chinese elements are fire, water, earth, wood and metal. No wind.
Nope, no wind. At the start, when they're telling the tale of the dragon emperor, the narrator lists off the elements the emperor controls and they're the Chinese ones you listed. Also, when the emperor is trying to suck the undead army back into the Great Wall, the five orbs he has levitating before him are pretty clearly of those materials.

Still, he should've been able to shoot the plane down with fire balls or turn into a dragon again and knock it out of the sky. Also, I don't think he ever did anything with wood or metal, which would have been nice to see. He pretty much stuck with fire and water.
"I want to mow down a bunch of motherfuckers with absurdly large weapons and relative impunity - preferably in and around a skyscraper. Then I want to fight a grim battle against the unlikely duo of the Terminator and Robocop. The last level should involve (but not be limited to) multiple robo-Hitlers and a gorillasaurus rex."--Uraniun235 on his ideal FPS game

"The ability to destroy a planet is insignificant compared to the power of the Force."--Darth Vader
Block
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2333
Joined: 2007-08-06 02:36pm

Post by Block »

I believe he used metal when he pulled all the mummies towards the wall briefly at the end.
User avatar
MichaelFerrariF1
Youngling
Posts: 117
Joined: 2008-05-07 11:49pm
Location: Houston, TX

Post by MichaelFerrariF1 »

Trogdor wrote:Also, I don't think he ever did anything with wood or metal, which would have been nice to see. He pretty much stuck with fire and water.
He may have turned his hand into hot metal when he cut Alex's Professor's head off with his hand.

He could also recall his sword after throwing it.
You need a Ferrari, no, two Ferraris powersliding around a Bentley...that's also powersliding. - Jeremy Clarkson
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

I also have to wonder how the hell the undead slave-worker army came up with weapons. They weren't buried with weapons. But at that point, you know the battle is happening just because the writers wanted a big CGI battle, not because it logically flowed from the story.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
MichaelFerrariF1
Youngling
Posts: 117
Joined: 2008-05-07 11:49pm
Location: Houston, TX

Post by MichaelFerrariF1 »

Some of them carried tools which may have been left in the ground when they built the wall. That doesn't explain the actual weapons though.
You need a Ferrari, no, two Ferraris powersliding around a Bentley...that's also powersliding. - Jeremy Clarkson
User avatar
Kuja
The Dark Messenger
Posts: 19322
Joined: 2002-07-11 12:05am
Location: AZ

Post by Kuja »

It also doesn't explain how Ming, a man DRAWN AND QUARTERED BY HORSES still had three out of four limbs attached. The man should've been nicknamed Torso Boy by the end of the introduction. Maybe he had a regen orb on him or something.
Image
JADAFETWA
User avatar
starslayer
Jedi Knight
Posts: 731
Joined: 2008-04-04 08:40pm
Location: Columbus, OH

Post by starslayer »

Kuja wrote:It also doesn't explain how Ming, a man DRAWN AND QUARTERED BY HORSES still had three out of four limbs attached. The man should've been nicknamed Torso Boy by the end of the introduction. Maybe he had a regen orb on him or something.
I haven't seen the movie, so I can't say if he was actually torn apart and then magically got his limbs back, but in real life, the human body is surprisingly resilient against this kind of thing. There were many cases where the horses couldn't pull the limbs off, and the executioners had to cut through most of the flesh themselves. The horses were easily able to dislocate the joints, however.
User avatar
Guardsman Bass
Cowardly Codfish
Posts: 9281
Joined: 2002-07-07 12:01am
Location: Beneath the Deepest Sea

Post by Guardsman Bass »

It had some decent bits (and I did like Brendan Frasier's character), but other than that, I think it kind of sucked (and saying it was better than the second movie, which I thought was at least more entertaining, is damning with faint praise).

Jonathan was nerfed mostly (he had some funny moments, but it really paled in comparison to the first movie), the son was, as mentioned, flat (at least the kid in the second movie was funny at times, and had character), and what was the deal with the sudden romance between said kid and the young woman (Lin, I think?)? Are we supposed to assume that he's met with her at some points between the museum and when she tried to kill him at the burial site? Minor nitpick, but it kind of bugged me.

Jet Li wasn't bad, but Imhotep was still more interesting and better as a villain in both movies.
“It is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life.”
-Jean-Luc Picard


"Men are afraid that women will laugh at them. Women are afraid that men will kill them."
-Margaret Atwood
User avatar
Grasscutter
Padawan Learner
Posts: 445
Joined: 2005-03-24 09:24pm

Post by Grasscutter »

You can blame the son character for Rachel Weisz not signing on for the movie. She felt she didn't look old enough to credibly play the mother of a college-age boy, and she was right. Brendan Fraiser looks like he's the same age as the son in a lot of scenes and it bugged the hell out of me. The film would have been MUCH better without that kid. Flat character, bad acting, and he needlessly complicated the plot (with the dual clunker subplots of getting Lin to fall in love with him out of nowhere and reconciling with Brendan Fraiser).

I think the movie's most damning flaw however was the fight between Jet Li and Michelle Yeoh. You've got two of the greatest martial arts performers in the world playing bad-ass magic-powered kung fu immortals and all you have them do is cross swords a few times?
User avatar
Guardsman Bass
Cowardly Codfish
Posts: 9281
Joined: 2002-07-07 12:01am
Location: Beneath the Deepest Sea

Post by Guardsman Bass »

You can blame the son character for Rachel Weisz not signing on for the movie. She felt she didn't look old enough to credibly play the mother of a college-age boy, and she was right. Brendan Fraiser looks like he's the same age as the son in a lot of scenes and it bugged the hell out of me. The film would have been MUCH better without that kid. Flat character, bad acting, and he needlessly complicated the plot (with the dual clunker subplots of getting Lin to fall in love with him out of nowhere and reconciling with Brendan Fraiser).
That's why she dropped off? I thought it was because she read the script and thought it was appalling.

I didn't mind having A kid; it adds some interesting new bits to the story, although they should have picked someone with more of a character.
I think the movie's most damning flaw however was the fight between Jet Li and Michelle Yeoh. You've got two of the greatest martial arts performers in the world playing bad-ass magic-powered kung fu immortals and all you have them do is cross swords a few times?
Because Li's fighter is apparently "honorable" in some way (apparently not honorable enough to have the sorceress he used for immortality killed after breaking a promise to release her lover), and it wouldn't be honorable for him to simply turn into a monster and kill her.
“It is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life.”
-Jean-Luc Picard


"Men are afraid that women will laugh at them. Women are afraid that men will kill them."
-Margaret Atwood
Post Reply