[Vote] Punishment for Trekdestroyer

Post by **Sea Skimmer** » 2006-02-07 12:58pm

I voted for removal of sig, but then I read on and saw that he in fact had been warned before, and so I’d fully support a ban

Durandal wrote:I can't believe I'm the only one who voted for a perma-ban. Where is your hate people?!

Being channeled into force lighting, to jump start my car.

Post by **Kuja** » 2006-02-07 02:08pm

Permanant ban. He will will never grow up and he will never change. Let's get rid of him before the next round of this.

Admiral Valdemar · Post by **Admiral Valdemar** » 2006-02-07 02:45pm

I voted sig privileges being rescinded permanently. A temp-ban could also work, but we shall see.

Knife · Post by **Knife** » 2006-02-07 06:10pm

Temp ban. If this is indeed his second offense, time off for bad behavior is a good punishment. Removal of his sig is also a good idea.

If and when a third incident happens, the ban hammer should be quick and ruthless.

phongn · Post by **phongn** » 2006-02-09 11:37am

Temp ban + permanent removal of signature.

Alyeska · Post by **Alyeska** » 2006-02-09 01:50pm

Instead of a permanent removal of his sig, why not a 12 month removal and see if that gets him to see the picture?

Post by **Sea Skimmer** » 2006-02-09 04:49pm

Alyeska wrote:Instead of a permanent removal of his sig, why not a 12 month removal and see if that gets him to see the picture?

Why? He didn’t get the message the first time, and a picture that big is clearly obnoxious to anyone, there is no reason to be lenient.

Mad · Post by **Mad** » 2006-02-09 05:13pm

Sea Skimmer wrote:Why? He didn’t get the message the first time, and a picture that big is clearly obnoxious to anyone, there is no reason to be lenient.

At his age, a year is a long time. He should be around 18 by that time. If he hasn't learned by then, more severe punishment would be administered.

On the other hand, I'm more in favor of an "until further notice" time period, myself. If he shows enough maturity and productivity consistently, after a period of time, then the Senate can vote to restore his sig privileges.

Alyeska · Post by **Alyeska** » 2006-02-09 05:42pm

Sea Skimmer wrote:
Alyeska wrote:Instead of a permanent removal of his sig, why not a 12 month removal and see if that gets him to see the picture?
Why? He didn’t get the message the first time, and a picture that big is clearly obnoxious to anyone, there is no reason to be lenient.

Permanent punishments upon people who have a possibility of learning is inapropriate. 12 months is a sufficently long time to determine if Trekdestroyer might potentialy learn.

I say Sig removal for 12 months and parole contigent on Senate Approval.

SirNitram · Post by **SirNitram** » 2006-02-09 07:17pm

Alyeska wrote:Permanent punishments upon people who have a possibility of learning is inapropriate. 12 months is a sufficently long time to determine if Trekdestroyer might potentialy learn.

I say Sig removal for 12 months and parole contigent on Senate Approval.

It is within the power of this august body to consider changes in punishment after the fact. However, I would caution against this action being done lightly, as a temporary 'quiet period' has been a hallmark of far too many trolls.

Connor MacLeod · Post by **Connor MacLeod** » 2006-02-10 12:25am

True. On the other hand, a year is a LONG time. Either he's goign to hold a grudge against us, reform and possibly become somewhat useful as a member, or move on elsewhere.

Perhaps, if he really wishes to come back after a year, we can require him to demonstrate he's changed. If at the end of the year he's not changed or demonstrated that he has, it can be a permanant ban.

Post by **AdmiralKanos** » 2006-02-16 12:06pm

Sorry for neglecting this thread; I've been very busy and haven't had much time for the board in the last few days. The vote is overwhelmingly for a temp-ban, and so Trekdestroyer has now been temp-banned. I'm not sure exactly what duration of temp-ban would be appropriate here, so I guess we'll see if anyone has any input on that subject.

Post by **The Yosemite Bear** » 2006-02-16 12:10pm

well him, ein and spanky seem to be the worst continual offenders in terms of abuse of graphics......

Post by **AdmiralKanos** » 2006-02-16 12:33pm

The Yosemite Bear wrote:well him, ein and spanky seem to be the worst continual offenders in terms of abuse of graphics......

But Ein and Spanky don't do that in their sigs.

Post by **The Yosemite Bear** » 2006-02-16 07:09pm

true, I forgot who had that sig pick the first year that we were up, that kept trashing my connection (I was dail up until about a year or two ago)

Ender · Post by **Ender** » 2006-02-16 08:11pm

AdmiralKanos wrote:Sorry for neglecting this thread; I've been very busy and haven't had much time for the board in the last few days. The vote is overwhelmingly for a temp-ban, and so Trekdestroyer has now been temp-banned. I'm not sure exactly what duration of temp-ban would be appropriate here, so I guess we'll see if anyone has any input on that subject.

I say a week would be good, maybe 2.

Connor MacLeod · Post by **Connor MacLeod** » 2006-02-17 01:07am

AdmiralKanos wrote:Sorry for neglecting this thread; I've been very busy and haven't had much time for the board in the last few days. The vote is overwhelmingly for a temp-ban, and so Trekdestroyer has now been temp-banned. I'm not sure exactly what duration of temp-ban would be appropriate here, so I guess we'll see if anyone has any input on that subject.

I prefer "until we god damn feel like revoking it"

Connor MacLeod · Post by **Connor MacLeod** » 2006-02-17 01:08am

AdmiralKanos wrote:
The Yosemite Bear wrote:well him, ein and spanky seem to be the worst continual offenders in terms of abuse of graphics......
But Ein and Spanky don't do that in their sigs.

Which only slightly mitigates the offense, I think.

Post by **Dalton** » 2006-02-17 01:35am

The Yosemite Bear wrote:well him, ein and spanky seem to be the worst continual offenders in terms of abuse of graphics......

Spanky? Einhander yeah, he does that a bit much (take notice buddy) but what Spanky does, at worst, is a few amusing emoticons every so often.

Post by **AdmiralKanos** » 2006-05-20 09:14am

UPDATE: Trekdestroyer just E-mailed me to ask when his temp-ban would be over, so I unbanned him.

Patrick Degan · Post by **Patrick Degan** » 2006-05-20 03:08pm

Temp-ban and permanent revocation of sig privileges.

Post by **Sea Skimmer** » 2006-05-20 03:31pm

Umm, your about three months late here Degan.

RedImperator · Post by **RedImperator** » 2006-05-20 04:56pm

Sea Skimmer wrote:Umm, your about three months late here Degan.

It's never too late to punish Trekdestroyer.

StarDestroyer.Net BBS

[Vote] Punishment for Trekdestroyer

What should be done about GiantSigBoy?