What if Hitler became a painter?

OT: anything goes!

Moderator: Edi

Kreshna Aryaguna Nurzaman
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2230
Joined: 2002-07-08 07:10am

What if Hitler became a painter?

Post by Kreshna Aryaguna Nurzaman »

What if, due some twist of fate, Hitler was actually accepted in Academy of Arts in Vienna?

(1) Would he be a successful painter? Did he really 'lack of talent', like the Academy said? Or he was simply unappreciated?

(2) Hitler had adopted anti-Semite views since in Vienna, but IIRC his fanatical qualities were enhanced by German's loss in WWI. Would he be that extreme if he became a painter? And how would his racism affect his career as a painter? Would his views reflected on his paintings? (IIRC Picasso's anti-war views also shown on his works like Guernica)

(3) This is an age-old question, but would facism raise to power in Germany without Hitler? And if that's the case, would Hitler be a famous propaganda artist? Probably not a painter? A famous propaganda cartoonist, maybe?
User avatar
Joe
Space Cowboy
Posts: 17314
Joined: 2002-08-22 09:58pm
Location: Wishing I was in Athens, GA

Post by Joe »

(1) Would he be a successful painter? Did he really 'lack of talent', like the Academy said? Or he was simply unappreciated?
I've seen his art. It is really not hard on the eyes at all and quite honestly I'd rather have a Hitler painting in my room than the baby Jesus getting blown by a demon with monkey shit smeared all over the place or whatever the hell they consider art these days. But he was out of sync with the Zeitgeist, and could never have been a critically successful artist. Commercially he barely made enough as an artist to support himself.
(2) Hitler had adopted anti-Semite views since in Vienna. How would his racism affect his career as a painter? Would his views reflected on his paintings? (IIRC Picasso's anti-war views also shown on his works like Guernica)
More than likely he would have, since he was later a strong advocate of promoting National Socialism through the arts. The Nazis funded the arts to suit their purposes, with nationalistic propaganda and such.
3) This is an age-old question, but would facism raise to power in Germany without Hitler? And if that's the case, would Hitler be a famous propaganda artist? Probably not a painter? A famous propaganda cartoonist, maybe?
Probably. Hitler's rise to power was a function of the rise of Fascism, not the other way around. Hitler just came along at a time when Germany was ready for him. I don't want to get into what he'd have been had he not been a dictator, because that'd be speculation pulled directly from my ass.
Image

BoTM / JL / MM / HAB / VRWC / Horseman

I'm studying for the CPA exam. Have a nice summer, and if you're down just sit back and realize that Joe is off somewhere, doing much worse than you are.
User avatar
The Grim Squeaker
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10314
Joined: 2005-06-01 01:44am
Location: A different time-space Continuum
Contact:

Post by The Grim Squeaker »

Quote:
3) This is an age-old question, but would facism raise to power in Germany without Hitler? And if that's the case, would Hitler be a famous propaganda artist? Probably not a painter? A famous propaganda cartoonist, maybe?


Probably. Hitler's rise to power was a function of the rise of Fascism, not the other way around. Hitler just came along at a time when Germany was ready for him. I don't want to get into what he'd have been had he not been a dictator, because that'd be speculation pulled directly from my ass.
___________
However the question is if it could have drummed up the level of popular support and political savvy necessary without hil :evil:
Photography
Genius is always allowed some leeway, once the hammer has been pried from its hands and the blood has been cleaned up.
To improve is to change; to be perfect is to change often.
User avatar
Joe
Space Cowboy
Posts: 17314
Joined: 2002-08-22 09:58pm
Location: Wishing I was in Athens, GA

Post by Joe »

the .303 bookworm wrote:
Quote:
3) This is an age-old question, but would facism raise to power in Germany without Hitler? And if that's the case, would Hitler be a famous propaganda artist? Probably not a painter? A famous propaganda cartoonist, maybe?


Probably. Hitler's rise to power was a function of the rise of Fascism, not the other way around. Hitler just came along at a time when Germany was ready for him. I don't want to get into what he'd have been had he not been a dictator, because that'd be speculation pulled directly from my ass.
___________
However the question is if it could have drummed up the level of popular support and political savvy necessary without hil :evil:
Yes, it would have. Hitler was an idiot of a human being who failed at nearly everything he did in his life and he was described as such by those who knew him honestly. He brought no political savvy to the Nazi party that it didn't have already. He was just a loud-mouthed idiot who happened to be at the right place at the right time. Hitler didn't ring his magick bell and make Germany Go Insane; it was already quite insane at the time, which was the reason the Nazis came to power in the first place.
Image

BoTM / JL / MM / HAB / VRWC / Horseman

I'm studying for the CPA exam. Have a nice summer, and if you're down just sit back and realize that Joe is off somewhere, doing much worse than you are.
User avatar
Gil Hamilton
Tipsy Space Birdie
Posts: 12962
Joined: 2002-07-04 05:47pm
Contact:

Post by Gil Hamilton »

1) Chances are, if he had stayed an artist he would have been a really unpopular one. He was only marginally technically competant and wouldn't have stood out at all. Chances are, eventually he'd become more hungry than artistically inspired and found some other job.

2) Most likely. There isn't an aspiring artist on the planet who takes up painting because it's just a job and doesn't care what his work says. Pretty much all artists want to express a message in their work. Even completely commercial artists like to get messages across, even if it's the message he's paid to make.

3) Again, probably, for the reason Joe said.
"Show me an angel and I will paint you one." - Gustav Courbet

"Quetzalcoatl, plumed serpent of the Aztecs... you are a pussy." - Stephen Colbert

"Really, I'm jealous of how much smarter than me he is. I'm not an expert on anything and he's an expert on things he knows nothing about." - Me, concerning a bullshitter
Kreshna Aryaguna Nurzaman
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2230
Joined: 2002-07-08 07:10am

Post by Kreshna Aryaguna Nurzaman »

Joe wrote:
(1) Would he be a successful painter? Did he really 'lack of talent', like the Academy said? Or he was simply unappreciated?
I've seen his art. It is really not hard on the eyes at all and quite honestly I'd rather have a Hitler painting in my room than the baby Jesus getting blown by a demon with monkey shit smeared all over the place or whatever the hell they consider art these days. But he was out of sync with the Zeitgeist, and could never have been a critically successful artist. Commercially he barely made enough as an artist to support himself.
So his paintings are quite good? And the reason he was rejected is because he wasn't inline with the "mainstream" trends those days?

How good his paintings actually are? Would his works be eventually appreciated some times later? Probably after his death? (IIRC van Gogh's paintings started to be truly appreciated after his death as well)


I found two Hitler's paintings on the net:

Image

Image

From my layman's perspective, they're quite pleasing to the eyes. I ain't no art critic, though. I also wonder whether the popularity of Hitler's paintings today is merely due to their "historical value", or it's because they're actually good?
Last edited by Kreshna Aryaguna Nurzaman on 2005-06-08 02:16am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Joe
Space Cowboy
Posts: 17314
Joined: 2002-08-22 09:58pm
Location: Wishing I was in Athens, GA

Post by Joe »

So his paintings are quite good? And the reason he was rejected is because he wasn't inline with the trends those days?
Yeah. Modern art, which Hitler despised, was the trend at the time. That and batshit Dada stuff.
How good his paintings actually are? Would his works be eventually appreciated some times later? Probably after his death? (IIRC van Gogh's paintings started to be truly appreciated after his death as well)
Well, I haven't seen anyone in modern times proclaiming the greatness of Hitler's art, so obviously that's a no.
From my layman's perspective, they're quite pleasing to the eyes. I have no idea what the critics would say, though. I also wonder whether the popularity of Hitler's paintings today is merely due to their "historical value", or it's because they're actually good?
His art isn't really popular today.
Image

BoTM / JL / MM / HAB / VRWC / Horseman

I'm studying for the CPA exam. Have a nice summer, and if you're down just sit back and realize that Joe is off somewhere, doing much worse than you are.
User avatar
Gil Hamilton
Tipsy Space Birdie
Posts: 12962
Joined: 2002-07-04 05:47pm
Contact:

Post by Gil Hamilton »

The problem with those paintings are that they are kind of technically competant, but they are boring. It's the sort of paintings that college kids sell at art festivals and home furnishing stores. They are perfectly fine little paintings, but you look at them and go "Oh, it's a house" and don't get anything else out of them. People don't buy them because they are great works of art, but because they've got a big blank wall with nothing there.

You can make a career out of paint that sort of thing, but not a very good one. Eventually you've got to offer something new or something interesting.
"Show me an angel and I will paint you one." - Gustav Courbet

"Quetzalcoatl, plumed serpent of the Aztecs... you are a pussy." - Stephen Colbert

"Really, I'm jealous of how much smarter than me he is. I'm not an expert on anything and he's an expert on things he knows nothing about." - Me, concerning a bullshitter
User avatar
Patrick Degan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 14847
Joined: 2002-07-15 08:06am
Location: Orleanian in exile

Post by Patrick Degan »

Technically competent work but uninspired —very uncreative composition. Sufficent to make a career as an architectural illustrator, perhaps.
When ballots have fairly and constitutionally decided, there can be no successful appeal back to bullets.
—Abraham Lincoln

People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House

Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)
Kreshna Aryaguna Nurzaman
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2230
Joined: 2002-07-08 07:10am

Post by Kreshna Aryaguna Nurzaman »

Joe wrote:His art isn't really popular today.
:oops: I meant among certain collectors. Not really that "popular", though. Anyway, probably the reason why collectors are hunting them is because of the person who painted them instead of their art values.




Gil Hamilton wrote:The problem with those paintings are that they are kind of technically competant, but they are boring. It's the sort of paintings that college kids sell at art festivals and home furnishing stores.
Patrick Degan wrote:Technically competent work but uninspired —very uncreative composition. Sufficent to make a career as an architectural illustrator, perhaps.
Yes, they're pretty, but empty. I wonder whether Vienna Academy of Art would help Hitler develop his own "personality" (style?), or he's just an helpless, untalented painter-wannabe anyway.
General Brock
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1739
Joined: 2005-03-16 03:52pm
Location: Land of Resting Gophers, Canada

Re: What if Hitler became a painter?

Post by General Brock »

Kreshna Aryaguna Nurzaman wrote:What if, due some twist of fate, Hitler was actually accepted in Academy of Arts in Vienna?

(1) Would he be a successful painter? Did he really 'lack of talent', like the Academy said? Or he was simply unappreciated?

(2) Hitler had adopted anti-Semite views since in Vienna, but IIRC his fanatical qualities were enhanced by German's loss in WWI. Would he be that extreme if he became a painter? And how would his racism affect his career as a painter? Would his views reflected on his paintings? (IIRC Picasso's anti-war views also shown on his works like Guernica)

(3) This is an age-old question, but would facism raise to power in Germany without Hitler? And if that's the case, would Hitler be a famous propaganda artist? Probably not a painter? A famous propaganda cartoonist, maybe?
1. Hitler had technical talent; Vienna should have accepted him, but he didn't have the connections or background, or the personality to work around that.

2. Hitler possibly blamed the Jews in the academy for keeping him out; that might be an interesting idea to explore. His racism and antisemitism at that point in his life was probably no worse than most men of his class in Germany at the time. In fact, had he been accepted, and been able to make friends in a more diverse cultural circle, he might not have become the unfortunate person he ended up becoming. On the other hand, that didn't help Wagner any.

3. Facism only needed a convenient face for the masses; Hitler was it. Here we have a populist leader, a decorated WW I hero, a struggling artist, in step with facist thought, who pulled himself to the top by his own bootstraps. Hitler probably came off as useful but not necessarily bright enough to go beyond the movement's more 'intellectual' leaders in the back rooms. Or so they thought.
User avatar
Lord Zentei
Space Elf Psyker
Posts: 8742
Joined: 2004-11-22 02:49am
Location: Ulthwé Craftworld, plotting the downfall of the Imperium.

Re: What if Hitler became a painter?

Post by Lord Zentei »

General Brock wrote:2. Hitler possibly blamed the Jews in the academy for keeping him out; that might be an interesting idea to explore. His racism and antisemitism at that point in his life was probably no worse than most men of his class in Germany at the time. In fact, had he been accepted, and been able to make friends in a more diverse cultural circle, he might not have become the unfortunate person he ended up becoming. On the other hand, that didn't help Wagner any.
Of course, in dedicating himself to the arts instead of politics, Wagner didn't end up killing millions of people. So even if he had become a racist artist, Hitler would have been way less bad than he actually did become.
CotK <mew> | HAB | JL | MM | TTC | Cybertron

TAX THE CHURCHES! - Lord Zentei TTC Supreme Grand Prophet

And the LORD said, Let there be Bosons! Yea and let there be Bosoms too!
I'd rather be the great great grandson of a demon ninja than some jackass who grew potatos. -- Covenant
Dead cows don't fart. -- CJvR
...and I like strudel! :mrgreen: -- Asuka
Gordonfrost
Redshirt
Posts: 42
Joined: 2005-06-03 11:11am

Post by Gordonfrost »

Just a thoght, but, wouldn't Hitler have been conscripted into the army anyway even if he did become a reasonably successful artist? It's quite possible that everything would have gone pretty much the way it did anyway.
User avatar
xcr
Youngling
Posts: 134
Joined: 2004-11-21 04:12pm
Location: New Brunswick

Post by xcr »

If he were, it would likley have been as a war painter, not a runner, and as such he would have had different experiences
User avatar
Hitch Hiker
Padawan Learner
Posts: 275
Joined: 2003-01-13 06:37am
Location: Hidden inside a ring with a snazy logo on it

Post by Hitch Hiker »

Also he wouldnt be in charge of the country, and therefore wouldnt have been able to kill the jews and most of WW2 would ahve been different, probably would not have happened atall. as he wasnt in politics the formar chancellor couldnt ahve put him in charge thinking he could control Hitler etc etc
Grand master in the art of Imaginary warfare and unsociable geography
Gallifrey Tec grade A+++

'Genetic material extrapolated, initiate cellular reconstruction' Dalek

Image
User avatar
salm
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 10296
Joined: 2002-09-09 08:25pm

Post by salm »

Honestly, that stuff is pure kitsch.
User avatar
Frank Hipper
Overfiend of the Superego
Posts: 12882
Joined: 2002-10-17 08:48am
Location: Hamilton, Ohio?

Post by Frank Hipper »

salm wrote:Honestly, that stuff is pure kitsch.
Look at what happened to art in Germany after the Nazis came to power, blecchhh.

Nudes, landscapes, propaganda. Ick.
Image
Life is all the eternity you get, use it wisely.
User avatar
Perinquus
Virus-X Wannabe
Posts: 2685
Joined: 2002-08-06 11:57pm

Post by Perinquus »

Joe wrote:
the .303 bookworm wrote:
Quote:
3) This is an age-old question, but would facism raise to power in Germany without Hitler? And if that's the case, would Hitler be a famous propaganda artist? Probably not a painter? A famous propaganda cartoonist, maybe?


Probably. Hitler's rise to power was a function of the rise of Fascism, not the other way around. Hitler just came along at a time when Germany was ready for him. I don't want to get into what he'd have been had he not been a dictator, because that'd be speculation pulled directly from my ass.
___________
However the question is if it could have drummed up the level of popular support and political savvy necessary without hil :evil:
Yes, it would have. Hitler was an idiot of a human being who failed at nearly everything he did in his life and he was described as such by those who knew him honestly. He brought no political savvy to the Nazi party that it didn't have already. He was just a loud-mouthed idiot who happened to be at the right place at the right time. Hitler didn't ring his magick bell and make Germany Go Insane; it was already quite insane at the time, which was the reason the Nazis came to power in the first place.
Hitler's paintings, you will note, completely lack any human presence. Not a single person is ever pictured in any of them. He seems to have had real difficulty in painting the human figure, and without the ability to do that, he never could have been accepted by the Vienna academy, regardless of what the prevailing trends in art were at the time.

Also, to dismiss Hitler as an idiot is entirely too simplistic. Harry S. Truman was a failure at his career before he entered politics. Ulysses S. Grant failed at everything he ever tried outside his military career. Does this make them idiots? Hitler was certainly no genius, and he was without doubt a twisted monster and a fanatical racist. But he was a very clever politician. You simply cannot rise to command a powerful, industrialized nation entirely on fool's luck. An idiot cannot just stumble and blunder his way into such a position. For several years, Hitler outmaneuvered and destroyed every opponent (including those like Franz von Pappen, who thought they were using him), and ultimately secured a grip on power so strong that it took the near destruction of his country to pry it loose. He was an ideologue who let his fanaticism cloud his judgement, and lead him to make mistakes that a saner man would never have made. At the end, he seems to have lost his grip on sanity entirely, and simply indulged in wishful thinking in response to later German military reverses (imagining phantom divisions, that existed nowhere but in his mind, for example, when speaking to his generals about how to stop the advancing Red Army).

Without Hitler, it's entirely possible that the Nazis would have risen to power anyway. The times in Germany were absolutely ripe for a strong man, who promised to end the terrible economic woes plaguing the country, and the people were ready to follow such a man, even as he took away every last shred of their political freedom. But Hitler did become a driving force in the Nazi party. And he was a charismatic figure who excelled at winning popular support. Without Hitler, it's also entirely possible that the communists (who were another growing political movement in post WWI Germany) would have prevailed instead of the Nazis.
Last edited by Perinquus on 2005-06-12 03:51pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
salm
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 10296
Joined: 2002-09-09 08:25pm

Post by salm »

Frank Hipper wrote:
salm wrote:Honestly, that stuff is pure kitsch.
Look at what happened to art in Germany after the Nazis came to power, blecchhh.

Nudes, landscapes, propaganda. Ick.
Bah, Nord-Süd Achse Welthauptstadt Germania (aka Berlin) by Albert Speer. ´nuff said.

*Fap, fap, fap, fap*

Image
User avatar
Frank Hipper
Overfiend of the Superego
Posts: 12882
Joined: 2002-10-17 08:48am
Location: Hamilton, Ohio?

Post by Frank Hipper »

Oh, it was pretty fap-tacular, from a distance.

Sadly, however, it was sterile in detail, derivative in form, and totally un-imaginatvie aside from size.
Image
Life is all the eternity you get, use it wisely.
User avatar
Glocksman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7233
Joined: 2002-09-03 06:43pm
Location: Mr. Five by Five

Post by Glocksman »

Patrick Degan wrote:Technically competent work but uninspired —very uncreative composition. Sufficent to make a career as an architectural illustrator, perhaps.
Hitler also thought of himself as an architect.
In fact that is what drew him close to Speer, who could make his ideas a reality.

If Hitler had become an architect or painter, Germany very probably would have become a dictatorship but I wonder if the racial element of it would have been so strong. Sure, lots of people beside Hitler blamed the Jews, but how many of them would have taken their antisemtitsm to the murderous extreme that Adolf did?
"You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours."- General Sir Charles Napier

Oderint dum metuant
User avatar
Frank Hipper
Overfiend of the Superego
Posts: 12882
Joined: 2002-10-17 08:48am
Location: Hamilton, Ohio?

Post by Frank Hipper »

Germany could have gone in an entirely different direction, as well.
I've read some speculation on the possibility of Hugo Eckener of Zeppelin Company fame being able to have defeated Hitler in 1932, he was extremely popular and respected...too bad he couldn't be bothered to get involved in politics.
Image
Life is all the eternity you get, use it wisely.
User avatar
Peregrin Toker
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 8609
Joined: 2002-07-04 10:57am
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by Peregrin Toker »

Joe wrote:
(1) Would he be a successful painter? Did he really 'lack of talent', like the Academy said? Or he was simply unappreciated?
I've seen his art. It is really not hard on the eyes at all and quite honestly I'd rather have a Hitler painting in my room than the baby Jesus getting blown by a demon with monkey shit smeared all over the place or whatever the hell they consider art these days.
Are you referring to H.R. Giger's "Satan" which depicts the Devil using the crucified Jesus as a slingshot? (That was the first thing I thought of when I read your description of modern art)


Kreshna wrote:(2) Hitler had adopted anti-Semite views since in Vienna. How would his racism affect his career as a painter? Would his views reflected on his paintings? (IIRC Picasso's anti-war views also shown on his works like Guernica)
Well, Salvador Dalí was a vocal supporter of Franco and while it did cause the other Surrealists to excommunicate him, it didn't affect his popularity in the mainstream, if that's anything to judge by.
"Hi there, would you like to have a cookie?"

"No, actually I would HATE to have a cookie, you vapid waste of inedible flesh!"
User avatar
Patrick Degan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 14847
Joined: 2002-07-15 08:06am
Location: Orleanian in exile

Post by Patrick Degan »

Glocksman wrote:If Hitler had become an architect or painter, Germany very probably would have become a dictatorship but I wonder if the racial element of it would have been so strong. Sure, lots of people beside Hitler blamed the Jews, but how many of them would have taken their antisemtitsm to the murderous extreme that Adolf did?
Probably a military dictatorship, perhaps fascist in character, but I don't think the racial theories of Nazism would have formed its ideological core. Might have been more like Spain under Franco.
When ballots have fairly and constitutionally decided, there can be no successful appeal back to bullets.
—Abraham Lincoln

People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House

Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)
IRG CommandoJoe
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3481
Joined: 2002-07-09 12:51pm

Post by IRG CommandoJoe »

Frank Hipper wrote:Oh, it was pretty fap-tacular, from a distance.

Sadly, however, it was sterile in detail, derivative in form, and totally un-imaginatvie aside from size.
:wtf: Have you ever seen this?

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
Who's the more foolish, the fool or the fool who follows him? -Obi-Wan Kenobi

"In the unlikely event that someone comes here, hates everything we stand for, and then donates a big chunk of money anyway, I will thank him for his stupidity." -Darth Wong, Lord of the Sith

Proud member of the Brotherhood of the Monkey.
Post Reply